Home Medicine Retrospective analysis of patients with cardiopulmonary symptoms in the setting of Long COVID syndrome: investigating risk factors
Article Open Access

Retrospective analysis of patients with cardiopulmonary symptoms in the setting of Long COVID syndrome: investigating risk factors

  • , , , , and EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 30, 2025

Abstract

Context

Long COVID, a debilitating condition characterized by persistent symptoms following acute Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, continues to pose a significant public health burden. Currently, research is ongoing regarding risk factors for developing Long COVID. Identifying patients susceptible to symptoms of Long COVID can assist with identifying those at risk, and developing preventative strategies for these individuals.

Objectives

The objectives of this study are to evaluate a cohort of patients who followed up in the Long COVID clinic who were experiencing cardiopulmonary symptoms 8–12 weeks from initial inoculation, and to retrospectively identify any statistically significant risk factors or clinical features present.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study examined patients identified between April 2021 and September 2022. Patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 and developed persistent symptoms were subsequently referred to the post–COVID-19 pulmonary clinic. For the cohort of patients seen in post COVID-19 pulmonary clinic, pre-existing pulmonary and systemic disease, severity of COVID-19 illness, and treatments received were examined. Analysis was performed on these data utilizing Cox regression analysis.

Results

Two hundred forty-six (246) adult patients who had Long COVID symptoms 8–12 weeks post–COVID-19 infection were identified and included in this analysis. Cox regression analysis indicated that in this population, patients who had required oxygen support (supplemental oxygen, noninvasive ventilation, or intubation) during their initial COVID-19 hospitalization and who also had prior history of either obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and were more likely to develop Long COVID symptoms. Patients with pre-existing OSA had an odds ratio (OR) of 3.6 and a 95 % confidence interval (CI) of 1.70–7.65 (p=0.0012). Patients with pre-existing COPD had an OR of 12.19 and a 95 % CI of 2.38–62.33 (p=0.0015).

Conclusions

Patients who required oxygen support during their initial COVID-19 hospitalization who also had previous history of either OSA or COPD were more likely to develop cardiopulmonary Long COVID symptoms. This suggests that pre-existing respiratory conditions and the severity of the initial COVID-19 illness may influence the development of these symptoms of Long COVID.

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), also known as COVID-19, or simply “COVID,” was the pathogen behind a major global pandemic starting in late 2019. Millions of patients were hospitalized over the course of the pandemic, and although overall disease severity was variable based on population, the prevalence of severe disease requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission had been reported as high as 15–20 % between 2020 and 2021 [1], [2], [3], [4]. More recently, for the 2023–2024 season, cumulative rates of hospitalizations were approximately 20 %, with an average of approximately 10 % requiring ICU level of care worldwide [5], 6]. In addition to significant morbidity burden among those who survived severe disease requiring ICU admission, there was also a number of individuals who suffered long-term adverse effects even after clearing a COVID-19 infection with only moderate, or even mild, symptoms on initial inoculation. These lingering effects have been grouped under an umbrella term “Long COVID,” a syndrome described to have multisystem involvement including constitutional, neurocognitive, cardiac, respiratory, and musculoskeletal changes associated with it [7], 8]. Clinical recovery can take weeks or even months, with symptoms persisting long after “microbiological recovery” (clearance of SARS-CoV-2 viral infection) [9], 10].

Long COVID continues to affect thousands of Americans even years after the initial COVID pandemic [11], [12], [13]. There is precedent for respiratory infection leading to prolonged recovery times, especially in at-risk populations. Adults hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia may take up to 3 weeks to recover fully from symptoms such as fatigue and shortness of breath. Further, those with existing pulmonary disease have been demonstrated to have even longer periods of recovery – approximately 2 months on average [14]. Previous studies have investigated the long-term effects after infection with previous coronavirus strains (SARS and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome [MERS]), demonstrating lung function abnormalities, breathlessness, and reduced exercise capacity 6 months after hospital discharge [15]. Long COVID in particular has revealed itself as a complex and potentially disabling disorder affecting multiple organ systems [11], 16]. With this in mind, given the large number of people across the globe who were infected, and the persistence of new strains even through to the present, we can only expect expansion of the large burden to the population and to the health system associated with “Long COVID” symptoms.

We set out to evaluate a cohort of patients who followed up in the Long COVID clinic who were experiencing cardiopulmonary symptoms 8–12 weeks after initial inoculation, and to retrospectively identify any statistically significant risk factors or clinical features present.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study examined patients seen in the post–COVID-19 pulmonary clinic or post–COVID-19 virtual recovery center between April 2021 and September 2021. This study was reviewed by the ChristianaCare Institutional Review Board (IRB registration number: IRB00000480; FWA00004301) and deemed exempt (protocol number CCC-40191). Patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 and developed persistent symptoms were subsequently referred to the post–COVID-19 pulmonary clinic or the post–COVID-19 virtual recovery center. Inclusion criteria for being evaluated in the clinic were COVID-19 diagnosis at least 12 weeks prior (8 weeks if patient was newly on home oxygen), recent chest x-ray or computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest, and available pulmonary function testing results. Exclusion criteria include symptoms attributable to diagnosis other than COVID-19, or failure to follow up in the clinic. We assessed patients’ COVID-19 severity by oxygen requirements while hospitalized, duration of oxygen support, and hospital length of stay. Treatment modalities were assessed and included steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), monoclonal antibodies, Interleukin-6 (IL-6) inhibitors, remdesivir, convalescent plasma, azithromycin, and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (sold under the brand name Paxlovid). Symptoms that prompted referral included dyspnea, cough, fatigue, exercise intolerance, palpitations, and chest pain. Patients were screened for pre-existing pulmonary, cardiovascular, and diabetes symptoms. Smoking history was also considered. Analysis was performed on these data utilizing Cox regression analysis.

Results

Three hundred ninety (390) patients were referred to either the post–COVID-19 clinic or post–COVID-19 virtual recovery center. Among those patients, 144 patients were excluded. As a result, 246 patients were included in the retrospective analysis and identified with Long COVID symptoms greater than 12 weeks post–COVID-19 infection. Descriptive statistics of the cohort summarized in Table 1 including details regarding demographics, pre-existing comorbidities, smoking history, and symptoms prompting referral to post–COVID-19 follow-up. Table 2 summarizes data regarding rates of hospitalization, oxygenation modalities utilized while inpatient, and treatments received.

Table 1:

A summary of study population characteristics, including information regarding age, gender, past medical history, and symptoms on presentation to post–COVID-19 pulmonary clinic or post–COVID-19 virtual recovery center (persistent symptoms 12 weeks after COVID infection).

n %
Total encounters 246

Female 162 65.9 %
Male 84 34.1 %

Age

Median, years 52
Average, years 52
Standard deviation 13.98

Past medical history

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 8 3.3 %
Asthma 50 20.3 %
Pulmonary hypertension 4 1.6 %
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) 47 19.1 %
Tobacco use 50 20.3 %
Hypertension, HTN 99 40.2 %
Atrial fibrillation 4 1.6 %
Congestive heart failure, CHF 5 2.0 %
Coronary artery disease, CAD 10 4.1 %
Diabetes 60 24.4 %

Presenting symptoms

Dyspnea 202 82.1 %
Cough 94 38.2 %
Exercise intolerance 105 42.7 %
Fatigue 202 82.1 %
Palpitations 26 10.6 %
Chest pain 47 19.1 %
Table 2:

A summary of hospitalization and treatment data, including information regarding the nature of the oxygen requirement while hospitalized and the treatments received (including both inpatient and outpatient treatments).

n %
Total encounters 246

Hospitalization data

Hospitalized 106 43.1 %
Median length of stay, days 10
Average length of stay, days 15.5
Standard deviation 15.8
Required O2 (inpatient days) 90 36.6 %
Median days requiring O2 12
Average days requiring O2 16.5
Standard deviation 16.7
O2 by nasal cannula 53 21.5 %
O2 by ventilator 12 4.9 %
O2 by other modality 41 16.7 %
Discharged with home O2 47 19.1 %

Treatment received

Steroids 126 51.2 %
IVIG 1 0.4 %
Monoclonal antibodies 21 8.5 %
IL-6 inhibitor 50 20.3 %
Remdesivir 75 30.5 %
Convalescent plasma 5 2.0 %
Azithromycin 9 3.7 %
Hydroxychloroquine 3 1.2 %
Ivermectin 4 1.6 %
Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir 3 1.2 %
  1. O2, oxygen; IL-6, interleukin 6; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin.

Cox regression analysis was performed showing an association in patients who had obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and required oxygen, noninvasive ventilation, or intubation (odds ratio [OR] 3.6, 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.70–7.65, p=0.0012). There was also an association with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and oxygen requirements in patients who had developed Long COVID symptoms (OR 12.19; 95 % CI, 2.38–62.33; p=0.0015). These data are summarized in Figure 1.

Figure 1: 
Cox regression analysis showed that in patients who had an in-hospital oxygen requirement along with chronic OSA (OR 3.6; 95 % CI, 1.70–7.65; p=0.0012) or COPD (OR 12.19; 95 % CI, 2.38–62.33; p=0.0015), there was an association with the development of long COVID symptoms.
Figure 1:

Cox regression analysis showed that in patients who had an in-hospital oxygen requirement along with chronic OSA (OR 3.6; 95 % CI, 1.70–7.65; p=0.0012) or COPD (OR 12.19; 95 % CI, 2.38–62.33; p=0.0015), there was an association with the development of long COVID symptoms.

Discussion

Some of the earlier literature investigating the characterization of Long COVID syndrome, risk factors, and demographics was published from Sudre et al., [17] utilizing the COVID Symptom Study application. They were able to analyze and report on prospective observational data from a cohort of 4182 people who had tested positive for COVID and who participated in long-term symptom reporting [17]. Long COVID demographic predictors included increasing age, body mass index (BMI), and female sex [17]. They also found that experiencing more than five symptoms during the first week of illness was associated with Long COVID [17]. Unfortunately, their study was limited somewhat by selection bias, being limited to those who interacted with the symptom reporting application. Although age was the strongest predictor, their study population was relatively young, and they did not report specifics on the comorbidities that contributed to prediction in older adults (>70) [17]. Now, there are enough studies to invite large meta-analyses. Luo et al. [18] meta-analyzed 211 studies, 97 of which investigated Long COVID risk factors. They identified several commonly reported risk factors, but they did not pool ORs, and they did not distinguish between different pre-existing comorbidities [18]. Hou et al. [19] included 429 studies published from 2021 to 2024 in their meta-analysis. However, when analyzing risk factors, the number of studies available was much smaller overall, only allowing them to pool ORs from 5-22 different studies [19]. They were able to find a significant OR of 1.50 (95 % CI, 1.24–1.81) for pre-existing cardiovascular disease, and a nonsignificant OR of 1.33 (95 % CI, 0.94–1.88) for COPD from five studies each [19]. Interestingly, not much has been reported on pre-existing respiratory comorbidities as a risk factor, despite it having been shown to be a significant risk factor for long-term effects in the past with patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia and other coronavirus infections [14], 15]. Recent studies have described a correlation between pre-existing lung disease such as asthma, COPD, and OSA with increased risk of developing Long COVID [20], [21], [22].

In our retrospective study, we found no specific association between cardiopulmonary symptoms of Long COVID and underlying cardiovascular conditions (CAD, hypertension [HTN], atrial fibrillation), diabetes mellitus, obesity, hospital oxygen requirement, or length of stay. Underlying COPD or OSA with a requirement of oxygen delivered by any modality was correlated in our study with the development of long-term cardiopulmonary symptoms of Long COVID. With COVID being known to exacerbate certain chronic conditions, there is a potential pathophysiologic basis for this association. Specifically, pre-existing parenchymal damage and predisposition to exacerbation of immune- and inflammatory-related lung pathology (like in the case of COPD) or chronic intermittent hypoxia and sympathetic activation (as in the case of OSA) could perhaps place patients at higher risk for developing clinically relevant long-term sequelae and therefore a diagnosis of Long COVID [21].

Long COVID continues to prove to be a challenging diagnosis owing to the diversity of presentation and symptoms, the difficulty distinguishing it from re-inoculation or new viral infection, and the fact that it presents itself in patients with varying severity of initial infection (even those with mild symptoms who were never hospitalized, or even those who were asymptomatic). Even at the time of our investigation, we have rapidly changing definitions and diagnostic criteria and varying results regarding pre-existing pulmonary disease as a risk factor [8], [19], [20], [21], [22]. Therefore, it is a condition that could benefit from further inquiry moving forward.

This study was limited by its retrospective nature and is subject to bias due to confounding factors. For example, those patients with pre-existing COPD or OSA may have had previous established relationships with pulmonologists who were more likely to suspect or diagnose Long COVID and refer them to the Long COVID clinic. We are also not able to tell if these patients had baseline symptoms prior to a COVID infection; despite being baseline, that may have contributed to a clinical diagnosis of Long COVID. In 2021, when these patients were being referred to the COVID follow-up clinic, we did not have access to specific criteria or indices for the diagnosis of Long COVID that exist today [8], 23]. Patients were referred to the clinic for dyspnea, cough, fatigue, exercise intolerance, palpitations, and chest pain. Although these symptoms align with our current understanding of Long COVID symptomatology, they are not inclusive of other Long COVID manifestations that we now know exist. Symptoms were identified subjectively by clinicians. Breathlessness or dyspnea in Long COVID could be related to anything from hypoxia, to breathing pattern disorder, to inducible laryngeal obstruction [24], 25]. Chest pain and palpitations are also symptoms related to a wide variety of syndromes. We relied on physician judgment to diagnose Long COVID based on the symptoms, and we excluded patients from the COVID clinic if their symptoms were attributed to another diagnosis.

The exclusion of alternative diagnoses continues to be a critical aspect of the diagnosis Long COVID, but it is an area of ambiguity [26]. This aspect is acknowledged but not directly addressed in current definitions and diagnostic indices [8], 23]. Our study population may have differed based on current definitions. Further investigation with larger, multi-center, forward-facing studies with benefits of current consensus and clinical definitions, blinding, and long periods of follow-up are potential next steps for this line of inquiry. An overall understanding of this disease would also benefit from further investigation into the pathophysiology of COVID-19 infection as it pertains to the long-term sequelae on lung parenchyma and how this affects patients with pre-existing lung disease, as well as pathophysiologic processes to help prevent the development of Long COVID. For example, future studies may include vitamin D screening because some existing literature suggests that vitamin D deficiency has been associated with severity and mortality of Long COVID given that 1,25(OH)2 D3 serves as a role in migration of dendritic cells and cytokine and chemokine production [27].

Conclusions

This analysis found that patients in this cohort who required oxygen support during their initial hospitalization with COVID-19 and with a previous history of OSA or COPD developed cardiopulmonary Long COVID symptoms at higher rates. This suggests that pre-existing pulmonary conditions and the severity of initial COVID-19 illness could be influential in the development of Long COVID. These findings may assist clinicians in identifying patients who are at higher risk of developing Long COVID syndrome (perhaps those with severe disease requiring oxygen and pre-existing lung disease such as COPD, and OSA), which may inform current management of patient expectations and future investigation into potential strategies for prevention.


Corresponding author: Dominic J. Valentino, III, DO, FCCP, Department of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Christiana Care Health System, Virtua Pulmonary & Sleep, 239 Hurffville Crosskeys Road, Suite 450, Sewell, NJ 08080, USA, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: This study was reviewed by the ChristianaCare Institutional Review Board (IRB registration number: IRB00000480; FWA00004301) and deemed exempt (protocol number CCC-40191).

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: None declared.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: All raw data may be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

1. Wu, Z, McGoogan, JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese center for disease control and prevention. JAMA 2020;323:1239–42. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.2648.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Wiersinga, WJ, Rhodes, A, Cheng, AC, Peacock, SJ, Prescott, HC. Pathophysiology, transmission, diagnosis, and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a review. JAMA 2020;324:782–93. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.12839.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Richardson, S, Hirsch, JS, Narasimhan, M, Crawford, JM, McGinn, T, Davidson, KW, et al.. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York city area. JAMA 2020;323:2052–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.6775.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Ochani, R, Asad, A, Yasmin, F, Shaikh, S, Khalid, H, Batra, S, et al.. COVID-19 pandemic: from origins to outcomes. A comprehensive review of viral pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnostic evaluation, and management. Inf Med 2021;29:20–36.Search in Google Scholar

5. CDC. Respiratory virus hospitalization surveillance network (RESP-NET). RESP-NET; 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/resp-net/dashboard/index.html [Accessed 25 July 2025].Search in Google Scholar

6. COVID-19 hospitalizations | WHO COVID-19 dashboard. datadot. https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/hospitalizations [Accessed 25 July, 2025].Search in Google Scholar

7. Raveendran, AV. Long COVID-19: challenges in the diagnosis and proposed diagnostic criteria. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2021;15:145–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.12.025.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. National Academies of Sciences. Engineering, and medicine; health and medicine division; board on global health; board on health sciences policy; committee on examining the working definition for long COVID. In: Goldowitz, I, Worku, T, Brown, L, Fineberg, HV, editors. A long COVID definition: a chronic, systemic disease state with profound consequences. National Academies Press (US); 2024. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK605676/ [Accessed 25 July 2025].Search in Google Scholar

9. Halpin, SJ, McIvor, C, Whyatt, G, Adams, A, Harvey, O, McLean, L, et al.. Postdischarge symptoms and rehabilitation needs in survivors of COVID-19 infection: a cross-sectional evaluation. J Med Virol 2021;93:1013–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26368.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Carfì, A, Bernabei, R, Landi, F, Gemelli Against COVID-19 Post-Acute Care Study Group. Persistent symptoms in patients after acute COVID-19. JAMA 2020;324:603–5. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.12603.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Al-Aly, Z, Davis, H, McCorkell, L, Soares, L, Wulf-Hanson, S, Iwasaki, A, et al.. Long COVID science, research and policy. Nat Med 2024;30:2148–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03173-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Household pulse survey. https://www.census.gov/data-tools/demo/hhp/#/?measures=LONGCOVID_1&s_state=00001,00002,00004,00005,00006,00008,00009,00010,00011,00012,00013,00015,00016,00017,00018,00019,00020,00021,00022,00023,00024,00025,00026,00027,00028,00029,00030,00031,00032,00033,00034,00035,00036,00037,00038,00039,00040,00041,00042,00044,00045,00046,00047,00048,00049,00050,00051,00053,00054,00055,00056 [Accessed 25 July 2025].Search in Google Scholar

13. Fang, Z, Ahrnsbrak, R, Rekito, A. Evidence mounts that about 7% of US adults have had long COVID. JAMA 2024;332:5–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.11370.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Wyrwich, KW, Yu, H, Sato, R, Powers, JH. Observational longitudinal study of symptom burden and time for recovery from community-acquired pneumonia reported by older adults surveyed nationwide using the CAP burden of illness questionnaire. Patient Relat Outcome Meas 2015;6:215–23. https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S85779.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Ahmed, H, Patel, K, Greenwood, DC, Halpin, S, Lewthwaite, P, Salawu, A, et al.. Long-term clinical outcomes in survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus outbreaks after hospitalisation or ICU admission: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med 2020;52:jrm00063. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2694.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Greenhalgh, T, Sivan, M, Perlowski, A, Nikolich, JŽ. Long COVID: a clinical update. Lancet 2024;404:707–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01136-X.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Sudre, CH, Murray, B, Varsavsky, T, Graham, MS, Penfold, RS, Bowyer, RC, et al.. Attributes and predictors of long COVID. Nat Med 2021;27:626–31. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.19.20214494.Search in Google Scholar

18. Luo, D, Mei, B, Wang, P, Li, X, Chen, X, Wei, G, et al.. Prevalence and risk factors for persistent symptoms after COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infection 2024;30:328–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2023.10.016.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Hou, Y, Gu, T, Ni, Z, Shi, X, Ranney, ML, Mukherjee, B. Global Prevalence of Long COVID, Its subtypes, and risk factors: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Forum Infect Dis 2025;12:ofaf533. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.01.24319384.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Kogevinas, M, Karachaliou, M, Espinosa, A, Iraola-Guzmán, S, Castaño-Vinyals, G, Delgado-Ortiz, L, et al.. Risk, determinants, and persistence of long-COVID in a population-based cohort study in Catalonia. BMC Med 2025;23:140. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-03974-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Mandel, HL, Colleen, G, Abedian, S, Ammar, N, Charles Bailey, L, Bennett, TD, et al.. Risk of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection associated with pre-coronavirus disease obstructive sleep apnea diagnoses: an electronic health record-based analysis from the RECOVER initiative. Sleep 2023;46:zsad126. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsad126.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Labarca, G, Henríquez-Beltrán, M, Lamperti, L, Nova-Lamperti, E, Sanhueza, S, Cabrera, C, et al.. Impact of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in COVID-19 survivors, symptoms changes between 4-Months and 1 year after the COVID-19 infection. Front Med 2022;9:884218. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.884218.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Geng, LN, Erlandson, KM, Hornig, M, Letts, R, Selvaggi, C, Ashktorab, H, et al.. 2024 update of the RECOVER-adult long COVID research index. JAMA 2025;333:694–700. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.24184.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Bode, SFN, Schwender, A, Toth, M, Kaeppler-Schorn, C, Siebeneich, U, Freihorst, J, et al.. Characterization of adolescents with functional respiratory disorders and prior history of SARS-CoV-2. Mol Cell Pediatr 2023;10:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40348-023-00165-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Heightman, M, Prashar, J, Hillman, TE, Marks, M, Livingston, R, Ridsdale, HA, et al.. Post-COVID-19 assessment in a specialist clinical service: a 12-month, single-centre, prospective study in 1325 individuals. BMJ Open Resp Res 2021;8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001041.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Dietz, TK, Brondstater, KN. Long COVID management: a mini review of current recommendations and underutilized modalities. Front Med 2024;11:1430444. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1430444.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Chen, KY, Lin, CK, Chen, NH. Effects of vitamin D and zinc deficiency in acute and long COVID syndrome. J Trace Elem Med Biol 2023;80:127278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2023.127278.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2025-05-20
Accepted: 2025-09-02
Published Online: 2025-09-30

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 1.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jom-2025-0099/html
Scroll to top button