Abstract
In this short etymological note, we derive Lat. nota ‘mark, sign’ from the PIE root *gnet- ‘press, knead’ (OE cnedan, OCS gnetǫ, etc.). It is argued that nota < *gnoteh 2 initially denoted impressed or branded marks, in contradistinction to signum < *seknom (from the root of secō ‘cut’), which denoted carved or incised signs.
References
Brachet, Jean-Paul. 1994. Esquisse d’une histoire de lat. signum. Revue de Philologie 68. 33–50.Search in Google Scholar
DV = De Vaan, Michiel. 2007. Etymological dictionary of Latin and the other Italic languages. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
EDG = Beekes, Robert S. P. 2010. Etymological dictionary of Greek. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
EDHIL = Kloekhorst, Alwin. 2008. Etymological dictionary of the Hittite inherited lexicon. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
EDPG = Kroonen, Guus. 2013. Etymological dictionary of Proto-Germanic. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
EM = Ernout, Alfred & Andre Meillet. 1967. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar
IEW = Pokorny, Julius. 1959. Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern: Francke.Search in Google Scholar
LIV = Rix, Helmut, Martin Kümmel, Thomas Zehnder, Reiner Lipp & Brigitte Schirmer. 2003. Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Search in Google Scholar
Meiser, Gerhard. 1998. Historische Laut- und Formenlehre der lateinischen Sprache. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Search in Google Scholar
OLD = Glare, P. W. (ed.). 1982. Oxford Latin dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon.Search in Google Scholar
Rix, Helmut. 1999. Schwach charakterisierte lateinische Präsensstämme. In Heiner Eichner & Hans Christian Lüschitzky (eds.), Compositiones indogermanicae. In Memoriam Jochem Schindler, 515–536. Prague: Enigma Corporation.Search in Google Scholar
Schrijver, Peter. 1991. The reflexes of the Proto-Indo-European laryngeals in Latin. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004653719Search in Google Scholar
Stephens, Laurence D. 1980. Latin gn-: Further considerations. Indogermanische Forschungen 75. 165–175.Search in Google Scholar
Weiss, Michael. 2009. Outline of the historical and comparative grammar of Latin. Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press.Search in Google Scholar
WH = Walde, Alois & Johann B. Hofmann. 1938. Lateinisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Clausal versus phrasal comparatives in Latin
- More on the collapse of contrastive vowel length in late Latin: a review of the metalinguistic evidence
- A note on Latin nota ‘mark, sign’
- A new hypothesis on the etymology of Lat. mulier ∼eris ‘woman’
- On the etymology of Latin signum and its Sabellic counterparts
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Clausal versus phrasal comparatives in Latin
- More on the collapse of contrastive vowel length in late Latin: a review of the metalinguistic evidence
- A note on Latin nota ‘mark, sign’
- A new hypothesis on the etymology of Lat. mulier ∼eris ‘woman’
- On the etymology of Latin signum and its Sabellic counterparts