Los patronímicos en los grammatici Latini. La adaptación de una categoría importada
-
Julia Burghini
Abstract
Este artículo analiza la doctrina de los nombres patronímicos (nomina patronyma) en los grammatici Latini, doctrina adaptada de la gramática griega. Las considerables diferencias entre el sistema onomástico latino y el griego ocasionaron, en palabras de Denecker y Swiggers (Denecker, Tim y Pierre Swiggers. 2018. The articulus according to Latin grammarians up to the early Middle Ages: The complex interplay of tradition and innovation in grammatical doctrine. Glotta 94. p. 130), “situaciones de negociación” al momento de trasladar el sistema de una lengua a la otra – por ejemplo, los sufijos – y de ofrecer latinos para ilustrar fenómenos originalmente griegos. Los diferentes grammatici no lidiaron del mismo modo con estas situaciones, y, como resultado, hay una clara diferencia entre la doctrina de los patronímicos de las artes grammaticae “occidentales” y de las “orientales” – i.e., las elaboradas en la parte occidental y oriental del Imperio respectivamente –. A través de un recorrido de la doctrina gramatical de los patronímicos – de Dionisio Tracio a Prisciano –, este artículo analizará cómo los grammatici adaptaron, según su origen, tradiciones y destinatarios, esta categoría a la lengua latina.
Abstract
This paper analyzes the patronymic doctrine (nomina patronyma) in late Latin grammarians, which was adopted from Greek grammar. The significant differences between the Latin and Greek onomastic systems caused, in the words of Denecker and Swiggers (Denecker, Tim and Pierre Swiggers. 2018. The articulus according to Latin grammarians up to the early Middle Ages: The complex interplay of tradition and innovation in grammatical doctrine. Glotta 94. p. 130), “bargaining situations” when transferring the system from one language to the other (e.g., suffixes) and when offering Latin exempla to illustrate originally Greek phenomena. Not all grammarians dealt with these situations in the same way. As a result, there is a clear difference between the patronymic doctrine of the Western and Eastern grammars – i.e., those situated in the western and eastern parts of the Latin Empire. Through a comparative analysis of patronymics’ grammatical doctrine – from Dionysius Thrax to Priscian –, this paper will analyze how the grammatici adapted, according to their origin, traditions, and audience, this category to the Latin language.
Acknowledgments
Agradezco las sugerencias, críticas y correcciones de Javier Uría, Ramón Gutiérrez González y de los dos revisores anónimos. Este artículo se enmarca en un proyecto de investigación financiado por el Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación del Gobierno de España (Referencia FFI2017-83315-C2-2-P).
Bibliografía
Aitchison, J. M. 1964. Τελαμώνιος Aἴας and other patronymics. Glotta 42(3/4). 132–138.10.1080/00185868.1964.12082879Search in Google Scholar
Ax, Wolfram. 2011. Quintilians Grammatik („Inst. Orat. “ 1,4–8): Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110254556Search in Google Scholar
Barwick, Karl. 1922. Remmius Palaemon und die römische Ars grammatica. Leipzig: Dieterich.Search in Google Scholar
Barwick, Karl. 1964. Flavii Sosipatri Charisii artis grammaticae libri V (reimpr. con addenda et corrigenda de F. Kühnert). Leipzig: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar
Bécares Botas, Vicente. 1987. Apolonio Díscolo. Sintaxis. Introducción, traducción y notas. Madrid: Gredos.Search in Google Scholar
Bécares Botas, Vicente. 2002. Dionisio Tracio. Gramática. Comentarios antiguos. Introducción, traducción y notas. Madrid: Gredos.Search in Google Scholar
Bernetti, Chiara. 2013. Ars Cledonii Romani senatoris Constantinopolitani grammatici: Nuova edizione critica. Tesi di Dottorato di ricerca in ‘Civiltà e tradizione greca e romana’ XXV ciclo. Roma: Università degli studi Roma Tre.Search in Google Scholar
Bonnet, Guillaume. 2005a. Les adverbes dans la tradition grammaticale latine avant Priscien. Histoire Épistémologie Langage 27(2). 141–150. https://doi.org/10.3406/hel.2005.2664.Search in Google Scholar
Bonnet, Guillaume. 2005b. Dositheé. Grammaire latine. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar
Chantraine, Pierre. 1933. La formation des noms en grec ancien. Paris: Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar
Dammer, Raphael. 2001. Diomedes grammaticus. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
De Melo, Wolfgang D. C. 2019. Varro: De lingua Latina. Introduction, text, translation, and commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/actrade/9780198829232.book.1Search in Google Scholar
De Nonno, Mario. 1982. La grammatica dell’ “Anonymus Bobiensis” (GL I 533–565 Keil). Con un’appendice carisiana. Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Search in Google Scholar
Denecker, Tim & Pierre Swiggers. 2018. The articulus according to Latin grammarians up to the early Middle Ages: The complex interplay of tradition and innovation in grammatical doctrine. Glotta 94. 127–152. https://doi.org/10.13109/glot.2018.94.1.127.Search in Google Scholar
Desbordes, Françoise. 2007. La fonction du grec chez les grammairiens latins. In Françoise Desbordes, Idées grecques et romaines sur le langage. Travaux d’histoire et d’épisémologie, 107–120. Lyon: ENS Éditions.10.4000/books.enseditions.30633Search in Google Scholar
Dickey, Eleanor. 1997. The ancient Greek address system and some proposed sociolinguistic universals. Language in Society 26(1). 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500019382.Search in Google Scholar
Dionisotti, Anna Carlotta. 1984. Latin grammar for Greeks and Goths. The Journal of Roman Studies 74. 202–208. https://doi.org/10.2307/299016.Search in Google Scholar
Grossardt, Peter. 2001. Die Erzählung von Meleagros. Zur literarischen Entwicklung der kalydonischen Kultlegende. Leiden, Boston & Köln: Brill.10.1163/9789004351059Search in Google Scholar
Groupe Ars Grammatica = Baratin, Marc, Frédérique Biville, Guillaume Bonnet, Bernard Colombat, Cécile Conduché, Alessandro Garcea, Louis Holtz, Issaeva Séverine, Madeleine Keller & Diane Marchard. 2013. Priscien. Grammaire. Livres XIV, XV, XVI. Les invariables (préposition, adverbe et interjection, conjonction). Paris: J. Vrin.Search in Google Scholar
Hardie, Philip. 1994. Virgil: Aeneid Book IX. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hilgard, Alfred. 1901. Scholia in Dionysii Thracis Artem grammaticam. Leipzig: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar
Holtz, Louis. 1981. Donat et la tradition de l’enseignement grammatical. Étude sur l’Ars de Donat et sa diffusion (IVe–IXe siècle) et édition critique. Paris: CNRS.Search in Google Scholar
Keil, Heinrich. 1961 [1857–1870]. Grammatici Latini, 8 vols. Leipzig: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar
Krieter-Spiro, Martha. 2018. Homer’s Iliad. The Basel commentary. Book XIV. Boston & Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110569995Search in Google Scholar
Kyriakidis, Stratis. 2017. The patronymics Pelides and Aenides: Past, present and future in Homeric and Virgilian genealogical catalogues. In Anton Bierl, Menelaos Christopoulos & Athina Papachrysostomou (eds.), Time and space in ancient myth, religion and culture, 79–95. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110535150-006Search in Google Scholar
Lallot, Jean. 1998 [1989]. La grammaire de Denys le Thrace, 2nd edn. Paris: CNRS.Search in Google Scholar
Lentz, Augustus. 1870. Grammatici Graeci III.2. Leipzig: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar
Maltby, Robert. 1991. A lexicon of ancient Latin etymologies. Leeds: Francis Cairns.Search in Google Scholar
Matthews, Elaine. 2012 [1949]. names, personal, Greek. In Simon Hornblower & Antony Spawforth (eds.), The Oxford Classical dictionary, 4th edn, 995–996. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.013.4328Search in Google Scholar
Munzi, Luigi. 2011. Tecnica e ruolo dell’exemplum nei grammatici latini, in L’insegnamento delle technai nelle culture antiche. Atti del convegno (Ercolano, 23–24 marzo 2009), a cura di A. Roselli e R. Velardi, 125–149. Pisa & Roma: Serra.Search in Google Scholar
Niedermann, Max. 1937. Consentii Ars de barbarismis et metaplasmis. Victorini fragmentum de soloecismo et barbarismo. Neuchâtel: Paul Attinger.Search in Google Scholar
Reinikka, Anna. 2012. Ars Pseudo-Scauri: A critical edition and commentary. Helsinki: University of Helsinki dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Rix, Helmut (Freiburg). 2006. Gentile. In Brill’s New Pauly. Brill. Antiquity volumes edited by: Hubert Cancik & Helmuth Schneider, English Edition by: Christine F. Salazar, Classical Tradition volumes edited by: Manfred Landfester, English Edition by: Francis G. Gentry. Consulted online on 18 March 2020. First published online: 2006. http://doi.org/10.1163/1574-9347_bnp_e421690.10.1163/1574-9347_bnp_e421690Search in Google Scholar
Rodríguez Adrados, Francisco. 1992. Nueva Sintaxis del Griego Antiguo. Madrid: Gredos.Search in Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Noriega, Guillén, Lucía & Javier Uría. 2017. Ibycus and Diomedes: On the reception of a Greek poet by a Late latin grammarian. Mnemosyne 70(3). 450–475. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525x-12342113.Search in Google Scholar
Russell, Donald Andrew (ed. & trans.). 2002. Quintilian. The orator’s education, Books 1–2 (Loeb Classical Library 124). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, Dirk Marie. 2007. Charisius and Diomedes writing a Latin grammar for Greeks. In Louis Basset, Frédérique Biville, Bernard Colombat, Alfons Wouters & Pierre Swiggers (eds.), Bilinguisme et terminologie grammaticale gréco-latine, 181–189. Louvain: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar
Smitherman, Thomas. 2014. Patronymics. In Georgios K. Giannakis (ed.), Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek language and linguistics. Managing Editors Online Edition: First Last. Consulted online on 27 February 2020. First published online: 2014. http://doi.org/10.1163/2214-448X_eagll_SIM_00000406.10.1163/2214-448X_eagll_SIM_00000406Search in Google Scholar
Solin, Keikki. 2012 [1949]. names, personal, Roman. In Simon Hornblower & Antony Spawforth (eds.), The Oxford Classical dictionary, 4th edn, 996–998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.013.4329Search in Google Scholar
Stoppie, Karen. 2005. The role of the Greek in Charisius’. Ars grammatica. Roczniki Humanistyczne. Annales de lettres et sciences humaines 53(3). 123–138.Search in Google Scholar
Thomas, Richard. 1988. Virgil Georgics. Volume 1: Books I–II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Thomson, Douglas F. S. 1997. Catullus: Edited with a textual and interpretative commentary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442672789Search in Google Scholar
Uhlig, Gustav. 1910. Apollonii Dyscoli quae supersunt, vol. 1.2: Apollonii Dyscoli De constructione libri quattuor, Grammatici Graeci II.1.2. Leipzig: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar
Uría Varela, Javier. 2007. Charisius (“Ars Grammatica” p. 158.6–12 Barwick): On Cinna, fr. 1 Blänsdorf. Mnemosyne 60(1). 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852507x165900.Search in Google Scholar
Vaahtera, Jaana. 1998. Derivation. Greek and Roman views on word formation. Turku: Turun Yliopisto.Search in Google Scholar
Viciano, Albert. 1996. El articulus en los gramáticos latinos. Minerva 10. 87–104.Search in Google Scholar
Zetzel, James E. G. 2018. Critics, Compilers, and Commentators. An introduction to Roman philology, 200 BCE–800 CE. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Romanization and Latinization of the Roman Empire in the light of data in the Computerized Historical Linguistic Database of Latin Inscriptions of the Imperial Age
- Los patronímicos en los grammatici Latini. La adaptación de una categoría importada
- Negative adjectival morphology in Latin.
- Does Prenestinian fe⋮faked actually exist?
- Ancient Latin grammarians on suppletion
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Romanization and Latinization of the Roman Empire in the light of data in the Computerized Historical Linguistic Database of Latin Inscriptions of the Imperial Age
- Los patronímicos en los grammatici Latini. La adaptación de una categoría importada
- Negative adjectival morphology in Latin.
- Does Prenestinian fe⋮faked actually exist?
- Ancient Latin grammarians on suppletion
