Greeting in Roman comedy: register and (im)politeness

References

Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bach, Kent & Robert M. Harnish. 1979. Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Barrios-Lech, Peter. 2016. Linguistic interaction in Roman comedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316416983Search in Google Scholar

Barsby, John (ed.). 2001. Terence. Comedies, vol. 1–2. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Berger, Łukasz. 2016a. Escenas de bienvenida en las comedias de Plauto. Scripta Classica 13. 65–84.Search in Google Scholar

Berger, Łukasz. 2016b. Introducing the first topic slot in Plautine dialogues. Roczniki Humanistyczne 64(3). 89–110. https://doi.org/10.18290/rh.2016.64.3-5.Search in Google Scholar

Berger, Łukasz. 2017a. Bendecir para saludar en Plauto. Redistribución de la función pragmática. Emerita 85(2). 261–287. https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2017.13.1626.Search in Google Scholar

Berger, Łukasz. 2017b. Estrategias de la cortesía positiva en la apertura diálogica en Plauto y Terencio. Revista de estudios latinos: RELat 17. 11–35.Search in Google Scholar

Berger, Łukasz. 2017c. The old man and linguistic politeness in the comedies of Plautus. Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae 27(3). 249–273. https://doi.org/10.14746/sppgl.2017.xxvii.3.14.Search in Google Scholar

Berger, Łukasz. 2018. Negotiating the interactional meaning on the Roman stage: Tokens of phaticity. In A. Gałkowski & M. Kopytowska (eds.), Current perspectives in semiotics. Text, genres, and representations, 217–237. Berlin: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar

Cabrillana, Concepción. 2019. Expresiones directivas con verbos de uso copulativo en la comedia latina. Glotta 95(1). 8–25. https://doi.org/10.13109/glot.2019.95.1.8.Search in Google Scholar

Coulmas, Florian. 1979. On the sociolinguistic relevance of routine formulae. Journal of Pragmatics 3(3/4). 239–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(79)90033-x.Search in Google Scholar

De Melo, Wolfgang (ed.). 2011–2013. Plautus. Comedies, vol. 1–5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Denizot, Camille & Olga Spevak. 2017. Pragmatics in Latin and ancient Greek. An introduction. In Olga Speval & Camille Denizot (eds.), Pragmatic approaches to Latin and ancient Greek, 1–13. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.190.01speSearch in Google Scholar

Dickey, Eleanor. 2002. Latin forms of address. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199242870.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Dickey, Eleanor. 2016. Politeness in ancient Rome: Can it help us evaluate modern politeness theories?. Journal of Politeness Research 12(2). 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2016-0008.Search in Google Scholar

Duranti, Alessandro. 1997. Universal and culture‐specific properties of greetings. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 7(1). 63–97. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1997.7.1.63.Search in Google Scholar

Echols, Edward C. 1950. The quid-greeting in Plautus and Terence. The Classical Journal 45(4). 188–190.Search in Google Scholar

Eelen, Gino. 2001. A critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.Search in Google Scholar

Ferguson, Charles A. 1976. The structure and use of politeness formulas. Language in Society 5(2). 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500006989.Search in Google Scholar

Ferri, Rolando. 2009. Politeness in Latin comedy. Some preliminary thoughts. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 61. 15–28.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles. 1977. Scenes-and-frames semantics. In Antonio Zampolli (ed.), Linguistic structures processing, 55–81. Amsterdam: North Holland.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles. 1982. Frame semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected Papers from SICOL, 111–138. Seoul: Hanshin.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00424-7Search in Google Scholar

Forberg, Martin. 1913. De salutandi formulis Plautinis et Terentianis. Weidae Turingorum: Thomas et Hubert.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1955. On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry 18(3). 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1963. Behavior in public places. New York: Glencoe.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1971. Relations in public. Macrostudies of the public order. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, Jon. 1998. The deference-greeting in Roman society. Maia 50(3). 413–426.Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2007. The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative. Journal of Politeness Research 3. 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr.2007.013.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Maria E. 1983. Conversation openings in the comedies of Plautus. In Harm Pinkster (ed.), Latin linguistics and linguistic theory, 217–226. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.12.20hofSearch in Google Scholar

Laver, John. 1975.  Communicative function of phatic communion. In Kendon Adam, Richard M. Harris & Mary R. Key (eds.), Organization of behavior in face-to-face interaction, 215–238. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110907643.215Search in Google Scholar

Laver, John. 1981. Linguistic routines and politeness in greeting and parting. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), Conversational routine, 289–304. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110809145.289Search in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. 2014. The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Letessier, Piere. 2000. La salutation chez Plaute. Adaptation ludique d’un rituel social. Lalies 20. 151–163.Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813313Search in Google Scholar

Locher, Miriam A. & Richard J. Watts. 2005. Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 1(1). 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9.Search in Google Scholar

Malinowski, Bronisław. 1923. The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In Charles K. Ogden & Ivory A. Richards (eds.), The meaning of meaning, 296–336. New York: Harvest Book.Search in Google Scholar

Mills, Sara. 2003. Gender and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615238Search in Google Scholar

Monserrat Roig, Catalina. 2005. Anàlisi pragmàtica i conversacional dels vocatius a les comedies plautines. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona dissertation [Pragmatic and conversational analysis of vocatives in the comedies by Plautus].Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Roman. 1997. Sprechen und Sprache. Dialoglinguistische Studien zu Terenz. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula. 2014. Phases in discourse. In Klaus P. Schneider & Anne Barron (eds.), Pragmatics of discourse, vol. 3, 353–383. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214406-014Search in Google Scholar

Poccetti, Paolo. 2010. Greeting and farewell expressions as evidence for colloquial language: Between literary and epigraphical texts. In Eleanor Dickey & Chahoud Anna (eds.), Colloquial and literary Latin, 100–126. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511763267.008Search in Google Scholar

Risselada, Rodie. 1993. Imperatives and other directive expressions in Latin. A study in the pragmatics of a dead language. Amsterdam: Brill.10.1163/9789004408975Search in Google Scholar

Roesch, Sophie. 2007. Les débuts de dialogue dans la comédie et la tragédie latines. In Bruno Bureau & Christian Nicolas (eds.), Commencer et finir dans les littératures antiques (Colloque de Lyon, 29–30 sept. 2006), 207–222. Lyon: Université Jean Moulin.Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1975. Everyone has to lie. In Ben G. Blount & Mary Sanches (eds.), Sociocultural dimensions of language use, 57–79. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1968. Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 70(6). 1075–1095. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1986. The routine as achievement. Human Studies 9(2). 111–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00148124.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1991. Reflections on talk and social structure. In Deirdre Boden & Donald H. Zimmerman (eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis, 44–70. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791208Search in Google Scholar

Schiffrin, Deborah. 1977. Opening encounters. American Sociological Review 42(5). 679–691. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094858.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John R. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438Search in Google Scholar

GiadaSorrentino. Forthcoming. Conversational openings and politeness in Menander. Towards an integrated pragmatic approach to Menandrean dialogue. In Luis Unceta Gómez & Łukasz Berger (eds.), Doing Im/politeness in ancient Greek and Latin.Search in Google Scholar

Terkourafi, Marina. 2002. Politeness and formulaicity: Evidence from Cypriot Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 3(1). 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1075/jgl.3.08ter.Search in Google Scholar

Terkourafi, Marina. 2005. Beyond the micro-level in politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research 1. 237–262. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.237.Search in Google Scholar

Unceta Gómez, Luis. 2012. Cuando los sentimientos irrumpen: valores expresivos de las interjecciones primarias en las comedias de Plauto. In Gregoris Rosario López (ed.), Estudios sobre teatro romano: el mundo de los sentimientos y su expresión, 347–395. Zaragoza: Libros Pórtico.Search in Google Scholar

Unceta Gómez, Luis. 2016. Congratulations in Latin comedy: Types and functions. Journal of Politeness Research 12(2). 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2016-0005.Search in Google Scholar

Unceta Gómez, Luis. 2018. Gli studi sulla (s)cortesia linguistica in latino. Possibilità di analisi e proposte per il futuro. Studi e Saggi Linguistici 56(2). 9–37.Search in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun A. 1977. Context and cognition: Knowledge frames and speech act comprehension. Journal of Pragmatics 1(3). 211–231.10.1016/0378-2166(77)90035-2Search in Google Scholar

Ventola, Eija. 1979. The structure of casual conversation in English. Journal of Pragmatics 3(3/4). 267–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(79)90034-1.Search in Google Scholar

Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615184Search in Google Scholar