The syntax of the Latin presentative adverb ecce: Relation to focus phrase

References

Adams, James N. 1976. A typological approach to Latin word order. Indogermanische Forschungen 81. 70–99. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110243239.70.Search in Google Scholar

Adams, James N. 1992. British Latin: Notes on the language, text and interpretation of the bath curse tablets. Britannia 23. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/526102.Search in Google Scholar

Adams, James N. 2013. Social variation and the Latin language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511843433Search in Google Scholar

Adler, George J. 1858. A practical grammar of the Latin language; with perpetual exercises in speaking and writing: For the use of schools, colleges, and private learners. Boston: Sanborn, Carter, Bazin & Co.Search in Google Scholar

Aelbrecht, Lobke, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye. 2012. Main clause phenomena: New horizons. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.190Search in Google Scholar

Bianchi, Valentina & Mara Frascarelli. 2010. Is topic a root phenomenon?. Iberia 2(1). 43–88.Search in Google Scholar

Bloch, Oscar & Walther von Wartburg. 1968. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue française, 5th edn. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

Bortolussi, Bernard. 2017. Topicalizations, left dislocations and the left-periphery. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 16. 101–123. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.208.Search in Google Scholar

Cennamo, Michela. 2009. Argument structure and alignment variations and changes in Late Latin. In Jóhanna Barðdal & Shobhana L. Chelliah (eds.), The role of semantic, pragmatic, and discourse factors in the development of case, 307–346. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.108.17cenSearch in Google Scholar

Charpin, François. 1989. Étude de syntaxe énonciative: L’ordre des mots et la phrase. In Gualtiero Calboli (ed.), Subordination and other topics in Latin, 503–520. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.17.32cha.Search in Google Scholar

Chase, Thomas. 1882. A Latin grammar. Philadelphia: Eldredge & Brother.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge [Mass]: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Cleveland, Charles D. 1836. Adam’s Latin grammar: With numerous additions and improvements, designed to aid the more advanced student by fuller elucidations of the Latin classics. Philadelphia: William Marshall & Company.Search in Google Scholar

Crane, Gregory, Bridget Almas, Alison Babeu, Lisa Cerrato, Anna Krohn, Frederik Baumgart, Monica Berti, Greta Franzini, & Simona Stoyanova. 2014. Cataloging for a billion word library of Greek and Latin. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Digital Access to Textual Cultural Heritage: DATeCH ’14, 83–88. New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2595188.2595190.Search in Google Scholar

Cuzzolin, Pierluigi. 1998. Quelques remarques syntaxiques à propos de ecce. In Benjamín García-Hernández (ed.), Estudios de lingüística latina: Actas del IX coloquio internacional de lingüística latina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 14–18 de abril 1997, vol. I, 261–271. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Search in Google Scholar

Danckaert, Lieven. 2011. On the left periphery of Latin embedded clauses. Ghent: Universiteit Gent [Belgium] unpublished doctoral dissertation. https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/1908358/file/4335555 (accessed 4 April 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Danckaert, Lieven. 2012. Latin embedded clauses: The left periphery. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.184Search in Google Scholar

De Cuba, Carlos. 2014. In defense of the truncation account for main clause phenomena. Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. http://cla-acl.ca/wp-content/uploads/deCuba-2014.pdf (accessed 2 March 2020).Search in Google Scholar

De Jong, Jan. 1994. Word order in Cato’s De Agricultura. In Jozseph Herman (ed.), Linguistic studies on Latin studies, 91–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.28.10jonSearch in Google Scholar

De Vaan, Michielnd. 2008. Etymological dictionary of Latin and the other Italic languages. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

Devine, Andrew M. & Laurence D.Stephens. 2006. Latin word order: Structured meaning and information. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195181685.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Donaldson, John W. 1867. A complete Latin grammar for the use of students. London: Deighton, Bell, and Co.Search in Google Scholar

Emonds, Joseph E. 1970. Root and structure-preserving transformations. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Ph.D. dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Fruyt, Michèle. 2011. Grammaticalization in Latin. In Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), New perspectives on historical Latin syntax. Volume 4: Complex sentences, grammaticalization, typology. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110253412.661Search in Google Scholar

Greenough, James B. & Joseph H. Allen. 2013. Allen and Greenough’s new Latin grammar. Mineola, NY: Courier Corporation.Search in Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane. 2006a. Argument fronting in English, Romance CLLD and the left periphery. In Raffaella Zanuttini, Hector Campos, Elena Herburger & Paul Portner (eds.), Negation, tense and clausal architecture: Cross-linguistic investigations, 27–52. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane. 2006b. Conditionals, factives and the left periphery. Lingua 116. 1651–1669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.03.014.Search in Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane. 2012. The syntax of MCP: Deriving the truncation account. In Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds.), Main clause phenomena: New horizons, 113–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.190.05haeSearch in Google Scholar

Hall, Robert A. 1952. The classification of Italian ecco and its cognates. Romance Philology 6. 278–280. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44939767 (accessed 2 March 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Hill, Virginia. 2014. Vocatives: How syntax meets with pragmatics. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004261389Search in Google Scholar

Hoekstra, Eric. 1993. Dialectal variation inside CP as parametric variation. In Werner Abraham & Josef Bayer (eds.), Dialektsyntax. Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft, vol. 5. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.10.1007/978-3-322-97032-9_8Search in Google Scholar

Hooper, Joan B. & Sandra A. Thompso. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4(4). 465–497. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4177789 (accessed 2 March 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Jones, Peter V. & Keith C. Sidwell. 2016. Reading Latin: Grammar and exercises, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139540704Search in Google Scholar

Julia, Marie-Ange. 2016. Sur ecce et quelques présentatifs des langues anciennes. In Paolo Pocetti (ed.), Actes du XVII ème Colloque International de Linguistique Latine, Rome, mai 2013. http://www.academia.edu/5925308/SUR_LATIN_ECCE_ET_QUELQUES_PRESENTATIFS_DES_LANGUES_ANCIENNES (accessed 24 December 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Kiss, Katalin, É. 1995. Discourse configurational languages: Introduction. In Katalin, É. Kiss (ed)., Discourse configurational languages, 3–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195088335.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kiss, Katalin, É. 1998. Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74(2). 245–273.10.1353/lan.1998.0211Search in Google Scholar

Ledgeway, Adam. 2012a. From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic typology and change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584376.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ledgeway, Adam. 2012b. From Latin to Romance: Configurationality, functional categories and head‐marking. Transactions of the Philological Society 110(3). 422–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2012.01310.x.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, Charlton T. & Charles Short. 1879. A Latin dictionary. Founded on Andrews’ edition of Freund’s Latin dictionary. Revised, enlarged, and in great part rewritten. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Linde, Paul. 1923. Die Stellung des Verbs in der lateinischen Prosa. Glotta 12. 153–78 http://www.jstor.org/stable/40265515 (accessed 23 December 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Maiden, Martin. 1995. A linguistic history of Italian. London: Taylor & Francis.Search in Google Scholar

Manoliu, Maria. 2011. Pragmatic and discourse changes. In Martin Maiden, John C. Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds.), The Cambridge history of the Romance languages I: Structures, 472–531. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521800723.011Search in Google Scholar

Matthews, Peter H. 2014. The concise Oxford dictionary of linguistics, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

McFadden, Patrick J. E. 1999. The discourse function of discontinuous noun phrases in Latin: A discourse-pragmatic approach to a word order pattern. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan doctoral dissertation. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/131722 (accessed 23 December 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Mondon, Jean-François. 2015. Intensive basic Latin: A grammar and workbook. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315683522Search in Google Scholar

Nigel, Vincent. 1988. Latin. In M. Harris & V. Nigel (eds.), The Romance languages, 26–79. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Oniga, Renato. 2014. Latin: A linguistic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Panhuis, Dirk G. J. 2009. Latin grammar. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar

Penny, Ralph. 2002. A history of the Spanish language, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511992827Search in Google Scholar

Petit, Daniel. 2010. On presentative particles in the Baltic languages. In Nicole Nau & Norbert Ostrowski (eds.), Particles and connectives in Baltic, Acta Salensia, vol. 2, 151–170. Vilnius: Vilniaus Universiteto Leidykla.Search in Google Scholar

Pinkster, Harm. 1990. Latin syntax and semantics. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Pinkster, Harm. 2015. The Oxford Latin syntax. Volume 1: The simple clause. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283613.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Plautus, Titus M. 2011. Amphitryon – The Comedy of Asses – The Pot of Gold – The Two Bacchises – The Captives. Edited and translated by Wolfgang de Melo London: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Poste, Edward (trans.) 1871. Elements of Roman law by Gaius. London: Macmillan & Co.Search in Google Scholar

Riley, Henry T. 1869. The comedies of Plautus, vol. 1. London: Bell and Daldy.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi & Giuliano Bocci 2017. Left periphery of the clause. Primarily illustrated for Italian. In Martin Everaert & Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, 2nd edn. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom104.Search in Google Scholar

Roby, Henry J. 1887. A grammar of the Latin language from Plautus to Suetonius, Part. I, 5th edn. London: Macmillan & Co.Search in Google Scholar

Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1954. Historische Grammatik der Italienischen Sprache und ihrer Mundarten III. Syntax und Wortbildung. Berne: A. Francke AG.Search in Google Scholar

Salvi, Giampaolo. 2004. La formazione della struttura di frase romanza. Ordine delle parole e clitici dal latino alle lingue romanze antiche. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783110945508Search in Google Scholar

Scott, Peter D. 1965. Alcuin’s “Versus de Cuculo”: The vision of pastoral friendship. Studies in Philology 62(4). 510–530. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4173496 (accessed 21 November 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Smitherman, Thomas & Jóhanna Barðdal. 2009. Typological changes in the evolution of Indo-European syntax?. Diachronica 26(2). 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.26.2.04sam.Search in Google Scholar

Snijders, Liselotte. 2012. Issues concerning constraints on discontinuous NPs in Latin. CSLI. (n.p.) Proceedings of LFG12. http://web.stanford.edu/group/cslipublications/cslipublications/LFG/17/abstracts/lfg12abs-snijders.html (accessed 8 April 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Spevak, Olga. 2010. Constituent order in classical Latin prose. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.117Search in Google Scholar

Spigariol, Stefano. 1990. The discontinuity of NP in the Latin sentence: An attempt of interpretation. Journal of Latin Linguistics 3(1). 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1515/joll.1990.3.1.57.Search in Google Scholar

Suñer, Margarita. 1982. Syntax and semantics of Spanish presentational sentence-types. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, John. 2017. Essential GCSE Latin, 2nd edn. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar

Touratier, Christian. 1994. Syntaxe latine. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

Unceta Gómez, Luis. 2017. Discursive and pragmatic functions of Latin em. Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization… interjectionalization?. In Camille Denziot & Olga Spevak (eds.), Pragmatic approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek, 63–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.190.04unc.Search in Google Scholar

Valpy, Francis E. J. 1828. An etymological dictionary of the Latin language. London: A.J. Valpy.Search in Google Scholar

Wood, Jim, Laurence Horn, Raffaella Zanuttini & LukeLindemann. 2015. The Southern dative presentative meets mechanical Turk. American Speech 90(3). 291–320. https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-3324487.Search in Google Scholar

Zanuttini, Raffaella. 2017. Presentatives and the syntactic encoding of contextual information. In Enoch Aboh, Eric Haeberli, Genoveva Puskás & Manuela Schönenberger (eds.), Elements of comparative syntax: Theory and description, 221–255. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781501504037-008Search in Google Scholar