The politeness formula si placet in Late Latin: on the role of pragmatic conventions in discourse traditions

References

Adams, James N. 1984. Female speech in Latin comedy. Antichthon 18. 43–77.10.1017/S0066477400003142Search in Google Scholar

Barrios-Lech, Peter G. 2016. Linguistic interaction in Roman comedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316416983Search in Google Scholar

Beeching, Kate. 2005. Politeness-induced semantic change: The case of quand même. Language Variation and Change 17(2). 1–27.10.1017/S0954394505050076Search in Google Scholar

Berger, Łukasz. 2018. Dialogue structure and politeness in Querolus: Imitation and change. Paper presented at the 13th International Colloquium on Latin Vulgaire – Latin Tardif, Budapest, 3–7 September 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Bolkestein, Machtelt. 1998. Between brackets: Some properties of parenthetical clauses in Latin discourse. In Rodie Risselada (ed.), Latin in use: Amsterdam studies in the pragmatics of Latin, 1–17. Amsterdam: Gieben.10.1163/9789004409033_003Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar

Burton, Philip. 2012. Augustine and language. In Mark Vessey (ed.), A companion to Augustine, 113–124. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781118255483.ch9Search in Google Scholar

Calboli, Gualtiero. 2009. Latin syntax and Greek. In Pierluigi Cuzzolin & Philip Baldi (eds.), New perspectives on historical Latin syntax, 65–194. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110205626.65Search in Google Scholar

Cuzzolin, Pierluigi. 2014. Grecismi sintattici antichi e grecismi sintattici tardi: Osservazioni per un riesame anche terminologico. In Piera Molinelli, Pierluigi Cuzzolin & Chiara Fedriani (eds.), Latin vulgaire Latin tardif. Actes du X Colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif, 247–262. Bergamo: Sestante.Search in Google Scholar

Dickey, Eleanor. 2010. Latin influence and Greek request formulae. In Trevor V. Evans & Dirk D. Obbink (eds.), The language of the papyri, 208–220. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199237081.003.0013Search in Google Scholar

Dickey, Eleanor. 2012. How to say “please” in Classical Latin. Classical Quarterly 62(2). 731–748.10.1017/S0009838812000286Search in Google Scholar

Dickey, Eleanor. 2015. How to say “please” in post-Classical Latin: Fronto and the importance of archaism. Journal of Latin Linguistics 14(1). 17–31.10.1515/joll-2015-0002Search in Google Scholar

Fedriani, Chiara. Submitted. Hypothetical parentheticals as mitigating devices: si placet and cognate forms in Latin.Search in Google Scholar

Fedriani, Chiara & Piera Molinelli. 2013. Ut ita dicam and cognates: A pragmatic account. Journal of Latin Linguistics 12(1). 71–99.10.1515/joll-2013-0005Search in Google Scholar

Ferri, Rolando. 2008. Politeness in Latin comedy: Some preliminary thoughts. MD 61. 15–28.Search in Google Scholar

Foley, Michael P. 1999. Cicero, Augustine, and the philosophical roots of the Cassiciacum dialogues. Revue des E´tudes Augustiniennes 45. 51–77.10.1484/J.REA.5.104795Search in Google Scholar

Fraser, Bruce. 1996. Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics 6(2). 167–190.10.1075/prag.6.2.03fraSearch in Google Scholar

Fuhrer, Therese. 2012. Conversationalist and consultant: Augustine in dialogue. In Mark Vessey (ed.), A companion to Augustine, 270–283. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781118255483.ch21Search in Google Scholar

Ghezzi, Chiara & Piera Molinelli. 2014. Cycles of pragmaticalization: Politeness markers from Latin to Italian (quaeso/rogo and prego/chiedo). In Chiara Ghezzi & Piera Molinelli (eds.), Discourse and pragmatic markers from Latin to the Romance languages, 60–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681600.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, Jon. 2009. Politeness and politics in Cicero’s letters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329063.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Haverkate, Henk. 1984. Speech acts, speakers and hearers. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/pb.v.4Search in Google Scholar

Hofmann, Johann Baptist. 2003. La lingua d’uso latina. Bologna: Pàtron. [3 ed. it. a cura di L. Ricottilli; ed. or. 1936, Lateinische Umgangssprache].Search in Google Scholar

Koch, Peter. 2008. Tradiciones discursivas y cambio lingüístico: El ejemplo del tratamiento de vuestra merced en español. In Johannes Kabatek (ed.), Sintaxis histórica del español y cambio lingüístico: nuevas perspectivas desde las tradiciones discursivas, 53–87. Madrid: Iberoamericana Vervuert.10.31819/9783865278623-003Search in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey. 2014. The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lopez Serena, Araceli. 2011. La doble determinación del nivel histórico en el saber expresivo. Hacia una nueva delimitación del concepto de “tradición discursiva”. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 62. 59–97.10.1515/roma.62.3Search in Google Scholar

Mencacci, Francesca. Submitted. Text as interaction. Ut mihi (quidem) videtur as a hedging device in Latin literary texts. Submitted to Luis Unceta Gómez & Łukasz Berger (eds.), Doing Im/Politeness in Ancient Greek and Latin.Search in Google Scholar

Molinelli, Piera. 2015. Dialoghi a distanza e pragmatica: Marcatori funzionali e lettere private in latino e in greco. In Maria Grazia Busà & Sara Gesuato (eds.), Lingue e contesti. Studi in onore di Alberto M. Mioni, 609–621. Padova: CLEUP.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Roman. 1997. Sprechen und Sprache: Dialoglinguistische Studien zu Terenz. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Núñez, Darmstadt S. 1995. Materiales para una sociología de la lengua latina: Terencio y los modificadores de imperativo. Florentia Iliberritana 6. 347–366.Search in Google Scholar

Primmer, Adolf. 1995. The function of the “genera dicendi” in “De doctrina christiana 4”. In Duane W. H. Arnold & Pamela Bright (eds.), De doctrina Christiana. A classic of western culture, 68–86. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Search in Google Scholar

Risselada, Rodie. 1989. Latin illocutionary parentheticals. In Marius Lavency & Dominique Longrée (eds.), Actes du cinquième Colloque de Linguistique Latine. Cahiers de l’Institut de Linguistique de Louvain 15, 367–378. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters.10.2143/CILL.15.1.2016756Search in Google Scholar

Risselada, Rodie. 1993. Imperatives and other directive expressions in Latin: A study in the pragmatics of a dead language. Amsterdam: Gieben.10.1163/9789004408975Search in Google Scholar

Risselada, Rodie. 1998. Nunc’s use as discourse marker of “cohesive shifts”. Etudes Luxembourgeoises d’histoire & de littérature Romaines 1. 142–159.Search in Google Scholar

Rosén, Hannah. 2009. Coherence, sentence modification, and sentence-part modification – the contribution of particles. In Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), New perspectives on historical Latin syntax, 317–442. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110205626.317Search in Google Scholar

Rosén, Hannah. 2012. Greek in Latin, Greek into Latin: Reflections on the passage of patterns. In John Glucker & Charles Burnett (eds.), Greek into Latin from Antiquity until the nineteenth century, 1–18. London & Turin: The Warburg Institute/Nino Aragno.Search in Google Scholar

Rosén, Hannah. 2017. Latin, Sardic, and Irish evolvements. Paper presented at the panel Cyclicity in Semantic-Pragmatic Change, organized by Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen at the 15th International Pragmatics Association Conference (IPrA), Belfast, July 16–21, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Rosén, Hannah & Donna Shalev. 2017. Quasi: Its grecizing (?) syntactic patterns. Pallas 103. 273–282.10.4000/pallas.4435Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John. 1975. Indirect speech acts. In Peter Cole & J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3. Speech acts, 59–82. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_004Search in Google Scholar

Shanzer, Danuta R. 2012. Augustine and the Latin classics. In Mark Vessey (ed.), A companion to Augustine, 161–174. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781118255483.ch13Search in Google Scholar

Unceta Gómez, Luis. 2009. La petición verbal en latín, Estudio léxico, semántico y pragmático. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas – UAM Ediciones.Search in Google Scholar

Unceta Gómez, Luis. 2017. Estrategias de cortesía lingüística en Querolus. Latomus 76. 140–161.Search in Google Scholar

Unceta Gómez, Luis. 2020. Indexicalidad y cortesía en latín: el caso de las cartas de Claudio Terenciano. L’Antiquité Classique 89. 135–155.Search in Google Scholar