Copular clause classification in Latin

References

Bolkestein, A. Machtelt. 1983. Genitive and dative possessors in Latin. In Simon Dik (ed.), Advances in functional grammar, 55–91. Dordrecht: Foris.Search in Google Scholar

Bortolussi, Bernard. 1998. Esse + datif et esse + génitif en latin. In Alain Rouveret (ed.), “Etre” et “avoir”, syntaxe, sémantique, typologie, 68–94. Vincennes: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Search in Google Scholar

Bortolussi, Bernard. 2008. L’accord avec l’attribut. In Danièle Auger (ed.), Culture classique et christianisme. Mélanges offerts à J. Bouffartigue, 341–359. Paris: Picard.Search in Google Scholar

Cabrillana, Concepcion. 1998. Structures of identification and attribution with sum. In Benjamin García-Hernández (ed.), Estudios de lingüística latina, 217–233. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas.Search in Google Scholar

Cabrillana, Concepcion. 2001. Locative structures in construction with sum. In Claude Moussy (ed.), De lingua latina nouae quaestiones, 275–290. Louvain-Paris: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

Cabrillana, Concepcion. 2002. Semantic and syntactic characterization of the ‘genitive + esse’ construction. In Gualtiero Calboli (ed.), Papers on grammar, Vol. VIII. 43–68. Bologna: CLUEB.10.1515/joll.2002.8.1.43Search in Google Scholar

Cabrillana, Concepcion. 2003. Estudio de rasgos diferenciales en las estructuras de Genitivo y Dativo “posesivos” en latin. In J. M. Baños, C. Cabrillana, M. E. Torrego & J. de la Villa (eds.), Verba (Praedicatiua. Complementación en griego y en latín), Vol. 53. 79–109. University of Santiago de Compostela.Search in Google Scholar

Carlier, Anne. 2004–2005. Ce sont des Anglais: Un accord avec l’attribut? L’information Grammaticale 103. 13–18 and 104. 4–14.10.3406/igram.2004.2544Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1992. Roles and values: The case of French copula constructions. In C. Georgopoulos & R. Ishihara (eds.), Essays in honour of S.-Y. Kuroda, 181–206. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1007/978-94-011-3818-5_9Search in Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob. 1892. Über Begriff and Gegenstand. Vierteljahrschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie 16. 192–205, (trad. fr. “Concept et Objet” in Ecrits logiques et philosophiques, 1971, Paris: Seuil).Search in Google Scholar

Fugier, Hélène. 1973. L’apposition en latin. La Linguistique 1. 97–133.Search in Google Scholar

Guéron, Jacqueline. 1994. On HAVE and BE. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society 25. 191–206.Search in Google Scholar

Heberlein, Friedriech. 1996. Über “enge” Appositionen. In Hannah Rosén (ed.), Aspects of Latin. Papers from the seventh international colloquium on Latin linguistics. Jerusalem, 343–359. Innsbruck: IBS.Search in Google Scholar

Heycock, Carline. 1998. Phrases réduites inverses. In Alain Rouveret (ed.), “Etre” et “Avoir”. Syntaxe, sémantique, typologie, 95–114. Vincennes: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Search in Google Scholar

Heycock, Caroline. 2012. Specification, equation, and agreement in copular sentences. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne De Linguistique 57(2). 209–240.10.1017/S0008413100004758Search in Google Scholar

Heycock, Caroline & Anthony Kroch. 2002. Topic, focus, and syntactic representations. In Line Mikkelsen & Christopher Potts (eds.), Proceedings of west coast conference on formal linguistics (WCCFL), Vol. 21. 101–125. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Search in Google Scholar

Higgins, Francis Roger. 1979. The pseudo-cleft constructions in English. New York: Garland.Search in Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The philosophy of grammar. London: G. Allen & Unwin.Search in Google Scholar

Lahousse, Karen. 2009. Specificational sentences and the influence of information structure on (anti-)connectivity effects. Journal of Linguistics 45. 139–166.10.1017/S0022226708005549Search in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form. Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620607Search in Google Scholar

Mikkelsen, Line. 2005. Copular clauses. Specification, predication and equation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.85Search in Google Scholar

Mikkelsen, Line. 2011. Copular clauses. In Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics (HSK 33.2), 1805–1829. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Milner, Jean-Claude. 1982. Réflexions sur la référence et la coréférence. Ordre et raisons de langue, 9–17. Paris: Seuil.Search in Google Scholar

Moro, Andrea. 1988. Per une teoria unificata delle frasi copulari. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 13. 81–110.Search in Google Scholar

Moro, Andrea. 1997. The raising of predicates. Predicative noun phrases and the theory of clause structure (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519956Search in Google Scholar

Moro, Andrea. 1998. Esserci e averci: Les clitiques sujets et l’analyse en petite proposition. In Alain Rouveret (ed.), ‘Etre’ et ‘Avoir’. Syntaxe, sémantique, typologie, 155–170. Vincennes: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Search in Google Scholar

Pinkster, Harm. 1984. Latijnse syntaxis en semantiek. Amsterdam: Grüner (English transl. 1990, London, New York: Routledge).Search in Google Scholar

Rosén, Hannah. 2002. Equating and comparing. Remarks on apposition, adjective gradation and equative sentences in Latin. In Gualtiero Calboli (ed.), Papers on grammar, Vol. VIII. 209–228. Bologna: CLUEB.Search in Google Scholar

Rouveret, Alain. 1998. Points de vue sur le verbe ‘être’. In Alain Rouveret (ed.), ‘Etre’ et ‘Avoir’. Syntaxe, sémantique, typologie, 11–65. Vincennes: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Search in Google Scholar

Ruwet, Nicolas. 1982. Grammaire des insultes et autres études. Paris: Seuil.Search in Google Scholar

Serbat, Guy. 1983. Le verbe sum: Syntaxe et sémantique. Vita Latina 73. 8–12.Search in Google Scholar

Stowell, Tim, et al. 1978. What was there before there was there? In Donka Farkas (ed.), Papers from the fourteenth regional meeting of the Chicago linguistics society, 457–471. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar

Touratier, Christian. 1994. Syntaxe latine. Louvain: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

Van Peteghem, Marleen. 1991. Les phrases copulatives dans les langues romanes. Wilhemsfeld: Egert.Search in Google Scholar