Handling contention resolution and congestion control in optical burst switching (OBS) for 5G networks
-
Amit Kumar Garg
Abstract
Optical Burst Switching (OBS) is emerging as a promising framework for the next wave of high-speed transport networks, but it does face significant challenges like burst contention and network congestion that can compromise performance. This paper presents the Adaptive Contention Resolution Protocol (ACRP), which merges proactive and reactive strategies to address these issues. The protocol’s performance has been evaluated through comprehensive simulations on the NSFNET topology. The results reveal that proposed ACRP outshines in comparison to traditional techniques like Just-Enough-Time (JET) with Tail-Drop and Basic Deflection Routing, achieving as much as a 40% reduction in Burst Loss Probability (BLP) and a 30% enhancement in average end-to-end delay under heavy load. These findings highlight the importance of adaptive solutions for the resilience of future optical transport networks.
Acknowledgments
NSFNET for Simulations.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: No conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Data availability: Not applicable.
References
1. Xu, L, Perros, HG, Rouskas, G. Techniques for optical packet switching and optical burst switching. IEEE Commun Mag 2001;39:136–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/35.894388.Search in Google Scholar
2. Chen, Y, Qiao, C, Yu, X. Optical burst switching: a new area in optical networking research. IEEE Network 2004;18:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/mnet.2004.1301018.Search in Google Scholar
3. Farahmand, F, Vokkarane, VM, Jue, JP. Practical priority-based segmentation for optical burst switched networks. Proceedings of the IEEE global communications conference (GLOBECOM). Dallas, TX, USA; 2004. p. 1817–21.Search in Google Scholar
4. Li, Y, Shen, G, Peng, L. Toward energy-efficient optical burst switching networks with limited FDLs. J Lightwave Technol2016;34:3419–29.Search in Google Scholar
5. Wang, SY, Chen, HW. A hybrid contention resolution mechanism for optical burst switching networks. J Lightwave Technol2017;35:1920–31.Search in Google Scholar
6. Venkatesh, T, Patel, AN, Murthy, CSR. A reinforcement learning framework for path selection and wavelength assignment in optical burst switched networks. IEEE J Sel Area Commun 2020;38:2452–65.Search in Google Scholar
7. Al-Gailani, MDA. A survey of optical burst switching in software-defined optical networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 2021;23:2379–405.Search in Google Scholar
8. da Silva, RMLR, Drummond, AC. A reinforcement learning-based deflection routing for optical burst-switched networks. IEEE Commun Lett 2021;25:2023–7.Search in Google Scholar
9. Guo, Z. Intelligent route planning in OBS networks using deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking 2022;8:1024–37.Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
