Abstract
Underwater visible light communication (VLC) systems are increasingly considered as a promising alternative for communication in aquatic environments due to their high data rates and low latency. However, the performance of VLC systems in underwater environments is significantly affected by factors such as distance and salinity level, leading to channel impairments that must be accurately estimated for reliable communication. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for channel estimation in underwater VLC (UVLC) systems, where the channel model is assumed to follow a log-normal distribution based on the distance and salinity level of the water. We leverage the power of deep learning, specifically a deep neural network with Q-layers, to estimate the channel conditions dynamically. The Q-layers enable the network to model the nonlinearities inherent in the channel estimation problem, providing robust performance even in the presence of varying environmental conditions. Our results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves superior performance compared to traditional estimation techniques, offering a significant improvement in the reliability and accuracy of underwater VLC systems. Simulation results show that the proposed Q-network-based estimator achieves up to 31 % lower NMSE than ChanEstNet under high turbulence (distance >15 m), and improves BER performance by nearly 18 % in long-distance UVLC conditions.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank their institutes for their support and assistance during the course of this study.
-
Research ethics: This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: [Author 1 and 2]: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft, [Author 3]: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – Review and Editing, All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: The authors declare that no generative AI or machine learning tools were used for the generation of data, figures, or analysis in this study.
-
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Data availability: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
1. Salama, WM, Moustafa, HA. Improved channel estimation for underwater wireless optical communication OFDM systems by combining deep learning and machine learning models. Opt Quant Electron 2025;57:1–21.10.1007/s11082-025-08090-7Search in Google Scholar
2. Mou, Y, Liu, S. Channel estimation for underwater visible light communication: a sparse learning perspective. Rome: IEEE; 2023. p. 943–8. 2023 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops).10.1109/ICCWorkshops57953.2023.10283706Search in Google Scholar
3. Ma, X, Yang, F, Liu, S, Song, J. Channel estimation for wideband underwater visible light communication: a compressive sensing perspective. Opt Express 2018;26:311–21. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.26.000311.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Yaseen, M, El-Far, S, Ikki, S. Machine learning-based channel estimation in visible light communication with signal-dependent noise. Abu Dhabi: IEEE; 2024. p. 263–7.2024 IEEE Middle East Conference on Communications and Networking (MECOM).10.1109/MECOM61498.2024.10882105Search in Google Scholar
5. Turan, B, Coleri, S. Machine learning based channel modeling for vehicular visible light communication. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2021;70:9659–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2021.3107835.Search in Google Scholar
6. Asif, HM, Affan, A, Tarhuni, N, Raahemifar, K. Deep learning-based next-generation waveform for multiuser VLC systems. Sensors 2022;22:2771. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22072771.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
7. Kumar, A, Al-Kuwari, S, Jayakody, DNK, Alkanhel, R. Security performance analysis of a NOMA-assisted underwater VLC system under imprecise channel estimations. IEEE Access 2022;10:117021–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3218049.Search in Google Scholar
8. Chen, J, Jiang, M. Joint blind channel estimation, channel equalization, and data detection for underwater visible light communication systems. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters 2021;10:2664–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/lwc.2021.3111075.Search in Google Scholar
9. Bariah, L, Elamassie, M, Muhaidat, S, Sofotasios, PC, Uysal, M. Non-orthogonal multiple access-based underwater VLC systems in the presence of turbulence. IEEE Photon J 2021;14:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/jphot.2021.3138723.Search in Google Scholar
10. Kang, J, Chun, C, Kim, I. Deep-learning-based channel estimation for wireless energy transfer. IEEE Commun Lett 2018;22:2310–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcomm.2018.2871442.Search in Google Scholar
11. Balevi, E, Andrews, JG. One-bit OFDM receivers via deep learning. IEEE Trans Commun 2019;67:4326–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcomm.2019.2903811.Search in Google Scholar
12. Gao, S, Dong, P, Pan, Z, Li, GY. Deep learning-based channel estimation for massive MIMO with mixed-resolution ADCs. IEEE Commun Lett 2019;23:1989–93. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcomm.2019.2936393.Search in Google Scholar
13. Hu, Q, Gao, F, Zhang, H, Jin, S, Li, GY. Deep learning for MIMO channel estimation: interpretation, performance, and comparison. 2019;11:1–29. arXiv:1911.01918.Search in Google Scholar
14. Zhang, Y, Alrabeiah, M, Alkhateeb, A. Deep learning for massive MIMO with 1-bit ADCs: when more antennas need fewer pilots. IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. 2020;9:1273–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/lwc.2020.2987893.Search in Google Scholar
15. He, H, Wen, C, Jin, S, Li, GY. Deep learning-based channel estimation for beamspace mmWave massive MIMO systems. IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. 2018;7:852–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/lwc.2018.2832128.Search in Google Scholar
16. Chun, C, Kang, J, Kim, I. Deep learning-based channel estimation for massive MIMO systems. IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. 2019;8:1228–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/lwc.2019.2912378.Search in Google Scholar
17. Taha, A, Alrabeiah, M, Ahmed, A. Enabling large intelligent surfaces with compressive sensing and deep learning. IEEE Access 2021;9:44304–21. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3064073.Search in Google Scholar
18. Abewa, M, Hamamreh, JM. Non-coherent OFDM- subcarrier power modulation for low complexity and high throughput IoT applications. RS Open J. Innov. Commun. Technol 2020;1:1–36. https://doi.org/10.46470/03d8ffbd.2a45a9a1.Search in Google Scholar
19. Chun, C-J, Kang, J-M, Kim, I-M. Deep learning-based joint pilot design and channel estimation for multiuser MIMO channels. IEEE Commun Lett 2019;23:1999–2003. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcomm.2019.2937488.Search in Google Scholar
20. Abdavinejad, H, Mostafapour, E, Ghobadi, C, Nourinia, J, Lotfzad Pak, A. VLC turbulence effects on the performance of the fish school behavior modeling mobile diffusion adaptive networks in underwater environments. Wirel Pers Commun 2022;124:1661–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09425-9.Search in Google Scholar
21. Abdavinejad, H, Baghali, H, Ostadieh, J, Mostafapour, E, Ghobadi, C, Nourinia, J. Complete performance analysis of underwater VLC diffusion adaptive networks. 2022;9:226–41. arXiv:2206.02554.Search in Google Scholar
22. Tannaz, S, Ghobadi, C, Nourinia, J, Mostafapour, E. Theoretical analysis of the underwater incremental adaptive network performance based on the VLC technology. Wirel Pers Commun 2020;113:17–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07176-7.Search in Google Scholar
23. Elbir, AM, Mishra, KV. Online and offline deep learning strategies for channel estimation and hybrid beamforming in multi-carrier mm-Wave massive MIMO systems. 2019;1:1–15. arXiv:1912.10036.Search in Google Scholar
24. Ma, W, Qi, C, Zhang, Z, Cheng, J. Sparse channel estimation and hybrid precoding using deep learning for millimeter wave massive MIMO. IEEE Trans Commun 2020;68:2838–49. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcomm.2020.2974457.Search in Google Scholar
25. Ye, H, Liang, L, Li, GY, Juang, B-H. Deep learning-based end-to-end wireless communication systems with conditional GANs as unknown channels. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun 2020;19:3133–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/twc.2020.2970707.Search in Google Scholar
26. Ye, H, Li, GY, Juang, BH. Power of deep learning for channel estimation and signal detection in OFDM systems. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters 2017;7:114–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/lwc.2017.2757490.Search in Google Scholar
27. Gao, X, Jin, S, Wen, CK, Li, GY. ComNet: combination of deep learning and expert knowledge in OFDM receivers. IEEE Commun Lett 2018;22:2627–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcomm.2018.2877965.Search in Google Scholar
28. Soltani, M, Pourahmadi, V, Mirzaei, A, Sheikhzadeh, H. Deep learning-based channel estimation. IEEE Commun Lett 2019;23:652–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcomm.2019.2898944.Search in Google Scholar
29. Zhang, J, He, H, Wen, C, Jin, S, Li, GY. Deep learning based on orthogonal approximate message passing for CP-Free OFDM. IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), Brighton, UK; 2019.10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8682639Search in Google Scholar
30. Liao, Y, Hua, Y, Dai, X, Yao, H, Yang, X. ChanEstNet: a deep learning based channel estimation for high-speed scenarios. IEEE Int Conf Commun 2019;1–6.10.1109/ICC.2019.8761312Search in Google Scholar
31. Osvaldo, S, Umberto, S. Adaptive pilot pattern for OFDM systems. In: 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37577). New York: IEEE. 2004. vol. 2, pp. 978–982 https://doi.org/10.1109/icc.2004.1312647.Search in Google Scholar
32. Byun, J, Natarajan, NP. Adaptive pilot utilization for OFDM channel estimation in a time varying channel. IEEE 10th annual wireless and microwave technology conference, USA; 2009.10.1109/WAMICON.2009.5207292Search in Google Scholar
33. Rezgui, C, Grayaa, K. An enhanced channel estimation technique with adaptive pilot spacing for OFDM system. International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications (ISNCC), Hammamet 2016.10.1109/ISNCC.2016.7746098Search in Google Scholar
34. Rao, RM, Marojevic, V, Reed, JH. Adaptive pilot patterns for CA-OFDM systems in nonstationary wireless channels. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2018;67:1231–44. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2017.2751548.Search in Google Scholar
35. OM Elbadri and AS Elbarsha, “Kalman-Filter channel estimator for OFDM system in time-varying channel,” Univ. Benghazi-Al-Adab J, 23:92–5, 2016.Search in Google Scholar
36. Hung, K-C, Lin, DW. Pilot-based LMMSE channel estimation for OFDM systems with power-delay profile approximation. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2010;59:150–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2009.2029862.Search in Google Scholar
37. Rahman, MH, Sejan, MAS, Aziz, MA, Baik, J-I, Kim, D-S, Song, H-K. Deep learning based improved cascaded channel estimation and signal detection for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces-assisted MU-MISO systems. IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking 2023;7:1515–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgcn.2023.3237132.Search in Google Scholar
38. Ravikumar, CV, Ravikumar, C. Developing novel channel estimation and hybrid precoding in millimeter-wave communication system using heuristic-based deep learning. Energy 2023;268:126600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126600.Search in Google Scholar
39. Wu, X, Huang, Z, Ji, Y. Deep neural network method for channel estimation in visible light communication. Opt Commun 2020;462:125272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2020.125272.Search in Google Scholar
40. Salama, WM, Aly, MH, Amer, ES. Deep learning-based channel estimation optimization in VLC systems. Opt Quant Electron 2023;55:79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-022-04363-7.Search in Google Scholar
41. Elamassie, M, Miramirkhani, F, Uysal, M. Performance characterization of underwater visible light communication. IEEE Trans Commun 2018;67:543–52. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcomm.2018.2867498.Search in Google Scholar
42. Elamassie, M, Geldard, C, Popoola, W. Underwater Visible Light Communication (UVLC). In: Handbook of Radio and Optical Networks Convergence. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2024:1–36 pp.10.1007/978-981-33-4999-5_62-1Search in Google Scholar
43. Hamidnejad, E, Gholami, A. Developing a comprehensive model for underwater MIMO OCC system. Opt Express 2023;31:31870–83. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.499897.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
44. Liu, S, Mou, Y, Zhang, H. Block-Sparse learning enabled approach towards efficient channel estimation for underwater visible light communications. In: 2024 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC). Chicago: IEEE; 2024:1166–70 pp.10.1109/IWCMC61514.2024.10592451Search in Google Scholar
45. Elamassie, M. Path selection in parallel multihop UVLC systems over turbulence channels. IEEE J Ocean Eng 2024;14:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/joe.2024.3360532.Search in Google Scholar
46. Elamassie, M, Uysal, M. Vertical underwater VLC links over cascaded gamma-gamma turbulence channels with pointing errors. Abu Dhabi: IEEE; 2019. p. 1–5. 2019 IEEE International Black Sea Conference on Communications and Networking. (BlackSeaCom).10.1109/BlackSeaCom.2019.8812811Search in Google Scholar
47. Tannaz, S, Ghobadi, C, Nourinia, J, Mostafapour, E. The node distance effects on the performance of the underwater VLC incremental adaptive networks. J Mod Opt 2019;66:2093–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340.2019.1694711.Search in Google Scholar
48. Elamassie, M, F Miramirkhani, and M Uysal. “Channel modeling and performance characterization of underwater visible light communications.” In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), pp. 1–5. Sochi: IEEE, 2018.10.1109/ICCW.2018.8403731Search in Google Scholar
49. Hochreiter, S, Schmidhuber, J. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 1997;9:1735–80. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
50. Gu, J, Shan, C, Chen, X, Yin, H, Wang, W. A novel pilot-aided channel estimation scheme based on RNN for FDD-LTE systems. 10th international conference on wireless communications and signal processing (WCSP), Hangzhou, China; 2018.10.1109/WCSP.2018.8555634Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston