DehazeNet-assisted fog removal and channel estimation for robust visible light V2V communication
-
Mohit Kumar Srivastava
,
Rakesh Ranjan
Abstract
In foggy weather conditions, road visibility is drastically reduced, significantly increasing the risk of head-on vehicle collisions. This paper proposes a vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication system based on visible light communication (VLC), enhanced by a deep neural network (DNN) that estimates and corrects the channel degradation caused by fog. Traditional channel models based on physical parameters often fail under highly dynamic foggy scenarios. To address this limitation, we introduce a DehazeNet-based framework that leverages real-time camera input to extract fog characteristics and estimate the attenuation effects on the VLC channel. DehazeNet, originally designed for single image haze removal, is adapted to model and correct signal path loss due to fog-induced scattering and absorption. This enables real-time compensation of visual and communication degradation, improving both signal integrity and object visibility for vehicle detection. A time-to-collision (TTC) metric is computed from the estimated inter-vehicle distances to trigger timely warnings. At a moderate fog visibility level of 50 m, the original system shows a TTC of 1.08 s at 42 m, while the fog-suppressed system improves this to 1.40 s at 54.47 m. Thus, simulation results demonstrate that the DehazeNet-based compensation significantly enhances the effective range and accuracy of V2V communication in foggy environments, enabling earlier collision warnings and contributing to improved road safety.
-
Research ethics: NA.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: Only use of the grammatical corrections and sentence improvement.
-
Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Data availability: Not applicable.
References
1. Siddiqi, K, Raza, AD, Sheikh Muhammad, S. Visible light communication for V2V intelligent transport system. In: 2016 International conference on broadband communications for next generation networks and multimedia applications (CoBCom). IEEE; 2016: 1–4 pp.10.1109/COBCOM.2016.7593510Search in Google Scholar
2. Kinoshita, M, Yamazato, T, Okada, H, Fujii, T, Arai, S, Yendo, T, et al.. Motion modeling of mobile transmitter for image sensor based I2V-VLC, V2I-VLC, and V2V-VLC. In: 2014 IEEE Globecom workshops (GC Wkshps). IEEE; 2014:450–5 pp.10.1109/GLOCOMW.2014.7063473Search in Google Scholar
3. Meucci, M, Seminara, M, Nawaz, T, Caputo, S, Mucchi, L, Catani, J. Bidirectional vehicle-to-vehicle communication system based on VLC: outdoor tests and performance analysis. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst 2021;23:11465–75. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2021.3104498. Search in Google Scholar
4. Hasnawi, A, Rasha, Marghescu, I, and Rusu-Casandra, A. Reliability and capacity evaluation for vehicle-to-vehicle VLC. In: 2024 15th International conference on communications (COMM). IEEE; 2024:1-6 pp.10.1109/COMM62355.2024.10741390Search in Google Scholar
5. Zhou, H, Chen, Z, Li, Q, Tao, T. Dehaze-UNet: a lightweight network based on UNet for single-image dehazing. Electronics 2024;13:2082. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13112082.Search in Google Scholar
6. Sikder, P, Rahman, MT, and Bakibillah, ASM. Advancements and challenges of visible light communication in intelligent transportation systems: a comprehensive review. In: Photonics. MDPI AG;12:225 p. 2025.10.3390/photonics12030225Search in Google Scholar
7. Giraldo, LM, Perez Soler, J, Botella-Mascarell, C, Juan, VG, Roger Varea, S, Torres, JM, et al.. VLC positioning in low data rate for V2V communication. In: Proceedings of the 12th Euro American conference on telematics and information systems; 2024:1–7 pp.10.1145/3685243.3685253Search in Google Scholar
8. Chaabna, A, Babouri, A, Chouabia, H, Hafsi, T, Meguetta, ZE, Zhang, X. Experimental demonstration of V2V communication system based on VLC technology for smart transportation. In: Artificial intelligence and heuristics for smart energy efficiency in smart cities: case study. Tipasa, Algeria: Springer International Publishing; 2022:653–61 pp.10.1007/978-3-030-92038-8_65Search in Google Scholar
9. Liu, W, He, X. Performance analysis of MIMO visible light based V2V communications. In: 2019 IEEE 89th Vehicular technology conference (VTC2019-Spring). IEEE; 2019:1–4 pp.10.1109/VTCSpring.2019.8746568Search in Google Scholar
10. Dixit, AK, Pandey, R. Integrating visible light communication into vehicle-to-vehicle systems: a detailed overview. Int J Intell Commun Comput Sci 2024;2:39–56.Search in Google Scholar
11. Mishra, S, Maheshwari, R, Grover, J, Vaishnavi, V. Investigating the performance of a vehicular communication system based on visible light communication (VLC). Int J Inf Technol 2022:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-021-00834-4.Search in Google Scholar
12. Hasnawi, A, Rasha, NM, Rusu-Casandra, A. Influence of channel modeling and atmospheric conditions on the reliability and capacity of V2V-VLC systems. In: 2024 15th International conference on communications (COMM). IEEE; 2024:1–6 pp.10.1109/COMM62355.2024.10741462Search in Google Scholar
13. Kumar, A. Performance analysis of V2V visible light communication systems under diverse scenarios. J Opt Commun 2024. https://doi.org/10.1515/joc-2024-0189.Search in Google Scholar
14. Sharda, P. Next generation based vehicular visible light communications: a novel transmission scheme. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2024;73:16735–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2024.3417479.Search in Google Scholar
15. Arafa, NA, Abd El-atty, SM, Arafa, MS. Performance analysis of NOMA system with imperfect SIC-based infrastructure-to-vehicle visible light communication. J Opt 2024:1–11.10.1007/s12596-024-01781-6Search in Google Scholar
16. Saikrishnan, S, Singh, P, Singh, A, Srivastava, A. Hybrid RF-VLC technology for V2X in platooning applications under different weather conditions. In: 2024 IEEE Wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC). IEEE; 2024:1–6 pp.10.1109/WCNC57260.2024.10570908Search in Google Scholar
17. Okasha, NM, Newagy, FA. Car to car communication using RF cognitive radio with VLC common control channel. IEEE Access 2024;12:89339–52. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3419072.Search in Google Scholar
18. Deniz, A, Oztopal, M, Yuksel, H. Enhancing signal-to-noise ratio in vehicle-to-vehicle visible light communication systems through diverse LED array transmitter geometries. J Sens Actuator Netw 2024;13:69. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan13060069.Search in Google Scholar
19. Song, Y, Mo, R, Zhang, P, Wang, C, Sheng, Z, Sun, Y, et al.. VehicleTalk: lightweight V2V network enabled by optical wireless communication and sensing. In: 2024 IEEE 99th Vehicular technology conference (VTC2024-Spring). IEEE; 2024:1–5 pp.10.1109/VTC2024-Spring62846.2024.10683127Search in Google Scholar
20. Eldeeb, HB, Qaraqe, M, Muhaidat, S, Ali, G. Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces-assisted I2V-Visible light communication. In: 2024 IEEE International mediterranean conference on communications and networking (MeditCom). IEEE; 2024:465–70 pp.10.1109/MeditCom61057.2024.10621213Search in Google Scholar
21. Arafa, NA, Abd El-Att, SM, Eldeeb, HB, Arafa, MS. Deep learning-based automatic modulation format identification for I2V visible light communication. In: 2024 41st National radio science conference (NRSC). IEEE; 2024:191–9 pp.10.1109/NRSC61581.2024.10510466Search in Google Scholar
22. Srivastava, MK. VLC-based collision avoidance system for vehicles on curved roads in hilly areas. J Opt Commun 2025.10.1515/joc-2025-0132Search in Google Scholar
23. Yaseen, M, Elamassie, M, Ikki, S, Uysal, M. Signal-Dependent shot and relative intensity noise in channel estimation of Laser diode-based indoor VLC systems. IEEE Trans Commun 2024;73:498–509. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcomm.2024.3420736.Search in Google Scholar
24. Chen, H, Albert, TLL, Tan, SC, Hui, SY. Electrical and thermal effects of light-emitting diodes on signal-to-noise ratio in visible light communication. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2018;66:2785–94.10.1109/TIE.2018.2849966Search in Google Scholar
25. Srivastava, R, Bhattacharya, P, Tiwari, AK. Optical data centers router design with fiber delay lines and negative acknowledgement. J Eng Res 2020;8.Search in Google Scholar
26. Srivastava, R, Singh, RK, Singh, YN. Design analysis of optical loop memory. J Lightwave Technol 2009;27:4821–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2009.2026493.Search in Google Scholar
27. Otas, K, Pakenas, VJ, Vaskys, A, Vaskys, P. Investigation of LED light attenuation in fog. Elektron Elektrotech 2012;121:47–52. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.eee.121.5.1651.Search in Google Scholar
28. Fattal, R. Single image dehazing. ACM Trans Graph 2008;27:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/1360612.1360671.Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
