Conflict resolution in nested transactions using ConvLTSM and Crow search algorithm in distributed optical data center databases with fiber delay lines and load balancing
-
Meenu
and
Udai Shanker
Abstract
This paper addresses the issue of conflict resolution in nested transactions within distributed databases of optical data centers, where efficient data processing and management are crucial. We propose a novel approach using conflict resolution in nested transactions via ConvLTSM (Convolutional long short-term memory) along with the Crow
Search algorithm (CSA) for optimizing database performance. A key component of our approach is the integration of fiber delay lines (FDLs), which play a critical role in enhancing system efficiency by minimizing overall delays and ensuring optimal resource utilization. The use of FDLs helps in controlling the timing of data transmission, ensuring that transactions are processed in a timely manner, and reducing bottlenecks within the system. The incorporation of FDLs along with load balancing techniques significantly improves the throughput of nested transactions, reduces latency, and ensures consistency across the distributed system. By optimizing the timing and distribution of transaction data, FDLs facilitate better resource management, leading to more efficient and reliable database operations. Our experimental results, with a load of 0.6 and a buffering of 10, show that the transaction loss probability is 7.27 × 10−5 and the average delay is 1.54 slots. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in mitigating conflicts, improving data integrity, and optimizing the performance of optical data centers.
Acknowledgments
The AI tool is used for English corrections. AI tool is NOT used in designing or methodlogy.
-
Research ethics: Research Ethics are followed.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: All authors equally contribute to the manuscript.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: The LLM is used for the refinement of usage of English and Grammer.
-
Conflict of interests: No.
-
Research funding: No.
-
Data availability: No data used in the preparation of the manuscript.
References
1. Sunkara, JR, Ramdas, SR, Madhavaram, CR, Galla, EP, Gollangi, HK. Optimizing cloud computing performance with advanced DBMS techniques: a comparative study. J ReAtt Ther Dev Divers. Green Publication 2023;3206. https://doi.org/10.53555/jrtdd.v6i10s.Search in Google Scholar
2. Cheng, Q, Bahadori, M, Glick, M, Rumley, S, Bergman, K. Recent advances in optical technologies for data centers: a review. Optica 2018;5:1354–70. https://doi.org/10.1364/optica.5.001354.Search in Google Scholar
3. SaiSindhuTheja, R, Shyam, GK. An efficient metaheuristic algorithm based feature selection and recurrent neural network for DoS attack detection in cloud computing environment. Appl Soft Comput 2021;100:106997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106997.Search in Google Scholar
4. Chaudhry, N, Murtaza Yousaf, M. Concurrency control for real‐time and mobile transactions: historical view, challenges, and evolution of practices. Concurrency Comput Pract Ex 2022;34:e6549. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.6549.Search in Google Scholar
5. Moishin, M, Deo, RC, Prasad, R, Raj, N, Abdulla, S. Designing deep-based learning flood forecast model with ConvLSTM hybrid algorithm. IEEE Access 2021;9:50982–93. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3065939.Search in Google Scholar
6. Hussien, AG, Mohamed, A, Wang, M, Liang, G, Ahmed, A, Gumaei, A, et al.. Crow search algorithm: theory, recent advances, and applications. IEEE Access 2020;8:173548–65. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3024108.Search in Google Scholar
7. Srivastava, R, Singh, YN. Feedback fiber delay lines and AWG based optical packet switch architecture. Opt Switch Netw 2010;7:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osn.2010.01.002.Search in Google Scholar
8. Shukla, MP, Keswani, P, Keswani, B. Artificial neural network based load balancing scheme for top of rack switches in optical data centers. J Opt Commun 2025;45:2019–28. https://doi.org/10.1515/joc-2023-0189.Search in Google Scholar
9. Jogin, M, Madhulika, MS, Divya, GD, Meghana, RK, Apoorva, S. Feature extraction using convolution neural networks (CNN) and deep learning. In: 2018 3rd IEEE international conference on recent trends in electronics, information & communication technology (RTEICT). Bangalore, India: IEEE; 2018:2319–23 pp.10.1109/RTEICT42901.2018.9012507Search in Google Scholar
10. Sherstinsky, A. Fundamentals of recurrent neural network (RNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) network. Phys Nonlinear Phenom 2020;404:132306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2019.132306.Search in Google Scholar
11. Askarzadeh, A. A novel metaheuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: crow search algorithm. Comput Struct 2016;169:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.03.001.Search in Google Scholar
12. Samieiyan, B, MohammadiNasab, P, Abbas Mollaei, M, Hajizadeh, F, Kangavari, M. Novel optimized crow search algorithm for feature selection. Expert Syst Appl 2022;204:117486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117486.Search in Google Scholar
13. Shukla, U, Singhal, N, Srivastava, R. A large-capacity optical switch design for high-speed optical data centers. J Opt Commun 2024;44:s1777–83. https://doi.org/10.1515/joc-2019-0217.Search in Google Scholar
14. Bhattacharya, P, Singh, A, Tiwari, AK, Pathak, VK, Srivastava, R. DbOBS: dual buffered switch for variable optical bursts in future datacenters. Opt Quant Electron 2021;53:235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-021-02899-8.Search in Google Scholar
15. Srivastava, R, Bhattacharya, P, Tiwari, AK. Dual buffers optical based packet switch incorporating arrayed waveguide gratings. J Eng Res 2019;7.10.1016/S2307-1877(25)00806-5Search in Google Scholar
16. Bryhni, H, Klovning, E, Kure, O. A comparison of load balancing techniques for scalable web servers. IEEE Netw 2000;14:58–64. https://doi.org/10.1109/65.855480.Search in Google Scholar
17. Devine, KD, Boman, EG, Heaphy, RT, Hendrickson, BA, Teresco, JD, Faik, J, et al.. New challenges in dynamic load balancing. Appl Numer Math 2005;52:133–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnum.2004.08.028.Search in Google Scholar
18. Neghabi, AA, Jafari Navimipour, N, Hosseinzadeh, M, Ali, R. Load balancing mechanisms in the software defined networks: a systematic and comprehensive review of the literature. IEEE Access 2018;6:14159–78. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2805842.Search in Google Scholar
19. Pourghebleh, B, Hayyolalam, V. A comprehensive and systematic review of the load balancing mechanisms in the Internet of Things. Clust Comput 2020;23:641–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-019-02950-0.Search in Google Scholar
20. Zhao, L, R Xu, T Wang, T Tian, X Wang, W Wu, et al.. BaPipe: exploration of balanced pipeline parallelism for DNN training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.12544 2020.Search in Google Scholar
21. Rikhtegar, N, Bushehrian, O, Keshtgari, M. DeepRLB: a deep reinforcement learning‐based load balancing in data center networks. Int J Commun Syst 2021;34:e4912. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.4912.Search in Google Scholar
22. Liu, Q, Xia, T, Cheng, L, Van Eijk, M, Ozcelebi, T, Mao, Y. Deep reinforcement learning for load-balancing aware network control in IoT edge systems. IEEE Trans Parallel Distr Syst 2021;33:1491–502. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpds.2021.3116863.Search in Google Scholar
23. Xu, Y, Mohammed, T, Di Francesco, M, Fischione, C. Distributed assignment with load balancing for dnn inference at the edge. IEEE Internet Things J 2022;10:1053–65. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2022.3205410.Search in Google Scholar
24. Ye, Q, Zhou, Y, Shi, M, Sun, Y, Lv, J. DLB: a dynamic load balance strategy for distributed training of deep neural networks. IEEE Trans Emerg Top Comput Intell 2022;7:1217–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/tetci.2022.3220224.Search in Google Scholar
25. Liu, Y, Li, W, Qu, W, Qi, H. BULB: lightweight and automated load balancing for fast datacenter networks. In: Proceedings of the 51st international conference on parallel processing. Bordeaux France: Association for Computing Machinery New York NY United States; 2022:1–11 pp.10.1145/3545008.3545021Search in Google Scholar
26. Shukla, MP, Keswani, P. Congestion control in high-speed optical data center networks. Int J Inf Technol 2023;15:1481–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-023-01199-6.Search in Google Scholar
27. Chen, X, Xie, X, Teng, D. Short-term traffic flow prediction based on ConvLSTM model. In: 2020 IEEE 5th information technology and mechatronics engineering conference (ITOEC). Chongqing, China: IEEE; 2020:846–50 pp.10.1109/ITOEC49072.2020.9141783Search in Google Scholar
28. Meraihi, Y, Gabis, AB, Ramdane-Cherif, A, Acheli, D. A comprehensive survey of Crow Search Algorithm and its applications. Artif Intell Rev 2021;54:2669–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09911-9.Search in Google Scholar
29. Gers, FA, Schmidhuber, J, Cummins, F. Learning to forget: continual prediction with LSTM. Neural Comput 2000;12:2451–71. https://doi.org/10.1162/089976600300015015.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
