Review of fibreless optical communication technology: history, evolution, and emerging trends

References

1. Majumdar, A, Ghassemlooy, Z, Raj, A. Principles and applications of free space optical (FSO) communication. London: IET; 2019.10.1049/PBTE078ESearch in Google Scholar

2. Khalighi, MA, Uysal, M. Survey on free space optical communication: a communication theory perspective. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 2014;16:2231–58. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2014.2329501.Search in Google Scholar

3. History of free space optics. Available from: http://precog.iiitd.edu.in/people/anupama [Accessed May 2013].Search in Google Scholar

4. Huurdeman, AA. The worldwide history of telecommunications. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2003.10.1002/0471722243Search in Google Scholar

5. Raj, AB, Majumder, AK. Historical perspective of free space optical communications: from the early dates to today’s developments. IET Commun 2019;13:2405–19. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2019.0051.Search in Google Scholar

6. Hutt, DL, Snell, KJ, Bélanger, PA. Alexander Graham Bell’s photophone. Opt Photonics News 1993;4:20–5. https://doi.org/10.1364/opn.4.6.000020.Search in Google Scholar

7. Groth, M. Photophones revisited. Available from: http://www.bluehaze.com.au/modlight/GrothArticle1.htm [Accessed May 1987].Search in Google Scholar

8. Goodwin, FE. A review of operational laser communication systems. Proc IEEE 1970;58:1746–52. https://doi.org/10.1109/proc.1970.7998.Search in Google Scholar

9. Begley, DL. Free-space laser communications: a historical perspective. In: The 15th Annual Meeting of the IEEE Lasers and Electro-Optics Society. IEEE; 2002, vol 2. pp. 391–2.10.1109/LEOS.2002.1159343Search in Google Scholar

10. Son, IK, Mao, S. A survey of free space optical networks. Digit Commun Netw 2017;3:67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2016.11.002.Search in Google Scholar

11. Free space optics (FSO) and visible light communication (VLC)/light fidelity (Li-Fi) market by component, transmission type, application | COVID-19 impact analysis. Available from: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/visible-light-communication-market-946.html.Search in Google Scholar

12. Deep space optical communications (dsoc). Available from: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/tdm/dsoc/index.html.Search in Google Scholar

13. Tolker-Nielsen, T, Oppenhauser, G. In-orbit test result of an operational optical intersatellite link between Artemis and SPOT4, Silex. In: Free-Space Laser Communication Technologies XIV. International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2002, vol. 4635:1–15 pp.10.1117/12.464105Search in Google Scholar

14. Kazaura, K, Omae, K, Suzuki, T, Matsumoto, M, Mutafungwa, E, Murakami, T, et al.. Performance evaluation of next generation free-space optical communication system. IEICE Trans Electron 2007;90:381–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ietele/e90-c.2.381.Search in Google Scholar

15. Raj, AB, Sharma, V, Banerjee, S. Principle and applications of free space optical communication. London: IET; 2019.Search in Google Scholar

16. Raj, AAB, Selvi, AJV, Durai, KD, Singaravelu, RS. Intensity feedback-based beam wandering mitigation in free-space optical communication using neural control technique. EURASIP J Wirel Commun Netw 2014;1:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1499-2014-160.Search in Google Scholar

17. Ali, MAA, Baqi, ZH, Rahi, SK. On the performance of free space optical communication link over dust environment. AIP Conf Proc 2020;2213:020105. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000241.Search in Google Scholar

18. De, S, Raj, AB. Experimental study of sand-storm effect on digital FSO communication link. In: 2020 International Conference on Recent Trends on Electronics, Information, Communication and Technology (RTEICT). IEEE; 2020:35–40 pp.10.1109/RTEICT49044.2020.9315587Search in Google Scholar

19. Rifat, MA, Majumder, S, et al.. Performance evaluation of a free space optical (FSO) communication system impaired by atmospheric effects. In: 2015 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Information Communication Technology (ICEEICT). IEEE; 2015:1–6 pp.10.1109/ICEEICT.2015.7307470Search in Google Scholar

20. Raj, AAB, Lancelot, J. Seasonal investigation on prediction accuracy of atmospheric turbulence strength with a new model at Punalkulam, Tamil Nadu. J Opt Technol 2016;83:55–68. https://doi.org/10.1364/jot.83.000055.Search in Google Scholar

21. Shaker, FK, Ali, MAA. Multi-beam free-space optical link to mitigation of rain attenuation. J Opt Commun 2018;42:235–40. https://doi.org/10.1515/joc-2018-0015.Search in Google Scholar

22. Kaur, G, Singh, H, Sappal, AS. Free space optical using different modulation techniques–a review. Int J Eng Trends Technol 2017;43:109–15. https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/ijett-v43p218.Search in Google Scholar

23. Kumar, A, Krishnan, P. Performance analysis of ROFSO links with spatial diversity over combined channel model for 5G in smart city applications. Opt Commun 2020;466:125600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2020.125600.Search in Google Scholar

24. Căilean, A-M, Dimian, M. Current challenges for visible light communications usage in vehicle applications: a survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 2017;19:2681–703. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2017.2706940.Search in Google Scholar

25. Darusalam, U, Raj, AB, Zulkifli, FY, Priambodo, PS, Rahardjo, ET. Performance of free-space optical communication systems using optical amplifiers under amplify-forward and amplify-received configurations. Makara J Technol 2020;24:117–24. https://doi.org/10.7454/mst.v24i3.3648.Search in Google Scholar

26. Li, L, Geng, T, Wang, Y, Li, X, Wu, J, Li, Y, et al.. Free-space optical communication using coherent detection and double adaptive detection thresholds. IEEE Photonics J 2018;11:1–17.10.1109/JPHOT.2018.2885542Search in Google Scholar

27. Barua, B, Majumder, S. FDM FSO communication system with coherent heterodyne optical receiver under strong turbulent condition. J Opt 2020;49:291–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-020-00637-z.Search in Google Scholar

28. Raj, AAB, Selvi, JAV, Kumar, D. Low cost BER measurement in wireless digital laser communication link with autonomous beam steering system. ICWCSC 2010:1–6.10.1109/ICWCSC.2010.5415900Search in Google Scholar

29. Raj, AAB, Padmavathi, S. Quality metrics and reliability analysis of laser communication system. Defence Sci J 2016;66:175–85. https://doi.org/10.14429/dsj.66.9707.Search in Google Scholar

30. Hamza, AS, Deogun, JS, Alexander, DR. Classification framework for free space optical communication links and systems. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 2018;21:1346–82.10.1109/COMST.2018.2876805Search in Google Scholar

31. ArockiaBazilRaj, A, Darusalam, U. Performance improvement of terrestrial free-space optical communications by mitigating the focal-spot wandering. J Mod Opt 2016;63:2339–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340.2016.1200684.Search in Google Scholar

32. Raj, AB, Sharma, V, Banerjee, S. Quantum-based satellite free space optical communication and microwave photonics, principles and applications of free space optical communications. IET Telecommunications series, 78; 2019.10.1049/PBTE078E_ch15Search in Google Scholar

33. Leitgeb, E, Gebhart, M, Birnbacher, U. Optical networks, last mile access and applications. In: Free-space laser communications. Berlin: Springer; 2005:273–302 pp.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-28677-8_6.Search in Google Scholar

34. Majumdar, AK, Ricklin, JC. Free-space laser communications: principles and advances. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 2010, vol 2.Search in Google Scholar

35. Willebrand, H, Ghuman, BS. Free space optics: enabling optical connectivity in today’s networks. Indianapolis: SAMS Publishing; 2002.Search in Google Scholar

36. Zhu, X, Kahn, JM. Free-space optical communication through atmospheric turbulence channels. IEEE Trans Commun 2002;50:1293–300. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcomm.2002.800829.Search in Google Scholar

37. Wu, X, Soltani, MD, Zhou, L, Safari, M, Haas, H. Hybrid Li-Fi and Wi-Fi networks: a survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 2021;23:1398–420. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2021.3058296.Search in Google Scholar

38. Pathak, PH, Feng, X, Hu, P, Mohapatra, P. Visible light communication, networking, and sensing: a survey, potential and challenges. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 2015;17:2047–77. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2015.2476474.Search in Google Scholar

39. Komine, T, Nakagawa, M. Fundamental analysis for visible-light communication system using led lights. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 2004;50:100–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/tce.2004.1277847.Search in Google Scholar

40. Lee, S, Kwon, J, Jung, S, Kwon, Y. Simulation modeling of visible light communication channel for automotive applications. In: 2012 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. IEEE; 2012:463–8 pp.10.1109/ITSC.2012.6338610Search in Google Scholar

41. Viñals, R, Muñoz, O, Agustín, A, Vidal, J. Multi-user precoder designs for RGB visible light communication systems. Sensors 2020;20:6836.10.3390/s20236836Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

42. Touhami, R, Slimani, D, Khelil, A. Analysis of an OFDM based indoor visible light communication system. In: 2018 International Conference on Communications and Electrical Engineering (ICCEE). IEEE; 2018:1–4 pp.10.1109/CCEE.2018.8634433Search in Google Scholar

43. Vučić, J, Kottke, C, Habel, K, Langer, K-D. 803 mbit/s visible light WDM link based on DMT modulation of a single RGB led luminary. In: 2011 Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exposition and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference. IEEE; 2011:1–3 pp.10.1364/OFC.2011.OWB6Search in Google Scholar

44. Vucic, J, Kottke, C, Nerreter, S, Habel, K, Buttner, A, Langer, K-D, et al.. 125 mbit/s over 5 m wireless distance by use of ook-modulated phosphorescent white leds. In: 2009 35th European Conference on Optical Communication. IEEE; 2009:1–2 pp.Search in Google Scholar

45. Kottke, C, Habel, K, Grobe, L, Hilt, J, del Rosal, LF, Paraskevopoulos, A, et al.. Single-channel wireless transmission at 806 mbit/s using a white-light led and a pin-based receiver. In: 2012 14th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON). IEEE; 2012:1–4 pp.10.1109/ICTON.2012.6253882Search in Google Scholar

46. Borogovac, T, Rahaim, MB, Tuganbayeva, M, Little, TD. “Lights-off” visible light communications. In: 2011 IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops (GC Workshops). IEEE; 2011:797–801 pp.Search in Google Scholar

47. Cossu, G, Khalid, A, Choudhury, P, Corsini, R, Ciaramella, E. 3.4 gbit/s visible optical wireless transmission based on RGB led. Opt Exp 2012;20:B501–6. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.20.00b501.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

48. Bian, R, Tavakkolnia, I, Haas, H. 15.73 gb/s visible light communication with off-the-shelf leds. J Lightwave Technol 2019;37:2418–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2019.2906464.Search in Google Scholar

49. Lee, SH, Ahn, K-I, Kwon, JK. Multilevel transmission in dimmable visible light communication systems. J Lightwave Technol 2013;31:3267–76. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2013.2281209.Search in Google Scholar

50. Haas, H, Yin, L, Wang, Y, Chen, C. What is LiFi? J Lightwave Technol 2015;34:1533–44.10.1109/JLT.2015.2510021Search in Google Scholar

51. Albraheem, LI, Alhudaithy, LH, Aljaser, AA, Aldhafian, MR, Bahliwah, GM. Toward designing a li-fi-based hierarchical iot architecture. IEEE Access 2018;6:40811–25. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2857627.Search in Google Scholar

52. Haas, H, Yin, L, Chen, C, Videv, S, Parol, D, Poves, E, et al.. Introduction to indoor networking concepts and challenges in lifi. J Opt Commun Netw 2020;12:A190–203. https://doi.org/10.1364/jocn.12.00a190.Search in Google Scholar

53. Lee, C, Islim, MS, Videv, S, Sparks, A, Shah, B, Rudy, P, et al.. Advanced LiFi technology: laser light. In: Light-emitting devices, materials, and applications XXIV. Washington, DC: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2020, vol 11302:1130213 p.10.1117/12.2537420Search in Google Scholar

54. Haas, H. Lifi is a paradigm-shifting 5G technology. Rev Phys 2018;3:26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revip.2017.10.001.Search in Google Scholar

55. Soni, N, Mohta, M, Choudhury, T. The looming visible light communication li-fi: an edge over Wi-Fi. In: 2016 International Conference System Modeling and Advancement In Research Trends (SMART). IEEE; 2016:201–5 pp.10.1109/SYSMART.2016.7894519Search in Google Scholar

56. Dimitrov, S, Haas, H. Principles of LED light communications: towards networked Li-Fi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015.10.1017/CBO9781107278929Search in Google Scholar

57. Abdallah, W, Krichen, D, Boudriga, N. An optical backhaul solution for lifi-based access networks. Opt Commun 2020;454:124473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2019.124473.Search in Google Scholar

58. Ghosh, D, Chatterjee, S, Kothari, V, Kumar, A, Nair, M, Lokesh, E. An application of Li-Fi based wireless communication system using visible light communication. In: International Conference on Opto-Electronics and Applied Optics (Optronix). IEEE; 2019:1–3pp.10.1109/OPTRONIX.2019.8862366Search in Google Scholar

59. Dahri, FA, Umrani, FA, Baqai, A, Mangrio, HB. Design and implementation of led–led indoor visible light communication system. Phys Commun 2020;38:100981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phycom.2019.100981.Search in Google Scholar

60. Ramirez-Aguilera, A, Luna-Rivera, J, Guerra, V, Rabadán, J, Perez-Jimenez, R, Lopez-Hernandez, FJ. A review of indoor channel modeling techniques for visible light communications. In: 2018 IEEE 10th Latin-American Conference on Communications (LATINCOM). IEEE; 2018:1–6 pp.10.1109/LATINCOM.2018.8613205Search in Google Scholar

61. Mukherjee, M. Visible light communication-a survey of potential research challenges and advancements. In: 2017 Second International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT). IEEE; 2017:1–8 pp.10.1109/ICECCT.2017.8117843Search in Google Scholar

62. Karbalayghareh, M, Miramirkhani, F, Eldeeb, HB, Kizilirmak, RC, Sait, SM, Uysal, M. Channel modelling and performance limits of vehicular visible light communication systems. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2020;69:6891–901. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2020.2993294.Search in Google Scholar

63. Shen, X, Haas, H. Vehicle to infrastructure VLC channel models. In: 2020 IEEE 91st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020-Spring). IEEE; 2020:1–5 pp.10.1109/VTC2020-Spring48590.2020.9129060Search in Google Scholar

64. Pesek, P, Zvánovec, S, Chvojka, P, Ghassemlooy, Z, Haigh, PA. Demonstration of a hybrid FSO/VLC link for the last mile and last meter networks. IEEE Photonics J 2018;11:1–7.10.1109/JPHOT.2018.2886645Search in Google Scholar

65. Le, NT, Hossain, MA, Jang, YM. A survey of design and implementation for optical camera communication. Signal Process Image Commun 2017;53:95–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.image.2017.02.001.Search in Google Scholar

66. Cahyadi, WA, Chung, YH, Ghassemlooy, Z, Hassan, NB. Optical camera communications: principles, modulations, potential and challenges. Electronics 2020;9:1339. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9091339.Search in Google Scholar

67. Akram, M, Godaliyadda, R, Ekanayake, P. Design and analysis of an optical camera communication system for underwater applications. IET Optoelectron 2020;14:10–21. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-opt.2018.5157.Search in Google Scholar

68. Yang, F, Li, S, Yang, Z, Qian, C, Gu, T. Spatial multiplexing for non-line-of-sight light-to-camera communications. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 2018;18:2660–71.10.1109/TMC.2018.2880442Search in Google Scholar

69. Hasan, MK, Le, NT, Shahjalal, M, Chowdhury, MZ, Jang, YM. Simultaneous data transmission using multilevel led in hybrid OCC/LiFi system: concept and demonstration. IEEE Commun Lett 2019;23:2296–300. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcomm.2019.2945758.Search in Google Scholar

70. Saeed, N, Guo, S, Park, K-H, Al-Naffouri, TY, Alouini, M-S. Optical camera communications: survey, use cases, challenges, and future trends. Phys Commun 2019;37:100900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phycom.2019.100900.Search in Google Scholar

71. Li, L, Zhang, R, Zhao, Z, Xie, G, Liao, P, Pang, K, et al.. High-capacity free-space optical communications between a ground transmitter and a ground receiver via a UAV using multiplexing of multiple orbital-angular-momentum beams. Sci Rep 2017;7:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17580-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

72. Raj, AAB, Selvi, JAV. Lower-order adaptive beam steering system in terrestrial free space point-to-point laser communication using fine tracking sensor. In: 2011 International Conference on Signal Processing, Communication, Computing and Networking Technologies. IEEE; 2011:699–704 pp.10.1109/ICSCCN.2011.6024641Search in Google Scholar

73. Esmail, MA, Ragheb, AM, Fathallah, HA, Altamimi, M, Alshebeili, SA. 5g-28 ghz signal transmission over hybrid all-optical FSO/RF link in dusty weather conditions. IEEE Access 2019;7:24404–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2900000.Search in Google Scholar

74. A Burlacu, Google x to bring rural India online via FSOC light beams. Available from: https://www.techtimes.com/articles/217105/20171217/google-x-to-bring-rural-india-online-via-light-beams.htm.Search in Google Scholar

75. Janyala, S. Andhra Pradesh: how technology linked far-flung villages to each other, administration. Available from: https://indianexpress.com/article/india/andhra-pradesh-how-technology-linked-far-flung-villages-to-each-other-administration-5957280/.Search in Google Scholar

76. Mirza, J, Aljohani, AJ, Raza, A, Iqbal, S, Ghafoor, S. A multi-hop free space optical link based on a regenerative relay. Alexandria Eng J 2021;61:1459–67.10.1016/j.aej.2021.06.050Search in Google Scholar

77. Karimi, M, Nasiri-Kenari, M. Free space optical communications via optical amplify-and-forward relaying. J Lightwave Technol 2011;29:242–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2010.2102003.Search in Google Scholar

78. Safari, M, Uysal, M. Relay-assisted free-space optical communication. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun 2008;7:5441–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/t-wc.2008.071352.Search in Google Scholar

79. Kashani, MA, Rad, MM, Safari, M, Uysal, M. All-optical amplify-and-forward relaying system for atmospheric channels. IEEE Commun Lett 2012;16:1684–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcomm.2012.082012.121066.Search in Google Scholar

80. Dabiri, MT, Sadough, SMS. Performance analysis of all-optical amplify and forward relaying over log-normal FSO channels. J Opt Commun Netw 2018;10:79–89. https://doi.org/10.1364/jocn.10.000079.Search in Google Scholar

81. Hemmati, H. Deep space optical communications. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2006, vol 11.10.1002/0470042419Search in Google Scholar

82. Chan, VW. Optical satellite networks. J Lightw Technol 2003;21:2811. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2003.819534.Search in Google Scholar

83. Sova, RM, Sluz, JE, Young, DW, Juarez, JC, Dwivedi, A, Demidovich, NMIII, et al.. 80 gb/s free-space optical communication demonstration between an aerostat and a ground terminal. In: Free-Space Laser Communications VI. International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2006, vol 6304:630414 p.10.1117/12.703216Search in Google Scholar

84. Hemmati, H, Biswas, A, Djordjevic, IB. Deep-space optical communications: future perspectives and applications. Proc IEEE 2011;99:2020–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2011.2160609.Search in Google Scholar

85. Lou, Y, Zhao, Y, Chen, C, Tong, S, Jiang, H, Ren, Z. Atmosphere impact and ground station selection of satellite to ground laser communication. In: Electronics, Communications and Networks IV: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Networks (CECNET IV), Beijing, China, 12–15 December 2014. CRC Press; 2015:283 p.10.1201/b18592-53Search in Google Scholar

86. Kaushal, H, Kaddoum, G. Optical communication in space: challenges and mitigation techniques. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 2016;19:57–96.10.1109/COMST.2016.2603518Search in Google Scholar

87. Ashraf, A, Zaghloul, A, Shaalan, AA, Kasban, H. Effect of fog and scintillation on performance of vertical free-space optical link from earth to low earth orbit satellite. Int J Satell Commun Netw 2021;39:294–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/sat.1390.Search in Google Scholar

88. Alshaer, N, Ismail, T, Seleem, H, Nasr, ME. Analysis of beam wander and scintillation in ground-to-satellite fso system with dpsk. In: 2019 Novel Intelligent and Leading Emerging Sciences Conference (NILES). IEEE; 2019, vol 1:5–8 pp.10.1109/NILES.2019.8909337Search in Google Scholar

89. Alshaer, N, Ismail, T, Nasr, ME. Enhancing earth-to-satellite fso system spectrum efficiency with adaptive m-ary PSK and SIMO in presence of scintillation and beam wander. AEU-Int J Electron Commun 2020;125:153366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2020.153366.Search in Google Scholar

90. Saathof, R, den Breeje, R, Klop, W, Doelman, N, Moens, T, Gruber, M, et al.. Pre-correction adaptive optics performance for a 10 km laser link. In: Free-Space Laser Communications XXXI. Washington, DC: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2019, vol 10910:109101H p.10.1117/12.2506849Search in Google Scholar

91. Zhang, S, Wang, R, Wang, Y, Mao, H, Xu, G, Cao, Z, et al.. Extending the detection and correction abilities of an adaptive optics system for free-space optical communication. Opt Commun 2021;482:126571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2020.126571.Search in Google Scholar

92. Jouhari, M, Ibrahimi, K, Tembine, H, Ben-Othman, J. Underwater wireless sensor networks: a survey on enabling technologies, localization protocols, and internet of underwater things. IEEE Access 2019;7:96879–99. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2928876.Search in Google Scholar

93. Kaushal, H, Kaddoum, G. Underwater optical wireless communication. IEEE Access 2016;4:1518–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2016.2552538.Search in Google Scholar

94. Hamza, T, Khalighi, M-A, Bourennane, S, Léon, P, Opderbecke, J. Investigation of solar noise impact on the performance of underwater wireless optical communication links. Opt Exp 2016;24:25832–45. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.24.025832.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

95. Li, C-Y, Lu, H-H, Wang, Y-C, Wang, Z-H, Su, C-W, Lu, Y-F, et al.. An 82-m 9 gb/s pam4 fso-pof-uwoc convergent system. IEEE Photonics J 2019;11:1–9.https://doi.org/10.1109/jphot.2018.2890514.Search in Google Scholar

96. Zeng, Z, Fu, S, Zhang, H, Dong, Y, Cheng, J. A survey of underwater optical wireless communications. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 2016;19:204–38.10.1109/COMST.2016.2618841Search in Google Scholar

97. Ali, MAA. Comparison of modulation techniques for underwater optical wireless communication employing apd receivers. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 2015;10:707–15. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.10.2481.Search in Google Scholar

98. Sun, X, Kang, CH, Kong, M, Alkhazragi, O, Guo, Y, Ouhssain, M, et al.. A review on practical considerations and solutions in underwater wireless optical communication. J Lightwave Technol 2020;38:421–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2019.2960131.Search in Google Scholar

99. Shen, C. Laser-based high bit-rate visible light communications and underwater optical wireless network. In: 2020 Photonics North (PN). IEEE; 2020:1 p.10.1109/PN50013.2020.9166987Search in Google Scholar

100. Wei, W, Zhang, C, Zhang, W, Jiang, W, Shu, C, Xiaorui, Q. Led-based underwater wireless optical communication for small mobile platforms: experimental channel study in highly-turbid lake water. IEEE Access 2020;8:169304–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3020947.Search in Google Scholar

101. Adnan, SA, Ali, MA, Kadhim, AC, Sadeq, M, Riaz, M. Investigating the performance of underwater wireless optical communication with intensity modulation direct detection technique. In: Optical Nanostructures and Advanced Materials for Photovoltaics. Optical Society of America; 2017:JW5A–14 pp.10.1364/PV.2017.JW5A.14Search in Google Scholar

102. Mikhlif, HM, Ali, MAA, Saleh, ZA. Underwater wireless optical communication: a case study of chlorophyll effect. J Opt Commun 2023;44:s1365–70. https://doi.org/10.1515/joc-2020-0139.Search in Google Scholar

103. Ali, MAA, Rahi, SK. Line of sight (LOS) underwater wireless optical communication based on LED. In: 2018 9th International Symposium on Telecommunications (IST). IEEE; 2018:270–4 pp.10.1109/ISTEL.2018.8660998Search in Google Scholar

104. Nasser, AG, Ali, MAA. Performance of led for line-of-sight (los) underwater wireless optical communication system. J Opt Commun 2023;44:s1355–63. https://doi.org/10.1515/joc-2020-0132.Search in Google Scholar

105. Ali, MAA, Shaker, FK, Kadhum, HA. Investigation and analysis of data rate for free space optical communications system under dust conditions. Wireless Pers Commun 2020;113:2327–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07328-9.Search in Google Scholar

106. AL-Deen, MB, Ali, MAA, Saleh, ZA. Theoretical investigation of multiple input–multiple output (MIMO) technique for line of sight (LOS) underwater wireless optical communications system. J Opt Commun 2021.10.1515/joc-2020-0297Search in Google Scholar

107. AL-Deen, MB, Ali, MAA, Saleh, ZA. Improving the optical link for UVLC using MIMO technique. J Opt Commun 2023;44:s1671–80. https://doi.org/10.1515/joc-2021-0050.Search in Google Scholar

108. Al-Deen, MB, Ali, MAA, Saleh, ZA. Analyzing of UVLC system considering the effect of water depth. J Opt Commun 2023;44:s1637–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/joc-2021-0030.Search in Google Scholar

109. Magidi, S, Jabeena, A. Review on wavelength division multiplexing free space optics. J Opt Commun 2018. https://doi.org/10.1515/joc-2017-0197.Search in Google Scholar

110. Robinson, S, Jasmine, S, Pavithra, R. Investigation on hybrid WDM (DWDM+CWDM) free space optical communication system. ICTACT J Commun Technol 2015;6.Search in Google Scholar

111. Mohammad, AB. Optimization of FSO system in tropical weather using multiple beams In: 2014 IEEE 5th International Conference on Photonics (ICP). IEEE; 2014:109–12 pp.10.1109/ICP.2014.7002326Search in Google Scholar

112. Biswas, SK, Biswas, P, Akhtar, J, Reja, MI. Estimation of link range and bit rate for 16 channel wdm-fso considering atmospheric turbulence and pointing error under various weather conditions. In: 2017 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering (ECCE). IEEE; 2017:838–43 pp.10.1109/ECACE.2017.7913019Search in Google Scholar

113. Miglani, R, Malhotra, JS. Evaluation of link-compensated 32×40 gbit/s dwdm free space optical (FSO) transmission. J Opt Commun 2018;47:467–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-018-0484-8.Search in Google Scholar

114. Ali, MAA, Adnan, SA, Al-Saeedi, SA. Transporting 8×10 gbps wdm ro-fso under various weather conditions. J Opt Commun 2020;41:99–105.10.1515/joc-2017-0140Search in Google Scholar

115. Lee, K, Park, H. Modulations for visible light communications with dimming control. IEEE Photon Technol Lett 2011;23:1136–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/lpt.2011.2157676.Search in Google Scholar

116. Kaushal, H, Jain, V, Kar, S. Free space optical communication. Berlin: Springer; 2017.10.1007/978-81-322-3691-7Search in Google Scholar

117. Singh, M, Malhotra, J, Rajan, MM, Dhasarathan, V, Aly, MH. Performance evaluation of 6.4 tbps dual polarization quadrature phase shift keying nyquist-wdm superchannel fso transmission link: impact of different weather conditions. Alexandria Eng J 2020;59:977–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.03.031.Search in Google Scholar

118. Parween, S, Tripathy, A. Free space optic communication using optical AM, OOK-NRZ and OOK-RZ modulation techniques. In: 2019 3rd International conference on electronics, materials engineering & nano-technology (IEMENTech). IEEE; 2019:1–4pp.10.1109/IEMENTech48150.2019.8981373Search in Google Scholar

119. Cho, E, Choi, J-H, Park, C, Kang, M, Shin, S, Ghassemlooy, Z, et al.. NRZ-OOK signaling with led dimming for visible light communication link. In: 2011 16th European Conference on Networks and Optical Communications. IEEE; 2011:32–5 pp.Search in Google Scholar

120. Kwon, JK. Inverse source coding for dimming in visible light communications using NRZ-OOK on reliable links. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett 2010;22:1455–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/lpt.2010.2062498.Search in Google Scholar

121. Ijaz, M, Ghassemlooy, Z, Ansari, S, Adebanjo, O, Le Minh, H, Rajbhandari, S, et al.. Experimental investigation of the performance of different modulation techniques under controlled FSO turbulence channel. In: 2010 5th International symposium on telecommunications. IEEE; 2010:59–64 pp.10.1109/ISTEL.2010.5733999Search in Google Scholar

122. Xu, F, Khalighi, M-A, Bourennane, S. Coded ppm and multipulse PPM and iterative detection for free-space optical links. J Opt Commun Netw 2009;1:404–15. https://doi.org/10.1364/jocn.1.000404.Search in Google Scholar

123. Ebrahimi, F, Ghassemlooy, Z, Olyaee, S. Investigation of a hybrid OFDM-PWM/PPM visible light communications system. J Opt Commun 2018;429:65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2018.08.001.Search in Google Scholar

124. Noshad, M, Brandt-Pearce, M. Application of expurgated ppm to indoor visible light communications–part i: single-user systems. J Lightwave Technol 2013;32:875–82.10.1109/JLT.2013.2293341Search in Google Scholar

125. Chizari, A, Jamali, MV, AbdollahRamezani, S, Salehi, JA, Dargahi, A. Designing a dimmable OPPM-based VLC system under channel constraints. In: 2016 10th International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks and Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP). IEEE; 2016:1–6 pp.10.1109/CSNDSP.2016.7573964Search in Google Scholar

126. Abdullah, MFL, Bong, SW. Adaptive differential amplitude pulse-position modulation technique for optical wireless communication channels based on fuzzy logic. IET Commun 2014;8:427–32. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2013.0443.Search in Google Scholar

127. Liao, H, Zhang, Q, Tan, L. Coded error performance bound for q-ary PPM signaling over the satellite-to-ground optical channel. Optik 2013;124:1486–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2012.04.009.Search in Google Scholar

128. Jang, H-J, Choi, J-H, Ghassemlooy, Z, Lee, CG. PWM-based PPM format for dimming control in visible light communication system. In: 2012 8th International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks and Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP). IEEE; 2012:1–5 pp.10.1109/CSNDSP.2012.6292778Search in Google Scholar

129. Lange, R, Smutny, B, Wandernoth, B, Czichy, R, Giggenbach, D. 142 km, 5.625 gbps free-space optical link based on homodyne bpsk modulation. In: Free-space laser communication technologies XVIII. Washington, DC: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2006, vol 6105:61050A pp.10.1117/12.673749Search in Google Scholar

130. Hassan, MZ, Hossain, MJ, Cheng, J, Leung, VC. Subcarrier intensity modulated optical wireless communications: a survey from communication theory perspective. ZTE Commun 2019;14:2–12.Search in Google Scholar

131. Ahn, K-I, Kwon, JK. Capacity analysis of M-PAM inverse source coding in visible light communications. J Lightwave Technol 2012;30:1399–404. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2012.2185780.Search in Google Scholar

132. Yang, L, Cheng, J, Holzman, JF. Performance of convolutional coded subcarrier intensity modulation over gamma-gamma turbulence channels. IEEE Commun Lett 2013;17:2332–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcomm.2013.102913.131461.Search in Google Scholar

133. Krishnan, P. Performance analysis of hybrid RF/FSO system using BPSK-SIM and DPSK-SIM over gamma-gamma turbulence channel with pointing errors for smart city applications. IEEE Access 2018;6:75025–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2881379.Search in Google Scholar

134. Lee, K, Park, H. Channel model and modulation schemes for visible light communications. In: 2011 IEEE 54th International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS). IEEE; 2011:1–4 pp.10.1109/MWSCAS.2011.6026479Search in Google Scholar

135. Jahid, A, Alsharif, MH, Hall, TJ. A contemporary survey on free space optical communication: potential, technical challenges, recent advances and research direction; 2020. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.00155.Search in Google Scholar

136. Azhar, AH, Tran, T-A, O’Brien, D. A gigabit/s indoor wireless transmission using MIMO-OFDM visible-light communications. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett 2012;25:171–4.10.1109/LPT.2012.2231857Search in Google Scholar

137. T Komine, S Haruyama, M Nakagawa, Performance evaluation of narrowband ofdm on integrated system of power line communication and visible light wireless communication. In: 2006 1st International Symposium on Wireless Pervasive Computing, IEEE, 2006:6 p.10.1109/ISWPC.2006.1613633Search in Google Scholar

138. Anthonisamy, ABR, James, AVS. Formulation of atmospheric optical attenuation model in terms of weather data. J Opt 2016;45:120–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-016-0325-6.Search in Google Scholar

139. Kh, F, Ali, MAA. Performance of free space optical communication link under foggy weather. J Commun 2019;14:518–23.10.12720/jcm.14.6.518-523Search in Google Scholar

140. Weichel, H. Laser beam propagation in the atmosphere. SPIE Press; 1990, vol 10319.Search in Google Scholar

141. Long, RK. Atmospheric attenuation of ruby lasers. Proc IEEE 1963;51:859–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/proc.1963.2294.Search in Google Scholar

142. Langer, R. Effects of atmospheric water vapour on near infrared transmission at sea level. Report on Signal Corps Contract DA-36-039-SC-723351; 1957.Search in Google Scholar

143. Raj, AAB, Selvi, JAV, Kumar, D, Sivakumaran, N. Mitigation of beam fluctuation due to atmospheric turbulence and prediction of control quality using intelligent decision-making tools. Appl Opt 2014;53:3796–806. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.53.003796.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

144. Mahalati, RN, Kahn, JM. Effect of fog on free-space optical links employing imaging receivers. Opt Exp 2012;20:1649–61. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.20.001649.Search in Google Scholar

145. Rouissat, M, Borsali, AR, Chikh-Bled, ME. Free space optical channel characterization and modeling with focus on Algeria weather conditions. Int J Comput Netw Inf Secur 2012;4:17. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijcnis.2012.03.03.Search in Google Scholar

146. Achour, M. Simulating atmospheric free-space optical propagation: Ii. haze, fog, and low clouds attenuations. In: Optical Wireless Communications V. Washington, DC: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2002, vol 4873:1–12 pp.10.1117/12.458571Search in Google Scholar

147. Kim, II, McArthur, B, Korevaar, EJ. Comparison of laser beam propagation at 785 nm and 1550 nm in fog and haze for optical wireless communications. In: Optical Wireless Communications III. Washington, DC: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2001, vol 4214:26–37 pp.10.1117/12.417512Search in Google Scholar

148. Anthonisamy, ABR, Durairaj, P, Paul, LJ. Performance analysis of free space optical communication in open-atmospheric turbulence conditions with beam wandering compensation control. IET Commun 2016;10:1096–103. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2015.0717.Search in Google Scholar

149. Suriza, A, Rafiqul, IM, Wajdi, A, Naji, AW. Proposed parameters of specific rain attenuation prediction for free space optics link operating in tropical region. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 2013;94:93–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2012.11.008.Search in Google Scholar

150. Al Naboulsi, MC, Sizun, H, de Fornel, F. Fog attenuation prediction for optical and infrared waves. Opt Eng 2004;43:319–29. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1637611.Search in Google Scholar

151. Vavoulas, A, Sandalidis, HG, Varoutas, D. Weather effects on FSO network connectivity. J Opt Commun Netw 2012;4:734–40. https://doi.org/10.1364/jocn.4.000734.Search in Google Scholar

152. Oh, E, Ricklin, JC, Eaton, FD, Gilbreath, GC, Doss-Hammel, S, Moore, CI, et al.. Estimating optical turbulence using the Pamela model. In: Free-Space Laser Communications IV. Washington, DC: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2004, vol. 5550:256–66 pp.10.1117/12.561481Search in Google Scholar

153. Andrews, LC, Phillips, RL, Hopen, CY. Laser beam scintillation with applications. Bellingham: SPIE Press; 2001, vol. 99.10.1117/3.412858Search in Google Scholar

154. Yousif, BB, Elsayed, EE, Alzalabani, MM. Atmospheric turbulence mitigation using spatial mode multiplexing and modified pulse position modulation in hybrid RF/FSO orbital-angular-momentum multiplexed based on MIMO wireless communications system. Opt Commun 2019;436:197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2018.12.034.Search in Google Scholar

155. Al-Habash, A, Andrews, LC, Phillips, RL. Mathematical model for the irradiance probability density function of a laser beam propagating through turbulent media. Opt Eng 2001;40:1554–62. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1386641.Search in Google Scholar

156. Chatterjee, MR, Mohamed, FH. Modeling of power spectral density of modified von Karman atmospheric phase turbulence and acousto-optic chaos using scattered intensity profiles over discrete time intervals. In: Laser Communication and Propagation through the Atmosphere and Oceans III. Washington, DC: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2014, vol 9224:922404 p.10.1117/12.2065421Search in Google Scholar

157. Kaymak, Y, Rojas-Cessa, R, Feng, J, Ansari, N, Zhou, M. On divergence-angle efficiency of a laser beam in free-space optical communications for high-speed trains. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2017;66:7677–87. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2017.2686818.Search in Google Scholar

158. Raj, AAB, Selvi, JAV, Kumar, D, Raghavan, S. A direct and neural controller performance study with beam wandering mitigation control in free space optical link. Opt Mem Neural Netw 2014;23:111–29. https://doi.org/10.3103/s1060992x14030059.Search in Google Scholar

159. Raj, AAB, Selvi, JAV, Raghavan, S. Real-time measurement of meteorological parameters for estimating low-altitude atmospheric turbulence strength (c n 2). IET Sci Meas Technol 2014;8:459–69. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-smt.2013.0236.Search in Google Scholar

160. Darusalam, U, Priambodo, PS, Rahardjo, ET. Noise suppression in the signal spectral induced by atmospheric turbulence on the FSO (free-space optical) communications. Int J Technol 2015;4:336–44. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v6i4.1198.Search in Google Scholar

161. Katsilieris, TD, Latsas, GP, Nistazakis, HE, Tombras, GS. An accurate computational tool for performance estimation of FSO communication links over weak to strong atmospheric turbulent channels. Computation 2017;5:18. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation5010018.Search in Google Scholar

162. Islam, AN, Majumder, S. Effect of atmospheric turbulence on the BER performance of an optical cdma FSO link with SIK receiver. Optik 2019;179:867–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.08.008.Search in Google Scholar

163. Smutny, B, Kaempfner, H, Muehlnikel, G, Sterr, U, Wandernoth, B, Heine, F, et al.. 5.6 gbps optical intersatellite communication link. In: Free-Space Laser Communication Technologies XXI. International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2009, vol 7199:719906 p.10.1117/12.812209Search in Google Scholar

164. Smutny, B, Lange, R, Kämpfner, H, Dallmann, D, Mühlnikel, G, Reinhardt, M, et al.. In-orbit verification of optical inter-satellite communication links based on homodyne bpsk. In: Free-Space Laser Communication Technologies XX. International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2008, vol 6877:687702 p.10.1117/12.774673Search in Google Scholar

165. Guelman, M, Kogan, A, Kazarian, A, Livne, A, Orenstein, M, Michalik, H. Acquisition and pointing control for inter-satellite laser communications. IEEE Trans Aero Electron Syst 2004;40:1239–48. https://doi.org/10.1109/taes.2004.1386877.Search in Google Scholar

166. Zech, H, Heine, F, Tröndle, D, Seel, S, Motzigemba, M, Meyer, R, et al.. LCT for EDRS: Leo to geo optical communications at 1, 8 gbps between alphasat and sentinel 1a. In: Unmanned/Unattended Sensors and Sensor Networks XI; and Advanced Free-Space Optical Communication Techniques and Applications. International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2015, vol 9647:96470J.10.1117/12.2196273Search in Google Scholar

167. Barua, B, Hossain, MM, Islam, MR, Bashar, MK. Performance evaluation of different type of channel models in fso communication. Int J Sci Adv Technol 2011;1.Search in Google Scholar

168. Epple, B. Simplified channel model for simulation of free-space optical communications. J Opt Commun Netw 2010;2:293–304. https://doi.org/10.1364/jocn.2.000293.Search in Google Scholar

169. Parthasarathy, S, Giggenbach, D, Kirstädter, A. Channel modelling for free-space optical inter-hap links using adaptive ARQ transmission. In: Unmanned/Unattended Sensors and Sensor Networks X. International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2014, vol 9248:92480Q p.10.1117/12.2067195Search in Google Scholar

170. Boucouvalas, A, Sagias, N, Yiannopoulos, K. First order statistics of semiconductor optical amplifier assisted optical wireless systems under log-normal fading. In: 2013 2nd International Workshop on Optical Wireless Communications (IWOW). IEEE; 2013:142–6 pp.10.1109/IWOW.2013.6777795Search in Google Scholar

171. Ghassemlooy, Z, Popoola, W, Rajbhandari, S. Optical wireless communications: system and channel modelling with Matlab®. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2019.10.1201/9781315151724Search in Google Scholar

172. Ai, DH, Trung, HD, Tuan, DT. On the aser performance of amplify-and-forward relaying mimo/fso systems using SC-QAM signals over log-normal and gamma-gamma atmospheric turbulence channels and pointing error impairments. J Inf Telecommun 2020;4:267–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751839.2020.1732734.Search in Google Scholar

173. Jiang, S, Yang, G, Wei, Y, Bi, M, Lu, Y, Zhou, X, et al.. Performance analysis of space-diversity free-space optical links over exponentiated Weibull channels. IEEE Photon Technol Lett 2015;27:2250–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/lpt.2015.2458321.Search in Google Scholar

174. Salhab, AM, Al-Qahtani, FS, Radaydeh, RM, Zummo, SA, Alnuweiri, H. Power allocation and performance of multiuser mixed RF/FSO relay networks with opportunistic scheduling and outdated channel information. J Lightw Technol 2016;34:3259–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2016.2555944.Search in Google Scholar

175. Trinh, PV, Thang, TC, Pham, AT. Mixed mmwave RF/FSO relaying systems over generalized fading channels with pointing errors. IEEE Photonics J 2016;9:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/jphot.2016.2644964.Search in Google Scholar

176. Bayaki, E, Schober, R, Mallik, RK. Performance analysis of MIMO free-space optical systems in gamma-gamma fading. IEEE Trans Commun 2009;57:3415–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcomm.2009.11.080168.Search in Google Scholar

177. Wang, J, Zhang, Q, Udeh, CP, Wu, R. Fast QC-LDPC code for free space optical communication. In: Free-Space Laser Communication and Atmospheric Propagation XXIX. Washington, DC: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2017, vol 10096:1009609 p.10.1117/12.2253502Search in Google Scholar

178. Raj, AAB, Selvi, JAV, Durairaj, S. Comparison of different models for ground-level atmospheric turbulence strength (cn 2) prediction with a new model according to local weather data for fso applications. Appl Opt 2015;54:802–15. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.54.000802.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

179. Leitgeb, E, Plank, T, Awan, MS, Brandl, P, Popoola, W, Ghassemlooy, Z, et al.. Analysis and evaluation of optimum wavelengths for free-space optical transceivers. In: 2010 12th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks. IEEE; 2010:1–7 pp.10.1109/ICTON.2010.5549009Search in Google Scholar

180. Jurado-Navas, A, Garrido-Balsells, JM, Paris, JF, Castillo-Vázquez, M, Puerta-Notario, A. Impact of pointing errors on the performance of generalized atmospheric optical channels. Opt Exp 2012;20:12550–62. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.20.012550.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

181. Mohorcic, M, Fortuna, C, Vilhar, A, Horwath, J. Evaluation of wavelength requirements for stratospheric optical transport networks. J Commun 2009;4:588–96. https://doi.org/10.4304/jcm.4.8.588-596.Search in Google Scholar

182. Flecker, B, Gebhart, M, Leitgeb, E, Muhammad, SS, Chlestil, C. Results of attenuation measurements for optical wireless channels under dense fog conditions regarding different wavelengths. In: Atmospheric optical modeling, measurement, and simulation II. International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2006, vol 6303:63030P p.10.1117/12.680456Search in Google Scholar

183. Shakir, F, Ali, MAA, Ameer, F. Utilization of mimo concept for optical communication system under fog condition. ECTI Trans Electr Eng Electron Commun 2019;17:130–5. https://doi.org/10.37936/ecti-eec.2019172.219183.Search in Google Scholar

184. Prabu, K. Analysis of FSO systems with SISO and MIMO techniques. Wirel Pers Commun 2019;105:1133–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06139-x.Search in Google Scholar

185. Sarangal, H, Singh, A, Malhotra, J, Chaudhary, S. A cost effective 100 gbps hybrid MDM–OCDMA–FSO transmission system under atmospheric turbulences. Opt Quant Electron 2017;49:184.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-017-1019-2.Search in Google Scholar

186. Adnan, SA, Ali, MAA, Al-Saeedi, S. Characteristics of RF signal in free space optics (ROFSO) considering rain effect. J Eng Appl Sci 2018;13:1644–8.Search in Google Scholar

187. Rahaim, MB, Vegni, AM, Little, TD. A hybrid radio frequency and broadcast visible light communication system. In: IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops (GC Workshops). IEEE; 2011:792–6pp.10.1109/GLOCOMW.2011.6162563Search in Google Scholar

188. Pati, PS, Krishnan, P. Modelling of OFDM based ROFSO system for 5G applications over varying weather conditions: a case study. Optik 2019;184:313–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.03.031.Search in Google Scholar

189. Chang, C-H, Li, C-Y, Lu, H-H, Lin, C-Y, Chen, J-H, Wan, Z-W, et al.. A 100-gb/s multiple-input multiple-output visible laser light communication system. J Lightw Technol 2014;32:4121–7. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.003468.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

190. Kumar, P, Thakor, S. Performance of OFDM-FSO link with analog network coding. Photonic Netw Commun 2018;35:210–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11107-017-0730-z.Search in Google Scholar

191. Bohata, J, Komanec, M, Spáčil, J, Ghassemlooy, Z, Zvánovec, S, Slavík, R. 24–26 ghz radio-over-fiber and free-space optics for fifth-generation systems. Opt Lett 2018;43:1035–8. https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.43.001035.Search in Google Scholar

192. Li, C-Y, Wu, H-W, Lu, H-H, Tsai, W-S, Tsai, S-E, Xie, J-Y. A hybrid internet/catv/5g fiber-fso integrated system with a triple-wavelength polarization multiplexing scenario. IEEE Access 2019;7:151023–33. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2947623.Search in Google Scholar

193. Dhasarathan, V, Singh, M, Malhotra, J. Development of high-speed fso transmission link for the implementation of 5g and internet of things. Wirel Netw 2019;26:2403–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-019-02166-5.Search in Google Scholar