Home Analysis of AWG-Based Optical Data Center Switches
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Analysis of AWG-Based Optical Data Center Switches

  • Preeti Singh EMAIL logo , J.K. Rai and Ajay K. Sharma
Published/Copyright: October 31, 2019
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Optical packet switching (OPS) is an emerging area of research in next-generation datacenter applications. There is an exponential growth in the internet traffic due to applications such as social networking, cloud computing, video streaming, etc. Fiber optical network plays a critical role in various data center (DC) operations. Large bandwidth of the optical fiber made OPS, a promising technology for DCs. Arrayed waveguide gratings (AWGs) are used more frequently in the core of optical packet switches due to its low insertion loss and wavelength dependent routing pattern. Optical switching function can be performed by AWG if each input port is properly equipped with Tunable wavelength converters (TWCs). This paper presents analysis of four optical packet switches namely AWG and Feedback Loop Buffer based switch, AWG and Electronic Memory based switch, Petabit Optical Switch, AWG and Feedback Loop Buffer Loss Compensated based Switch. Switches are analyzed for Bit Error Rate (BER) and energy consumption. The power and noise analysis is performed for calculating the total power required for correct operation of switch and to determine the BER using physical layer analysis. Minimum power level is determined so that received bits are decoded correctly. Energy consumption per bit is also evaluated to identify architecture consuming less energy in the considered architectures.

References

1. Chen K, Singla A, Singh A, Ramachandran K, Xu L, Zhang Y, et al. OSA: an optical switching architecture for data center networks with unprecedented flexibility. IEEE/ACM Trans Networking (TOM). 2014;22:498–511.10.1007/978-3-319-61052-8_4Search in Google Scholar

2. Cheng Q, Bahadori M, Glick M, Rumley S, Bergman K. Recent advances in optical technologies for data centers: a review. Optica. 2018;5:1354–70.10.1364/OPTICA.5.001354Search in Google Scholar

3. Kachris C, Kanonakis K, Tomkos I. Optical interconnection networks in data centers: recent trends and future challenges. IEEE Commun Mag. 2013;51:39–45.10.1109/MCOM.2013.6588648Search in Google Scholar

4. Xia W, Zhao P, Wen Y, Xie H. A survey on data center networking (DCN): infrastructure and operations. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials. 2017;19:640–56.10.1109/COMST.2016.2626784Search in Google Scholar

5. Bowers J, Burmeister E, Blumenthal D. Optical buffering and switching for optical packet switching. In: 2006 International Conference on Photonics in Switching, IEEE, 2006 Oct 16:1–3.10.1109/PS.2006.4350183Search in Google Scholar

6. Chia MC, Hunter DK, Andonovic I, Ball P, Wright I, Ferguson SP, et al. Packet loss and delay performance of feedback and feed-forward arrayed-waveguide gratings-based optical packet switches with WDM inputs-outputs. J Lightwave Technol. 2001;19:1241.10.1109/50.948271Search in Google Scholar

7. Singh RK, Srivastava R, Singh YN. Wavelength division multiplexed loop buffer memory based optical packet switch. Opt Quantum Electron. 2007;39:15–34.10.1007/s11082-007-9061-0Search in Google Scholar

8. Kachris C, Tomkos I. Power consumption evaluation of all-optical data center networks. Cluster Comput. 2013;16:611–23.10.1007/s10586-012-0227-6Search in Google Scholar

9. Fiorani M, Aleksic S, Casoni M. Hybrid optical switching for data center networks. J Electr Comput Eng. 2014;2014:1.10.1155/2014/139213Search in Google Scholar

10. Aleksić S. Analysis of power consumption in future high-capacity network nodes. J Opt Commun Networking. 2009;1:245–58.10.1364/JOCN.1.000245Search in Google Scholar

11. Ye T, Lee TT, Hu W. A study of modular AWGs for large-scale optical switching systems. J Lightwave Technol. 2012;30:2125–33.10.1109/JLT.2012.2193382Search in Google Scholar

12. Ye T, Lee TT, Ge M, Hu W. Modular AWG-based interconnection for large-scale data center networks. IEEE Trans Cloud Comput. 2018;6:785–99.10.1109/TCC.2016.2522417Search in Google Scholar

13. Srivastava R, Singh YN. Feedback fiber delay lines and AWG based optical packet switch architecture. Opt Switching Networking. 2010;7:75–84.10.1016/j.osn.2010.01.002Search in Google Scholar

14. Ye X, Yin Y, Yoo SB, Mejia P, Proietti R, Akella V. DOS: a scalable optical switch for datacenters. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE Symposium on Architectures for Networking and Communications Systems, ACM, 2010 Oct 25:24.10.1145/1872007.1872037Search in Google Scholar

15. Xi K, Kao YH, Chao HJ. A petabit bufferless optical switch for data center networks. In: Kachris C, Bergman K, Tomkos I, editors. Optical interconnects for future data center networks. New York, NY: Springer, 2013:135–54.10.1007/978-1-4614-4630-9_8Search in Google Scholar

16. Pallavi S, Lakshmi M, Srivastava R. Physical layer analysis of AWG based optical packet switch architecture. J Opt. 2015;44:119–27.10.1007/s12596-015-0237-xSearch in Google Scholar

17. Shukla VA, Jain AR, Srivastava R. Design of an arrayed waveguide gratings based optical packet switch. J Eng Sci Technol. 2016;11:12–20.Search in Google Scholar

18. Shukla V, Jain A. Design and analysis of high speed optical routers for next generation data centre network. J Eng Res. 2018;6:122–37.Search in Google Scholar

19. Shukla V, Jain A, Srivastava R. Performance evaluation of an AWG based optical router. Opt Quantum Electron. 2016;48:69.10.1007/s11082-015-0348-2Search in Google Scholar

20. Agrawal GP. Fiber-optic communication systems. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

21. Tucker RS. The role of optics and electronics in high-capacity routers. J Lightwave Technol. 2006;24:4655–73.10.1109/JLT.2006.885774Search in Google Scholar

22. Tucker RS. Optical packet switching: a reality check. Opt Switching Networking. 2008;5:2–9.10.1016/j.osn.2007.08.001Search in Google Scholar

23. Tucker RS. Optics versus electronics for high-speed switching and signal processing. In: IEEE Photonics Society Summer Topicals, 2010 Jul 19:111–2.10.1109/PHOSST.2010.5553656Search in Google Scholar

24. Tucker RS. Green optical communications—Part I: energy limitations in transport. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron. 2010;17:245–60.10.1109/JSTQE.2010.2051216Search in Google Scholar

25. Singh P, Rai JK, Sharma AK. Optical packet switch architectures evaluation using optical cost and physical loss. In: 2017 8th IEEE International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), 2017 Jul 3:1–6.10.1109/ICCCNT.2017.8204073Search in Google Scholar

26. Singh A, Tiwari AK. Analysis of hybrid buffer based optical data center switch. J Opt Commun 2018. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1515/joc-2018-0121.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-05-23
Accepted: 2019-10-07
Published Online: 2019-10-31
Published in Print: 2021-07-27

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Amplifiers
  3. Performance Analysis of FBG WDM System using Different Optical Amplifiers
  4. Devices
  5. Performance Evaluation of Two Dimensional Photonic Crystal Based All Optical AND/OR Logic Gates
  6. A Radio over Fiber (RoF) Based Single Sideband Modulated Passive Optical Network (PON) Using Mach Zender Modulator Based on Different Electrical Phase Shifts
  7. Analysis of Hybrid Buffer Based Optical Data Center Switch
  8. An Optical Majority Gate Using Photonic Crystal Based Nonlinear Resonant Cavity
  9. Analysis of AWG-Based Optical Data Center Switches
  10. Fibers
  11. Optimization of Concentration Quenching on Erbium Ytterbium Doped Wave Guide EYDWA Using for Extended Reach up to 160 Km of Hybrid Gigabit Passive Optical Networks and Free Space Optical Technologie “GPON-FSO”
  12. Networks
  13. On the Cost Minimization in Space Division Multiplexing Based Elastic Optical Networks
  14. Systems
  15. Incorporating SDC Module for ISI Compensation for a Long-Haul Co-OFDM System
  16. Performance Analysis of Free Space Optics and Inter-Satellite Communicating System Using Multiplexing Techniques – A Review
  17. To Overcome the Effects of Self-Phase Modulation in Single-Tone RoF System by Employing SSP Compensation Technique
  18. Analysis of Optical Wireless Communication Systems
  19. Investigation of Cross-Phase Modulation-Induced Crosstalk with Sub-Planck Higher-Order Dispersion Parameters in Optical Transmission Systems
  20. Performances Analysis of Novel Proposed Code for SAC-OCDMA System
  21. Design and Implementation of OFDM System using QPSK & QAM
  22. To Mitigate the Effect of Cross-Phase Modulation by Employing PC-DCF Technique in Multi-Tone RoF System
  23. Mitigating the Effects of Non-Linear Distortion Using Polarizers in Microwave Photonic Link
  24. Theory
  25. Improving Performance of Optical Networks by Using FRPI Algorithm
  26. Performance Evaluation of Novel Dynamic Data Replication Algorithm under Optical Burst Switching
  27. Performance Analysis of Relay Assisted Multihop Coherant OFDM System over Malaga Distribution with Pointing Errors
Downloaded on 3.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/joc-2019-0140/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button