Performance of FSO Links using CSRZ, RZ, and NRZ and Effects of Atmospheric Turbulence

References

1. Kaur A, Sheetal A. Performance analysis of 16×2.5GB/s FSO system for the most critical weather conditions. Int J Adv Res Comput Commun Eng 2015 May;4(5):612–8.10.17148/IJARCCE.2015.45131Search in Google Scholar

2. Ali MAA. Analysis of data rate for free space optics communication system. Int J Electron Commun Technol 2014 Mar;5(1):20–3.10.1007/978-1-4939-0918-6_1Search in Google Scholar

3. Roy R, Babu JS. Performance Analysis of Multiple TX/RX Free Space Optical System under Atmospheric Disturbances. IJERT 2015 Jan;4(1):445–7.Search in Google Scholar

4. Duvey D, Ritu Gupta Er. Review paper on performance analysis of a free space optical system. Int J Appl Innov Eng Manage (IJAIEM) 2014 Jun;3(6):135–9.Search in Google Scholar

5. Chawla A, Mishra S, Aarthi G. Simulation research of free-space optical communication based on linear polarization shift keying modulation. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 2015 Aug;10(14):6116–20.Search in Google Scholar

6. Jabeena A, Saxena S. Performance of FSO links using various modulation techniques and cloud effect. Int J Eng Res General Sci 2015 Mar-Apr;3(2, Part 2):616–21.Search in Google Scholar

7. Miglani R. Analysis of FSO communication links for mid and far infrared wavelengths. Int J Sci Eng Res 2013 Jul;4(7). ISSN 2229–5518.Search in Google Scholar

8. Rashidi FU, Semakuwa SK. Analysis of rain effect in free space optical communication under NRZ modulation in two regions of Tanzania. Int J Adv Eng Nano Technol (IJAENT 2014 Sept;1(10). ISSN: 2347–6389.Search in Google Scholar

9. Ennser K, Petermann K. Performance of RZ versus NRZ-transmission on standard single-mode fibers. IEEE Photon Technol Lett 1996 Mar;8(3):443–5.10.1109/68.481144Search in Google Scholar

10. Bakhshi B, Vaa M, Golovchenko EA, Patterson WW, Maybach RL, Bergano NS. Comparison of CRZ, RZ and NRZ modulation formats in a 65×12.3 Gb/s WDM transmission experiment over 9000 km. In Proc. OFC, paper WF4, 2001.10.1364/OFC.2001.WF4Search in Google Scholar

11. Winzer P, Kogelnik H, Kim CH, Kim H, Jopson RM, Nelson LE, Effect of receiver design on PMD outage for RZ and NRZ. In Proc. OFC, paper TuI1, 2002.10.1109/OFC.2002.1036194Search in Google Scholar

12. Lin HS, Lai PC. Single Mach-Zehnder modulator with RZ-DPSK modulation signal in 48 Chs×40 Gbit/s long haul DWDM transmission. J Opt Commun 2013;34(3):155–60.10.1515/joc-2013-0009Search in Google Scholar

13. Cai JX, Cai Y, Davidson CR, Foursa DG, Lucero AJ, Sinkin OV, et al. Transmission of 96 × 100 Gb/s bandwidth constrained PDM-RZ-QPSK channels with 300 % spectral efficiency over 10610 km and 400 % spectral efficiency over 4370 km. J Lightwave Technol 2011;29(4):491–8.10.1109/JLT.2010.2093931Search in Google Scholar

14. Jia W, Matsui Y, Mahgerefteh D, Lyubomirsky I, Chan CK. Generation and transmission of 10-Gbaud optical 3/4-RZ-DQPSK signals using a chirp-managed DBR laser. J Lightwave Technol 2012;30(21):3299–305.10.1109/JLT.2012.2213066Search in Google Scholar

15. Zhou X, Nelson LE, Isaac R, Zhu B, Peckham DW, Borel PI, et al.. PDM-Nyquist-32QAM for 450 Gb/s per-channel WDM transmission on the 50 GHz ITU-T grid. J Lightwave Technol 2012 Feb;30(4):553–9.10.1109/JLT.2011.2177243Search in Google Scholar

16. Fludger CRS. Coherent equalization and POLMUX-RZDQPSK for robust 100-GE transmission. J Lightwave Technol 2008;26(1):64–72.10.1109/JLT.2007.912128Search in Google Scholar