Skip to main content
Article Publicly Available

A Review on Radio-Over-Fiber Technology-Based Integrated (Optical/Wireless) Networks

  • EMAIL logo and
Published/Copyright: April 12, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In the present paper, radio-over-fiber (RoF) technology has been proposed, which is the integration of the optical and radio networks. With a high transmission capacity, comparatively low cost and low attenuation, optical fiber provides an ideal solution for accomplishing the interconnections. In addition, a radio system enables the significant mobility, flexibility and easy access. Therefore, the system integration can meet the increasing demands of subscribers for voice, data and multimedia services that require the access network to support high data rates at any time and any place inexpensively. RoF has the potentiality to the backbone of the wireless access network and it has gained significant momentum in the last decade as a potential last-mile access scheme. This paper gives the comprehensive review of RoF technology used in the communication system. Concept, applications, advantages and limitations of RoF technology are also discussed in this paper.

PACS: 42.82. -m

1 Introduction

Due to increasing popularity of the Internet and tremendous increase in the growth of mobile technology, people have become so much dependent on online services. Recent statistics showed that the usage of the Internet, a reliable communication tool in today’s society, increases by 40 % per year in North America and about 20 % worldwide. The numbers of users are expected to increase dramatically. So a high broadband and high capacity communication system is required. Fiberoptic communication systems have the highest information-carrying capacity and this is what makes these systems the linchpin of modern telecommunications [1]. Due to various limitations such as geographical condition, economical balance, provider’s strategy and damage situation in the case of disasters, high-speed connections based on an optical fiber such as a fiber to the home cannot always be deployed everywhere. Therefore, a radio transmission link is considered for aggregating large network traffics, which has prior characteristics in system deployment, such as flexible arrangement and easy installation [1]. So integration of optical and wireless network is done to provide sufficient bandwidth to individual users. This network is called radio-over-fiber (RoF) technology. In order to meet ever-increasing user bandwidth and wireless demands in broadband, interactive and multimedia wireless services, RoF technology has been proposed as a promising cost-effective solution. RoF is an analog optical link to transport information over optical fiber by transmitting modulated radiofrequency (RF) signals to and from central station (CS) to base station (BS) or remote antenna unit (RAU) [1]. This modulation can be done directly with the radio signal or at an intermediate frequency. In other words, RoF means to transport information over optical fiber by modulating light with the radio signal [1, 2].

RoF serves as a high-speed wireless local or personal area network. The frequencies of the radio signals distributed by RoF systems span a wide range (usually in the GHz region) and depend on the nature of the applications [2]. In RoF systems, wireless signals are transported in the optical form between a CS and a set of BSs before being radiated through the air. Most of the signal-processing processes (including coding, multiplexing, and RF generation and modulation) are carried out by the central office (CO), which makes the BS cost-effective. Each BS is adapted to communicate over a radio link with at least one user’s mobile station located within the radio range of said BS. Therefore, RoF will become a key technology in the next generation of mobile communication system [2, 3].

1.1 Concept of RoF

The RoF network typically comprises a Central Station (CS), where all switching, routing, medium access control (MAC) and frequency management functions are performed, and an optical fiber network, which interconnects a large number of BSs for wireless signal distribution. The BS has no processing function and its main function is to convert optical signal to wireless one and vice versa [4]. RoF makes it possible to centralize the radio frequency (RF) signal-processing function in one head end, then to use optical fiber, which offers low-signal loss between 0.3 dB/km for 1,550 nm and 0.5 dB/km for 1,310 nm wavelength. It distributes the RF signals to the RAUs as shown in the following (see Figure 1). RoF applications range from mobile cellular networks, wireless local area network (WLAN) at mm-wave bands broadband wireless access networks to road vehicle communication (RVC) networks for intelligent transportation system (ITS) [4, 5].

Figure 1: Radio-over-fiber concept [5].
Figure 1:

Radio-over-fiber concept [5].

1.2 Transmission techniques for RoF technology

There are several optical techniques for generating and transporting radio signals over fiber. Some of these techniques are briefly discussed in this section.

1.2.1 Direct modulation technique

In this method, the intensity of the light source is directly modulated with the RF signal and then direct detection is used at the photodetector (PD) to recover the RF signal. This is the simplest and low-cost method for optically distributing RF signals. It is referred to as intensity modulation direct detection (IMDD). Prior to transmission, the RF signal must be appropriately premodulated. After transmission through the fiber and direct detection on a PD, the photocurrent is a replica of the modulating RF signal applied directly at the head end [5]. Subsequently, at the remote antenna site, the PD and band-pass amplifier convert the received optical signal to an RF signal to be radiated by the antenna (Figures 2 and 3).

Figure 2: Direct intensity modulation method by laser [6].
Figure 2:

Direct intensity modulation method by laser [6].

Figure 3: Direct intensity modulation method by external modulator [6].
Figure 3:

Direct intensity modulation method by external modulator [6].

The main advantage of this method is that it is simple, robust and low cost. Second, the system becomes linear if low dispersion fiber is used together with an external modulator. The transmitter configuration is extremely simple and cost-effective but its performance is severely limited by the laser modulation impairments. RoF systems using direct microwave intensity modulation of a laser diode are commercially available up to limited RFs (up to about 2 GHz, for wireless services such as Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM) and Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS). Therefore, the major drawback of this technique is that the operation at higher microwave frequencies is prohibited by the restricted modulation bandwidth of the laser diode and by the fiber dispersion, which causes fading of the two modulation sidebands. Such microwave frequencies may only be handled by sophisticated very high-frequency optical analog transmitters and receivers, and careful fiber dispersion compensation techniques [6, 7].

1.2.2 External modulation technique

In order to overcome the drawbacks of the direct modulation, external modulation is the straightforward solution. An optical external modulation technique is a good option to generate optical mm-wave signal with high spectral purity, out of all schemes. External modulation is often used at high RFs (say above 10 GHz). The simplest implementation consists of a continuous wave (CW) laser followed by an external modulator that modulates the laser light with an intermediate frequency (IF) or an mm-wave tone [7]. The operation of the laser in CW mode avoids the excessive chirp of the pulses in external modulation. In this method, high-speed external modulators are used, such as the Mach–Zehnder modulators (MZM) or electroabsorption modulators (EAM) or a phase Modulator (PM), whose output is optically filtered (Figure 4).

Figure 4: Direct intensity modulation method by external modulator using a Mach–Zehnder modulator [7].
Figure 4:

Direct intensity modulation method by external modulator using a Mach–Zehnder modulator [7].

There are two approaches to generate mm-wave signals and they are briefly discussed as follows:

1.2.2.1 Intensity modulation-based approach

In this technique, the system implementation is greatly simplified because no tunable optical filter is required. An MZM is consisted in this system that is biased at the maximum transmission point of the transfer function to suppress the odd-order optical sidebands. To filter out the optical carrier a wavelength-fixed notch filter is then used. At the output of the PD a stable and low-phase noise mm-wave signal having frequency four times that of the RF drive signal is generated [7]. The MZM should be biased at the minimum or maximum point of the transfer function so that the odd-order or even-order optical sidebands can be suppressed, which would cause the bias-drifting problem, leading to poor system robustness, or have to employ sophisticated control circuit to minimize the bias drift.

1.2.2.2 PM-based approach

By using an optical PM no DC bias is required, which eliminates the bias drifting problem. This is the key advantage of using it. So therefore the MZM used in intensity modulation approach should be replaced by optical PM [8]. The limitation of the above techniques is that an ultra-narrowband optical filter is required, which causes poor system stability and high cost. External modulators are simple but they present certain disadvantages such as significant insertion loss. External modulators can operate with bandwidths of up to 40 GHz and bit rates of more than 10 Gbps, which makes them particularly attractive for long-haul optical communication networks. The method of external modulation suffers from distortion due to the intrinsic nonlinearity of the modulators, high power consumption and complexity. Of course, this modulation system is more expensive than the direct modulation [7, 8].

1.2.3 Heterodyne modulation technique

Two or more optical signals are simultaneously transmitted and are heterodyned in the receiver by using this technique. One or more of the heterodyning products is the required RF signal. The optical intensity-modulated signal from an laser diode (LD) is subsequently modulated by an external modulator which is biased at its inflexion point of the modulation characteristic and driven by a sinusoidal signal at half the microwave frequency. Thus, a two-tone optical signal emerges at the modulator output, with a tone spacing equal to the microwave frequency. The desired amplitude-modulated microwave signal is generated after heterodyning. The transmitter may also use multiple LDs, and thus a multi-wavelength RoF system can be realized with a tunable wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) filter to select the desired wavelength radio channel at the antenna site [8]. As phase noise is a major problem in mm-wave transmission, care must be taken to produce a small phase noise only by the heterodyned signals. This approach overcomes chromatic dispersion effect and also offers flexibility in frequency since frequencies from some megahertz up to the terahertz region are possible [7, 8] (Figure 5).

Figure 5: Remote heterodyning using a filter [8].
Figure 5:

Remote heterodyning using a filter [8].

1.2.4 Optical frequency/phase-locked loops

This technique is used to reduce phase noise sensitivity. It is able to track small-scale phase perturbations. It does not suppress small-scale frequency variations caused by phase noise. The basic configuration of Optical Frequency Locked-Loops/Optical Phase Locked-Loops (OFLL/OPLL) techniques is shown in Figure 6. It consists of a free-running master laser, a Positive Intrinsic Negative (PIN) photodiode, a slave laser, a frequency or phase detector, an amplifier, a loop filter and a microwave reference oscillator. The combined outputs of the master and slave lasers are split into two parts: one is used in the OPLL/OFLL at the head end while the other part is transmitted to the RAU. To generate a microwave signal, the optical signal at the head end is heterodyned on a PD. This generated signal is then compared with the reference signal. A frequency error signal in the case of the OFLL (and a phase error signal in the case of OPLL) is fed back to the slave laser [8]. Hence, the slave laser is forced to track the master laser at a frequency offset corresponding to the frequency of the microwave reference oscillator. The main advantage of this technique is that it is capable of producing high-quality RF signals with narrow linewidth and also has good temperature-tracking capabilities. In addition, OPLLs exhibit a wide locking range [9]. On the other hand, OFLL techniques have the advantage that they can be realized with standard and fairly inexpensive Distributed Feedback (DFB) lasers [8, 9].

Figure 6: Principal of optical frequency/phase-locked loops [9].
Figure 6:

Principal of optical frequency/phase-locked loops [9].

1.2.5 Dual-mode lasers

The major drawback of optical heterodyning-based techniques is the sensitivity to phase noise of the two heterodyning signals, and the dependence of the RF beat signal on the polarization state difference of the two heterodyning carriers. One way to achieve correlation of optical modes is to remove the phase shift in the DFB laser so that no oscillation occurs at the Bragg frequency which result in a device called the dual-mode laser (DML) as it emits two modes, one on either side of the Bragg frequency [10]. By tuning the grating strength coefficient, the required mode separation can be obtained. The main advantage of this approach is that it does not require complex feedback circuitry. However, because of narrow locking range, this method has limitations regarding tenability [9, 10].

1.3 Advantages of RoF

Some of the advantages and benefits of RoF technology are discussed below:

1.3.1 Low attenuation loss

It is a well-known fact that signals transmitted on optical fiber attenuate much less than through other media, especially when compared with wireless medium. By using optical fiber, the signal will travel further, reducing the need of repeaters. With increase in frequency, losses due to absorption and reflection in free space increase, whereas in transmission line, impedance rises with frequency and leads to very high losses [10]. So for electrically distributing high-frequency radio signals over long distances expensive regenerating equipment is required. At each BS, the baseband or IF signals are upconverted to the required mm-wave frequency, amplified and then radiated. Since for upconversion at each BS, high-performance local oscillators (LO) would be required which leads to complex BS with tight performance requirements. However, RoF technology can be used to achieve both low-loss distribution of RF signal and simplification of BS at the same time, since optical fiber offers very low loss [10, 11].

1.3.2 Large bandwidth

Optical fibers offer enormous bandwidth. There are three main transmission windows, which offer low attenuation, namely the 850, 1,310 and 1,550 nm wavelengths. For a single-mode fiber (SMF) optical fiber, the combined bandwidth of the three windows is in the excess of 50 THz. The high optical bandwidth allows high-speed signal processing which is just impossible to do in electronic systems [11]. Thus, some demanding microwave functions such as filtering, mixing, upconversion and downconversion can be easily executed. Subcarrier Multiplexing (SCM) technique is used in analog optical systems including RoF technology in order to increase optical fiber bandwidth utilization.

1.3.3 Easy installations and maintenance

Most RoF techniques eliminate the need for an LO and related equipment at the RAU. In RoF systems, complex and expensive equipment is kept at the head end, thereby making the RAUs simpler. At the CS high-frequency electro-optical modulators and electronics must be avoided due to their high price and power consumption. Similarly complicated implementations of downlink transmission techniques are also avoided due to their high manufacturing and maintenance costs. Modulation and switching equipment is kept in the head end and is shared by several RAUs [12]. This arrangement leads to smaller and lighter RAUs, effectively reducing system installation and maintenance costs. Easy installation and low maintenance costs of BSs are very significant demand for RoF systems, because elevated numbers of BSs are required. Simplicity of the BSs drives the reduction of price associated with energy consumption, site leasing and site acquisition. Therefore, the increasing demand for new services in current cellular system will lead RoF systems to support different traffic characteristics. Hence, a suitable pricing scheme must be selected that allow service providers to assure the uninterrupted quality of service provisioning and simultaneously to be economically survivable [11, 12].

1.3.4 Reduced power consumption

The energy efficiency of a system can also be measured as the energy consumed per bit of data transferred (Joules per bit). The power consumption of a system is one of the important figures of merit that can be expressed by the power consumption per user versus the average access rate (Watts/Mbps) and the power consumption of an access network infrastructure is designed on the basis of network segmentation. The energy consumption of each part of the system for a range of access rates is computed using manufacturer’s data on equipment energy consumption for a range of typical types of hardware. To predict the rise in power consumption because the number of users and access rate per user is increasing rapidly, this perspective provides a better platform. For an RoF system, the power efficiency should account for both optoelectronic and electrical components in the CS [13]. Since, BS accounts for up to 70 % of the total power consumption in commercial cellular systems, therefore, BS design has the most opportunities for saving energy. Since the large numbers of BSs are needed to cover a service, therefore, power consumption of the BSs is of special importance. The BS power consumption varies depending on the transmitting power and traffic load, the higher is the transmitting power or traffic load, higher power will be consumed by the BS. In RoF, the power consumption model for BS includes the mm-wave frequency to be radiated, the expected cell coverage or transmitting power and the transmission schemes for uplink and downlink [13, 14].

1.3.5 Dynamic resource allocation

Dynamic capacity allocation obviates the requirement for allocating permanent capacity, which would be a waste of resources where traffic loads vary frequently. Moreover, the centralized head end enables other signal-processing functions such as macro-diversity transmission and mobility functions [15]. It is possible to dynamically allocate peak times capacity; since modulation, switching and other RF functions are performed at a centralized head end. For example, more capacity can be allocated to an area (e. g. shopping mall) and then re-allocated to other areas (e. g. to populated residential areas in the evenings) when off-peak in an RoF distribution system for GSM traffic. This can be attained by allocating optical wavelengths through WDM technique whenever needed [14, 15].

1.4 Limitations of ROF technology

In SMF-based RoF, systems, chromatic dispersion may limit the fiber link lengths and may also cause phase de-correlation leading to increased RF carrier phase noise [15]. In multi-mode fiber-based RoF systems, modal dispersion severely limits the available link bandwidth and distance. It must be stated that although the RoF transmission system itself is analog, the radio system being distributed need not be analog as well, but it may be digital (e. g. WLAN and UMTS), using comprehensive multi-level signal modulation formats such as Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM), or orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM). Since RoF involves analog modulation, and detection of light, it is fundamentally an analog transmission system. Therefore, signal impairments such as noise and distortion, which are important in analog communication systems, are important in RoF systems as well [16]. These impairments tend to limit the noise figure (NF) and dynamic range (DR) of the RoF links. DR is a very important parameter for mobile (cellular) communication systems such as GSM because the power received at the BS from the MUs varies widely, i. e. the RF power received from an MU which is close to the BS can be much higher than the RF power received from an MU which is several kilometers away, but within the same cell [15, 16].

2 Historical achievements in RoF technology

Table 1 shows that the methodology starts with literature study and review on overall RoF system. These papers had different kinds of techniques used by different authors. Following section gives a discussion about this literature table.

Table 1:

Comparison of various RoF techniques.

Author nameTechniqueResults
Mohamed and Rashed [17]Parametrical investigation of the transmission performance characteristics of the radio-over-fiber (RoF) system that is modulated with multiple bit rates using different transmission techniques such as soliton, and maximum time division multiplexing (MTDM) technique which are employed through two ultra-multiplexing techniques, four links space division multiplexing (SDM) plus multi-channels dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) over optical window.The increased number of links in the fiber cable core, the decreased fiber temperature and the decreased fiber link length resulted in the increased transmission bit rates either per optical link or per optical channel. Soliton transmission technique presented higher transmission bit rates and products either per link or per channel than MTDM transmission technique.
Khayatzadeh et al. [18]Theoretical and experimental study of amplitude noise impact on EVM values in mm-wave RoF system based on PMLLD and two DFB lasers. A simulation method was presented that determined among different optical and electrical noise, the one that has the most effects on EVM results just by observing the EVM evolution versus received optical power.Impact of optical sources phase noise on performance of the system is removed using a non-coherent downconversion method based on envelope detector. Using this method, a very good matching between the experimental and the simulation results was observed.
Gowda et al.[19]The energy efficiency of next generation in building IT networks to deliver high-speed mobile access to end users via integrate optical/wireless networks using RoF technology was analyzed.Based on a validated energy efficiency model, results showed that although individual point-to-point RoF links are not as energy efficient as legacy baseband-over-fiber links, RoF networks may actually be more energy-efficient when designed keenly with small cell sizes and when the static energy consumption of the remote units is above a particular threshold.
Kumar et al. [20]Parameters such as Q-factor and BER were compared for different modulation techniques such as DPSK, OQPSK, MSK and CPFSK using optisystem software.Results found that RoF system incorporating DPSK modulation and direct detection of baseband signal has the potential to be applied in next-generation convergent wireless-wired optical network.
Johny and Shashidharan [21]Radio-over-fiber system were designed and simulated using the Optisystem software and its various parameters such as Q-factor, BER, eye height, etc. were compared for different categories of coding such as NRZ and RZ coding.NRZ suffer from more nonlinearities due to higher peak power, whereas RZ suffer from more dispersion which is due to shorter pulse width. Studies show that in general, RZ modulation can be better operated in high-power regime than NRZ coding.
Liu et al. [22]Multi-service small-cell wireless access architecture based on RoF technologies (cloud RoF access network) was proposed.By combining RoF with optical wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) techniques, multiple bands, multiple services and multiple operators can coexist in a shared optical infrastructure without interference.
Kanno et al. [23]Multi-input multi-output (MIMO) transmission of two mm-wave radio signals seamlessly converted from polarization division multiplexed quadrature phase shift keying optical signals was demonstrated.20-Gbaud optical and radio seamless MIMO transmission provided a total capacity of 74.4 Gb/s with a forward error correction overhead of 7 %.

3 Conclusion

RoF is a technology that integrates broadband wireless and optical access networks, enabling network infrastructure that is capable of a flexible access offering broadband wireless connectivity to the variety of services and applications. This technology can provide many benefits including architecture with the ability to support multiple radio services and standards. It provides reliable and cost-effective way for interfacing multiple remotely located antennas by reducing their complexity using a centralized architecture. Thus, only simplified BS is located closer to the customer. The main advantages of the RoF technology are low attenuation loss, large bandwidth and easy installation and maintenance. The main drawback of the RoF technology is signal impairments such as noise and distortion that should be eliminated in the future.

References

1. Karthikeyan R, Prakasam S. A survey on radio over fiber for wireless broadband access technologies. Int J Comput Appl 2013;64:975–8887.10.5120/10686-5587Search in Google Scholar

2. Xu Z, Zhang X. Employing inverse return-to-zero and Manchester formats for uplink wavelength reuse in RoF systems. Optics Commun 2011;284:3403–7.10.1016/j.optcom.2010.11.008Search in Google Scholar

3. Mohammed HA. Performance evaluation of DWDM for radio over fiber system with dispersion compensation and EDFA. Int J Comput Appl 2013;72:4011–16.Search in Google Scholar

4. Kaur H, UpadhyayȦ V, JaiswalȦ AK. Comparison of NRZ and RZ data modulation formats in SAC-OCDMA system under introduced clock timing jitter of laser diode. Int J Curr Eng Technol 2014;2:2549–52.Search in Google Scholar

5. Goyal R, Randhawa R, Kaler RS. Single tone and multi tone microwave over fiber communication system using direct detection method. Optik 2012;123:917–23.10.1016/j.ijleo.2011.01.018Search in Google Scholar

6. Singh S, Kapoor A, Kaur G, Kaler RS, Goyal R. Investigation on wavelength re-modulated bi-directional passive optical network for different modulation formats. Optik 2014;125:5378–82.10.1016/j.ijleo.2014.06.019Search in Google Scholar

7. Vyas AK, Agrawal N. Radio over fiber: future technology of communication. Int J Emerging Trends Technol Comput Sci 2012;1:233–7.Search in Google Scholar

8. Goyal R, Kaler RS. A novel architecture of hybrid (WDM/TDM) passive optical networks with suitable modulation format. Opt Fiber Technol 2012;18:518–22.10.1016/j.yofte.2012.08.006Search in Google Scholar

9. Abd El-Naser A, Mohammed MM, El-Halawany E, Zaki Rashed AN, Eid MM. Recent applications of optical parametric amplifiers in hybrid WDM/TDM local area optical networks. Int J Comput Sci Inform Secur 2009;3;125:14–24.Search in Google Scholar

10. Kosek H, He Y, Gu X, Fernando X. All-optical demultiplexing of WLAN and cellular CDMA radio signals. J Lightwave Technol 2007;25:1401–9.10.1109/JLT.2007.896767Search in Google Scholar

11. Raghavendra MV, Prasad PH. Estimation of optical link length for multi Haul applications. Int J Eng Sci Technol 2010;2:1485–91.Search in Google Scholar

12. Mitchell JE. Integrated wireless backhaul over optical access network. J Lightwave Technol 2014;32:3373–82.10.1109/MWP.2013.6724082Search in Google Scholar

13. Sangeetha A, Sudheer SK, Anusudha K. Performance analysis of NRZ, RZ, and chirped RZ transmission formats in dispersion managed 10 Gbit/sec long Haul DWDM lightwave systems. Int J Recent Trends Eng 2009;2:103–5.Search in Google Scholar

14. Sauer M, Kobyakov A, George J. Radio over fiber for picocellular network architectures. J Lightwave Technol 2007;25:3301–20.10.1109/LEOS.2009.5343391Search in Google Scholar

15. Tucker RS. Green optical communications – part II: Energy limitations in networks. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 2011;17:261–74.10.1109/JSTQE.2010.2051217Search in Google Scholar

16. Goyal H, Saxena J, Dewra S. Performance analysis of optical communication system using different channels. Int J Adv Res Comput Commun Eng 2015;4:19–22.Search in Google Scholar

17. Mohamed AE, Rashed AN, Tabbour MS. Transmission characteristics of radio over fiber (ROF) millimeter wave systems in local area optical communication networks. Int J Adv Network Appl 2011;2:876–86.Search in Google Scholar

18. Khayatzadeh R, Elwan HH, Poette J, Cabon B. Impact of amplitude noise in millimeter-wave radio-over-fiber systems. J Lightwave Technol 2015;33:2913–3919.10.1109/JLT.2015.2422572Search in Google Scholar

19. Gowda AS, Dhaini AR, Kazovsky LG, Yang H, Abraha ST, Ng’oma A. Towards green optical/wireless in-building networks: radio-over-fiber. J Lightwave Technol 2014;32:3545–56.10.1109/JLT.2014.2315960Search in Google Scholar

20. Kumar M, Srivastava NK, Jaiswal AK. Design and performance analysis of radio over fiber system incorporating differential phase shift keying modulation in high speed transmission system. IOSR-JECE J Electron Commun Eng 2014;9:37–42.10.9790/2834-09413741Search in Google Scholar

21. Johny J, Shashidharan S. Design and simulation of a radio over fiber system and its performance analysis. Opt Network Technol Data Secur 2012:636–9.10.1109/ICUMT.2012.6459744Search in Google Scholar

22. Liu C, Zhang L, Zhu M, Wang J, Chang L, Chang G-K. A novel multi-service small-cell cloud radio access network for mobile backhaul and computing based on radio-over-fiber technologies. J Lightwave Technol 2013;31:2869–75.10.1109/JLT.2013.2274193Search in Google Scholar

23. Kanno A, Kuri T, Hosako I, Kawanishi T, Yoshida Y, Yasumura Y, et al. Optical and millimeter-wave radio seamless MIMO transmission based on a radio over fiber technology. Opt Express 2012;20:29395–403.10.1364/OE.20.029395Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-2-20
Accepted: 2016-2-29
Published Online: 2016-4-12
Published in Print: 2017-6-27

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 21.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/joc-2016-0020/html
Scroll to top button