Home Technology On the identification of two internal tensorial variables and a heat transport equation with inertial, thermal viscosity and vorticity terms
Article Publicly Available

On the identification of two internal tensorial variables and a heat transport equation with inertial, thermal viscosity and vorticity terms

  • Liliana Restuccia EMAIL logo , David Jou and Michal Pavelka ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: December 8, 2025

Abstract

In a rigid crystal, phonons are quasiparticles that carry heat, and they can be seen at various levels of description like phonon kinetic theory, phonon hydrodynamics, Guyer–Krumhansl equation, or Fourier heat conduction. In a previous paper, we extended the Guyer–Krumhansl equation by adding two internal state variables, a symmetric tensor and an antisymmetric tensor. These internal variables express the viscous and vortical motion of phonons. In the present paper, we analyze the model by means of asymptotic expansion, and we find a geometric analogue of the model. While the zeroth-order expansion reduces the model to the Guyer–Krumhansl equation, the first-order expansion gives a more complicated heat flux evolution equation, of which the stability conditions of equilibrium solutions are studied. The geometric formulation of the model gives the heat flux as a functional of the entropy flux, in contrast to the usual setting of Extended Irreversible Thermodynamics, and also the two fluxes cease to be proportional via the temperature (in contrast to the Clausius formula for entropy flux).

1 Introduction

Due to the recent interest in phonon hydrodynamics [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13] and, in particular, in heat vortices [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], several new extensions of the Guyer–Krumhansl equation have been developed in the context of thermal transport [20], [21]. Thermodynamic foundations for generalized equations for heat transport has been given by non-equilibrium thermodynamics [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30] with internal variables (see [24] and [31], [32], [33], [34]). Vortices in the motion of phonons were described on the level of kinetic theory [18], as well as in phonon hydrodynamics [19], using the framework of General Equation for Non-Equilibrium Reversible-Irreversible Coupling (GENERIC) approach (see [35], [36], [37], [38], [39]). This is in contrast with other approaches where the shear viscosity of the phonon fluid is taken into account [5], [6], [7], but nonlinear terms propagating the vortices is missing. To better represent the phonon vortices, it is convenient to enlarge such frameworks by taking into account some rotational viscosity of the phonon fluid, analogous to that occurring in complex fluids [40], [41], [42].

In a previous paper [14], two nonlocal tensorial variables (the symmetric part Q s and the antisymmetric part Q a of a tensorial variable Q) were added, and a subsequent approximation leads to a generalized Guyer–Krumhansl equation. In this paper, we further analyze this approach.

In particular, we identify a posteriori the two internal variables by means of an appropriate asymptotic method, in order to obtain a heat transfer equation more general than the one derived in [14], that contains additional contributions describing special viscous and vortical motions of the phonons inside the considered rigid heat-conducting media.

The existence of vortices does not imply the need of a rotational viscosity; vortices arise in the usual Navier–Stokes equation with only shear viscosity (or with shear viscosity and bulk viscosity). In fact, the concept of thermal viscosity is not new: it is a part of the model of phonon hydrodynamics, used for more than 20 years in the literature. It does not come from dimensional considerations, but from the mathematical structure of the equation for the heat flux, in situations in which it is analogous to the equation for velocity in viscous fluids. The essential physical aspect of rotational viscosity is the irreversible transfer of some part of the macroscopic or mesoscopic rotational energy of vortices to microscopic rotational energy of the constituent particles [40], [41], [42].

In the case of complex fluids, this refers to elongated molecules which may rotate with respect to some of their axes, and which take organized macroscopic rotational energy into disorganized molecular rotations. In the case of phonon hydrodynamics, such microscopic rotations could arise in the case that the basic constituents of the crystal are not single particles, but couples of particles which do not only vibrate around their respective equilibrium positions but also rotate around their equilibrium orientation. A part of the organized rotational momentum of the phonon fluid would then go into disorganized rotational motion of the couples constituting the crystal. Thus, it would be found not in any crystal, but in particular crystals having such microscopic constitutions.

In this sense, we are enlarging the concept of phonon hydrodynamics to a more complex interpretations than the simplest phonon hydrodynamics. Some attempts in this direction have been done by analogy of some rheological models describing non-Newtonian fluids, as power-law fluids [11] or non-linear viscoelastic fluids [12], but considering the symmetric part Q s of a tensorial internal variable Q. Here, instead, we also consider the antisymmetric part Q a of such a tensor.

The presence of non-local effects in generalized equations for heat transport is of special interest in systems in which l (the mean-free path of the heat carriers, phonons) is comparable to (or bigger than) L, the size of the system (for instance, it could be the radius of a cylindrical channel), i.e., for Knudsen number l L 1 . This may be valid for systems small enough, as the nanosystems, having their size comparable to the mean free path, or when (see [14]) “the mean free path is long enough to become comparable to the size of the system, as for low-temperature phonons (superfluid helium-4 [43]), or in rarefied systems, as for instance it occurs in aerodynamics at low environmental pressure”. In nanosystems, generalizations of the Guyer–Krumhansl equation for the heat transfer are used [10].

In this paper we use the Gyarmati approach (see [26], [27]), where the specific entropy s depends on the equilibrium state variables but also presents homogeneous quadratic terms depending on vectorial, tensorial variables, and current densities. Then, we show an analogous model formulated within the GENERIC framework.

The obtained results may be relevant in several technological fields. In [18], phonon vortices at heavy impurities in two-dimensional materials were investigated theoretically and discovered. Using the density-functional-theory, calculations for two configurations of Si (Silicon) impurities in Graphene, Si–C 3 and Si–C 4 and of other materials were carried out and it was shown that the vortex formation is due to the vibrational displacements of large-impurities heavy atoms at a characteristic frequency. Experimental measurements were performed using special monochromated electron microscopes, and it was discovered that vortices present circular patterns of vibrating atoms, reflecting the local symmetry and connecting to a phonon wave. Latest generations of microscopes could make more accurate investigations. It is expected that phonon vortices at defects influence the thermal conductivity and other thermal properties. In [19], a von Kármán vortex street was predicted for higher heat fluxes in the presence of impurities.

The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we recall the model for rigid media formulated in [14] while providing further clarifications. The model has two non-local macroscopic internal variables, the symmetric part and the antisymmetric part of a second order tensor Q, Q s and Q a . The evolution equations of Q s and Q (a) and a generalized Guyer–Krumhansl equation, describing kinematic and viscous motions of phonons with a rotational viscosity are presented. In Section 3, we derive other forms of the generalized heat equation obtained in Section 2, bringing in closer to the Guyer–Krumhansl equation. Section 4 shows similarities between our model, hydrodynamics of micropolar fluids, and hydrodynamics of phonons. In Section 5, we identify the two internal tensorial variables, Q s and Q (a), by asymptotic expansion of the evolution equations, keeping the zeroth and first orders. The small parameters with respect to which the equations are expanded express the ratios of the relaxation times of each variable and the typical timescale. Furthermore, the stability conditions of equilibrium solutions of this obtained equation are studied. Finally, Section 6 contains a geometric analogue of the models, formulated within the GENERIC approach, which suggests an alternative approach for the formulation of Extended Irreversible Thermodynamics and leads to a non-Clausius relation between the entropy flux and heat flux.

2 Recalling the model

The aim of the model presented in [14] is to describe diffusive, ballistic, viscous, and vortical motions of phonons. On the macroscopic scale it is possible to investigate all these behaviours within the framework of non-equilibrium thermodynamics with internal variables. In this Section, we recall the model, that leads to a generalized Guyer–Krumhansl equation, while providing further insight.

The thermodynamic state space C contains, besides the internal energy u and the heat flux J (q), two non-local macroscopic internal variables, Q s and Q a , which express the symmetric part and the antisymmetric part of a second order tensor Q, C = C u , J ( q ) , Q s , Q a .

Balance laws within the thermodynamic state space are described by the following equations:

  1. Internal energy balance equation:

    (1) ρ d u d t + J ( q ) = 0 ,

    where ρ is the mass density field of the considered medium (supposed to be constant), d/dt is the material time derivative, u is the internal energy density, and J (q) is the heat flux.

  2. Entropy inequality:

    (2) σ ( s ) = ρ d s d t + J ( s ) 0 ,

    where the fields of specific entropy s, the entropy flux density J (s), and the entropy production density σ (s) are constitutive quantities, functions of the independent variables of the thermodynamics state space.

As neither the heat flux nor the internal variables are a priori conserved, we employ the Gyarmati approach [26], [27] to find the remaining evolution equations. The specific entropy s is not function only on the local equilibrium state variables, but also depends on J (q), Q s , and Q a . To ensure stability, entropy is a concave function of the state variables, and thus near equilibrium it can be approximated by a quadratic form,

(3) s u , J ( q ) , Q s , Q a = s ( eq ) ( u ) 1 2 α 1 J ( q ) 2 1 2 α 2 s Q s : Q s 1 2 α 2 a Q a : Q a ,

where s (eq)(u) is the equilibrium entropy function, α 1, α 2 s and α 2 a are inductivity constants (positive for the sake of thermodynamic stability), and the symbol “:” denotes double contraction, for example Q s : Q s = Q i j s Q i j s ( i , j = 1,2,3 ) .

Derivatives of the entropy with respect to the state variables are then

(4a) 1 T = s u

(4b) s J i ( q ) = α 1 J i ( q ) ,

(4c) s Q i j s = α 2 s Q i j s ,

(4d) s Q i j a = α 2 a Q i j a .

The entropy flux J (s) is assumed having the form

(5) J ( s ) = T 1 J ( q ) β 1 s Q s J ( q ) β 1 a Q a J ( q ) = T 1 J ( q ) β 1 s Q s J ( q ) β 1 a Q ( a ) × J ( q ) ,

where β 1 s and β 2 s are constant material coefficients, that conveniently represent the deviation of J (s) from the local equilibrium. Quantity Q i ( a ) = ϵ ijk Q j k a is the axial vector associated with antisymmetric tensor Q a . The symbol “⋅” indicates one contraction, for instance Q s J ( q ) = Q i j s J j ( q ) , and we have used the formula Q a J (q) = Q (a) × J (q), with the symbol “×” indicating the vector product, see Appendix A for more details.

The evolution equations for the independent variables J (q), Q s and Q (a) are then found from the entropy production, which is obtained by taking the time derivative of entropy,

(6) s ̇ = T 1 u ̇ α 1 J ( q ) J ̇ ( q ) α 2 s Q s : Q ̇ s α 2 a Q a : Q ̇ a ,

where the upper dot “” denotes the total time derivative. The entropy production σ s , see Equation (2), is then

(7) σ s = ρ α 1 J ( q ) J ̇ ( q ) + J ( q ) T ( 1 ) β 1 s J ( q ) Q s + Q s : J ( q ) s β 1 a Q ( a ) × J ( q ) ρ α 2 s Q s : Q ̇ s ρ α 2 a Q a : Q ̇ a .

In (7) we have taken into account that x i ( Q i j J j ( q ) ) = Q i j , i J j ( q ) + Q i j J j , i ( q ) = ( Q j i ) , i T J j ( q ) + Q i j ( J i , j ( q ) ) T = J j ( q ) ( Q j i ) , i T + Q i j ( J i , j ( q ) ) T , where the symbol “ T ” means transposition and a comma in lower indices denotes the partial spatial derivate, for instance J i , j ( q ) = J i ( q ) x j = J ( q ) i j . Furthermore, we have decomposed the gradient of heat flux ∇J (q) in its symmetric part J ( q ) s and antisymmetric part J ( q ) a . Note also that we consider only the case of a rigid heat conductor at rest, so that the substantial time derivative is equal to the partial temporal derivative t .

Using the expression x i ( ϵ ijk Q j ( a ) J k ( q ) ) = ϵ ijk Q j , i ( a ) J k ( q ) + ϵ ijk Q j ( a ) J k , i ( q ) = J k ( q ) ϵ kij Q j , i ( a ) Q j ( a ) ϵ jik J k , i ( q ) , the formula for entropy production can be then also rewritten as

(8) σ s = J ( q ) T ( 1 ) ρ α 1 J ̇ ( q ) β 1 s Q s β 1 ( a ) × Q ( a ) + Q s : ρ α 2 s Q ̇ s β 1 s J ( q ) s + + Q ( a ) ρ α 2 ( a ) Q ̇ ( a ) + β 1 ( a ) × J ( q ) ,

where the following notation is used, β 1 a = β 1 ( a ) , and α 2 ( a ) = 2 α 2 a , as well as identities Q i j a Q ̇ i j a = ϵ ijk Q k ( a ) ϵ ijl Q ̇ l ( a ) = ( δ j j δ k l δ l j δ k j ) Q k ( a ) Q ̇ l ( a ) = 3 Q ( a ) Q ̇ ( a ) Q ( a ) Q ̇ ( a ) = 2 Q ( a ) Q ̇ ( a ) .

The entropy production σ s (8) is given by the sum of products of thermodynamic fluxes and forces. Assuming that the media under consideration are perfectly isotropic and thus have the symmetry property of being invariant under orthogonal transformations, we obtain the following linear relations among the chosen thermodynamic fluxes J (q), Q s , Q (a) and the corresponding thermodynamic affinities:

(9a) J ( q ) = λ 1 T 2 T ( 1 ) ρ α 1 J ̇ ( q ) β 1 s Q s β 1 ( a ) × Q ( a ) ,

(9b) Q s = λ 2 s ρ α 2 s Q ̇ s β 1 s ( J ( q ) ) s ,

(9c) Q ( a ) = λ 2 ( a ) ρ α 2 ( a ) Q ̇ ( a ) + β 1 ( a ) × ( J ( q ) ) ,

where λ 1 (heat conductivity), λ 2 s , and λ 2 ( a ) are positive scalar coefficients. Note that J (q), Q s , and Q (a) are a polar vector, a second order tensor, and an axial vector, respectively, that do not couple for the Curie principle [23].

Then, in the isotropic case the Onsager matrix is diagonal. In Section 6, we show that this diagonality is partly a consequence of the Hamiltonian structure of the model (taking into account only the reversible evolution).

The two equations (9b) and (9c) are coupled with the evolution equation for the heat flux (9a). If we assume that these two equations relax quickly to their quasi-stationary states where Q ̇ s = 0 = Q ̇ ( a ) , the remaining equation for the heat flux turns to a generalized Guyer–Krumhansl equation

(10) J ( q ) = λ 1 T τ J ̇ ( q ) + l 1 2 J ( q ) + Δ J ( q ) l 2 2 × ( × J ( q ) ) ,

with

(11) τ = ρ λ 1 T 2 α 1 , l 1 2 = 1 2 λ 1 T 2 λ 2 s β 1 s 2 , l 2 2 = λ 1 T 2 λ 2 ( a ) ( β 1 ( a ) ) 2 ,

which was identified in [14].

In (10), coefficients l 1 2 and l 2 2 represent the square of the mean free path of phonons related to the exchange of linear momentum and internal angular momentum, respectively. Coefficient l 1 2 is multiplied by a term describing weakly non-local effects and, in particular, the viscous motions of phonons. Coefficient l 2 2 is multiplied by a non-local term related to the rotational motion of the heat flux, describing rotational viscous motion of the heat carriers in crystals of elongated or polarized constituents. These terms are analogous to the terms that in the Navier–Stokes equation for viscous fluids describe the shear and rotational viscous effects of fluid particles.

When coefficient l 2 2 can be neglected, Equation (10) reduces to the Guyer–Krumhansl heat equation,

(12) J ( q ) = λ 1 T τ J ̇ ( q ) + l 1 2 J ( q ) + Δ J ( q ) ,

describing both diffusive motion of phonons and ballistic motion of phonons subjected to collisions with the walls of the solid.

3 Enlarged Guyer–Krumhansl description

In this Section we show how Equation (10) is connected with various levels of description of beyond-Fourier heat conduction. Heat equation (10) was found by assuming that Q ̇ s and Q ̇ ( a ) were negligible in their evolution equations (9b) and (9c). In other words, we assumed that the tensorial quantities Q s and Q (a) relax quickly to their respective quasi-equilibria, characterized by Q s = λ 2 s β 1 s ( J ( q ) ) s and Q ( a ) = λ 2 ( a ) β 1 ( a ) × J ( q ) . When we plug these constitutive relations into the remaining evolution equation for the heat flux (9a), we obtain

(13) J ( q ) = λ 1 T 2 T ( 1 ) ρ α 1 J ̇ ( q ) + β 1 s 2 λ 2 s ( J ( q ) ) s ( β 1 ( a ) ) 2 λ 2 ( a ) × × J ( q ) = λ 1 T 2 T ( 1 ) ρ α 1 J ̇ ( q ) + 1 2 β 1 s 2 λ 2 s ( β 1 ( a ) ) 2 λ 2 ( a ) ( J ( q ) ) + 1 2 β 1 s 2 λ 2 s + ( β 1 ( a ) ) 2 λ 2 ( a ) Δ J ( q ) ,

which is another form generalized Guyer–Krumhansl equation (10).

In case of β 1 ( a ) = 0 , when the entropy does not depend on the skew-symmetric tensor Q a , Equation (13) simplifies to the Guyer–Krumhansl equation,

(14) J ( q ) = λ 1 T 2 T ( 1 ) ρ α 1 J ̇ ( q ) + β 1 s 2 λ 2 s ( J ( q ) ) s ,

see Equation (65) in [20].

Moreover, if we assume that the entropy is independent of the symmetric tensor Q s as well, the equation further simplifies to the Cattaneo equation [44],

(15) J ( q ) = λ 1 T 2 T ( 1 ) ρ α 1 J ̇ ( q ) ,

describing at the macroscopic scale thermal signals (second-sound phenomena) with relaxation time τ and finite velocity of propagation.

Finally, if the dependence of entropy on the heat flux is negligible as well, the equation restores the usual Fourier heat conduction J (q) = −λ 1T, describing thermal signals with relaxation time τ null, valid at large space scales and at low frequencies.

4 Hydrodynamic analogies

Equation (10) may be of special interest in the context of phonon hydrodynamics. It contains the usual Guyer–Krumhansl equation (the third term on the right-hand side), that is related to the viscous behaviour of phonons, and the fourth term on the right-hand side, that describes the rotational viscous behaviour arising from rotational motions of the phonon fluid (heat vortices). This term may be physically relevant when the particles constituting the crystal are not single particles but dipoles (see Figure 1). In this case, the rotational viscosity describes the transfer from organized macroscopic rotational motion of the heat vortex to microscopic disorganized individual rotations of the dipoles.

Figure 1: 
The dots represent particles. In (a), the crystal is made by single particles; in (b), it is made by dipoles. In (a), the particles vibrate; in (b), they vibrate and rotate. The crystal may have any kind of geometry; in particular, we may assume, for the sake of simplicity, that it has a cubic crystallization.
Figure 1:

The dots represent particles. In (a), the crystal is made by single particles; in (b), it is made by dipoles. In (a), the particles vibrate; in (b), they vibrate and rotate. The crystal may have any kind of geometry; in particular, we may assume, for the sake of simplicity, that it has a cubic crystallization.

Equation (10) can be also written in the form

(16) J ̇ ( q ) = J ( q ) τ λ 1 τ T + ν 1 Δ J ( q ) + J ( q ) ν 2 × ( × J ( q ) ) ,

with ν 1 and ν 2 playing the role of shear and kinematic viscosities, given by ν 1 = l 1 2 τ and ν 2 = l 2 2 τ . J (q) is given by J (q) = (ρc v T)v, with v being the average velocity of phonon flow and c v the specific heat per unit mass (see for instance [19]).

From the point of view of hydrodynamic analogies, Equation (16) is similar to the Navier–Stokes equation for micropolar fluids, having elongated, not spherical molecules,

(17) v ̇ = p ρ + μ 1 ρ Δ v + μ 0 ρ v + μ 2 ρ × ( × v ) 2 ω ,

where v is the velocity field, ∇p the pressure field, μ 0, μ 1 and μ 2 are the bulk, the shear and the rotational viscosities, and ω is the local spin or intrinsic angular momentum (not considered in this paper). The rotational degrees of freedom, that vibrate with respect to their equilibrium position, contribute to the macroscopic rotational energy (see [45], [46], [47], [48]). In (17), ω appears as related to the balance equation of the angular momentum, we consider ω = 0. If the liquid flows in a porous environment, an additional term α v ρ on the right-hand side of Navier–Stokes equation (17) could be present (a Darcy term), α being a porosity coefficient. Such Darcy term would play a role analogous to the first term on the right side-hand side of equation (16), J ( q ) τ .

Moreover, we can have in a solid a lattice formed by elongated (not spherical) particles (as for instance dipoles), free to rotate around their center of mass, heat transfer will incorporate vibrational energy and rotational energy. The interaction of the heat vortices with the rotational degrees of freedom of the components of the lattice, will transfer collective rotational motion of the heat flux to individual disordered random motion. This transfer contributes to dissipation and is phenomenologically described by the rotational viscosity.

From the point of view of the analogy between the hydrodynamics of phonons and the hydrodynamics of Navier Stokes fluids, vortices are found from the Navier–Stokes equation for isotropic fluids using the Reynolds method, that is used to study turbulence. This method leads to finding a term called Reynolds stress tensor, that describes vortices in the isotropic fluids (see [40]).

In this paper the two internal variables Q s and Q (a) describe thermal phenomena inside the medium from the macroscopic point of view, as for instance the introduction of the “anisotropy-grain tensor” describes particular physical fields responsible for the internal structure and/or geometry of anisotropic media in ferroelastic crystals. In Section 5, we add some remarks about the use of the internal variable as a powerful tool to model the behaviour of media.

5 Identification of the two internal variables Q s and Q a and a heat equation with special thermal viscosity terms

In Sections 2 and 3, the two internal variables Q s and Q a were eliminated to obtain the generalized heat transport equations (10) and (13). In the current Section, we determine the expressions for the two internal variables in more detail.

Internal variables can be used to describe complex phenomena continuous media [24], [27], [31], [32], [33], [34]. In several papers, the macroscopic internal variables are introduced by their definitions to describe the internal structure of a medium. For example, the anisotropy-grain tensor describes particular physical fields responsible for the internal structure and/or geometry in ferroelastic crystals [49]. It is assumed that the medium as a whole is homogeneous and isotropic, where there exist particular physical fields responsible for its internal anisotropy described by internal variables. There are other example of internal variables also in rheology and other physical fields [14]. In [50] in a model for media presenting several microscopic phenomena of dielectric polarization, n hidden variables influencing the dielectric polarization are introduced. By means of a particular demonstration, they are interpreted as n partial specific polarization polar vectors, which are parts of a total specific polarization and describe the dielectric relaxation of polar isotropic media [51]. Using these specific partial polarizations as internal variables, a generalized Debye equation for the dielectric relaxation is obtained for isotropic media. Moreover, in [52], a model for isotropic media presenting several microscopic phenomena of magnetization showed that it is possible to describe these microscopic phenomena by introducing n partial specific magnetizations as internal variables. Using these specific partial magnetizations, a generalized Snoek equation for magnetic relaxation phenomena was obtained by eliminating the internal variables. This is the case of complex media where different kinds of molecules, contributing to the total magnetization, have different magnetic susceptibilities and relaxation times. These physical situations arise for example in magnetic resonance in medicine, biology and other science fields, where different molecules present particular magnetic relaxation phenomena. In other papers the internal variables are eliminated by an appropriate method from the formalism as in [13]. In Reference [31], Muschik defines the internal variable by seven concepts, among which: the internal variables need a microscopic/molecular model for their physical interpretation. In this Section, we use asymptotic expansion to identify the two internal variables Q s and Q a . It seems that this asymptotic method to determine internal variables has not been used in literature so far for the purpose of internal variable identification. It allows to find a generalized Guyer–Krumhansl-like heat equation that describes more complex heat phenomena.

5.1 Direct identification

Let us first directly identify the internal variables with quantities related to the heat flux. Equations (9a), (9b) and (9c) can be written in the following form

(18a) τ 1 J ̇ ( q ) + J ( q ) = λ 1 T 2 T ( 1 ) β 1 s Q s β 1 ( a ) × Q ( a ) ,

(18b) τ 2 Q ̇ s = Q s λ 2 s β 1 s ( J ( q ) ) s ,

(18c) τ 3 Q ̇ ( a ) = Q ( a ) + λ 2 ( a ) β 1 ( a ) ( × J ( q ) ) ,

with

(19) τ 1 = τ = ρ λ 1 α 1 T 2 , τ 2 = ρ λ 2 s α 2 s , τ 3 = ρ λ 2 ( a ) α 2 ( a ) ,

the relaxation times of J (q), Q s , and Q (a), respectively. These equations represent the most detailed level of description where three state variables and three evolution equations are present (on top of the energy conservation equation). We could identify the two variables as

(20) Q s = J ( q ) s and Q a = J ( q ) a , or J ( q ) ( a ) = 1 2 × J ( q ) ,

where we have considered the related axial vector Q (a), Q ( a ) = J ( q ) ( a ) (see (52) in Appendix A). However, by means of this identification Equations (18b) and (18c) take following form

(21) τ 2 ( J ( q ) ) ̇ s = 1 λ 2 s β 1 s ( J ( q ) ) s , and τ 3 ( × J ̇ ( q ) ) = 1 2 λ 2 ( a ) β 1 ( a ) ( × J ( q ) ) ,

and this choice is true in a steady state only under certain conditions. Indeed, in a steady state, when the right-hand sides of equation (21) disappears, ( J ( q ) ) s 0 , ∇ × J (q) ≠ 0, and J (q) is a function dependent only on the spatial variables (not on time t), the above proposals for the internal variables are valid when λ 2 s β 1 s = 1 and λ 2 ( a ) β 1 ( a ) = 1 / 2 .

5.2 Asymptotic expansion

To remove the above restriction of the coefficient, we apply asymptotic expansion to identify a posteriori the internal variables. The tensor fields Q s and Q (a), which result from their evolution equations (18b) and (18c), can be then formally asymptotically expanded by means of a perturbation theory, which is a part of asymptotic approximation (see [53]).

In the first step, we need to rewrite the evolution equations (18b), (18c), and (18a) in non-dimensional form, using x = x ̄ x ̂ , where x ̄ stands for a typical length at which spatial variations take place and x ̂ is the non-dimensional position. Similarly, t = t ̄ t ̂ with a typical time t ̄ and a non-dimensional time t ̂ , T = T ̄ T ̂ for the temperature, = ̄ ̂ = 1 x ̄ ̂ for the gradient operator. The non-dimensional heat flux is then

(22a) J ( q ) = J ̄ ( q ) J ̂ ( q ) = λ 1 T ̄ 2 T ̂ 2 ̄ ̂ 1 T ̄ 1 T ̂ = λ 1 T ̄ x ̄ T ̂ 2 ̂ 1 T ̂ , with J ̄ ( q ) = λ 1 T ̄ x ̄ and J ̂ ( q ) = T ̂ 2 ̂ 1 T ̂ ,

while the non-dimensional internal variables become

(22b) Q s = Q ̄ s Q s ̂ = λ 2 s β 1 s ̄ J ̄ ( q ) ( ̂ J ̂ ( q ) ) s = λ 2 s β 1 s J ̄ ( q ) x ̄ Q ̂ s

with

Q ̂ s = ( ̂ J ̂ ( q ) ) s and Q ̄ s = λ 2 s β 1 s J ̄ ( q ) x ̄

and

(22c) Q ( a ) = Q ̄ ( a ) Q ̂ ( a ) = λ 2 ( a ) β 1 ( a ) ̄ J ̄ ( q ) ( ̂ J ̂ ( q ) ) ( a ) = λ 2 ( a ) β 1 ( a ) J ̄ ( q ) x ̄ ( ̂ J ̂ ( q ) ) ( a )

with

Q ̂ ( a ) = ( ̂ J ̂ ( q ) ) ( a ) and Q ̄ ( a ) = λ 2 ( a ) β 1 ( a ) J ̄ ( q ) x ̄ .

For the heat flux J (q), Q s , and Q (a) in (18a), (18b) and (18c), we obtain the evolution equations of J (q), Q s and Q (a) in the following non-dimensional form

(23a) τ 1 t ̄ J ̂ ( q ) t ̂ = J ̂ ( q ) + T ̂ 2 ̂ 1 T ̂ λ 1 T ̄ 2 T ̂ 2 β 1 s 2 λ 2 s 1 x ̄ 2 ̂ Q ̂ s λ 1 T ̄ 2 T ̂ 2 ( β 1 ( a ) ) 2 λ 2 ( a ) 1 x ̄ 2 ̂ Q ̂ ( a ) ,

(23b) τ 2 t ̄ t ̂ Q ̂ s = Q ̂ s ̂ J ̂ ( q ) s ,

(23c) τ 3 t ̄ t ̂ Q ̂ ( a ) = Q ̂ ( a ) + ̂ × J ̂ ( q ) ,

where the hats denote the non-dimensional quantities while bars identify the typical scales.

In the second step, we look for the solution of equation (23b) as a power series of the small parameter ε 1 = τ 2 t ̄ , i.e., with respect to the asymptotic sequences 1 , ε 1 , ε 1 2 , , as ɛ 1 → 0, around the initial steady state Q ̂ s ( 0 ) . Simultaneously, we look for the solution of equation (23c) as an asymptotic power series of the small parameter ε 2 = τ 3 t ̄ , namely with respect to the asymptotic sequences 1 , ε 2 , ε 2 2 , , as ɛ 2 → 0, around the initial state Q ̂ ( a ) ( 0 ) . As the two equations are not directly coupled, they can be solved simultaneously, assuming both the parameters are small. The expansions of the internal variables are then

(24a) Q ̂ s = Q ̂ s ( 0 ) + ε 1 Q ̂ s ( 1 ) + ε 1 2 Q ̂ s ( 2 ) + O ε 1 3 as ε 1 0

(24b) Q ̂ ( a ) = Q ̂ ( a ) ( 0 ) + ε 2 Q ̂ ( a ) ( 1 ) + ε 2 2 Q ̂ ( a ) ( 2 ) + O ε 2 3 as ε 2 0 .

In (24a) and (24a) the expressions as ɛ 1 → 0 and as ɛ 2 → 0 correspond, from the physical point view, to say as τ 2 t ̄ 1 and as τ 3 t ̄ 1 .

The tensor fields Q ̂ s and Q ̂ ( a ) have be expanded simultaneously because their evolution equations are not coupled with each other, so only the ratios of their timescales and the typical timescale of J (q) are important. The evolution for J (q) is assumed to proceed at a much slower timescale, i.e., we assume that the timescales of Q s and Q (a) are much smaller than the timescale of J (q). In other words, both Q s and Q (a) evolve exponentially to their respective quasi-equilibria on timescales faster than the timescale of J (q).

In the third step, relations (24a) and (24b) and their temporal derivatives with respect to t ̂ are plugged into Equations (23b) and (23c), respectively, and, going back to the nomenclature ε 1 = τ 2 t ̄ and ε 2 = τ 3 t ̄ , we obtain the following expressions

(25a) τ 2 t ̄ t ̂ Q ̂ s ( 0 ) + O τ 2 t ̄ 2 = Q ̂ s ( 0 ) τ 2 t ̄ Q ̂ s ( 1 ) ̂ J ̂ ( q ) s ,

(25b) τ 3 t ̄ t ̂ Q ̂ ( a ) ( 0 ) + O τ 3 t ̄ 2 = Q ̂ ( a ) ( 0 ) τ 3 t ̄ Q ̂ ( a ) ( 1 ) + ̂ × J ̂ ( q )

where only the zeroth and first-order terms are considered.

The fourth step consists of matching the obtained series, obtaining the zeroth order of the expansions

(26) Q ̂ s ( 0 ) = ̂ J ̂ ( q ) s and Q ̂ ( a ) ( 0 ) = ̂ × J ̂ ( q ) ,

which are the zeroth-order solutions of the evolution equations (23b) and (23c) for Q ̂ s and Q ̂ ( a ) , and the first orders of the expansions

(27) t ̂ ̂ J ̂ ( q ) s = Q ̂ s ( 1 ) and t ̂ ̂ × J ̂ ( q ) = Q ̂ ( a ) ( 1 ) .

From equations (26), we see that the expressions until the zeroth order approximation of Q ̂ s and Q ̂ ( a ) represent their values in a thermodynamic steady state (see (20), (23b) and (23c)).

The fifth step of the method consists in plugging these relations (26) and (27) in (24a) and (24b), obtaining the following identification of the internal variables approximately up to the first-order of the asymptotic expansions

(28a) Q ̂ s = ̂ J ̂ ( q ) s + τ 2 t ̄ t ̂ ̂ J ̂ ( q ) s + O τ 2 t ̄ 2 ,

(28b) Q ̂ ( a ) = ̂ × J ̂ ( q ) + τ 3 t ̄ t ̂ ̂ × J ̂ ( q ) + O τ 3 t ̄ 2 ,

Finally, the last step consists of obtaining from the non-dimensional fields Q ̂ s and Q ̂ ( a ) the fields Q s and Q (a). Thus, multiplying (28a) by Q ̄ s = λ 2 s β 1 s J ̄ ( q ) x ̄ and (28b) by Q ̄ ( a ) = λ 2 ( a ) β 1 ( a ) J ̄ ( q ) x ̄ , we obtain the following constitutive relations

(29a) Q s = λ 2 s β 1 s J ( q ) s + τ 2 λ 2 s β 1 s J ̇ ( q ) s + O τ 2 t ̄ 2 ,

(29b) Q ( a ) = λ 2 ( a ) β 1 ( a ) × J ( q ) τ 3 λ 2 ( a ) β 1 ( a ) × J ̇ ( q ) + O τ 3 t ̄ 2 .

Constitutive relations (29) can be now plugged into the evolution equation (18a) for J q , which leads to

(30) τ 1 J ̇ ( q ) + J ( q ) = λ 1 T + l 1 2 J ( q ) + Δ J ( q ) h 1 2 J ̇ ( q ) + Δ J ̇ ( q ) l 2 2 × × J ( q ) + h 2 2 × × J ̇ ( q ) ,

where

l 1 2 = 1 2 λ 1 T 2 λ 2 s β 1 s 2 , h 1 2 = 1 2 ρ T 2 λ 1 λ 2 s β 1 s α 2 s = 1 2 T 2 λ 1 β 1 s τ 2 ,

(31) l 2 2 = λ 1 T 2 λ 2 ( a ) ( β 1 ( a ) ) 2 , h 2 2 = 1 2 ρ λ 1 T 2 λ 2 ( a ) β 1 ( a ) α 2 ( a ) = 1 2 T 2 λ 1 β 1 ( a ) τ 3

are positive.

To obtain Equation (30) we have taken into consideration that [ ( J ̇ ( q ) ) s ] i = j = 1 3 x j 1 2 ( J ̇ ( q ) ) i , j + ( J ̇ ( q ) ) j , i = 1 2 ( J ̇ i , j j ( q ) + J ̇ j , j i ( q ) ) .

Furthermore, (30) with (31) can take the following form

(32) τ 1 J ̇ ( q ) = J ( q ) λ 1 T + γ s ( J ( q ) ) + γ ( a ) Δ J ( q ) + δ s ( J ̇ ( q ) ) + δ ( a ) Δ J ̇ ( q ) ,

with

(33) δ s = λ 1 T 2 1 2 β 1 s 2 λ 2 s τ 2 + ( β 1 ( a ) ) 2 λ 2 ( a ) τ 3 and δ ( a ) = λ 1 T 2 1 2 β 1 s 2 λ 2 s τ 2 ( β 1 ( a ) ) 2 λ 2 ( a ) τ 3 .

Equation (30) is a generalized Guyer–Krumhansl equation more general than the heat transport equation (10). Coefficients h 1 2 and h 2 2 are proportional to relaxation times τ 2 and τ 3, respectively, and are multiplied by terms describing particular viscous motions and vortical motions of phonons.

Note also that boundary conditions must be chosen so that energy is not pumped into the extra state variables Q s and Q (a). Otherwise, the asymptotic expansion would fail, since no relaxation would be possible. Boundary conditions for the heat flux are typically of slip or partial-slip form, but in general it might be rather complicated to fully determine the interaction of the bulk with the external environment [54], [55].

The internal variables can also be excited by a time-dependent boundary condition, where the time-scale is shorter than the relaxation times τ 2 and τ 3. Then, the identification of the internal variables ceases to be valid, and the full system of equations (18a), (18b), and c(18c) must be solved. The internal variables can be thus considered as relaxed to their quasi-equilibrium values only when the time-scale of the remaining effects (both bulk and boundary) is much larger than the relaxation times.

Of course, when the relaxation times τ 2 and τ 3 are much smaller than the typical time t ̄ , equations (32) and (33) simplify to the zeroth order approximation evolution equation for J (q) (13). Indeed, in (30), the terms in h 1 and h 2 may be of interest in processes where the time derivative of J (q) is sufficiently high; otherwise, in slow phenomena or in steady states, the terms with h 1 and h 2 disappear and one recovers the enlarged version of the Guyer–Krumhansl-like equation with shear and rotational phonon viscosities.

From the point of view of hydrodynamic analogies, Equation (30) is similar to the following Navier–Stokes equation for complex fluids, composed of elongated molecules (not of spherical form), having rotational degrees of freedom, in addition to vibrational ones, around their equilibrium position. This rotational motion of molecules, giving rise to a rotational viscosity, can interact with their vortical motions.

When coefficients h 1 2 , h 2 2 , and l 2 2 can be neglected, Equation (30) reduces to a generalized Guyer–Krumhansl heat equation. In the case when the coefficients l 1 2 , h 1 2 , l 2 2 , and h 2 2 can be disregarded, it reduces to the Maxwell–Vernotte–Cattaneo model (15), and in the case where coefficients τ, l 1 2 , h 1 2 , l 2 2 , and h 2 2 can be neglected, it reduces to the Fourier equation.

5.3 Stability conditions of the equilibrium solutions of the heat equation (30)

Let us now analyze in one-dimensional case the stability of the heat equation with special thermal viscosity (30), with respect to perturbations of the temperature and heat flux fields T(t, x), J (q)(t, x, being J (q) ≡ (q, 0, 0), starting from their initial values chosen as thermodynamic equilibrium values, T 0 constant and q 0 = 0, respectively. Therefore, we have TT 0 + δT, qδq. In the one dimensional case, if we take into consideration the following relation u = c v T, the internal energy balance equation (1) takes the form

(34) ρ c v t T = x q ,

where c v = d u d T > 0 , according to thermodynamic stability.

Equation (30) in the one dimensional case takes the form

(35) τ 1 t q = q λ 1 x T + 2 l 1 2 x x q 2 h 1 2 x x t q ,

Hence, the perturbed forms of the system of equations (34) and (30) can be written as

(36) ρ c v t δ T = x δ q ,

(37) τ 1 t δ q = δ q λ 1 x δ T + 2 l 1 2 x x δ q 2 h 1 2 x x t δ q .

Then, from the system of perturbed equations (36) and (37) we obtain

(38) τ 1 ρ c v t t δ T = ρ c v t δ T + λ 1 x x T + 2 ρ c v l 1 2 x x t δ T 2 h 1 2 ρ c v x x t t δ T .

We look for the solutions of this equation having the form of an exponential plane wave

(39) δ T = δ T ̂ i ( ω t k x ) , δ q = δ q ̂ i ( ω t k x ) ,

where δ T ̂ and δ q ̂ are the amplitudes of the waves δT and δq, ω the angular frequency, ω = 2 π f = 2 π / T , being f the wave frequency and T the wave period, k the wave number, given by k = 2π/λ, with λ the wave length. Furthermore, the wave propagation velocity v is defined by v = ω/k and from the previous relations we have λ = v T .

In order to obtain the asymptotic exponential stability of the equilibrium solutions we require that in (39) ω is a complex number with positive imaginary part.

From (38) and (39) we obtain the dispersion relation

(40) τ 1 ρ c v 2 h 1 2 ρ c v k 2 ω 2 i ρ c v 1 + 2 l 1 2 k 2 ω λ 1 k 2 = 0 .

The roots are

(41) ω ± = i ρ c v 1 + 2 l 1 2 k 2 2 ρ c v τ 1 2 h 1 2 k 2 ± D 2 ρ c v τ 1 2 h 1 2 k 2

with D = ρ 2 c v 2 1 + 2 l 1 2 k 2 2 + 4 ρ c v τ 1 2 h 1 2 k 2 λ 1 k 2 .

We consider two cases:

  1. If τ 1 > 2 h 1 2 k 2 we can have:

    1. D > 0, we obtain two roots with the same positive imaginary part,

    2. D < 0, we obtain two roots with positive imaginary parts.

Thus, in this case (a) the physical fields T and q are stable when λ 2 > 4 π 2 2 h 1 2 / τ 1 , i.e., when λ > 2 π 2 h 1 2 / τ 1 , taking into consideration results (1) and (2);

  1. If τ 1 < 2 h 1 2 k 2 we can have:

    1. D > 0, we obtain no roots with positive imaginary part,

    2. D < 0 we obtain two purely imaginary roots: one with positive imaginary part and the other with negative imaginary part, which does not provide stability to the solution.

Thus, in this case (b) the physical fields T and q are stable when λ 2 > 4 π 2 2 h 1 2 / τ 1 , i.e., when λ > 2 π 2 h 1 2 / τ 1 , taking into account conditions (ii).

An important role in this study of stability is played by the relaxation time τ 1 (then by the considered material) and by the wave velocity v inversely proportional to the wave number k, v being also related to the wavelength λ and the wave period T , i.e., v = λ / T .

The fact that the solutions are unstable for small wave-lengths indicates the limits of the present approximation, which would require a generalization in such conditions. But the essential point of the paper is not so much the focus on very small wave-lengths, but in the introduction of a rotational phonon viscosity (the term with β 1 ( a ) in Equation (18a), or the term with l 2 2 in Equation (30)) besides the shear phonon viscosity (the term with β 1 s in Equation (18a), or the term in l 1 2 in Equation (30)), used in standard phonon hydrodynamics.

6 A geometric formulation

This Section contains a geometric formulation of Equations (9), compatible with the GENERIC (or metriplectic) framework (see [35], [36], [37], [38], [39]). The equations are split into a Hamiltonian part and a part representing gradient dynamics. This formulation brings an alternative approach within non-equilibrium thermodynamics towards those equations, as well as a geometrical interpretation.

The Hamiltonian part of the model is generated by a Poisson bracket and Hamiltonian functional. As the latter has already been specified in Equation (3), we only need to specify the Poisson bracket. We extend the Poison bracket known from the case of phonon hydrodynamics [19] by adding additional variables analogical to the two internal variables. A physical motivation for this Poisson bracket is given later in this Section. The Poisson bracket is a bilinear operator and on two arbitrary functionals F and G it acts as

(42) { F , G } = δ F δ w i i δ G δ s ̄ δ G δ w i i δ F δ s ̄ d r 1 2 δ F δ Q ̃ i j s i δ G δ w j + j δ G δ w i δ G δ Q ̃ i j s i δ F δ w j + j δ F δ w i d r + δ F δ Q ̃ i ( a ) ϵ ijk j δ G δ w k δ G δ Q ̃ i ( a ) ϵ ijk j δ F δ w k d r ,

where F and G are functionals of the following fields: volumetric entropy density s ̄ = ρ s , conjugate entropy flux w i , and tensors Q ̃ i j s and Q ̃ i ( a ) , that are proportional to the internal variables Q i j s and Q i ( a ) , respectively. The first term in the Poisson bracket describes the evolution of the entropy and the corresponding conjugate entropy flux, while the second and third terms describe the evolution of the internal variables. The Poisson bracket is antisymmetric and satisfies the Jacobi identity, as the corresponding Poisson bivector is constant. The Poisson bracket is similar to that in [56].

The Poisson bracket can be motivated as a simple closure of the entropic Grad hierarchy [57], where the entropy flux is coupled with higher moments of the kinetic entropy density. This approach would rely on the one-particle kinetic theory for phonons. When disregarding the higher moments, the Poisson bracket for phonon hydrodynamics and generalized Guyer–Krumhansl equation is recovered [19].

Another possibility is to take the bracket can as a simplification of the Poisson bracket for the two-point kinetic theory [9], [38], applied on phonons and dipoles, where the conjugate entropy flux is the momentum density divided by the entropy density [19] and the internal variables are related to the two-point correlation functions.

Finally, the two tensor fields may be interpreted as the symmetric and antisymmetric parts of the distortion field within the thermomass framework [58]. The exact relation with first principles is, however, left for the future research.

The evolution equations implied by bracket (42) are

(43a) s ̄ ̇ = { s , H } = i δ H δ w i ,

(43b) w ̇ i = { w i , H } = i δ H δ s ̄ + 1 2 j δ H δ Q ̃ i j s + j δ H δ Q ̃ j i s ϵ ijk j δ H δ Q ̃ k ( a ) ,

(43c) Q ̃ ̇ i j s = Q ̃ i j s , H = 1 2 i δ H δ w j + j δ H δ w i ,

(43d) Q ̃ ̇ i ( a ) = Q ̃ i ( a ) , H = ϵ ijk j δ H δ w k ,

where H = e s ̄ , w , Q ̃ s , Q ̃ ( a ) d r is the Hamiltonian, e = ρu being the volumetric energy density. The functional derivatives of the Hamiltonian coincide with the corresponding partial derivatives of the energy, δ H δ = e , where • is one of the fields, as long as the energy does not explicitly depend on the gradients of the fields, which is the case of the whole manuscript.

Equations (43) are then supplemented by the dissipative evolution, generated by a Rayleigh dissipation functional [59]

(44) R = 1 τ ̃ 1 δ H δ w 2 + 1 τ ̃ 2 δ H δ Q ̃ s 2 + 1 τ ̃ 3 δ H δ Q ̃ ( a ) 2 d r ,

where τ ̃ 1 , τ ̃ 2 , and τ ̃ 3 are positive coefficients proportional to the relaxation times τ 1, τ 3, and τ 3, respectively. The full evolution equations are then

(45a) s ̄ ̇ = { s ̄ , H } + 1 T δ H δ w i δ R δ δ H δ w i + δ H δ Q ̃ i j s δ R δ δ H δ Q ̃ i j s + δ H δ Q ̃ i ( a ) δ R δ δ H δ Q ̃ i ( a ) , = i δ H δ w i + 1 T 1 τ ̃ 1 δ H δ w i δ H δ w i + 1 τ ̃ 2 δ H δ Q ̃ i j s δ H δ Q ̃ i j s + 1 τ ̃ 3 δ H δ Q ̃ i ( a ) δ H δ Q ̃ i ( a ) ,

(45b) w ̇ i = { w i , H } δ R δ δ H δ w i = i δ H δ s ̄ + 1 2 j δ H δ Q ̃ i j s + j δ H δ Q ̃ j i s ϵ ijk j δ H δ Q ̃ k ( a ) ,

(45c) Q ̃ ̇ i j s = Q ̃ i j s , H δ R δ δ H δ Q ̃ i j s = 1 2 i δ H δ w j + j δ H δ w i 1 τ ̃ 2 δ H δ Q ̃ i j s ,

(45d) Q ̃ ̇ i ( a ) = Q ̃ i ( a ) , H δ R δ δ H δ Q ̃ i ( a ) = ϵ ijk j δ H δ w k 1 τ ̃ 3 δ H δ Q ̃ i ( a ) ,

where the temperature is identified as the derivative of the Hamiltonian with respect to the entropy density, T = δ H δ s ̄ . The dissipative evolution is generated by the Rayleigh dissipation potential [38], [39], [59], [60]. The total energy (the Hamiltonian) is automatically conserved by both the Hamiltonian and dissipative parts of the equations. The total entropy grows, fulfilling the second law of thermodynamics.

The entropy flux can be read from the entropy equation, J ( s ) = δ H δ w . The heat flux J (q) can be then read from the evolution equation for the energy density,

(46) e ̇ = j δ H δ s ̄ δ H δ w i + 1 2 δ H δ w i δ H δ Q ̃ i j s + δ H δ Q ̃ j i s + ϵ ijk δ H δ w i δ H δ Q ̃ i ( a ) ,

obtained by applying the chain rule to the energy density e. The relation between the heat flux and entropy flux is then

(47) J ( q ) = T J ( s ) + 1 2 J ( s ) δ H δ Q ̃ s + δ H δ Q ̃ s T J ( s ) × δ H δ Q ̃ ( a ) .

This relation is actually inverse to the usual form in Extended Irreversible Thermodynamics, where the entropy flux is assumed as a function of the heat flux. Moreover, the relation between the heat flux and entropy flux contains the usual Clausius relation (dS = dQ/T) only as the first approximation when all the extra state variables vanish. To obtain a formula for the entropy flux in terms of the heat flux, we can invert this last formula,

(48) J ( s ) = J ( q ) T J ( s ) T δ H δ Q ̃ s + J ( s ) T × δ H δ Q ̃ ( a ) = J ( q ) T J ( q ) T 2 δ H δ Q ̃ s 1 T 2 δ H δ Q ̃ ( a ) × J ( q ) + O δ H δ Q ̃ s 2 + O δ H δ Q ̃ ( a ) 2 .

To compare this relation with the entropy flux (5), we need to define the proportionality between Q ̃ s and Q s and between Q ̃ ( a ) and Q (a). When Q s = β 1 s T Q ̃ s / α 2 s and Q ( a ) = β 1 ( a ) T Q ̃ ( a ) / α 2 ( a ) , we obtain relation (5), up to the first order in the internal variables. The second order terms are neglected, as they are small compared to the first order terms.

In this Section, we have added a geometric formulation of the previously derived Equations (9). Equations (6) are compatible with the GENERIC framework, as they can be expressed in terms of a Hamiltonian structure and gradient dynamics. The Hamiltonian part of the model is generated by the energy functional (3) and Poisson bracket (42), while the gradient-dynamics part is generated by the Rayleigh dissipation functional (44). The energy is conserved while the entropy is produced, satisfying the first and second laws of thermodynamics. Moreover, the GENERIC structure of the equations may serve as a basis for a microscopic derivation of the model in the future.

7 Conclusions

In this paper, we apply the Gyarmati approach within the framework of non-equilibrium thermodynamics developed in a previous paper [14], where we introduced two internal variables and derived a generalized Guyer–Krumhansl equation, describing particular motions of phonons (shear viscosity and rotational viscosity, in addition to their diffusive and ballistic motions). While in [14] the two internal variables have been eliminated by neglecting some terms from the formalism, in the present manuscript, they are identified by means of asymptotic expansion. The identification of the two internal variables allows to find a Guyer–Krumhansl-like heat equation (30) more generalized than that one found in [14]. It contains two terms in addition describing vortical motions and viscous motions of the phonons.

Phonons can rotate, in addition to their vibration, around their equilibrium positions. This can happen in ferroelectric or/and ferromagnetic solids having different molecular species constituting their crystal lattice, see [61], in solid media with defects creating material forces [62], and still in two-dimensional graphene with heavy impurities of atoms as Si–C 3 and Si–C 4, where the vortices of phonons are given by large displacements due to the vibration of the impurities at a characteristic frequency [18]. In these materials, experimental measurements on the phonon vortices have been performed by special microscopes. Next-generation microscopes could be able to produce maps of phonon vortices. These studies and experiments could be of interest in the development of new thermal metamaterials, a field of much current interest [63].

Furtheremore, in this paper, the stability conditions of equilibrium solutions of (30) were studied. Therefore, in practical situations, the full set of evolution equations (9) should be preferred to Equation (32).

Equations (9a)–(9c) – the central equations of the present paper – are linear; if one goes to a non-linear extension of them, terms in Q a  × J (q) could be added to (9a) and (9c). These terms would be especially relevant in two-dimensional flows, where the vorticity of the heat vortices – related to Q a – has a well-defined direction, perpendicular to the plane of the flow, upwards for counter-clock-wise rotating vortices, downwards in the opposite case. In this case, the terms in Q a  × J (q) would describe that the vortices produce a lateral deviation of the heat flux, and that the heat flux produces a lateral deviation of vortices, contributing to a separation between vortices with positive and negative vorticity. In two-dimensional flows of turbulent superfluids (see for instance [64], [65]), in which case the vortices are quantized, these effects are well known [66], [67].

Finally, Section 6 contains a geometric reformulation of the model, compatible with the GENERIC framework. An interesting outcome is the inverse dependence of entropy flux on heat flux, the latter being a function of the former.

How could tensors Q s and Q a be understood from the microscopic point of view? In the kinetic theory of phonons [30], the second moment of the phonon distribution function can be considered as a state variable and can be represented by the symmetric tensor Q s . For the skew-symmetric tensor field, we have to go beyond the one-particle kinetic theory, moments of which are always symmetric in their indeces. The two-particle kinetic theory [38] brings the tensor field of nonlocal vorticity (the second-order mixed moment of the distribution function with respect to the spatial distance of two particles and their relative velocity). The nonlocal vorticity tensor could be interpreted as related to the skew-symmetric field Q a . A microscopic derivation of the model will however be subject to future research.

Finally, in a forthcoming paper we will deal with the influence of the boundary conditions on the heat-flux behavior in particular media.


Corresponding author: Liliana Restuccia, Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Physical Sciences and Earth Sciences, University of Messina, Viale F. Stagno d’Alcontres, Salita Sperone 31, 98166, Messina, Italy, E-mail: 

Acknowledgments

MP was supported by Czech Science Foundation, project 23-05736S. MP is a member of the Nečas Centre of Mathematical Modeling.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The author states no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: MP was supported by Czech Science Foundation, project 23-05736S.

  7. Data availability: Not applicable.

Appendix A

In this Appendix we include for the reader’s convenience some mathematical formulas useful in the calculation throughout the manuscript.

Each antisymmetric tensor Q a can be represented by an axial vector Q (a). Then, it holds that

(49) Q i j a J j ( q ) = ( Q ( a ) × J ( q ) ) i ,

where the matrix formulation of the quantities reads Q i j a = 0 Q 12 a Q 13 a Q 12 a 0 Q 23 a Q 13 a Q 23 a 0 , J j ( q ) = ( J 1 ( q ) , J 2 ( q ) , J 3 ( q ) ) T , ( Q ( a ) × J ( q ) ) = Q 2 ( a ) J 3 ( q ) Q 3 ( a ) J 2 ( q ) Q 3 ( a ) J 1 ( q ) Q 1 ( a ) J 3 ( q ) Q 1 ( a ) J 2 ( q ) Q 2 ( a ) J 1 ( q ) .

Therefore, from equation (49), we obtain

( Q 12 a + Q 3 ( a ) ) J 2 ( q ) + ( Q 13 a Q 2 ( a ) ) J 3 ( q ) = 0 ,

( Q 12 a + Q 3 ( a ) ) J 1 ( q ) + ( Q 23 a + Q 1 ( a ) ) J 3 ( q ) = 0 ,

(50) ( Q 13 a Q 2 ( a ) ) J 1 ( q ) ( Q 23 a + Q 1 ( a ) ) J 3 ( q ) = 0 ,

so that equation (49) is equivalent to requiring that each vector J (q) is a solution of the homogeneous system of equations (50), i.e., we have Q 1 ( a ) = Q 23 a , Q 2 ( a ) = Q 13 a , Q 3 ( a ) = Q 12 a , or

(51) Q i ( a ) = ϵ ijk Q j k a ,

where ϵ ijk is the Levi-Civita symbol.

In the case when Q a = ( J ( q ) ) a , the associated axial vector Q (a) is

(52) Q ( a ) = 1 2 × J ( q ) , or in components Q i ( a ) = 1 2 ϵ ijk j J k ( q ) = 1 2 ϵ ijk J k , j ( q ) ,

i.e., taking into account (51) 1 and (51) 2, we have × J ( q ) 1 = ( J 3,2 ( q ) J 2,3 ( q ) ) = 2 Q 1 ( a ) = 2 Q 23 a , × J ( q ) 2 = ( J 1,3 ( q ) J 3,1 ( q ) ) = 2 Q 2 ( a ) = 2 Q 13 a , × J ( q ) 3 = ( J 2,1 ( q ) J 1,2 ( q ) ) = 2 Q 3 ( a ) = 2 Q 12 a .

References

[1] R. Kovács and P. Ván, “Second sound and ballistic heat conduction: NaF experiments revisited,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 117, pp. 682–690, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.10.041.Search in Google Scholar

[2] A. Sellitto, I. Carlomagno, and D. Jou, “Two-dimensional phonon hydrodynamics in narrow strips,” Proc. R. Soc. A, vol. 471, no. 2182, p. 20150376, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2015.0376.Search in Google Scholar

[3] A. Cepellotti, G. Fugallo, L. Paulatto, M. Lazzeri, F. Mauri, and N. Marzari, “Phonon hydrodynamics in two-dimensional materials,” Nat. Commun., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 6400, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7400.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Y. Machida, N. Matsumoto, T. Isono, and K. Behnia, “Phonon hydrodynamics and ultrahigh room-temperature thermal conductivity in thin graphite,” Science, vol. 367, no. 6475, pp. 309–312, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz8043.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] H. Beck, P. F. Meier, and A. Thellung, “Phonon hydrodynamics in solids,” Phys. Status Solidi A, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 11, 1974. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.2210240102.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Y. Guo and M. Wang, “Phonon hydrodynamics and its applications to heat transport in nanosystems,” Phys. Rep., vol. 595, pp. 1–44, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2015.07.003.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Y. Guo and M. Wang, “Phonon hydrodynamics for nanoscale heat transport at ordinary temperatures,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 97, p. 035421, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.97.035421.Search in Google Scholar

[8] G. Lebon, H. Machrafi, M. Grmela, and C. Dubois, “An extended thermodynamic model of transient heat conduction at sub-continuum scales,” Proc. R. Soc. A, vol. 467, no. 2135, pp. 3241–3256, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2011.0087.Search in Google Scholar

[9] M. Grmela, D. Jou, J. Casas-Vazquez, M. Bousmina, and G. Lebon, “Ensemble averaging in turbulence modelling,” Phys. Lett. A, vol. 330, nos. 1–2, pp. 54–64, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2004.07.043.Search in Google Scholar

[10] A. Sellitto, V. A. Cimmelli, and D. Jou, Mesoscopic Theories of Heat Transport in Nanosystems, SEMA SIMAI, 6, Heidelberg, New York, Springer, 2016.10.1007/978-3-319-27206-1Search in Google Scholar

[11] M. Sciacca and D. Jou, “A power-law model for non-linear phonon hydrodynamics,” Z. Angew. Math. Phys., vol. 75, no. 2, p. 70, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-024-02208-9.Search in Google Scholar

[12] R. Y. Dong, Y. Dong, and A. Sellitto, “An analogy analysis between one-dimensional non-Fourier heat conduction and non-Newtonian flow in nanosystems,” Int J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 164, p. 120519, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120519.Search in Google Scholar

[13] A. Famà, L. Restuccia, and P. Ván, “Generalized ballistic-conductive heat transport laws in three-dimensional isotropic materials,” Continuum Mech. Thermodyn., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 403–430, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-020-00909-w.Search in Google Scholar

[14] L. Restuccia and D. Jou, “Non-local vectorial internal variables and generalized Guyer–Krumhansl evolution equations for the heat flux,” Entropy, vol. 25, no. 9, p. 1259, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25091259.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[15] Y. Guo, Z. Zhang, M. Nomura, S. Volz, and M. Wang, “Phonon vortex dynamics in graphene ribbon by solving Boltzmann transport equation with ab initio scattering rates,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 169, p. 120981, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.120981.Search in Google Scholar

[16] M. Y. Shang, C. Zhang, Z. Guo, and J. T. Lü, “Heat vortex in hydrodynamic phonon transport of two-dimensional materials,” Sci. Rep., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 8272, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65221-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] C. Zhang, S. Chen, and Z. Guo, “Heat vortices of ballistic and hydrodynamic phonon transport in two-dimensional materials,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 176, p. 121282, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121282.Search in Google Scholar

[18] D.-L. Bao, M. Xu, A.-W. Li, G. Su, W. Zhou, and S. T. Pantelides, “Phonon vortices at heavy impurities in two-dimensional materials,” Nanoscale Horiz., vol. 9, p. 248, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1039/d3nh00433c.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] M. Sýkora, M. Pavelka, L. Restuccia, and D. Jou, “Multiscale heat transport with inertia and thermal vortices,” Phys. Scr., vol. 98, no. 10, p. 105234, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/acf418.Search in Google Scholar

[20] R. A. Guyer and J. A. Krumhansl, “Solution of the linearized Boltzmann equation,” Phys. Rev., vol. 148, no. 2, pp. 766–777, 1966, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.148.766.Search in Google Scholar

[21] R. A. Guyer and J. A. Krumhansl, “Thermal conductivity, second sound, and phonon hydrodynaminc phenomena in nonmetallic crystals,” Phys. Rev., vol. 148, no. 2, pp. 778–788, 1966, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.148.778.Search in Google Scholar

[22] D. Jou, J. Casas-Vázquez, and G. Lebon, Extended Irreversible Thermodynamics, 4th ed., Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, Springer, 2010.10.1007/978-90-481-3074-0_2Search in Google Scholar

[23] S. R. De Groot and P. Mazur, Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, Amsterdam, North-Holland Publishing Company, 1962.Search in Google Scholar

[24] G. A. Kluitenberg, Plasticity and Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, CISM Lecture Notes, Wien, New York, Springer-Verlag, 1984.10.1007/978-3-7091-2636-3_4Search in Google Scholar

[25] D. Jou and L. Restuccia, “Mesoscopic transport equations and contemporary thermodynamics: an introduction,” Contemp. Phys., vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 465–474, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/00107514.2011.595596.Search in Google Scholar

[26] I. Gyarmati, “On the wave approach of thermodynamics and some problems of non-linear theories,” J. Non-Equilib. Thermodyn, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 233–260, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1515/jnet.1977.2.4.233.Search in Google Scholar

[27] J. Verhás, Thermodynamics and Rheology, Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó and Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

[28] W. Muschik, C. Papenfuss, and H. Ehrentraut, Concepts of Continuum Thermodynamics, Kielce, Poland, Kielce University of Technology, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

[29] W. Muschik, Aspects of Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, Singapore, World Scientific, 1990.10.1142/0991Search in Google Scholar

[30] I. Müller, Thermodynamics, Boston, MA, USA, Pitman Advanced Publishing Program, 1985.Search in Google Scholar

[31] W. Muschik, “Internal variables in non-equilibrium thermodynamics,” J. Non-Equilib. Thermodyn., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 127–137, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1515/jnet.1990.15.2.127.Search in Google Scholar

[32] G. A. Maugin and W. Muschik, “Thermodynamics with internal variables. Part I. General concepts,” J. Non-Equilib. Thermodyn., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 217–249, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1515/jnet.1994.19.3.217.Search in Google Scholar

[33] G. A. Maugin and W. Muschik, “Thermodynamics with internal variables. Part II. Applications,” J. Non-Equilib. Thermodyn., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 250–289, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1515/jnet.1994.19.3.250.Search in Google Scholar

[34] A. Berezovski and P. Van, Internal Variables in Thermoelasticity, Berlin, Springer, 2017.10.1007/978-3-319-56934-5Search in Google Scholar

[35] M. Grmela and H. C. Öttinger, “Dynamics and thermodynamics of complex fluids. I. Development of a general formalism,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 6620–6632, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.56.6620.Search in Google Scholar

[36] H. C. Öttinger and M. Grmela, “Dynamics and thermodynamics of complex fluids. II. Illustrations of a general formalism,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 56, pp. 6633–6655, 1997.10.1103/PhysRevE.56.6633Search in Google Scholar

[37] H. C. Öttinger, Beyond Equilibrium Thermodynamics, New York, Wiley, 2005.10.1002/0471727903Search in Google Scholar

[38] M. Pavelka, V. Klika, and M. Grmela, Multiscale Thermo-Dynamics, Berlin, Germany, de Gruyter, 2018.10.1515/9783110350951Search in Google Scholar

[39] P. Morrison, “Bracket formulation for irreversible classical fields,” Phys. Lett. A, vol. 100, no. 8, pp. 423–427, 1984.10.1016/0375-9601(84)90635-2Search in Google Scholar

[40] A. Georgescu, “Complex fluid flows: classical fluid mechanics vs. thermodynamics of fluids,” Atti Accad. Peloritana Pericolanti, vol. 95, no. 1, p. C2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1478/AAPP.951C2.Search in Google Scholar

[41] V. K. Stokes, “Micropolar fluids,” in Theories of Fluids with Microstructure, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 1984.10.1007/978-3-642-82351-0Search in Google Scholar

[42] J. M. Rubí and J. Casas-Vázquez, “A variational criterion for micropolar fluids,” Int. J. Eng. Sci., vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1421–1429, 1981.10.1016/0020-7225(81)90039-2Search in Google Scholar

[43] L. Landau, “Theory of the superfluidity of helium II,” Phys. Rev., vol. 60, pp. 356–358, 1941, Int. J. Eng. Sci., vol. 19, pp. 1421-1429, (1981), https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.60.356.Search in Google Scholar

[44] C. Cattaneo, “Sulla conduzione del calore,” Atti Semin. Mat. Fis. Univ. Modena, vol. 3, pp. 83–101, 1948.Search in Google Scholar

[45] J. M. Rubí and J. Casas-Vázquez, “Thermodynamical aspects of micropolar fluids. A non-linear approach,” J. Non-Equilib. Thermodyn., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 155–164, 1980.10.1515/jnet.1980.5.3.155Search in Google Scholar

[46] A. C. Eringen, “Theory of micropolar fluids,” J. Math. Mech., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 1966. https://doi.org/10.1512/iumj.1967.16.16001.Search in Google Scholar

[47] G. Lukaszewicz, Micropolar Fluids. Theory and Applications, Boston, MA, USA, Birkhausen, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

[48] K. E. Aslani, E. Tzirtzilakis, and I. E. Sarris, “On the mechanics of conducting micropolar fluids with magnetic particles: vorticity-microrotation difference,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 36, no. 10, p. 102006, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0231232.Search in Google Scholar

[49] M. Francaviglia and L. Restuccia, “Thermodynamics of heterogeneous and anisotropic nonlinear ferroelastic crystals,” Atti Accad. Peloritana Pericolanti, vol. LXXXVI, no. 1, p. C1S0801008, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1478/C1S08010.Search in Google Scholar

[50] L. Restuccia and G. A. Kluitenberg, “Hidden vectorial variables as splitting operators for the polarization vector in the thermodynamic theory of dielectric polarization,” J. Non-Equilib. Thermodyn., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 335–346, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1515/jnet.1990.15.4.335.Search in Google Scholar

[51] L. Restuccia and G. A. Kluitenberg, “On generalizations of the Debye equation for dielectric relaxation,” Phys. A, vol. 154, pp. 157–182, 1988.10.1016/0378-4371(88)90186-0Search in Google Scholar

[52] L. Restuccia, “On a thermodynamic theory for magnetic relaxation phenomena due to n microscopic phenomena described by n internal variables,” J. Non-Equilib. Thermodyn., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 379–413, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1515/JNETDY.2010.023.Search in Google Scholar

[53] A. Georgescu, Asymptotic Treatment of Differential Equations, Applied Mathematics and Mathematical Computation 9, London, Chapman Hall, 1995.10.1007/978-1-4899-4535-8Search in Google Scholar

[54] Y.-C. Hua and B.-Y. Cao, “Slip boundary conditions in ballistic–diffusive heat transport in nanostructures,” Nanoscale Microscale Thermophys. Eng., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 159–176, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/15567265.2017.1344752.Search in Google Scholar

[55] Y.-C. Hua and B.-Y. Cao, “Phonon ballistic-diffusive heat conduction in silicon nanofilms by Monte Carlo simulations,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 78, pp. 755–759, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.07.037.Search in Google Scholar

[56] M. Szücs, M. Pavelka, R. Kovács, T. Fülöp, P. Ván, and M. Grmela, “A case study of non-Fourier heat conduction using internal variables and GENERIC,” J. Non-Equilib. Thermodyn., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 31–60, 2021.10.1515/jnet-2021-0022Search in Google Scholar

[57] M. Grmela, L. Hong, D. Jou, G. Lebon, and M. Pavelka, “Hamiltonian and Godunov structures of the Grad hierarchy,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 95, no. 3, p. 033121, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.95.033121.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[58] N. Ben-Dian, B.-Y. Cao, Z.-Y. Guo, and Y.-C. Hua, “Thermomass theory in the framework of GENERIC,” Entropy, vol. 22, no. 2, p. 227, 2020.10.3390/e22020227Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[59] I. E. Dzyaloshinskii and G. E. Volovick, “Poisson brackets in condensed matter physics,” Ann. Phys., vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 67–97, 1980.10.1016/0003-4916(80)90119-0Search in Google Scholar

[60] A. N. Beris and B. J. Edwards, Thermodynamics of Flowing Systems: With Internal Microstructure, Oxford Engineering Science Series, vol. 36, 1994, ISBN 0953-3222.10.1093/oso/9780195076943.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[61] G. A. Maugin, “A continuum theory of deformable ferrimagnetic bodies. I. Field equations,” J. Math. Phys., vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1727–1738, 1976. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.523101.Search in Google Scholar

[62] G. A. Maugin, “Material forces: concepts and applications,” Appl. Mech. Rev., vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 213–245, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3005101.Search in Google Scholar

[63] D. Jou and L. Restuccia, “Non-equilibrium thermodynamics of heat transport in superlattices, graded systems, and thermal metamaterials with defects,” Entropy, vol. 25, no. 7, p. 1091, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25071091.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[64] C. F. Barenghi, L. Skrbek, and K. R. Sreenivasan, Quantum Turbulence, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 2023.10.1017/9781009345651Search in Google Scholar

[65] M. S. Mongiovì, D. Jou, and M. Sciacca, “Non-equilibrium thermodynamics, heat transport and thermal waves in laminar and turbulent superfluid helium,” Phys. Rep., vol. 726, pp. 1–71, 2018.10.1016/j.physrep.2017.10.004Search in Google Scholar

[66] L. Saluto and D. Jou, “Coupling of heat flux and vortex polarization in superfluid helium,” J. Math. Phys., vol. 61, no. 11, p. 113101, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0010433.Search in Google Scholar

[67] L. Galantucci and M. Sciacca, “Non-classical velocity statistics in counterflow quantum turbulence,” Acta Appl. Math., vol. 132, no. 11, pp. 273–281, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10440-014-9902-3.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-01-24
Accepted: 2025-09-26
Published Online: 2025-12-08
Published in Print: 2026-01-23

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jnet-2024-0100/html
Scroll to top button