In the Mood for Paradox? Das Verhältnis von Fiktion, Stimmung und Welterschließung aus mentalistischer und phänomenologischer Perspektive
-
Benjamin Gittel
Abstract
It is widely acknowledged that responses to fiction can be divided into two categories: emotions or moods. Research on the paradox of fiction, however, solely focused on emotional responses to fiction. This paper analyses the different potentials of the mood concept with regard to the paradox of fiction: its potential to avoid the paradox on the one hand and its potential to rise a new paradox of fiction, a paradox of fiction for moods, on the other. To this end, the paper distinguishes two different meanings of the everyday concept of mood and two different paradigms in the research on moods.
The mood concept can designate not only affective states of an individual (moods1), but elusive, nuanced atmospheres of objects, places or situations (moods2). The mentalistic paradigm, widespread in psychology and analytic philosophy, generally assumes that moods are mental states with a certain quality of feeling (and physical symptoms). Moods2 are regarded by such approaches, if they discuss them, as a secondary phenomenon based on subjective perception. In contrast, the phenomenological paradigm focuses on moods2 and, if it accommodates moods1 as well, often postulates a characteristic connection between the two: moods1 reveal extra-individual atmospheres (moods2) that are assumed to exist in some ontologically robust sense. Therefore, moods1 can be said to have a world-disclosing function within the phenomenological paradigm.
Researchers in the mentalistic paradigm deal, among other issues, with the difference of emotions and moods1. One way in which moods1 differ from emotions is that they lack an intentional object and it is for that reason that the concept of mood1, at first glance, seems to offer a solution to the paradox of fiction. The paradox of fiction presumes that we have emotions with regard to fictional objects. If it were possible to redescribe the alleged emotions as more subtle mood1 responses without clear intentional objects, this would undermine a central premise of the paradox and dissolve it. However, such a redescription seems not equally plausible for all cases discussed in the debate (e. g. the green slime case). Therefore, moods1 can only be one element of a more subtle ›phenomenology‹ of affective reactions towards fiction and the »paradox avoiding potential« of the mood concept is limited.
The paradox creating potential of the mood concept emerges if one takes into account the outlined complex semantics of the concept »mood« and the postulated world-disclosing function of moods1. It seems possible to construct a new paradox, the paradox of fiction for moods: (a) Only real entities or representations of real entities can evoke moods1 with world-disclosing function (because this mood1 evocation is actually immersion in an atmosphere). (b) Many entities in fictions are not real. (c) Nevertheless, fictions can evoke moods1 with world-disclosing functions (e. g. with regard to places, situations) in the recipient.
The paper argues that the outlined paradox can be dissolved by pointing out that the expression »moods1 with world-disclosing function« in sentence (a) means something different than in (c). While the expression in (a) relates to the idea of grasping an atmosphere (mood2) that somehow is »in the world«, it means acquiring a non-propositional form of knowledge, namely knowledge of what-it-is-like to be in a certain situation, in (c). The idea that it is possible to acquire knowledge of what-it-is-like by means of fiction has often been postulated in the research literature, but rarely been spelled out in greater detail. The paper argues that such an acquisition can occur, among other possibilities, on the basis of mood1 evocation, but that the conditions for the acquisition of knowledge of what-it-is-like by means of fiction are more demanding than under usual circumstances: A recipient of fiction can reasonably be said to acquire knowledge of what-it-is-like to be in a certain situation if the fictional representation evokes a mood1 which is characteristic of a situation S and the recipient understands this mood1 as an affective reaction to a situation of the type S. Please note that moods2 play no explanatory role in the second interpretation of »world-disclosing function«.
Since assumption (a) and assumption (c) concern different world-disclosing functions or, in other words, different mechanisms of world-disclosure, there is no paradox. Although moods1 evoked by fictional representations (with some limitations pointed out in section 4) do not possess a world-disclosing function in the sense the phenomenological tradition postulated, it is possible to ascribe these moods1 a world-disclosing function, even within a non-phenomenological framework: They allow the recipient the acquisition of a knowledge of what-it-is-like to be in a certain situation or in a certain place.
Ultimately, for the paradox of fiction for moods seems to hold what could be said about the classical paradox of fiction as well: Even if the paradox ultimately dissolves, its analysis can be instructive for related research fields like the debate on knowledge from fiction which takes moods rarely into account until now.
Literatur
Andermann, Kerstin/Undine Eberlein (Hg.), Gefühle als Atmosphären. Neue Phänomenologie und philosophische Emotionstheorie, Berlin 2011.10.1524/9783050061368Search in Google Scholar
Anz, Thomas, Stimmungskunst und -kitsch in der Literatur um 1900. Untersuchungen zum Gelingen und zur Bewertung emotionaler Kommunikation, in: Friederike Reents/Burkhard Meyer-Sickendiek (Hg.), Stimmung und Methode, Tübingen 2013, 235–248.Search in Google Scholar
Arburg, Hans-Georg von/Sergej Rickenbacher (Hg.), Concordia discors. Ästhetiken der Stimmung zwischen Literaturen, Künsten und Wissenschaften, Würzburg 2011.Search in Google Scholar
Barbero, Carola, Can We Solve the Paradox of Fiction by Laughing at It?, in: Julien Dutant/Davide Fassio/Anne Meylan (Hg.), Liber Amicorum Pascal Engel, University of Geneva 2014, 92–111, www.unige.ch/lettres/philo/publications/engel/liberamicorum/barbero.pdf (06. 02. 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Beedie, Christopher/Peter C. Terry/Andrew M. Lane, Distinctions Between Emotion and Mood, Cognition and Emotion 19:6 (2005), 847–878.10.1080/02699930541000057Search in Google Scholar
Bieri, Peter, Nominalismus und innere Erfahrung, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 36:1 (1982), 3–24.Search in Google Scholar
Böhme, Gernot, Atmosphäre. Essays zur neuen Ästhetik, Frankfurt a.M. 1995.Search in Google Scholar
Bulka, Thomas, Stimmung, Emotion, Atmosphäre. Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Struktur der menschlichen Affektivität, Münster 2015.10.30965/9783957438980Search in Google Scholar
Carroll, Noël, Art and Mood, The Monist 86:4 (2003), 520–555.10.5840/monist200386426Search in Google Scholar
Cova, Florian/Fabrice Teroni, Is the Paradox of Fiction Soluble in Psychology?, Philosophical Psychology 29:6 (2016), 930–942.10.1080/09515089.2016.1164306Search in Google Scholar
Currie, Gregory, What is Fiction?, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 43:4 (1985), 385–392.10.1111/1540_6245.jaac43.4.0385Search in Google Scholar
Davidson, Richard J., On Emotion, Mood and Related Affective Constructs, in: Paul Ekman/R.J.D. (Hg.), The Nature of Emotion. Fundamental Questions, New York et al. 1994, 51–55.Search in Google Scholar
Depew, David, Empathy, Psychology, and Aesthetics. Reflections on a Repair Concept, An Interdisciplinary Journal of Rhetorical Analysis and Invention 4:1 (2005), 99–107.10.13008/2151-2957.1033Search in Google Scholar
Freeman, Damien, The Paradox of Fiction, in: Noël Carroll/John Gibson (Hg.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Literature, London/New York 2016, 247–258.10.4324/9781315708935-21Search in Google Scholar
Fuchs, Thomas, Zur Phänomenologie der Stimmungen, in: Friederike Reents/Burkhard Meyer-Sickendiek (Hg.), Stimmung und Methode, Tübingen 2013, 17–31.Search in Google Scholar
Gabás, Raúl, Schelers Phänomenologie der Gefühle und Heideggers Begriff der Stimmung, in: Christian Bermes/Wolfhart Henckmann/Heinz Leonardy (Hg.), Vernunft und Gefühl. Schelers Phänomenologie des emotionalen Lebens, Würzburg 2003, 199–214.Search in Google Scholar
Gabriel, Gottfried, Der Erkenntniswert der Literatur, in: Alexander Löck/Jan Urbich (Hg.), Der Begriff der Literatur. Transdisziplinäre Perspektiven, Berlin et al. 2010, 247–261.10.1515/9783110225488.247Search in Google Scholar
Gaut, Berys, Reasons, Emotions and Fictions, in: Matthew Kieran/Dominic Lopes (Hg.), Imagination, Philosophy and the Arts, London et al. 2010, 15–34.Search in Google Scholar
Geiger, Moritz, Zum Problem der Stimmungseinfühlung, Zeitschrift für Ästhetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft 6:1 (1911), 1–42.Search in Google Scholar
Gendler, Tamar Szabó/Karson Kovakovich, Genuine Rational Fictional Emotions, in: Matthew Kieran (Hg.), Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art, Malden, MA 2009, 239–253.Search in Google Scholar
Gisbertz, Anna-Katharina (Hg.), Stimmung. Zur Wiederkehr einer ästhetischen Kategorie, Paderborn 2011.10.30965/9783846751763_002Search in Google Scholar
Gittel, Benjamin, Lebendige Erkenntnis und ihre literarische Kommunikation. Robert Musil im Kontext der Lebensphilosophie, Münster 2013.10.30965/9783897858510_013Search in Google Scholar
Gittel, Benjamin/Robert Deutschländer/Martin Hecht, Conveying Moods and Knowledge-what-it-is-like Through Lyric Poetry, Scientific Study of Literature 6:1 (2016), 131–163.10.1075/ssol.6.1.07gitSearch in Google Scholar
Green, Melanie C./Christopher Chatham/Marc A. Sestir, Emotion and Transportation into Fact and Fiction, Scientific Study of Literature 2:1 (2012), 37–59.10.1075/ssol.2.1.03greSearch in Google Scholar
Griffiths, Paul E., What Emotions Really Are. The Problem of Psychological Categories, Chicago, IL 1997.10.7208/chicago/9780226308760.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Gumbrecht, Hans, Atmosphere, Mood, Stimmung. On a Hidden Potential of Literature, Stanford, CA 2012.Search in Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, Sein und Zeit, Tübingen 1927.Search in Google Scholar
Hiergeist, Teresa, Erlesene Erlebnisse. Formen der Partizipation an narrativen Texten, Bielefeld 2014.10.1515/transcript.9783839428207.65Search in Google Scholar
Hillebrandt, Claudia, Das emotionale Wirkungspotenzial von Erzähltexten. Mit Fallstudien zu Kafka, Perutz und Werfel, Berlin 2011.10.1524/9783050057163.27Search in Google Scholar
Klages, Ludwig, Ausdrucksbewegung und Gestaltungskraft. Grundlegung der Wissenschaft vom Ausdruck [1921], in: L.K., Sämtliche Werke, Bd. 4, hg. von Ernst Frauchiger, Bonn 1964, 139–314.Search in Google Scholar
Lafont, Cristina, Sprache und Welterschließung. Zur linguistischen Wende der Hermeneutik Heideggers, Frankfurt a.M. 1994.Search in Google Scholar
Levinson, Jerrold, Emotion in Response to Art, in: Mette Hjort/Sue Laver (Hg.), Emotion and the Arts, New York, NY 2010, 20–34.10.1093/oso/9780195111040.003.0002Search in Google Scholar
MacHardy, Karin J., The Boundaries of History and Literature, in: Gisela Brude-Firnau/K.J.M. (Hg.), Fact and Fiction. German History and Literature 1848–1924, Tübingen 1990, 11–25.Search in Google Scholar
Mar, Raymond A./Keith Oatley/Maja Djikic/Justin Mullin, Emotion and Narrative Fiction. Interactive Influences Before, During, and after Reading, Cognition and Emotion 25:5 (2011), 818–833.10.1080/02699931.2010.515151Search in Google Scholar
Martus, Steffen, Werkpolitik. Zur Literaturgeschichte kritischer Kommunikation vom 17. bis ins 20. Jahrhundert. Mit Studien zu Klopstock, Tieck, Goethe und George, Berlin/New York 2007.10.1515/9783110201772Search in Google Scholar
Meyer-Sickendiek, Burkhard, Lyrisches Gespür. Vom geheimen Sensorium der Poesie, Paderborn 2011.10.30965/9783846751466Search in Google Scholar
Meyer-Sickendiek, Burckhard, Stimmungen als Gegenstand moderner Lyrik. Zur unabgegoltenen Problematik einer alten Kontroverse, in: Sandra Poppe (Hg.), Emotionen in Literatur und Film, Würzburg 2014, 193–218.Search in Google Scholar
Oatley, Keith, A Taxonomy of the Emotions of Literary Response and a Theory of Identification in Fictional Narrative, Poetics 23:1 (1994), 53–74.10.1016/0304-422X(94)P4296-SSearch in Google Scholar
Parsons, Terence, Nonexistent Objects, London/New Haven 1980.Search in Google Scholar
Pavel, Thomas G., Fictional Worlds, Cambridge, MA et al. 1986.Search in Google Scholar
Reents, Friederike, Stimmungsästhetik. Realisierungen in Literatur und Theorie vom 17. bis ins 21. Jahrhundert, Göttingen 2015.Search in Google Scholar
Reents, Friederike/Burkhard Meyer-Sickendiek (Hg.), Stimmung und Methode, Tübingen 2013.Search in Google Scholar
Schmitz, Hermann, Der Leib, der Raum und die Gefühle [1998], Bielefeld/Locarno 2007.Search in Google Scholar
Schmitz, Hermann, Atmosphären, Freiburg i.Br./München 2016.10.5771/9783495860441Search in Google Scholar
Schmitz, Hermann/Rudolf Owen Müllan/Jan Slaby, Emotions Outside the Box. The New Phenomenology of Feeling and Corporeality, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10:2 (2011), 241–259.10.1007/s11097-011-9195-1Search in Google Scholar
Stecker, Robert, Should We Still Care About the Paradox of Fiction?, British Journal of Aesthetics 51:3 (2011), 295–308.10.1093/aesthj/ayr019Search in Google Scholar
Strack, Fritz/Atilla Höfling, Von Atmosphären, Stimmungen & Gefühlen, in: Rainer Goetz/Stefan Graupner (Hg.), Atmosphäre(n). Interdisziplinäre Annäherungen an einen unscharfen Begriff, München 2007, 103–111.Search in Google Scholar
Stroud, Scott R., Simulation, Subjective Knowledge, and the Cognitive Value of Literary Narrative, Journal of Aesthetic Education 42:3 (2008), 19–41.10.1353/jae.0.0016Search in Google Scholar
Stueber, Karsten, Empathy, in: Edward N. Zalta (Hg.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford 2014, https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/archives/win2014/entries/empathy/ (13. 02. 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Tye, Michael, Knowing What It is Like, in: Peter J. Ludlow/Yujin Nagasawa/Daniel Stoljar (Hg.), There’s Something About Mary. Essays on Phenomenal Consciousness and Frank Jackson’s Knowledge Argument, Cambridge, MA et al. 2004, 143–161.Search in Google Scholar
Vendrell Ferran, Íngrid, Die Emotionen. Gefühle in der realistischen Phänomenologie, Berlin 2009.10.1524/9783050047102Search in Google Scholar
Vendrell Ferran, Íngrid, Das Wissen der Literatur und die epistemische Kraft der Imagination, in: Christoph Demmerling/I.V.F. (Hg.), Wahrheit, Wissen und Erkenntnis in der Literatur. Philosophische Beiträge, Berlin 2014, 119–140.10.1524/9783050065366.119Search in Google Scholar
Walsh, Dorothy, Literature and Knowledge, Middletown, CT 1969.Search in Google Scholar
Walton, Kendall, Fearing Fictions, The Journal of Philosophy 75:1 (1978), 5–27.10.2307/2025831Search in Google Scholar
Walton, Kendall, Mimesis as Make-Believe. On the Foundations of the Representational Arts, Cambridge, MA et al. 1990.10.2307/2108134Search in Google Scholar
Walton, Kendall, In Other Shoes. Music, Metaphor, Empathy, Existence, Oxford et al. 2015.Search in Google Scholar
Wellbery, David E., Stimmung, in: Karlheinz Barck et al. (Hg.), Ästhetische Grundbegriffe. Historisches Wörterbuch in sieben Bänden, Bd. 5, Stuttgart 2003, 703–733.10.1007/978-3-476-98611-5_22Search in Google Scholar
Winko, Simone, Kodierte Gefühle. Zu einer Poetik der Emotionen in lyrischen und poetologischen Texten um 1900, Berlin 2003.Search in Google Scholar
Zipfel, Frank, Emotion und Fiktion. Zur Relevanz des Fiktions-Paradoxes für eine Theorie der Emotionalisierung in Literatur und Film, in: Sandra Poppe (Hg.), Emotionen in Literatur und Film, Würzburg 2011, 127–154.Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- The Paradox of Fiction – A Brief Introduction into Recent Developments, Open Questions, and Current Areas of Research, including a Comprehensive Bibliography from 1975 to 2018
- Emotion in the Appreciation of Fiction
- Empathy – Real-Life and Fiction-Based
- Desires and Fiction
- Von den Lesewelten zur Lebenswelt. Überlegungen zu der Frage, warum uns fiktionale Literatur berührt
- How Can We Be Moved to Shoot Zombies? A Paradox of Fictional Emotions and Actions in Interactive Fiction
- In the Mood for Paradox? Das Verhältnis von Fiktion, Stimmung und Welterschließung aus mentalistischer und phänomenologischer Perspektive
- Emotion, Darstellung, Fiktion. Literaturtheoretische Überlegungen zum Verhältnis zwischen Fiktionsparadox und Mimesisparadox
- Articles
- Why Does Frank Underwood Look at Us? Contemporary Heroes Suggest the Need of a Turn in the Conceptualization of Fictional Empathy
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- The Paradox of Fiction – A Brief Introduction into Recent Developments, Open Questions, and Current Areas of Research, including a Comprehensive Bibliography from 1975 to 2018
- Emotion in the Appreciation of Fiction
- Empathy – Real-Life and Fiction-Based
- Desires and Fiction
- Von den Lesewelten zur Lebenswelt. Überlegungen zu der Frage, warum uns fiktionale Literatur berührt
- How Can We Be Moved to Shoot Zombies? A Paradox of Fictional Emotions and Actions in Interactive Fiction
- In the Mood for Paradox? Das Verhältnis von Fiktion, Stimmung und Welterschließung aus mentalistischer und phänomenologischer Perspektive
- Emotion, Darstellung, Fiktion. Literaturtheoretische Überlegungen zum Verhältnis zwischen Fiktionsparadox und Mimesisparadox
- Articles
- Why Does Frank Underwood Look at Us? Contemporary Heroes Suggest the Need of a Turn in the Conceptualization of Fictional Empathy
