Home Literary Studies Performing the Poet, Reading (to) the Audience: Some Thoughts on Live Poetry as Literary Communication
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Performing the Poet, Reading (to) the Audience: Some Thoughts on Live Poetry as Literary Communication

Published/Copyright: September 20, 2012
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Like its primary medium language, poetry exists in two distinct forms: as written text and in oral performance. Nowadays, live poetry – poetry performed or ›read‹ by the poet to a live audience – constitutes an important mode of publication for poets and thus a prominent mode of experiencing poetry for the ›reader.‹ Given the increasing popularity of literary festivals, open mics, and poetry slams, one could justifiably claim that the English-speaking world is currently experiencing a live poetry boom. As such, live poetry entails a direct encounter and physical co-presence of poet-performer and audience in a specific spatio-temporal situation, a fact which has for a long time been neglected in the methodologies traditionally applied to the study of poetry.

Starting from a conception of oral performance as a basic manifestation of the art of poetry rather than a mere presentation of an essentially written text, this essay reflects upon the ways in which the workings of literary communication need to be reconsidered when the ›lyric I‹ is voiced by a real-life person who addresses an equally real audience. Drawing on examples from selected live poetry events and on concepts from theatre- and performance studies and verbal art studies, the status of the poet-performer will be theorised in relation to the audience as well as to the poetic text.

Due to its status of ›shared experience,‹ live poetry requires a thorough contextualisation. In verbal art studies, live performance is defined as a »specially marked, artful way of speaking that sets up or represents a special interpretative frame within which the act of speaking is to be understood« (Bauman & Briggs). Performance can thus be explained as a simultaneous relation to different contexts. A central question for the interpretation of live poetry is therefore how these contexts relate to each other.

As in the overwhelming majority of poetry readings/performances the performer is also the author of the text performed, the poet appears in a double role of ›poet-performer.‹ Focusing on the role of the poet-performer vis-à-vis the audience, an important aspect that needs to be addressed is the relation of the actual and the fictive speech situation: i. e. the relationship established between poet and fictive speaker in performance, as well as the relationship of the actual spatio-temporal situation and audience to the fictive spatio-temporal situation and addressee evoked by the poetic text. For this purpose I will introduce Fernando de Toro’s notion of the theatrical actor as an »icon of the character being performed« and Umberto Eco’s conception of theatrical performance as two simultaneous speech acts.

However, unlike in theatre live poetry audiences cannot usually draw on a conventionalised distinction between a real-life actor and an easily identifiable character whose name can be listed in the programme brochure. The poet-performer physically presents him- or herself rather than representing a fictitious character. This will be thematised in relation to Peter Middleton’s notion of »the performance of authorship« in live poetry and the idea of a »performance self« (Anthony Howell) – a personality projected by the poet in performance. The poet’s twofold role of ›poet-performer‹ is also the reason why the person of the poet is more easily confused with the persona in the poem in live poetry. As the fictive ›speaker‹ emerges in performance through the person of the author, the conceptual split of author/speaker is much harder for the audience to realise in live poetry than when dealing with print. The audience are thus invited to enter the »autobiographical pact« (Lejeune), and examples will demonstrate that some poets consciously work with this identificatory effect of live poetry performance.

Similarly, live poetry may create an interesting relationship between the physically present audience and a poem’s fictive addressee(s). I will identify factors and preconditions for this identificatory mode, and its possible effects. Conceiving of the audience as participants in, rather than recipients of, a performance, live poetry analyses must further take into account »spectator performer communication« (Elam) – which has been theorised by Erika Fischer-Lichte as a self-regulating ›feedback loop‹ – as well as »spectator-spectator communication« (Elam).

Finally, Gérard Genette’s notion of paratext will be modified to examine the functions of the poet’s ad-lib. The examples discussed will serve to demonstrate the context-dependence of live performance: its emergence through spatially and temporally defined performer-audience relations.

References

Anders, Petra, Poetry Slam im Deutschunterricht, Baltmannsweiler 2010. Search in Google Scholar

Austin, J. L., How to Do Things with Words, 2nd ed., Cambridge, MA 1975.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bakker, Egbert J., Poetry in Speech, Orality and Homeric Discourse, London 1997.10.7591/9781501722776Search in Google Scholar

Baraka, Amiri, Somebody Blew Up America, in: Amiri Baraka, Somebody Blew Up America & Other Poems. Phillipsburg 2003, 41–50.Search in Google Scholar

Bauman, Richard / Charles Briggs, Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life, Annual Review of Anthropology 19 (1990), 59–88.10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, Susan, Theatre Audiences: A Theory of Production and Reception, 2nd ed., London 1997.Search in Google Scholar

Bernstein, Charles (ed.), Close Listening: Poetry and the Performed Word, New York 1998.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195109924.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Büscher-Ulbrich, Dennis, The Poet/Poem as Agent Provocateur: Sounding the Performative Dimension of Amiri Baraka’s ›Somebody Blew Up America‹, in: Klaus Martens (ed.), State(s) of the Art: Considering Poetry Today, Würzburg 2010, 86–101.Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, William / Shai Goldstein, ADL Writes to the Governor of New Jersey about Amiri Baraka, online posting (27.11.2002), http://www.adl.org/anti_semitism/ltr_mcgreevy.asp (19.3.2011).Search in Google Scholar

Diehl, Joanne F., Poetry and Literary Theory, in: Neil Roberts (ed.), A Companion to Twentieth-Century Poetry, Oxford 2001, 89–100.10.1002/9780470998670.ch8Search in Google Scholar

Dillard, Scott, The Art of Performing Poetry: Festivals, Slams, and Americans’ Favorite Poem Project Events, Text and Performance Quarterly 22.3 (July 2002), 217–227.10.1080/10462930216611Search in Google Scholar

Ditschke, Stephan, ›Wenn ihr jetzt alle ein bisschen klatscht...‹: Text-Performance-Zusammenhänge als Faktoren für Publikumswertungen bei Poetry Slams, IASLonline (16.09.2007), http://www.iaslonline.de/index.php?vorgang_id=2716 (27.04.2012).Search in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto, Semiotik der Theateraufführung, in: Uwe Wirth (ed.) Performanz: Zwischen Sprachphilosophie und Kulturwissenschaften, Frankfurt a.M. 2002, 262–276.Search in Google Scholar

Ekman, Paul / Wallace V. Friesen, Nonverbal Leakage and Clues to Deception, Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes 32.1 (Feb. 1969), 88–106.Search in Google Scholar

Elam, Keir, The Semiotics of Theatre and Drama, 2nd ed, London 2002.10.4324/9780203426074Search in Google Scholar

Fischer-Lichte, Erika, Ästhetik des Performativen,Frankfurt a.M. 2004.Search in Google Scholar

Foster, Patricia, e-mail interview, 11.-16.10.2009.10.1007/BF03250097Search in Google Scholar

–, Lips, Spit Lit Festival 2007, London (9.3.2007), unpublished video recording.Search in Google Scholar

Published in print: Nicole Moore (ed.) Brown Eyes: A Selection of Creative Expressions by Black and Mixed-Race Women, Leicester, 2005, 75–76.Search in Google Scholar

Genette, Gérard, Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation, Trans. Jane E. Lewin, ed. Richard Macksey. Cambridge: CUP, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

Ginsberg, Allen, Poets on Stage: The Some Symposium on Poetry Readings, New York 1978.Search in Google Scholar

Habekost, Christian, Verbal Riddim: The Politics and Aesthetics of African-Caribbean Dub Poetry, Amsterdam 1993.10.1163/9789004483699Search in Google Scholar

Howell, Anthony, The Analysis of Performance Art: A Guide to its Theory and Practice, Amsterdam 1999.Search in Google Scholar

Joseph, Anthony, Aranguez, Vienna Lit Festival 2006, Vienna (13.10.2006), unpublished video recording. Published in print: Anthony Joseph, Excerpts from The African Origins of UFOs, London 2005, 19–20.Search in Google Scholar

Krämer, Sybille, Sprache – Stimme – Schrift: Sieben Gedanken über Performativität als Medialität, in: Uwe Wirth (ed.): Performanz: Zwischen Sprachphilosophie und Kulturwissenschaften, Frankfurt a.M. 2002, 323–346.Search in Google Scholar

Lejeune, Philippe, Le Pacte autobiographique, Paris 1974.Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, Michael, English and American Literatures, 3rd ed. Tübingen 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Middleton, Peter, Distant Reading: Performance, Readership, and Consumption in Contemporary Poetry, Tuscaloosa 2005.Search in Google Scholar

–, The Contemporary Poetry Reading, in: Charles Bernstein (ed.), Close Listening: Poetry and the Performed Word, New York 1998, 262-299.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195109924.003.0013Search in Google Scholar

Möhrmann, Malte, Über das Flüchtige und das Fixieren: Die Sprache der Theaterkritik, in: Renate Möhrmann (ed.), Theaterwissenschaft Heute: Eine Einführung, Berlin 1990, 165–186.Search in Google Scholar

Novak, Julia, Live Poetry: An Integrated Approach to Poetry in Performance, Internationale Forschungen zur Allgemeinen und Vergleichenden Literaturwissenschaft 153, Amsterdam/New York 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Nünning, Vera, / Ansgar Nünning, An Introduction to the Study of English and American Literature, Trans. Jane Dewhurst, Barcelona 2004.Search in Google Scholar

Quartermain, Peter, Sound Reading, in: Charles Bernstein (ed.), Close Listening: Poetry and the Performed Word, New York 1998, 217–230.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195109924.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, Mark, In the Familiar Space of the Voice, in: Mark Robinson (ed.), Words Out Loud: Ten Essays About Poetry Readings, Exeter 2002, 37–42.Search in Google Scholar

Salah, Trish, What’s All the Yap? Reading Mirha-Soleil Ross’s Performance of Activist Pedagogy, Canadian Theatre Review 130 (Spring 2007), 64–71.Search in Google Scholar

Schechner, Richard, Performance Studies: An Introduction, 2nd ed., New York 2006.Search in Google Scholar

Scherer, Klaus R., Die Funktionen des nonverbalen Verhaltens im Gespräch, in: Dirk Wegner (ed.), Gesprächsanalysen, Hamburg 1977, 275–297.Search in Google Scholar

Siddique, John, 90 Day Theory, Vienna Lit Festival 2006, Vienna (14.10.2006), unpublished video recording. Published in print: John Siddique, The Prize, Norwich 2005, 14.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Patricia, Skinhead, Russell Simmons’ Def Poetry, Season 2, Episode 2, 2002 (30.12.2009), http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Klb5TniRGao (05.06.2012). Published in print: Patricia Smith, Big Towns, Big Talk. Cambridge, MA.1992, 67–68.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Rommi, Personal interview (21.4.2008).Search in Google Scholar

Somers-Willett, Susan, Authenticating Voices: Performance, Black Identity, and Slam Poetry, Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin 2003, http://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/960 (12.12.2011).Search in Google Scholar

Toro, Fernando de, Theatre Semiotics: Text and Staging in Modern Theatre, Trans. John Lewis, Frankfurt 1995.10.31819/9783964563798Search in Google Scholar

Ubersfeld, Anne, The Pleasure of the Spectator, transl. Pierre Bouillaguet and Charles Jose, Modern Drama 25.1 (March 1982), 127–139.10.3138/md.25.1.127Search in Google Scholar

UK Poetry Slam Championships, London, 11.3.2006, unpublished audio recording.Search in Google Scholar

[VLF 2006] Vienna Lit Festival 2006. Vienna, 12.–14.10.2006, unpublished video recording.Search in Google Scholar

[VLF 2008] Vienna Lit Festival 2008. Vienna, 17.–19.4.2008, unpublished video recording.Search in Google Scholar

Watzlawick, Paul / Janet H. Beavin / Don D. Jackson, 1971. Menschliche Kommunikation: Formen, Störungen, Paradoxien, Bern: Hans Huber, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

Wheeler, Lesley, Voicing American Poetry: Sound and Performance from the 1920s to the Present, Ithaca, N.Y 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Widdowson, Henry, Critical Practices: On Representation and the Interpretation of Text, in: Srikant Sarangi and Malcolm Coulthard (ed.) Discourse and Social Life, Harlow 2000, 155–169.10.4324/9781315838502-9Search in Google Scholar

–, Discourse Analysis. Oxford 2007.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2012-09-20
Published in Print: 2012-09

© 2012 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 22.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jlt-2012-0003/html
Scroll to top button