Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Towards a ‘natural’ narratology: Frames and pedagogy. A reply to Nilli Diengott
-
Monika Fludernik
Published/Copyright:
October 5, 2010
Published Online: 2010-10-05
Published in Print: 2010-September
© 2010 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/New York
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Unveiling the dramatic secret of ‘Ghost’ in Hamlet
- Enhancing the critical apparatus for understanding metanarration: discourse deixis refined
- Towards a new convergence between Anglo-American and Russian literary linguistics: “mind style” and “kartina mira”
- A corpus-based approach to mind style
- The implied author in the conceptual context of hypothetical intentionalism: A good explication of the concept? On Kindt and Muller's The implied author: Concept and controversy
- Reviews
- Towards a ‘natural’ narratology: Frames and pedagogy. A reply to Nilli Diengott
- Index of articles in Volume 39 (2010)
Articles in the same Issue
- Unveiling the dramatic secret of ‘Ghost’ in Hamlet
- Enhancing the critical apparatus for understanding metanarration: discourse deixis refined
- Towards a new convergence between Anglo-American and Russian literary linguistics: “mind style” and “kartina mira”
- A corpus-based approach to mind style
- The implied author in the conceptual context of hypothetical intentionalism: A good explication of the concept? On Kindt and Muller's The implied author: Concept and controversy
- Reviews
- Towards a ‘natural’ narratology: Frames and pedagogy. A reply to Nilli Diengott
- Index of articles in Volume 39 (2010)
