Text World Theory and situation-model research: enhancing validity and tracking world-retrievals

References

Browse, Sam. 2018. Cognitive rhetoric: The cognitive poetics of political discourse. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/lal.31Search in Google Scholar

Cairns, Helen Smith, Wayne Cowart & Ann D. Jablon. 1981. Effects of prior context upon integration of lexical information during sentence processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20(4). 445–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(81)90551-x.Search in Google Scholar

Canning, Patricia. 2017. Text World Theory and real world readers: From literature to life in a Belfast prison. Language and Literature 17(3). 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947017704731.Search in Google Scholar

Emmott, Catherine. 1999. Narrative comprehension: A discourse perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner. 2002. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Gavins, Joanna. 2001. Text World Theory: A critical exposition and development in relation to absurd prose fiction. Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Gavins, Joanna. 2005. (Re)thinking modality: A text-world perspective. Journal of Literary Semantics 34(2). 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1515/jlse.2005.34.2.79.Search in Google Scholar

Gavins, Joanna. 2007. Text World Theory: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748629909Search in Google Scholar

Gibbons, Alison. 2012. Multimodality, cognition, and experimental literature. London; New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203803219Search in Google Scholar

Glenberg, Arthur M., Marion Meyer & Lindem. Karen. 1987. Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 26(1). 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596x(87)90063-5.Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, Peter C., Barbara J. Groz & Laura A. Gilliom. 1993. Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science 17. 311–347. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1703_1.Search in Google Scholar

Haberlandt, Karl. 1994. Components of sentence and word reading times. In David E. Kieras & Marcel A. Just (eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research, 219–252. Abingdon; New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780429505379-10Search in Google Scholar

Hidalgo Downing, Laura. 2000. Negation, text worlds and discourse: The pragmatics of fiction. Stanford: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1980. Mental models in cognitive science. Cognitive Science 4. 72–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0364-0213(81)80005-5.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1983. Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kurby, Christopher A. & Jeffrey M. Zacks. 2008. Segmentation in the perception and memory of events. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 122. 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.11.004.Search in Google Scholar

Kurby, Christopher A. & Jeffrey M. Zacks. 2015. Situation models in naturalistic comprehension. In Roel M. Willems (ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of natural language use, 59–76. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107323667.004Search in Google Scholar

Lahey, Ernestine. 2004. All the World’s a Subworld: Direct speech and subworld creation in Norman MacCaig’s ‘After’. Nottingham Linguistic Circular 18. 21–28.Search in Google Scholar

Lahey, Ernestine. 2005. Text-world landscapes and English-Canadian national identity in the poetry of Al Purdy, Milton Acorn and Alden Nowlan. Nottingham: University of Nottingham PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Loriga, Ray. 2003. Tokyo doesn’t love us anymore. Trans. John King. Edinburgh: Canongate.Search in Google Scholar

Magliano, Joseph P., Jason Miller & Rolf A. Zwaan. 2001. Indexing space and time in film understanding. Applied Cognitive Psychology 15. 533–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.724.Search in Google Scholar

Mason, Jessica. 2019. Intertextuality in practice. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

McNerney, M. Windy, Kerri A. Goodwin & Gabriel A. Radvansky. 2011. A novel study: A situation model analysis of reading times. Discourse Processes 48. 453–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2011.582348.Search in Google Scholar

Nieuwland, Mante S. 2014. “Who’s he?” Event-related brain potentials and unbound pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language 76. 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2014.06.002.Search in Google Scholar

Nieuwland, Mante S. & Jos J. A. van Berkum. 2006. Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: Evidence from ERPs. Brain Research 1118. 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.022.Search in Google Scholar

Nieuwland, Mante S., Karl Magnus Petersson & Jos J. A. van Berkum. 2007. On sense and reference: Examining the functional neuroanatomy of referential processing. NeuroImage 37. 993–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.048.Search in Google Scholar

Palardy, Diana. 2018. The dystopian imagination in contemporary Spanish literature and film. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-92885-2Search in Google Scholar

Radvansky, Gabriel A. 2012. Across the event horizon. Current Directions in Psychological Science 21(4). 269–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412451274.Search in Google Scholar

Radvansky, Gabriel A. & David E. Copeland. 2000. Functionality and spatial relations in situation models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 128. 563–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.128.4.563.Search in Google Scholar

Radvansky, Gabriel A. & Jeffrey M. Zacks. 1991. Mental models and the fan effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 17. 940–953. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.17.5.940.Search in Google Scholar

Radvansky, Gabriel A. & Jeffrey M. Zacks. 2014. Event cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199898138.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Radvansky, Gabriel A., Sabine A. Krawietz & Andrea K. Tamplin. 2011. Walking through doorways causes forgetting: Further explorations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 64(8). 1632–1645. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.571267.Search in Google Scholar

Rinck, Mike & Ulrike Weber. 2003. Who when where: An experimental test of the event-indexing model. Memory & Cognition 31. 1284–1292. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195811.Search in Google Scholar

Salter Reynolds, Susan. 2004. Discoveries. Los Angeles Times, 19 September 2004. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2004-sep-19-bk-reynolds19-story.html (accessed 23 November 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Scott Rich, Shannon & Holly A. Taylor. 2000. Not all narrative shifts function equally. Journal of Memory and Cognition 31. 1284–1292.Search in Google Scholar

Speer, Nicole K., Jeffrey M. Zacks & Jeremy R. Reynolds. 2007. Human brain activity time-locked to narrative event boundaries. Psychological Science 18. 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01920.x.Search in Google Scholar

Stockwell, Peter. 2009. Texture: A cognitive aesthetics of reading. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748631209Search in Google Scholar

Therriault, David J. & Mike Rinck. 2007. Multidimensional situation models. In Charles A. Perfetti & F. Schmalhofer (eds.), Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and comprehension processes, 311–327. New York; Hove: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar

Therriault, David J., Mike Rinck & Rolf A. Zwaan. 2006. Assessing the influence of dimensional focus during situation model construction. Memory & Cognition 34(1). 78–89. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193388.Search in Google Scholar

van der Bom, Isabelle. 2015. Text World Theory and stories of self: A cognitive discursive approach to identity. Sheffield: University of Sheffield PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk, Teun A & Walter Kintsch. 1983. Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

van Oostendorp, Herre. 1994. Text processing in terms of semantic cohesion monitoring. In Herre van Oostendorp & Rolf A. Zwaan (eds.), Naturalistic text comprehension, 97–115. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

van Oostendorp, Herre. 2001. Memory for text. In Neil J. Smelser & Paul B. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, 9579–9582. Amsterdam; Oxford: Elsevier.10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/01541-2Search in Google Scholar

Werth, Paul. 1995. How to build a world (in a lot less than six days, and using only what’s in your head). In Keith Green (ed.), New Essays in Deixis: Discourse, narrative, literature, 49–80. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004454927_007Search in Google Scholar

Werth, Paul. 1999. Text worlds: Representing conceptual space in discourse. Harlow: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Whiteley, Sara. 2010. Text World Theory and the emotional Experience of literary discourse. Sheffield: University of Sheffield PhD thesis. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/15112/1/527271.pdf (accessed 5 September 2013).Search in Google Scholar

Whiteley, Sara. 2011. Text World Theory, real readers and emotional responses to the remains of the day. Language and Literature 20(1). 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947010377950.Search in Google Scholar

Yarkoni, Tal, Nicole, K. & Jeffrey M. 2008. Zacks Neural substrates of narrative comprehension and memory. NeuroImage 41. 1408–1425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.062.Search in Google Scholar

Zacks, Jeffrey M., Todd S. Braver, Margaret A. Sheridan, David I. Donaldson, Abraham Z. Snyder, John M. Ollinger, Randy L. Buckner & Marcus E. Raichle. 2001. Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries. Nature Neuroscience 4. 651–655. https://doi.org/10.1038/88486.Search in Google Scholar

Zacks, Jeffrey M., Khena M. Swallow, Jean M. Vettel & Mark P. McAvoy. 2006. Visual movement and the neural correlates of event perception. Brain Research 1976. 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.122.Search in Google Scholar

Zacks, Jeffrey M., Nicole K. Speer & Jeremy R. Reynolds. 2009. Segmentation in reading and film comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138. 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015305.Search in Google Scholar

Zwaan, Rolf A. 2001. Situation models: Psychological. In Neil J. Smelser & Paul B. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, Vol. 21, 14137–14141. Oxford: Elsevier.10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/01550-3Search in Google Scholar

Zwaan, Rolf A. & Gabriel A. Radvansky. 1998. Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin 123(2). 162–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162.Search in Google Scholar

Zwaan, Rolf A., Mark C. Langston & Arthur C. Graesser. 1995. The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science 6. 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00513.x.Search in Google Scholar

Zwaan, Rolf A., Joe P. Magliano & Arthur C. Graesser. 1995. Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Discourse Processes 21. 2189–2327. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.386.Search in Google Scholar