Possible worlds theory, accessibility relations, and counterfactual historical fiction
-
Riyukta Raghunath
Abstract
Possible Worlds Theory has commonly been invoked to describe fictional worlds and their relationship to the actual world. As an approach to genre, the relationship between fictional worlds and the actual world is also constitutive of specific text types. By drawing on the notion of accessibility relations, different genres can be classified based on the distance between their fictional worlds and the actual world. Maître, Doreen. 1983. Literature and possible worlds. Middlesex: Middlesex University Press for example, in what is considered the first attempt to adapt accessibility relations from logic to literary studies, distinguishes between four text types depending on the extent to which their fictional worlds can be seen as possible, probable, or impossible in the actual world. Developing Maître’s work, Ryan, Marie-Laure. 1991a. Possible worlds and accessibility relations: A semantic typology of fiction. Poetics Today 12. 553–576, c.f. Ryan, Marie-Laure. 1991b. Possible worlds, artificial intelligence, and narrative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press) creates a comprehensive taxonomy of accessibility relations that may be perceived between fictional worlds and the actual world. This includes assuming compatibility with the actual world in terms of physical laws, general truths, people, places, and entities. Using her taxonomy, she then offers a typology of 13 genres to show how fictional worlds created by different genres differ from each other. As it stands, Ryan’s typology does not contain the genre of counterfactual historical fiction, but similar genres such as science fiction and historical confabulation are included. In this article, specific examples from counterfactual historical fiction are analysed to show why it is problematic to place these texts within the genres of historical confabulation or science fiction. Furthermore, as I show, Ryan’s typological model also does not account for some of the characteristic features of the genre of counterfactual historical fiction and as such the model cannot account for all texts within the genre. To resolve this issue, I offer modifications to Ryan’s model so it may be used more effectively to define and distinguish the genre of counterfactual historical fiction.
References
Ashline, William. 1995. The problem of impossible fictions. Style 215–234.Search in Google Scholar
Bell, Alice. 2010. The possible worlds of hypertext fiction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230281288Search in Google Scholar
Dannenberg, Hilary. 2008. Coincidence and counterfactuality: Plotting time and space in narrative fiction. Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.10.2307/j.ctt1dgn486Search in Google Scholar
Delany, Samuel. 1980. Generic protocols: Science fiction and Mundane. In Teresa de Lauretis, Andreas Huyssen & Kathleen Woodward (eds.), The technological imagination: Theories and fictions, 175–193. Wisconsin: Coda Press.Search in Google Scholar
Doležel, Lubomír. 1979. Extensional and intensional narrative worlds. Poetics 8(1). 193–211.10.1016/0304-422X(79)90020-2Search in Google Scholar
Doležel, Lubomír. 1980. Truth and authenticity in narrative. Poetics Today 1(3). 7–25.10.2307/1772407Search in Google Scholar
Duncan, Andy. 2003. Alternate history. In Edward James & Farah Mendlesohn (eds.), The Cambridge companion to science fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL0521816262.016Search in Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Heinrich & Roger Manvell. 2011. Goering: The rise and fall of the notorious Nazi leader. New York: Skyhorse Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Harris, Robert. 1992. Fatherland. London: Hutchinson.Search in Google Scholar
Hellekson, Karen. 2001. The alternate history: Refiguring historical time. Ohio: Kent State University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hitler, Adolf. [1925] 2021. Mein Kampf. New Delhi: Diamond Pocket Books.Search in Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul. 1963. Semantical considerations on modal logic. Acta Philosophica Fennica 16. 83–94.10.1007/978-3-0346-0145-0_16Search in Google Scholar
Maître, Doreen. 1983. Literature and possible worlds. Middlesex: Middlesex University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Pavel, Thomas. 1975. Possible worlds in literary semantics. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 34(2). 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540_6245.jaac34.2.0165.Search in Google Scholar
Pavel, Thomas. 1986. Fictional worlds. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Roberts, Adam. 2002. Science fiction. London: Taylor & Francis.10.4324/9780203454657Search in Google Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure. 1991a. Possible worlds and accessibility relations: A semantic typology of fiction. Poetics Today 12. 553–576. https://doi.org/10.2307/1772651.Search in Google Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure. 1991b. Possible worlds, artificial intelligence, and narrative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.2307/431530Search in Google Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure. 2006. From parallel universes to possible worlds: Ontological pluralism in physics, narratology, and narrative. Poetics Today 27(4). 633–674. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-2006-006.Search in Google Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure. 2017. Ontological rules. The Routledge companion to imaginary worlds, 74–81. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315637525-10Search in Google Scholar
Sarban. [2011] 1952. The sound of his horn. London: Peter Davies Ltd.Search in Google Scholar
Singles, Katheen. 2013. Alternate history: Playing with contingency and necessity. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110272475Search in Google Scholar
Traill, Nancy H. 1991. Fictional worlds of the fantastic. Style. 196–210.10.3138/9781487585839-002Search in Google Scholar
Yoke, Carl. 2003. ‘A dance of apes’: Sarban’s the sound of his horn. In Edgar Chapman & Carl Yoke (eds.), Classic and iconoclastic alternative history science fiction, 49–70. Lewiston, New York: Edward Mellen Press.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Possible worlds theory, accessibility relations, and counterfactual historical fiction
- ‘Made the absence shout’: paradox as iconoclasm in Toni Morrison’s Beloved
- How do characters perceive their world? Representation of perception from traditional past-tense narrative to contemporary present-tense narrative
- Embodiment in the diversity of literary experience: a reply to Wolfgang Teubert (2021)
- Book Review
- Marcello Giovanelli, Chloe Harrison and Louise Nuttall: New directions in cognitive grammar and style
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Possible worlds theory, accessibility relations, and counterfactual historical fiction
- ‘Made the absence shout’: paradox as iconoclasm in Toni Morrison’s Beloved
- How do characters perceive their world? Representation of perception from traditional past-tense narrative to contemporary present-tense narrative
- Embodiment in the diversity of literary experience: a reply to Wolfgang Teubert (2021)
- Book Review
- Marcello Giovanelli, Chloe Harrison and Louise Nuttall: New directions in cognitive grammar and style
