Wolfgang Iser’s conception of indeterminacy: An integrational critique
-
Theodore Tsz Hang Tam
Abstract
Adopting the perspective of a “Harrisian” integrational linguist, this article identifies two conflicting ways in which Wolfgang Iser describes “indeterminacy” and its implications on the act of reading in his “reception theory”. It will be argued that while his understanding of contextualisation and recontextualisation is markedly similar to the integrational idea of the radical indeterminacy of the sign, he is not an “integrational literary theorist” since he ultimately sees literary works as comprising determinate, intersubjective segments and indeterminate links supplied by the reader. Iser’s significance for integrationism lies mainly in the directions he provides for the development of “integrational literary criticism”, the practitioners of which would be “cultured readers” who appreciate the impossibility of “correct” analyses and recognise indeterminacy as an integral part of the reading process.
References
Carey, J. 2005. What good are the arts? London: Faber and Faber.Search in Google Scholar
De Bruyn, B. 2012. Wolfgang Iser: A companion. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110245523Search in Google Scholar
Fish, S. 1970. Literature in the reader: Affective stylistics. New Literary History 2(1). 123–162. http://doi.org/10.2307/468593.10.2307/468593Search in Google Scholar
Fish, S. 1980. Is there a text in this class? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Harris, R. 1980. The language-makers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Harris, R. 1981. The language Myth. London: Gerald Duckworth and Company Ltd.Search in Google Scholar
Harris, R. 1996 Signs, language and communication: Integrational and segregational approaches. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Harris, R. 1998. Introduction to integrational linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.10.1163/9789004454057_003Search in Google Scholar
Harris, R. & C. Hutton. 2007. Definition in theory and practice: Language, lexicography and the law. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar
Iser, W. 1971. Indeterminacy and the reader’s response in prose fiction. In J. H. Miller (ed.), Aspects of narrative, 1–45. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Iser, W. 1972. The reading process: A phenomenological approach. New Literary History 3(2). 279–299. http://doi.org/10.2307/468316.10.2307/468316Search in Google Scholar
Iser, W. 1975. The reality of fiction: A Functionalist approach to literature. New Literary History 7(1). 7–38. http://doi.org/10.2307/468276.10.2307/468276Search in Google Scholar
Iser, W. 1978. The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Iser, W. 1980a. Texts and readers. Discourse Processes 3. 327–343. http://doi.org/10.1080/01638538009544496.10.1080/01638538009544496Search in Google Scholar
Iser, W. 1980b. The indeterminacy of the text: a critical reply. In E. Shaffer (ed.), Comparative criticism: A yearbook, vol. 2, 27–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Iser, W. 2000. Do I write for an Audience? PMLA 115(3). 310–314. http://doi.org/10.2307/463451.10.2307/463451Search in Google Scholar
Iser, W. 2006. How to do theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Jones, P. E. 2007. Why there is no such thing as “critical discourse analysis”. Language & Communication 27(4). 337–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.08.001.10.1016/j.langcom.2006.08.001Search in Google Scholar
Pablé, A. & C. Hutton. 2015. Signs, meaning and experience: Integrational approaches to linguistics and semiotics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501502286Search in Google Scholar
Priestley, J. B. 1945. An inspector calls. New York, NY: Dramatists Play Service.Search in Google Scholar
Ransom, J. C. 1968. The World’s Body. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana University Press. (Original work published 1938).Search in Google Scholar
Taylor, T. J. 1982. Communication and literary style: The principle of inter-subjectivity. Poetics Today 3(4). 39–51. http://doi.org/10.2307/1771989.10.2307/1771989Search in Google Scholar
Taylor, T. J. & M. Toolan. 1984. Recent trends in stylistics. Journal of Literary Semantics 13(1). 57–79. http://doi.org/10.1515/jlse.1984.13.1.57.10.1515/jlse.1984.13.1.57Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Sexualised landscapes and gentry masculinity in Victorian scenery: An ecostylistic examination of a pornographic novel from the magazine The Pearl
- Multisensory perception and tactile metaphors for voice in the work of Herta Müller
- Wolfgang Iser’s conception of indeterminacy: An integrational critique
- Book Review
- Nina Nørgaard: Multimodal Stylistics of the Novel: More than Words
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Sexualised landscapes and gentry masculinity in Victorian scenery: An ecostylistic examination of a pornographic novel from the magazine The Pearl
- Multisensory perception and tactile metaphors for voice in the work of Herta Müller
- Wolfgang Iser’s conception of indeterminacy: An integrational critique
- Book Review
- Nina Nørgaard: Multimodal Stylistics of the Novel: More than Words
