Home Multisensory perception and tactile metaphors for voice in the work of Herta Müller
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Multisensory perception and tactile metaphors for voice in the work of Herta Müller

  • Pavlo Shopin EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 4, 2019
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this article, I examine tactile metaphors for voice in the work of Herta Müller. I use conceptual metaphor theory and consider the process of multisensory perception to argue that tactile metaphors can activate multiple senses. Müller evokes tactile experience to reason about voice in her works. These seemingly modality-specific metaphors relate voice to more than one sensory impression. While multisensory perception enables the author to associate her characters’ voices creatively with different sensory phenomena, it simultaneously problematizes scholarly efforts to analyze metaphorical language and categorize figurative associations according to sensory modalities. In her literary works, tactile metaphors for voice appear well-established and even conventional, but Müller defamiliarizes them and foregrounds a metaphorical reading of tactile language. Since analytical reasoning about metaphors can be problematic because of multisensory perception, Müller’s works can be challenging to interpret as she focuses the reader’s attention on the figurative meaning of language.

References

Bargh, John A., Kay L. Schwader, Sarah E. Hailey, Rebecca L. Dyer & Erica J. Boothby. 2012. Automaticity in social-cognitive processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16(12). 593–605. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.002.Search in Google Scholar

Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22. 577–660.10.1017/S0140525X99002149Search in Google Scholar

Beyer, Susanne von. 2012. Ich habe die Sprache gegessen”: Die Literatur-Nobelpreisträgerin Herta Müller über ihre zusammengeklebten Gedichte und über die Macht und das Versagen der Wörter. Der Spiegel 35. 128–132.Search in Google Scholar

Bozzi, Paola. 2005. Der fremde Blick: Zum Werk Herta Müllers. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Search in Google Scholar

Bozzi, Paola. 2013. Facts, fiction, autofiction, and surfiction in Herta Müller’s work. In Bettina Brandt & Valentina Glajar (eds.), Herta Müller: Politics and aesthetics, 109–129. Lincoln & London: University of Nebraska Press.10.2307/j.ctt1ddr8pv.12Search in Google Scholar

Deroy, Ophelia, Charles Spence & Uta Noppeney. 2016. Metacognition in multisensory perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20(10). 736–747. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.006.Search in Google Scholar

Dunbar, Robin I. M. 2010. The social role of touch in humans and primates: Behavioural function and neurobiological mechanisms. Neuroscience and Behavioral Reviews 34(2). 260–268. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.07.001.Search in Google Scholar

Eddy, Beverley Driver. 2013. A mutilated fox fur: Examining the contexts of Herta Müller’s imagery in Der Fuchs war damals schon der Jäger. In Brigid Haines & Lyn Marven (eds.), Herta Müller, 84–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654642.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1982. Frame semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin.Search in Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles. 2008. Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. In Raymond W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 462–482. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816802.028Search in Google Scholar

Gallese, Vittorio & George Lakoff. 2005. The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22. 455–479. doi:10.1080/02643290442000310.Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. 2006. Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Haines, Brigid. 1998. “Leben wir im Detail”: Herta Müller’s micro-politics of resistance. In Brigid Haines (ed.), Herta Müller, 109–125. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Search in Google Scholar

Harrar, Vanessa, Laurence R. Harris & Charles Spence. 2017. Multisensory integration is independent of perceived simultaneity. Experimental Brain Research 235(3). 763–775. doi:10.1007/s00221-016-4822-2.Search in Google Scholar

Haupt-Cucuiu, Herta. 1996. Eine Poesie der Sinne: Herta Müllers “Diskurs des Alleinseins” und seine Wurzeln. Paderborn: Igel.Search in Google Scholar

Johannsen, Anja K. 2008. Kisten, Krypten, Labyrinthe. Raumfigurationen in der Gegenwartsliteratur: W.G. Sebald, Anne Duden, Herta Müller. Bielefeld: Transcript.10.1515/9783839409084Search in Google Scholar

Johannsen, Anja K. 2013. Osmoses: Müller’s things, bodies, and spaces. In Bettina Brandt & Valentina Glajar (eds.), Herta Müller: Politics and aesthetics, 207–229. Lincoln & London: University of Nebraska Press.10.2307/j.ctt1ddr8pv.16Search in Google Scholar

Kohl, Katrin. 2013. Beyond realism: Herta Müller’s poetics. In Brigid Haines & Lyn Marven (eds.), Herta Müller, 16–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654642.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Köhnen, Ralph. 1997. Über Gänge. Kinästhetische Bilder in Texten Herta Müllers. In Ralph Köhnen (ed.), Der Druck der Erfahrung treibt die Sprache in die Dichtung: Bildlichkeit in Texten Herta Müllers, 123–138. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2015. Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Turner. 1989. More than cool reason: A guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Marven, Lyn. 2005. Body and narrative in contemporary literatures in German: Herta Müller, Libuše Moníková, and Kerstin Hensel. Oxford: Clarendon.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Herta. 2009a [1992]. Der Fuchs war damals schon der Jäger, 2nd edn. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Herta. 2010 [1989]. Reisende auf einem Bein. Munich: Carl Hanser.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Herta. 2011 [1982]. Niederungen. In Niederungen, 17–104. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Herta. 2013a [2009]. Atemschaukel, 3rd edn. Munich: Fischer.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Herta. 2013b [1997]. Heute wär ich mir lieber nicht begegnet, 3rd edn. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Herta. 2013c [2009]. Jedes Wort weiß etwas vom Teufelskreis. In Immer derselbe Schnee und immer derselbe Onkel, 7–22. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Search in Google Scholar

O’Shaughnessy, Brian. 2000. Consciousness and the world. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Patrut, Iulia-Karin. 2006. Schwarze Schwester – Teufelsjunge: Ethnizität und Geschlecht bei Paul Celan und Herta Müller. Cologne: Böhlau.Search in Google Scholar

Phelps, Steven M. 2017. Touched. The Aeon. https://aeon.co/essays/it-takes-neuroscience-and-poetry-to-map-the-tributaries-of-touch (accessed 15 April 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Shklovsky, Viktor. 2015 [1917]. Art, as device. Translated by Alexandra Berlina. Poetics Today 36(3). 151–174. doi:10.1215/03335372-3160709.Search in Google Scholar

Shopin, Pavlo. 2016. Metaphorical conceptualization of injurious and injured language in Herta Müller. Modern Language Review 111(4). 1068–1084. doi:10.5699/modelangrevi.111.4.1068.Search in Google Scholar

Sinha, Chris. 1999. Grounding, mapping, and acts of meaning. In Theo Janssen & Gisela Redeker (eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Foundations, scope, and methodology, 223–255. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110803464.223Search in Google Scholar

Steen, Gerard. 2008. The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol 23(4). 213–241. doi:10.1080/10926480802426753.Search in Google Scholar

Suren, Katja. 2011. Ein Engel verkleidete sich als Engel und blieb unerkannt: Rhetoriken des Kindlichen bei Natascha Wodin, Herta Müller und Aglaja Veteranyi. Sulzbach: Ulrike Helmer.Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12(1). 49–100.10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2Search in Google Scholar

Watson, Jenny. 2014. “Reden ist Silber, Schweigen ist Gold:” German as a site of fascist nostalgia and Romanian as the language of dictatorship in the work of Herta Müller. In Peter Davies & Andrea Hammel (eds.), New literary and linguistic perspectives on the German language, national socialism, and the Shoah, 143–158. Rochester: Camden House.10.1017/9781782044642.010Search in Google Scholar

Yu, Ning. 2003. Synesthetic metaphor: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Literary Semantics 32(1). 19–34. doi:10.1515/jlse.2003.001.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-10-04
Published in Print: 2019-10-25

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jls-2019-2011/html
Scroll to top button