Abstract
I discuss the phenomenological approach to the creative apprehension of a literary artwork along the lines set out, from the 1930s to the 1960s, by the Polish philosopher Roman Ingarden. Responding to a revival of interest in phenomenological proposals concerning language and its products, I focus specifically on the problem of ‘indeterminacy’, an inherent feature of both the linguistic system and the fictional worlds that support many literary texts, as envisaged by Ingarden. His works in the area of cognitive philosophy and aesthetics of literature, known to the readers outside Poland in not too numerous German and English versions, still merit the attention of contemporary scholars since they connect well with several frameworks that have taken up the issue of ‘gap-filling’ and its cognitive import. In brief, I would like to bring closer to the reader’s attention the issue of ‘places of indeterminacy’ in texts and text worlds and of their ‘concretization’ by the interpreter, according to the Ingarden model (discussed comprehensively by, among others, Wolfgang Iser). I argue that with some possible modifications, it is still relevant to the study of aesthetic response to both verbal and non-verbal texts from the perspective of phenomenology, cognitive studies and the neuroscience of the arts.
References
Roman Ingarden’s works (including all translations into English; for the English-language commentaries on his philosophy consult the catalogues of the British Library and the Library of Congress)
Ingarden, Roman.1931/1973. The literary work of art. An investigation on the borderlines of ontology, logic, and theory of literature. With an appendix on the function of language in the theatre. Translated, with an Introduction, by George G.Grabowicz. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman.1937, 1968/1973. The cognition of the literary work of art. Translated by Ruth A.Crowley & Kenneth R.Olson. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman.1947/2000a. Dwuwymiarowa budowa dzieła sztuki literackiej [Two-dimensional structure of the literary work of art.]. In RomanIngarden (ed.), Szkice z filozofii literatury [Sketches on the philosophy of literature], 20–37. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak.Search in Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman.1947/2000b. Schematyczność dzieła literackiego [Schematicity of the literary work of art]. In RomanIngarden, Szkice, 38–68.Search in Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman.1947/2000c. Dzieło literackie i jego konkretyzacje [The literary work of art and its concretizations]. In Roman Ingarden, Szkice, 69–88.Search in Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman.1958/1970. Studia z estetyki [Studies in aesthetics]. Warszawa: PWN.Search in Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman.1964. Time and modes of being. Translated by Helen R.Michejda. Springfield, IL:Charles C. Thomas.Search in Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman.1975. On the motives which led Husserl to transcendental realism. Translated from the Polish by Arnór Hannibalsson. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-010-1689-6Search in Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman.1983. Man and value. Translated by ArthurSzylewicz. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press; München: Philosophia Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman.1985. Selected papers in aesthetics. Ed. by Peter J.McCormick. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press; München: Philosophia Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman.1986. The work of music and the problem of its identity. Translated from the original Polish by AdamCzerniawski, ed. by Jean G.Harrell. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.10.1007/978-1-349-09254-3Search in Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman.1989. Ontology of the work of art: The musical work, the picture, the architectural work, the film. Translated by RaymondMeyer with John T.Goldthwait. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Critical literature
Armstrong, Paul B.2013. How literature plays with the brain. The neuroscience of reading and art. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Białas, Andrzej. 2004. Natura boi się próżni [Nature abhors the vacuum]. Dziennik Polski Nr106(30). 36.Search in Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon.1994. The Oxford dictionary of philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press [Polish version: 1997. Oksfordzki słownik filozoficzny. Ed. by Jan Woleński. Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza].Search in Google Scholar
Calvino, Italo.1993/1996. Wykłady amerykańskie [The American lectures]. Gdańsk & Warszawa: Marabut.Search in Google Scholar
Chrzanowska-Kluczewska, Elżbieta. 2006. Pustka w języku – horror vacui? [Emptiness in language – horror vacui?]. StylistykaXV: Styl i kultura [Style and culture]. 85–98.Search in Google Scholar
Chrzanowska-Kluczewska, Elżbieta. 2013a. Literary semantics and literary pragmatics– (in)separable disciplines?Bulletin de la Société Polonaise de Linguistique, LXIX. 77–94.Search in Google Scholar
Chrzanowska-Kluczewska, Elżbieta. 2013b. Much More than Metaphor. Master Tropes of Artistic Language and Imagination. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Edition.10.3726/978-3-653-02958-1Search in Google Scholar
Chrzanowska-Kluczewska, Elżbieta. 2014. The figures of suppression. Gappiness of language and text-worlds and its reflection in style. In EwaWillim (ed.), Continuity in language. Styles and registers in literary and non-literary discourse, 107–124. Kraków: AFM Publishing House.Search in Google Scholar
Cieśliński, Piotr. 2011. Chyba na pewno Higgs [Almost certainly Higgs]. Gazeta Wyborcza, 14 December 2001. 15.Search in Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C.1991. Consciousness explained. Boston, MA: Little Brown.Search in Google Scholar
Doležel, Lubomir. 1989. Possible worlds and literary fictions. In StureAllén (ed.), Possible worlds in humanities, arts, and sciences. Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 65 (1986), 221–242. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Doležel, Lubomir. 1995. Fictional worlds: density, gaps, and inference. Style Summer1995. 1–14.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto.1962/1994. Dzieło otwarte. Forma i nieokreśloność w poetykach współczesnych [Opus apertum – form and indeterminacy in contemporary poetics]. Warszawa: Czytelnik.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto.1990. The limits of interpretation. Bloomington, IL & Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Enkvist, Nils E.1989. Connexity, interpretability, universes of discourse, and text worlds. In StureAllén (ed.), Possible worlds in humanities, arts, and sciences, 162–186. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110866858.162Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel.1963/2001. Raymond Roussel. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo KR.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel.1969/1977. Archeologia wiedzy [Archeology of knowledge]. Warszawa: PIW.Search in Google Scholar
Holub, Robert.1984. Reception theory. London: Methuen.Search in Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang.1976/1978. The act of reading. A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore, MD & London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Jakubczak, Krzysztof.2001. Filozoficzne szkoły buddyzmu mahajany – madhjamaka i jogaczara [Philosophical schools of Mahāyāna Buddhism]. In BeataSzymańska (ed.), Filozofia Wschodu [Philosophy of the Orient], 207–244. Kraków: The Jagiellonian University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans R.1973/1984. Dzieje sztuki i historia [Art history and history]. Pamiętnik LiterackiLXXV(z. 3). 257–290.Search in Google Scholar
Korpikiewicz, Honorata.2010. Próżnia: niezwykła historia nieistnienia [Emptiness: An unusual story of non-existence]. In PiotrOrlik (ed.), Wobec nicości [Facing nothingness], 225–240. Poznań: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Filozofii.Search in Google Scholar
Kusch, Martin.1990. Heidegger on „Why is there something Rather than nothing? In LeilaHaaparanta, MartinKusch & IlkkaNiiniluoto (eds.), Language, knowledge and intentionality. Perspectives on the philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka. Acta Philosophica Fennica Vol. 49, 144–159. Helsinki: The University of Helsinki Press.Search in Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey.2008. Language in literature. Style and foregrounding. Harlow: Pearson-Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Lesser, Simon O.1962. Fiction and the unconscious. With a pref. by Ernest Jones. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Search in Google Scholar
de Man, Paul.1971. Blindness and insight. Essays in the rhetoric of contemporary criticism. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Markiewicz, Henryk.1996. Sposób istnienia i budowa dzieła literackiego [Way of existence and structure of the literary work of art]. In HenrykMarkiewicz (ed.), Prace wybrane. T. III: Główne problemy wiedzy o literaturze [Selected works. Vol. III: Main problems of the theory of literature], 71–98. Kraków: Universitas.Search in Google Scholar
Nagao, Gajin M.1991. Mādhyamika and Yogācāra. A study of Mahāyāna philosophies. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar
Orlik, Piotr.2010. Nicość, nowoczesność i antycypacja indyferencji, sutry pradżniaparimity i retrospekcja indyferencji… dyskusja [Nothingness, modernity and anticipation of indifference, the sutras of Prajnyaparamita and retrospection of indifference… discussion]. In PiotrOrlik (ed.), Wobec nicości [Facing nothingness], 43–68. Poznań: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Filozofii.Search in Google Scholar
Richter-Wąs, Elżbieta. 2014. Wielki przełom w fizyce – odkrycie i badania czastki Higgsa [A great breakthrough in physics – the discovery and study of Higgs particle]. An inaugural lecture at the opening of the academic year 2014/2015, the Jagiellonian University in Krakow.Search in Google Scholar
Sample, Ian.2010. Massive. The hunt for the God particle. London: Virgin Group. [Polish version: 2012. Peter Higgs. Poszukiwania boskiej cząstki. Warszawa: Prószyński i S-ka].Search in Google Scholar
Smith, Barry.1979. Roman Ingarden: Ontological foundation for literary theory. In JohnOdmark (ed.), Language, literature and meaning 1: Problems of literary theory, 373–390. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/llsee.1.13smiSearch in Google Scholar
Spolsky, Ellen.1993. Gaps in nature. Literary interpretation and the modular mind. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar
Spolsky, Ellen.2008. Gapping. In: DavidHerman, ManfredJahn & Marie-LaureRyan (eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory, 193–194. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig.1921/1974. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London & New York: Routledge [Polish version: 1997. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Translated, with an Introduction, by Bogusław Wolniewicz. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN].Search in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Textual indeterminacy revisited: from Roman Ingarden onwards
- The poetic mind: a producer-oriented approach to literature and art
- ‘Like’-similes in a 1st-person narrative: Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go
- A Genesis of Literary Semantics
- Book Review
- Dan Shen: Style and Rhetoric of Short Narrative Fiction: Covert Progressions Behind Overt Plots
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Textual indeterminacy revisited: from Roman Ingarden onwards
- The poetic mind: a producer-oriented approach to literature and art
- ‘Like’-similes in a 1st-person narrative: Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go
- A Genesis of Literary Semantics
- Book Review
- Dan Shen: Style and Rhetoric of Short Narrative Fiction: Covert Progressions Behind Overt Plots