Deverbal psych nominals and nominative-accusative object case alternation in Japanese: an experimental study

References

Adger, David & Gillian Ramchand. 2003. Predication and equation. Linguistic Inquiry 34(3). 325–360. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438903322247515.Search in Google Scholar

Aissen, Judith. 2003. Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21. 435–483. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024109008573.10.1023/A:1024109008573Search in Google Scholar

Amith, Jonathan D. & Thomas C. Smith-Stark. 1994. Transitive nouns and split possessive paradigms in Central Guerrero Nahuatl. International Journal of American Linguistics 60(4). 342–368. https://doi.org/10.1086/466241.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Mark & Nadya Vinokurova. 2010. Two modalities of case assignment: Case in Sakha. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28. 593–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-010-9105-1.Search in Google Scholar

Bossong, Georg. 1991. Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. In Dieter Wanner & Douglas A. Kibbee (eds.), New analyses in Romance linguistics, 143–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.69.14bosSearch in Google Scholar

Bruening, Benjamin. 2014. Precede-and-command revisited. Language 90(2). 342–388. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2014.0037.Search in Google Scholar

Caluianu, Daniela. 2009. Transitive adjectives in Japanese. In Jóhanna Borðdal & Shobhana L. Chelliah (eds.), The role of semantics, pragmatic, and discourse factors in the development of case, 225–257. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.108.13calSearch in Google Scholar

Cowart, Wayne. 1997. Experimental syntax: Applying objective methods to sentence judgments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Danon, Gabi. 2006. Caseless nominals and the projection of DP. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24. 977–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9005-6.Search in Google Scholar

de Hoop, Helen & Andrej Malchukov. 2007. On fluid differential case marking: A bidirectional OT approach. Lingua 117. 1636–1656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.06.010.Search in Google Scholar

Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Drummond, Alex. 2013. Ibex farm. Available at: https://spellout.net/ibexfarm/.Search in Google Scholar

Dubinsky, Stanley. 1992. Case assignment to VP-adjoined positions: Nominative objects in Japanese. Linguistics 30. 873–910. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1992.30.5.873.Search in Google Scholar

Enç, Mürvet. 1991. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22. 1–25.Search in Google Scholar

Fukui, Naoki. 1986. Theory of category projection and its applications. MIT Doctoral Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Fukui, Naoki & Taisuke Nishigauchi. 1992. Head-movement and case-marking in Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 14. 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1515/jjl-1992-0102.Search in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 2009. The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP. In Anastasia Giannakidou & Monika Rathert (eds.), Quantification, definiteness, and nominalization, 321–343. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199541089.003.0013Search in Google Scholar

Heggie, Lorie A. 1988. The syntax of copular structures. University of Southern California Doctoral Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Heycock, Caroline. 1994. Layers of predication: The non-lexical syntax of clauses. New York: Garland.Search in Google Scholar

Iida, Masayo. 1987. Case-assignment by nominals in Japanese. In Masayo Iida, Stephen Wechsler & Draga Zec (eds.), Working papers in grammatical theory and discourse structure: Interaction of morphology, syntax and discourse, 93–138. Stanford, CA: CLSI.Search in Google Scholar

Kageyama, Taro. 1982. Word formation in Japanese. Lingua 57. 215–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(82)90005-5.Search in Google Scholar

Kalin, Laura. 2018. Licensing and differential object marking: The view from Neo-Aramaic. Syntax 21. 112–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12153.Search in Google Scholar

Kang, Seung-Man. 1998. The syntax and morphology of default case. University of Florida Doctoral Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Koizumi, Masatoshi. 1994. Nominative objects: The role of TP in Japanese. In Masatoshi Koizumi & Hiroyuki Ura (eds.), Formal approaches to Japanese linguistics, Vol. 1, 211–230. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1994. On external arguments. Functional Projections: University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 17. 103–130.Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from the verb. In Johan Rooryck & Laurie A. Zariing (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Scope or pseudoscope? Are there wide-scope indefinites? In Susan Rothstein (ed.), Events and grammar, 163–196. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-3969-4_8Search in Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kuroda, Shige-Yuki. 1988. Whether we agree or not: A comparative syntax of English and Japanese. In William Poser (ed.), Papers from the Second International Workshop on Japanese Syntax, 103–143. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar

Kush, Dave, Terje Lohndal & Jon Sprouse. 2018. Investigating variation in island effects: A case study of Norwegian wh-extraction. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36. 743–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9390-z.Search in Google Scholar

Kush, Dave, Terje Lohndal & Jon Sprouse. 2019. On the island sensitivity of topicalization in Norwegian: An experimental investigation. Language 95. 393–420. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0237.Search in Google Scholar

Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff & Rune H. B. Christensen. 2017. lmerTest Package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82(13). 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13.Search in Google Scholar

Legate, Julie Anne. 2008. Morphological and abstract case. Linguistic Inquiry 39(1). 55–101. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2008.39.1.55.Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Theodore. 2019. On the nature of differential object marking: Insights from Palauan. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 37. 167–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-018-9412-5.Search in Google Scholar

Lidz, Jeffrey. 2006. The grammar of accusative case in Kannada. Language 82. 10–32. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0054.Search in Google Scholar

López, Luis. 2012. Indefinite objects: Scrambling, choice functions, and differential marking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9165.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lowe, John J. 2013. Transitive nouns and adjectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Maki, Hideki, Kana Ito, Megumi Hasebe, Kenichi Goto, Michiyo Hamasaki, Takashi Munakata & Yukiko Ueda. 2010. The nominative/accusative alternation in the transitive adjective construction in Modern Japanese: An ANOVA analysis. In Yukio Otsu (ed.), The proceedings of the Tenth Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, 167–191. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Search in Google Scholar

Maki, Hideki & Tamami Morishima. 2004. A statistical analysis of the nominative/accusative alternation in Japanese. In Proceedings of the 2004 Linguistic Society of Korea International Conference, Volume II: General Sessions, 309–318. Seoul: Linguistic Society of Korea (LSK)/Yonsei Institute of Language and Information Studies (ILIS)/Hansin Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Makino, Seiichi. 1996. Uchi to soto no gengobunkagaku – bunpoo o bunka de kiru [The cultural linguistics of inner circle and outer circule – analyzing grammar through culture]. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Samuel E. 1975. A reference grammar of Japanese. Tokyo: Charles E. Tuttle.Search in Google Scholar

Mikkelsen, Lina. 2005. Copular clauses: Specification, predication, and equation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.85Search in Google Scholar

Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1987. Lexical categories in Japanese. Lingua 73. 23–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(87)90013-1.Search in Google Scholar

Moro, Andrea. 1997. The raising of predicates: Predicative noun phrases and the theory of clause structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519956Search in Google Scholar

Nishiyama, Kunio. 1999. Adjectives and the copulas in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8(3). 183–222. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008395915524.10.1023/A:1008395915524Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/.Search in Google Scholar

Rothstein, Susan. 2004. Predicates and their subjects. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-010-0690-3Search in Google Scholar

Roy, Isabelle A. 2013. Non-verbal predication: Copular sentences at the syntax-semantics interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199543540.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Saito, Mamoru. 1982. Case marking in Japanese: A preliminary study. MIT Ms.Search in Google Scholar

Saito, Mamoru. 1985. Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. MIT Doctoral Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Schütze, Carson T. 2001. On the nature of default case. Syntax 4(3). 205–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9612.00044.Search in Google Scholar

Schütze, Carson T. & Jon Sprouse. 2013. Judgment data. In Rob J. Podesva & Devyani Sharma (eds.), Research methods in linguistics, 27–50. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139013734.004Search in Google Scholar

Shibatani, Masatoshi. 1978. Nihongo no bunseki [An analysis of Japanese]. Tokyo: Taishukan.Search in Google Scholar

Stowell, Tim. 1983. Subjects across categories. Linguistic Review 2(3). 285–312.10.1515/tlir-1983-020305Search in Google Scholar

Sugioka, Yoko. 1984. Interaction of derivational morphology and syntax in Japanese and English. University of Chicago Doctoral Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Takezawa, Koichi. 1987. A configurational approach to case-marking in Japanese. University of Washington Doctoral Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Torrego, Esther. 1998. The dependencies of object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2337.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Tsujimura, Natsuko. 1992. Licensing nominal clauses: The case of deverbal nominals in Japanese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 10. 477–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00133371.Search in Google Scholar

Urushibara, Saeko. 1993. Syntactic categories and extended projections in Japanese. Brandeis University Doctoral Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

von Prince, Kilu. 2012. Nominal possession in Daakaka: Transitivizing vs. linking. In Lauren E. Clemens, Gregory Scontras & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association (AFLA), 156–170. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Search in Google Scholar

Yamakido, Hiroko. 2005. The nature of adjectival inflection in Japanese. Stony Brook University Doctoral Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Malte. 2007. Overt existential closure in Bura (Central Chadic). In Tova Friedman & Masayuki Gibson (eds.), Proceedings of Semantic and Linguistic Theory 17, 333–353. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.10.3765/salt.v17i0.2965Search in Google Scholar