Home On the peculiar nature of double complement unaccusatives in Japanese
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

On the peculiar nature of double complement unaccusatives in Japanese

  • Hiroshi Aoyagi EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 8, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper attempts to elucidate the peculiar nature of double complement unaccusatives (DCUs). Among the two widely-held diagnostics for subjecthood in Japanese, i. e. zibun-binding and subject honorification, the subject of DCUs passes the former but not the latter. First, recognizing two subtypes of ditransitive verbs, verbs of change of possession (VCPs) and verbs of change of location (VCLs), we will note that DCUs are generally formed on VCPs. Next, given our layered verb phrase hypothesis, the ni-phrase in DCUs as well as VCPs is base-generated in Spec of Low Applicative (L-Appl), and it is moved to Spec of v for dat case marking. Spec of v is high enough for zibun-binding. However, since the target of subject honorification is licensed in Spec of High Applicative (H-Appl), the ni-phrase, base-generated in Spec of L-Appl, should further move to Spec of H-Appl. This is prohibited due to a feature-based version of theta criterion.

Acknowledgements

First and foremost, I would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers and J.J. Nakayama for their valuable comments on earlier versions of this paper. I have also benefited from discussions with Takashi Nakajima and Hideya Takahashi. However, I am solely responsible for remaining errors. The current research is financially supported by JSPS KAKENHI (#17K02700) and the Pache Research Promotion Grant 1-A-2 for the 2018 academic year from Nanzan University.

References

Aikawa, Takako. 1999. Reflexives. In Natsuko Tsujimura (ed.), The handbook of Japanese linguistics, 154–190. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9781405166225.ch6Search in Google Scholar

Aoyagi, Hiroshi. 1998. On the nature of particles in Japanese and its theoretical implications. Doctoral dissertation. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California.Search in Google Scholar

Aoyagi, Hiroshi. 2004. Morphological case marking as phoneticization. Proceedings of the 2004 LSK International Conference, Vol. I. 59–71. Linguistic Society of Korea.Search in Google Scholar

Aoyagi, Hiroshi. 2007. Toward a unified account of morphological causatives and passives in Korean. In Doo-Won Lee (ed.), Locality and minimalism: Proceedings of the 9th Seoul International Conference on generative grammar, 9–27. Seoul: Hankuk Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Aoyagi, Hiroshi. 2010. On the asymmetry in passives in Japanese and Korean. JELS 27, 11–20. The English Linguistic Society of Japan.Search in Google Scholar

Aoyagi, Hiroshi. 2017a. On the source of adversity and the architecture of verb phrase in Japanese. In Changguk Yim (ed.), The Syntax-Morphology Interface in Generative Grammar: Proceedings of the 19th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar, 53–69. The Korean Generative Grammar Circle.Search in Google Scholar

Aoyagi, Hiroshi. 2017b. On verb-stem expansion in Japanese and Korean. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 24, 71–86. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications & SLA.Search in Google Scholar

Arikawa, Koji. 2008. A reference guide of diagnostics for the generative syntax: Data from English, Hindi, and Japanese. Nagoya: Sankeisha.Search in Google Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 2005. The normal course of events (Structuring Sense, Vol. II). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263929.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. The Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, David Michaels, Carlos P. Otero & Maria-Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2006. Restructuring and functional heads: The cartography of syntactic structures (Vol. 4). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195179545.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Deo, Ashwini & Devyani Sharma. 2006. Typological variation in the ergative morphology of Indo-Aryan languages. Linguistic Typology 10. 369–418.10.1515/LINGTY.2006.012Search in Google Scholar

Harada, Naomi. 2002. The state of statives after spell-out. WECOL 2002, 112–123.Search in Google Scholar

Inoue, Kazuko. 1976a. Henkeibunpō to Nihongo (Vol. I: Tōgokōzō o chūshin ni) [Transformational grammar and the Japanese language (Vol. I: with special reference to syntactic structures)]. Tokyo: Taishukan.Search in Google Scholar

Inoue, Kazuko. 1976b. Henkeibunpō to Nihongo (Vol. II: Imikaishaku o chūshin ni) [Transformational grammar and the Japanese language (Vol. II: with special reference to semantic interpretation)]. Tokyo: Taishukan.Search in Google Scholar

Inoue, Kazuko. 2006. Case (with special reference to Japanese). In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsjijk (eds.), The blackwell companion to syntax (Volume I), 295–373. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470996591.ch11Search in Google Scholar

Ishizuka, Tomoko. 2012. The passive in Japanese: A cartographic minimalist approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.192Search in Google Scholar

Jacobsen, Wesley. 1992. The transitive structure of events in Japanese. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Kageyama, Taro. 1996. Dōshi Imiron [The semantics of verbs]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Kageyama, Taro. 2006. Nihongo ukemibun no tōgokōzō [The syntactic structure of passives in Japanese]. Lexicon Forum 2, 179–231. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Search in Google Scholar

Kishimoto, Hideki. 2001. The role of lexical meanings in argument encoding: Double object verbs in Japanese. Gengo Kenkyu 120. 35–65.Search in Google Scholar

Kishimoto, Hideki. 2012. Subject honorification and the position of subjects in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 21(1). 1–41.10.1007/s10831-011-9083-2Search in Google Scholar

Koizumi, Masatoshi. 1998. Invisible Agr in Japanese. Linguistic Review 15(1). 1–39.10.1515/tlir.1998.15.1.1Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the Lexicon, 109–137. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5Search in Google Scholar

Kubo, Miori. 1992. Japanese passives. Working Papers of the Department of Language and Culture 23, 231–302. Sapporo: Hokkaido University.Search in Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport-Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity at the syntax-Laxical semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1992. Case and licensing. In German Wesphal, Ao Benjamin & Hee-Rak Chae (eds.), Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics ’91, 234–253. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistic Colloquium, 201–225.Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 2001. Words. Unpublished manuscript. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Search in Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Yo. 2000. Causative alternation in English and Japanese: a closer look. English Linguistics 17(1). 160–192.10.9793/elsj1984.17.160Search in Google Scholar

McGinnis, Martha. 2001. Variation in the phrase structure of applicatives. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 1. 105–146.10.1075/livy.1.06mcgSearch in Google Scholar

Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1989. Structure and case marking in Japanese. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004373259Search in Google Scholar

Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1997. Against optional scrambling. Linguistic Inquiry 28(1). 1–26.Search in Google Scholar

Miyagawa, Shigeru & Takae Tsujioka. 2004. Argument structure and ditransitive verbs in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13(1). 1–38.10.4324/9780203126844-7Search in Google Scholar

Nakajima, Takashi. 2015. Remerge and causative in Japanese. Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics, 305–312. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Niinuma, Fumikazu & Hideya Takahashi. 2013. External cause and the structure of vP in Japanese dialects and Korean. In Il-Jae Lee & Uujinbai Dolgormaa (eds.), Universals and Parameters: Proceedings of the 15th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar, 297–316. Seoul: Hankuk Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Pylkkänen, Liina. 2000. Deriving adversity. WCCFL 19. 399–410.Search in Google Scholar

Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing Arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262162548.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Reinhart, Tanya. 2002. The theta system: an overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28(3). 229–290.10.1515/thli.28.3.229Search in Google Scholar

Reinhart, Tanya. 2016. Concepts, syntax, and their interface: The theta system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8496.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Saito, Mamoru. 1982. Case marking in Japanese. Unpublished manuscript. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Search in Google Scholar

Takano, Yuji. 2011. Double complement unaccusatives in Japanese: puzzles and implications. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 20(3). 229–254.10.1007/s10831-011-9079-ySearch in Google Scholar

Ueda, Yukiko. 2002. Subject positions, ditransitives, and scope in minimalist syntax: a phase-based approach. Doctoral dissertation. Chiba: Kanda University of International Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Ura, Hiroyuki. 2000. Checking theory and grammatical functions in universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195118391.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Watanabe, Akira. 1993. Agr-based case theory and its interaction with the A-bar system. Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Search in Google Scholar

Woolford, Ellen. 2006. Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry 37(1). 111–130.10.1162/002438906775321175Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-04-08
Published in Print: 2020-05-27

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jjl-2019-2019/pdf
Scroll to top button