Strong and weak pronouns in the covert system of pronouns

References

Baker, Mark. 2008. The macroparameter in a microparametric world. In Theresa Biberauer (ed.), The limits of syntactic variation, 351–373. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.132.16bakSearch in Google Scholar

Battistella, Edwin. 1989. Chinese reflexivization: Movement to INFL approach. Linguistics 27(6). 987–1012.10.1515/ling.1989.27.6.987Search in Google Scholar

Béjar, Susana & Milan Rezac. 2009. Cyclic agree. Linguistic Inquiry 40(1). 35–73.10.1162/ling.2009.40.1.35Search in Google Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 1983. Parametric syntax: Case studies in Semitic and Romance languages. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.10.1515/9783110808506Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. 1997. The syntax of nonfinite complementation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. 2002. A-movement and the EPP. Syntax 5(3). 167–218.10.1111/1467-9612.00051Search in Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, Anna & Michal Starke. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe, 145–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110804010.145Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalism in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 1–23.10.1162/0024389052993655Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2007. Approaching UG from below. In Uli Sauerland & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds.), Interfaces + recursion=language?: Chomsky’s minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics, 1–29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207552-001Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos Otero & Maria-Luisa Zubizaretta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7713.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Chou, Min-Chieh. 2004. Chinese learner’s overgeneration of English existential constructions. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 30(2). 183–214.Search in Google Scholar

Cole, Peter, Gabriella Hermon & C.-T. James Huang. 2005. Long distance anaphors in Asian languages. In Peter Cole, Gabriella Hermon & C.-T. James Huang (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, Volume 3, 21–84. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996591.ch39Search in Google Scholar

Cole, Peter, Gabriella Hermon & Li-May Sung. 1990. Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry 21(1). 1–22.Search in Google Scholar

Giblin, Iain. 2015. Agreement restrictions in Mandarin long-distance binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Gutman, Eynat. 2004. Third person null subjects in Hebrew, Finnish and Rumanian: An accessibility-theoretic account. Journal of Linguistics 40(3). 463–490.10.1017/S0022226704002890Search in Google Scholar

Holmberg, Anders. 2005. Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry 36(4). 533–564.10.1162/002438905774464322Search in Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15(4). 531–574.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James. 1987. Remarks on empty categories in Chinese. Linguistic Inquiry 18(2). 321–337.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James. 1991. Remarks on the status of the null object. In Robert Freidin (ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, 56–76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James & C.-C Tang Jane. 1991. The local nature of the long-distance reflexive in Chinese. In Jan Koster & Eric Reuland (eds.), Long-distance anaphora, 263–282. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627835.014Search in Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James & C.-S. Luther Liu. 2001. Logophoricity, attitudes and ziji at the interface. In Peter Cole, Gabriella Hermon & C.-T. James Huang (eds.), Long-distance reflexives. Syntax and Semantics 33, 141–195. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9781849508742_006Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Y.-H. 1984. Reflexives in Chinese. Studies in Literature and Linguistics 10. 163–188.Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard. 2005. Movement and silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179163.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kiss, Katalin É. 1995. Introduction. In É. Kiss Katalin (ed.), Discourse configurational languages, 3–27. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195088335.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kuroda, S.-Y. 1988. Whether we agree or not: A comparative syntax of English and Japanese. Linguisticae Investigationes 12. 1–47.10.1075/li.12.1.02kurSearch in Google Scholar

Liu, Chi-Ming. 2014. A modular theory of radical pro drop. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Roger. 1999. Case, the EPP, and minimalism. In Samuel D. Epstein & Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Working minimalism, 1–25. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7305.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2010. Why agree? Why move? Unifying agreement-based and discourse configurational languages. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 54. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8116.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2012. Agreements that occur mainly in main clauses. In Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds.), Main clause phenomena: New horizons, 79–112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.190.04miySearch in Google Scholar

Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2017. Agreement beyond phi. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 75. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/10958.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Oku, Satoshi. 1998. A theory of selection and reconstruction in the minimalist perspective. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Otani, Kazuyo & John Whitman. 1991. V-raising and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 22(2). 345–358.Search in Google Scholar

Pan, Haihua. 2001. Why the blocking effect?. In Peter Cole, C.-T. James Huang & Gabriella Hermon (eds.), Long-distance reflexives. Syntax and Semantics 33, 279–316. New York: Academic Press.10.1108/S0092-4563(2000)0000033011Search in Google Scholar

Patel-Grosz, Pritty & Patrick Grosz. 2017. Revisiting pronominal typology. Linguistic Inquiry 48(2). 259–297.10.1162/LING_a_00243Search in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego. 2001. T-to-C: Causes and consequences. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, 355–426. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0014Search in Google Scholar

Pica, Pierre. 1987. On the nature of the reflexivization cycle. In Joyce McDonough & Barnadette Plunkett (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 17, 483–500. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.Search in Google Scholar

Progovac, Liljana. 1992. Relativized SUBJECT: Long distance reflexives without movement. Linguistic Inquiry 23(4). 671–680.Search in Google Scholar

Progovac, Liljana. 1993. Long-distance reflexives: Movement to Infl versus relativized subject. Linguistic Inquiry 24(4). 755–772.Search in Google Scholar

Richards, Mark D. 2007. On feature inheritance: An argument from the phase impenetrability condition. Linguistic Inquiry 38(3). 563–572.10.1162/ling.2007.38.3.563Search in Google Scholar

Runić, Jelena. 2014. A new look at clitics, clitic doubling, and argument ellipsis: Evidence from Slavic. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Saito, Mamoru. 2007. Notes on East Asian argument ellipsis. Language Research 43. 203–227.Search in Google Scholar

Schwartz, Florian. 2009. Two types of definites in natural language. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Takahashi, Daiko. 2008. Noun phrase ellipsis. In Shigeru Miyagawa & Mamoru Saito (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics, 394–422. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195307344.013.0015Search in Google Scholar

Tang, C.-C. Jane. 1989. Chinese reflexives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7(1). 93–121.10.1007/BF00141348Search in Google Scholar

Tang, Sze-Wing, 1998. Parametrization of features in syntax. Irvine, CA: University of California dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina. 1998. On the syntax and semantics of (relative) pronouns and determiners. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2(2). 143–181.10.1023/A:1009719229992Search in Google Scholar

Yang, C.-Y. Barry. 2014. Chinese null subjects: A view from the top. In C.-T. James Huang & Feng-hsi Liu (eds.), Peaches and Plums, Language and Linguistics Monograph Series 54, 227–253. Tapei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia SinicaSearch in Google Scholar

Yang, Dong-Whee. 1983. The extended binding theory of anaphors. Language Research 19(2). 169–192.Search in Google Scholar