Home Psychological deictic –te kuru compared to passive: The case of victims’ stories in Japanese
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Psychological deictic –te kuru compared to passive: The case of victims’ stories in Japanese

  • Harumi Minagawa EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 13, 2018
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Japanese is often said to be stronger than English in construing an event and reporting it from the subjective position. While the auxiliary verb –te kuru ‘COME’ is one of the deictic devices that reports an event from a subjective perspective, very limited attention has been given to the use of –te kuru when it denotes ‘psychological deixis’ (Sawada 2000). Using on-line postings of sexual harassment victims, this study examines how the psychological –te kuru expresses the victims’ experience subjectively particularly in comparison with the much-studied passive structure. While showing that the two syntactic structures would often be interchangeable in the data, the study reveals that when the victim feels powerless and subdued by the offender’s act upon her/him, only the passive is used, while if the victim has a sufficient sense of power to feel anger, –te kuru tends to be used. The study argues that the semantic traits of the passive [associated with the perfective aspect] and –te kuru [which is interpreted as ‘psychological inchoative’ in this study] are reflected in the choices made in the victims’ narratives.

References

Alam, Yukiko S. 1999. Idōdōshi no hatsuwa jōtai izonsei: ‘te kuru/te iku’ niiyoru idōhōkō to hatsuwa chūshinten no kankei no shiji [Discourse situation dependency of motion verbs: Indication of the relationship between the direction of movement and the centre of discourse]. In Yukiko Alam (ed.), Gengogaku to Nihongo Kyōiku [Linguistics and Japanese language education], 177–196. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Aspect and voice: Some reflections on perfect and passive. In Philip Tadeschi & Annie Zaenen (eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 14. Tense and aspect, 65–78. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004373112_005Search in Google Scholar

Hasegawa, Yoko. 1996. A study of Japanese clause linkage: The connective te in Japanese. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Hirose, Yukio. 2013. Deconstruction of the speaker and the three-tier model of language use. Tsukuba English Studies 32. 1–29.10.9793/elsj.32.1_120Search in Google Scholar

Ikegami, Yoshihiko. 2005a. Japanese as seen from outside and from inside. In André Wlodarczyk (ed.), Paris lectures in Japanese linguistics, 15–25. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Ikegami, Yoshihiko. 2005b. Indices of a ‘subjectively-prominent’ language. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3. 132–164. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/arcl.3.08ikeSearch in Google Scholar

Ikegami, Yoshihiko. 2007. Subjectivity, ego-orientation and subject-object merger: A cognitive account of the zero-encoding of the grammatical subject in Japanese. In Yoshihiko Ikegami, Viktoria Eschbach-Szabo & André Wlodarczyk (eds.), Japanese Linguistics: European chapter, 15–29. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Ikegami, Yoshihiko. 2011. Nihongo to shukansei/shutaisei [Japanese and subjectification/subjectivity]. In Harumi Sawada (ed.), Shukansei to Shutaisei [Subjectification and subjectivity], 49–67. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Search in Google Scholar

Iwasaki, Shoichi. 1993. Subjectivity in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/sidag.2Search in Google Scholar

Iwashita, Mami. 2007. Being affected: The meanings and functions of Japanese passive constructions. Müenchen: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Kaiser, Stefan, Yasuko Ichikawa, Noriko Kobayashi & Hikofumi Yamamoto. 2001. Japanese: A comprehensive grammar. London/New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kindaichi, Haruhiko. 1976. Nihongo Dōshi no Asupekuto [The aspect of Japanese verbs]. Tokyo: Mugi Shobo.Search in Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 1978. Danwa no Bumpō [Discourse principles]. Tokyo: Taishukan.Search in Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu & Etsuko Kaburaki. 1997. Empathy and syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 8(4). 627–672.Search in Google Scholar

Kuroda, S. 1979. On Japanese passives. In George Bedell, Eichi Kobayashi & Masatake Muraki (eds.), Explorations in Linguistics: Papers in honor of Kazuko Inoue, 305–347. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Samuel E. 1987. A Reference grammar of Japanese. Tokyo: Tuttle.Search in Google Scholar

Masuoka, Takashi. 1991. Modariti no Bumpō [A grammar of modality]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Morita, Yoshiyuki. 1995. Nihongo no Shiten [Point of view in the Japanese language]. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Search in Google Scholar

Ōe, Saburō. 1975. Nichiei Hikaku Kenkyū: Shukansei o Megutte [Contrastive analysis of Japanese/English: On subjectivity]. Tokyo: Nanundo.Search in Google Scholar

Okutsu, Keiichirō. 1983. Naze ukemi ka: Shiten kara no kēsu sutadī [Why passive?: A case study in light of point of view]. Kokugogaku 132, 65–80.Search in Google Scholar

Sawada, Harumi. 1993. Shiten to Shukansei: Nichiei Jodōshi no Bunseki [Point of view and subjectivity: Analysis of auxiliary verbs in Japanese and English]. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Search in Google Scholar

Sawada, Jun. 2009. Idōdōshi ‘kuru’ no bumpōka to hōkōzuke kinō: ‘basho daikushisu’ kara ‘shinri daikushisu’ [Grammaticalization and deictic functions of the motion verb kuru: From location deixis to psychological deixis]. Goyōron Kenkyū 11. 1–20.Search in Google Scholar

Sekuhara keijiban mikuru [Sexual harassment forum Mikle] http://mikle.jp/search/%BE%B8%CA%D7/, accessed on 16/03/2014.Search in Google Scholar

Sexual Assault Message Board http://www.weaveinc.org/post/sexual-assault-message-board, accessed on 28/ 03/2014and 2/04/2016.Search in Google Scholar

Shibatani, Masayoshi. 2003. Directional verbs in Japanese. In Erin Shay & Uwe Seibert (eds.), Motion, direction, and location in languages, 259–285. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.56.19shiSearch in Google Scholar

Teramura, Hideo. 1984. Nihongo no Shintakusu to Imi II [Japanese syntax and meaning II]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Uehara, Satoshi. 2011. Shukansei ni kansuru gengo no taishō to ruikei [Contrastive linguistics and linguistic typology on subjectivity]. In Harumi Sawada (ed.), Shukansei to Shutaisei [Subjectification and subjectivity], 69–91. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Search in Google Scholar

Yoshikawa, Taketoki. 1976. Gendai nihongo dōshi no asupekuto no kenkyū [Study of the aspect of modern Japanese verbs]. In Haruhiko Kindaichi (ed.), Nihongo Dōshi no Asupekuto [The aspect of Japanese verbs], 155–327. Tokyo: Mugi Shobo.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-04-13
Published in Print: 2018-04-25

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jjl-2018-0003/html
Scroll to top button