Home A layer potential approach to inverse problems in brain imaging
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A layer potential approach to inverse problems in brain imaging

  • Paul Asensio , Jean-Michel Badier , Juliette Leblond , Jean-Paul Marmorat and Masimba Nemaire EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 11, 2023

Abstract

We study the inverse source localisation problem using the electric potential measured point-wise inside the head with stereo-ElectroEncephaloGraphy (sEEG), the electric potential measured point-wise on the scalp with ElectroEncephaloGraphy (EEG) or the magnetic flux density measured point-wise outside the head with MagnetoEncephaloGraphy (MEG). We present a method that works on a wide range of models of primary currents; in particular, we give details for primary currents that are assumed to be smooth vector fields that are supported on and normally oriented to the grey/white matter interface. Irrespective of the data used, we also solve the transmission problem of the electric potential associated with a recovered source; hence we solve the cortical mapping problem. To ensure that the electric potential and normal currents are continuous in the head, the electric potential is expressed as a linear combination of double layer potentials and the magnetic flux density is expressed as a linear combination of single layer potentials. Numerically, we solve the problems on meshed surfaces of the grey/white matter interface, cortical surface, skull and scalp. A main feature of the numerical approach we take is that, on the meshed surfaces, we can compute the double and single layer potentials exactly and at arbitrary points. Because we explicitly study the transmission of the electric potential in head when using magnetic data, the coupling of electric and magnetic data in the source recovery problem is made explicit and shows the advantage of using simultaneous electric and magnetic data. We provide numerical examples of the source recovery and inverse cortical mapping using synthetic data.

MSC 2010: 31A25; 65N21; 65R32

Award Identifier / Grant number: ANR-18-CE40-0035

Funding statement: The work of M. Nemaire is supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) through the project ANR-18-CE40-0035.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the OPAL infrastructure from Université Côte d’Azur for providing resources and support.

References

[1] R. A. Adams, Sobolev Spaces, Pure Appl. Math. 65, Academic Press, New York, 1975. Search in Google Scholar

[2] S. Axler, P. Bourdon and W. Ramey, Harmonic Function Theory, Grad. Texts in Math., Springer, New York, 2006. Search in Google Scholar

[3] L. Baratchart, C. Villalobos Guillén, D. P. Hardin, M. C. Northington and E. B. Saff, Inverse potential problems for divergence of measures with total variation regularization, Found. Comput. Math. 20 (2020), no. 5, 1273–1307. 10.1007/s10208-019-09443-xSearch in Google Scholar

[4] B. Beauzamy, Introduction to Banach Spaces and Their Geometry, Math. Notes, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985. Search in Google Scholar

[5] A. Beck, On the convergence of alternating minimization for convex programming with applications to iteratively reweighted least squares and decomposition schemes, SIAM J. Optim. 25 (2015), no. 1, 185–209. 10.1137/13094829XSearch in Google Scholar

[6] M. Belge, M. E. Kilmer and E. L. Miller, Efficient determination of multiple regularization parameters in a generalized L-curve framework, Inverse Problems 18 (2002), no. 4, 1161–1183. 10.1088/0266-5611/18/4/314Search in Google Scholar

[7] J. Bolte, S. Sabach and M. Teboulle, Proximal alternating linearized minimization for nonconvex and nonsmooth problems, Math. Program. 146 (2014), no. 1–2, 459–494. 10.1007/s10107-013-0701-9Search in Google Scholar

[8] J. W. Both, On the rate of convergence of alternating minimization for non-smooth non-strongly convex optimization in Banach spaces, Optim. Lett. 16 (2022), no. 2, 729–743. 10.1007/s11590-021-01753-wSearch in Google Scholar

[9] H. Brezis, Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations, Universitext, Springer, New York, 2010. 10.1007/978-0-387-70914-7Search in Google Scholar

[10] M. Clerc and J. Kybic, Cortical mapping by Laplace–Cauchy transmission using a boundary element method, Inverse Problems 23 (2007), no. 6, 2589–2601. 10.1088/0266-5611/23/6/020Search in Google Scholar

[11] M. Clerc, J. Leblond, J.-P. Marmorat and T. Papadopoulo, Source localization using rational approximation on plane sections, Inverse Problems 28 (2012), no. 5, Article ID 055018. 10.1088/0266-5611/28/5/055018Search in Google Scholar

[12] E. Corona and S. Veerapaneni, Boundary integral equation analysis for suspension of spheres in Stokes flow, J. Comput. Phys. 362 (2018), 327–345. 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.02.017Search in Google Scholar

[13] D. Cosandier-Rimélé, J.-M. Badier, P. Chauvel and F. Wendling, A physiologically plausible spatio-temporal model for EEG signals recorded with intracerebral electrodes in human partial epilepsy, IEEE Trans. Mio-Med. Eng. 54 (2007), 380–388. 10.1109/TBME.2006.890489Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[14] R. Dautray and J.-L. Lions, Mathematical Analysis and Numerical Methods for Science and Technology. Volume 1: Physical Origins and Classical Methods, Springer, Berlin, 2000. Search in Google Scholar

[15] P. de Lange, E. Boto, N. Holmes, R. M. Hill, R. Bowtell, V. Wens, X. De Tiège, M. J. Brookes and M. Bourguignon, Measuring the cortical tracking of speech with optically-pumped magnetometers, NeuroImage 233 (2021), Article ID 117969. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117969Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] F. Demengel and G. Demengel, Functional Spaces for the Theory of Elliptic Partial Differential Equations, Universitext, Springer, London, 2012. 10.1007/978-1-4471-2807-6Search in Google Scholar

[17] E. Fabes, O. Mendez and M. Mitrea, Boundary layers on Sobolev–Besov spaces and Poisson’s equation for the Laplacian in Lipschitz domains, J. Funct. Anal. 159 (1998), no. 2, 323–368. 10.1006/jfan.1998.3316Search in Google Scholar

[18] Q. Fang, Iso2mesh, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

[19] S. N. Fata, Explicit expressions for 3D boundary integrals in potential theory, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 78 (2009), no. 1, 32–47. 10.1002/nme.2472Search in Google Scholar

[20] A. Gramfort, M. Luessi, E. Larson, D. Engemann, D. Strohmeier, C. Brodbeck, L. Parkkonen and M. Hämäläinen, MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data, NeuroImage 86 (2013), Paper No. 10. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.027Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[21] A. Gramfort, T. Papadopoulo, E. Olivi and M. Clerc, OpenMEEG: Opensource software for quasistatic bioelectromagnetics, BioMed. Eng. OnLine 9 (2010), Paper No. 45. 10.1186/1475-925X-9-45Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[22] M. Hämäläinen, R. Hari, R. Ilmoniemi, J. Knuutila and O. Lounasmaa, Magnetoencephalography: Theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65 (1993), Article ID 413. 10.1103/RevModPhys.65.413Search in Google Scholar

[23] P. C. Hansen, The L-Curve and its use in the numerical treatment of inverse problems, Computational Inverse Problems in Electrocardiology, Adv. Comput. Bioeng. 5, WIT Press, Southampton (2000), 119–142. Search in Google Scholar

[24] B. Hofmann, B. Kaltenbacher, C. Pöschl and O. Scherzer, A convergence rates result for Tikhonov regularization in Banach spaces with non-smooth operators, Inverse Problems 23 (2007), no. 3, 987–1010. 10.1088/0266-5611/23/3/009Search in Google Scholar

[25] R. Ilmoniemi and J. Sarvas, Brain Signals: Physics and Mathematics of MEG and EEG, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2019. 10.7551/mitpress/10745.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[26] J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Wiley, New York, 1962. 10.1063/1.3057859Search in Google Scholar

[27] R. Kress, Linear Integral Equations, Appl. Math. Sci., Springer, Berlin, 1989. 10.1007/978-3-642-97146-4Search in Google Scholar

[28] V. D. Kupradze and M. A. Aleksidze, The method of functional equations for the approximate solution of certain boundary-value problems, USSR Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 4 (1964), 82–126. 10.1016/0041-5553(64)90006-0Search in Google Scholar

[29] J. Kybic, M. Clerc, T. Abboud, O. Faugeras, R. Keriven and T. Papadopoulo, A common formalism for the integral formulations of the forward EEG problem, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 24 (2005), 12–28. 10.1109/TMI.2004.837363Search in Google Scholar

[30] D. Mitrea, M. Mitrea and J. Pipher, Vector potential theory on nonsmooth domains in R 3 and applications to electromagnetic scattering, J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 3 (1997), no. 2, 131–192. 10.1007/BF02649132Search in Google Scholar

[31] M. Nili Ahmadabadi, M. Arab and F. M. Maalek Ghaini, The method of fundamental solutions for the inverse space-dependent heat source problem, Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 33 (2009), no. 10, 1231–1235. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2009.05.001Search in Google Scholar

[32] G. Peyre, Toolbox graph, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

[33] L. Rahmouni, S. Adrian, K. Cools and F. Andriulli, Conforming discretizations of boundary element solutions of the electroencephalography forward problem, C. R. Phys. 19 (2018), 7–25. 10.1016/j.crhy.2018.02.002Search in Google Scholar

[34] J. Rahol and S. Tissari, Iterative solution of dense linear systems arising from the electrostatic integral equation in MEG, Phys. Med. Biol. 47 (2002), 961–975. Search in Google Scholar

[35] J. Sarvas, Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem, Phys. Med. Biol. 32 (1987), 11–22. 10.1088/0031-9155/32/1/004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] D. Shattuck and R. Leahy, Brainsuite: An automated cortical surface identification tool, Med. Imag. Anal. 6 (2002), 129–42. 10.1016/S1361-8415(02)00054-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] S. K. Smirnov, Decomposition of solenoidal vector charges into elementary solenoids, and the structure of normal one-dimensional flows, St. Petersburg Math. J. 5 (1994), 841–867. Search in Google Scholar

[38] M. Stropahl, A.-K. Bauer, S. Debener and M. Bleichner, Source-modeling auditory processes of EEG data using EEGLAB and brainstorm, Front. Neurosci. 12 (2018), 10.3389/fnins.2018.00309. 10.3389/fnins.2018.00309Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[39] G. Verchota, Layer potentials and regularity for the Dirichlet problem for Laplace’s equation in Lipschitz domains, J. Funct. Anal. 59 (1984), no. 3, 572–611. 10.1016/0022-1236(84)90066-1Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-04-27
Revised: 2023-07-17
Accepted: 2023-09-19
Published Online: 2023-11-11
Published in Print: 2024-06-01

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jiip-2023-0041/html
Scroll to top button