Home Uniqueness and stability analysis of final data inverse source problems for evolution equations
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Uniqueness and stability analysis of final data inverse source problems for evolution equations

  • Vladimir Romanov and Alemdar Hasanov EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 28, 2022

Abstract

This article proposes a unified approach to the issues of uniqueness and Lipschitz stability for the final data inverse source problems of determining the unknown spatial load F ( x ) in the evolution equations. The approach is based on integral identities outlined here for the one-dimensional and multidimensional heat equations

ρ ( x ) u t - ( k ( x ) u x ) x = F ( x ) G ( t ) , ( x , t ) ( 0 , ) × ( 0 , T ] ,

and

ρ ( x ) u t - div ( k ( x ) u ) = F ( x ) G ( x , t ) , ( x , t ) Ω × ( 0 , T ] , Ω n ,

for the damped wave, and the Euler–Bernoulli beam and Kirchhoff plate equations

ρ ( x ) u t t + μ ( x ) u t - ( r ( x ) u x ) x = F ( x ) G ( x , t ) , ρ ( x ) u t t + μ ( x ) u t + ( r ( x ) u x x ) x x = F ( x ) G ( t ) ,

for ( x , t ) ( 0 , ) × ( 0 , T ] , and

ρ ( x ) h ( x ) u t t + μ ( x ) u t + ( D ( x ) ( u x 1 , x 1 + ν u x 2 , x 2 ) ) x 1 , x 1 + ( D ( x ) ( u x 2 , x 2 + ν u x 1 , x 1 ) ) x 2 , x 2 + 2 ( 1 - ν ) ( D ( x ) u x 1 , x 2 ) x 1 , x 2
= F ( x ) G ( t ) , ( x , t ) Ω T := Ω × ( 0 , T ) , Ω := ( 0 , 1 ) × ( 0 , 2 ) ,

and allows us to prove the uniqueness and stability of the solutions for all considered inverse problems under the same conditions imposed on the load G ( t ) or G ( x , t ) .

MSC 2010: 74G75; 65M32

Funding statement: The first author was supported by Mathematical Center in Akademgorodok at the Novosibirsk State University (the agreement with Ministry of Science and High Education of the Russian Federation number 075-15-2019-1613). The research of the second author has been supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) through the Incentive Program for International Scientific Publications (UBYT).

References

[1] O. Baysal and A. Hasanov, Solvability of the clamped Euler–Bernoulli beam equation, Appl. Math. Lett. 93 (2019), 85–90. 10.1016/j.aml.2019.02.006Search in Google Scholar

[2] I. Bushuyev, Global uniqueness for inverse parabolic problems with final observation, Inverse Problems 11 (1995), no. 4, 11–16. 10.1088/0266-5611/11/4/001Search in Google Scholar

[3] L. C. Evans, Partial Differential Equations, Grad. Stud. Math. 19, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2002. Search in Google Scholar

[4] N. L. Gol’dman, On a counterexample of inverse parabolic problems with final overdetermination, Dokl. Math. 88 (2013), no. 5, 714–716. 10.1134/S1064562413060240Search in Google Scholar

[5] A. Hasanov, V. Romanov and O. Baysal, Unique recovery of unknown spatial load in damped Euler–Bernoulli beam equation from final time measured output, Inverse Problems 37 (2021), no. 7, Paper No. 075005. 10.1088/1361-6420/ac01fbSearch in Google Scholar

[6] A. Hasanov Hasanoğlu and V. G. Romanov, Introduction to Inverse Problems for Differential Equations, Springer, Cham, 2017. 10.1007/978-3-319-62797-7Search in Google Scholar

[7] V. Isakov, Inverse Source Problems, Math. Surveys Monogr. 34, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1990. 10.1090/surv/034Search in Google Scholar

[8] V. Isakov, Inverse parabolic problems with the final overdetermination, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 44 (1991), no. 2, 185–209. 10.1002/cpa.3160440203Search in Google Scholar

[9] V. L. Kamynin, On the unique solvability of an inverse problem for parabolic equations with a final overdetermination condition, Mat. Zametki 73 (2003), no. 2, 217–227; translation in Math. Notes, 73 (2003), 202-211. Search in Google Scholar

[10] A. Kawano, Uniqueness in the identification of asynchronous sources and damage in vibrating beams, Inverse Problems 30 (2014), no. 6, Article ID 065008. 10.1088/0266-5611/30/6/065008Search in Google Scholar

[11] A. B. Kostin, Counterexamples in inverse problems for parabolic, elliptic, and hyperbolic equations, Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 54 (2014), no. 5, 797–810. 10.1134/S0965542514020092Search in Google Scholar

[12] S. Nicaise and O. Zaïr, Determination of point sources in vibrating beams by boundary measurements: Identifiability, stability, and reconstruction results, Electron. J. Differential Equations 2004 (2004), Paper No. 20. Search in Google Scholar

[13] P. W. Poon, The stability radius of a quasi-Fredholm operator, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 126 (1998), no. 4, 1071–1080. 10.1090/S0002-9939-98-04253-1Search in Google Scholar

[14] A. I. Prilepko and A. B. Kostin, On certain inverse problems for parabolic equations with final and integral observation, Sb. Math. 75 (1993), no. 2, Paper No. 473. 10.1070/SM1993v075n02ABEH003394Search in Google Scholar

[15] A. I. Prilepko and V. V. Solovev, Solvability theorems and the Rothe method in inverse problems for an equation of parabolic type, Differ. Equ. 23 (1987), 1341–1349. Search in Google Scholar

[16] M. Slodička, Uniqueness for an inverse source problem of determining a space dependent source in a non-autonomous parabolic equation, Appl. Math. Lett. 107 (2020), Article ID 106395. 10.1016/j.aml.2020.106395Search in Google Scholar

[17] K. Van Bockstal, Identification of an unknown spatial load distribution in a vibrating beam or plate from the final state, J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 27 (2019), no. 5, 623–642. 10.1515/jiip-2018-0068Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-11-21
Accepted: 2022-03-07
Published Online: 2022-04-28
Published in Print: 2022-06-01

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jiip-2021-0072/html
Scroll to top button