China’s Biotechnology Industry and the International Protection of Intellectual Property Rights
-
Laura J. Loppacher
and William A. Kerr
Abstract
Intellectual property rights were an anathema to the Marxist philosophy that dominated China for the second half of the 20th century. China's recent economic reforms have recognised the need for property rights in a market-oriented economy. Further, China's accession to the market oriented World Trade Organization (WTO) requires that it become legally compliant with the WTO's Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPS). China has, however, struggled to put in place an effective legal regime for intellectual property. Agricultural biotechnology is a knowledge industry. While China has worked hard to develop a domestic biotechnology industry, it is almost entirely funded by the government. Both because the investment demands of the Chinese biotechnology industry exceed the funds that can be made available by the government and to fully capitalize on the industry's potential requires the participation of foreign biotechnology firms, intellectual property protection for biotechnology has become of central importance to its future development. This paper reviews the progress China has made in putting in place an internationally compliant intellectual property regime for biotechnology. The constraints and prospects for the future development of the biotechnology industry in China are reviewed.
The TRIPS Agreement, which came into effect on 1 January 1995, is to date the most comprehensive multilateral agreement on intellectual property. (World Trade Organization, 2004a, p.1)
© Walter de Gruyter
Articles in the same Issue
- China’s Biotechnology Industry and the International Protection of Intellectual Property Rights
- Balancing Powers: Examining models of Biobank Governance
- Remedies for Injured Human Subject in the Age of Modern Biotechnology – A Perspective on Taiwan’s Civil Law and Health Regulations
- Food Sovereignty or Trade Obstruction? Labelling of Genetically Engineered Foods
- Biotechnology-Destination India
- Ethical respects of biotechnology and the case of Turkey
- Human Genetic Resources, Biopiracy and China’s Response: A Case Study of Harvard-Affiliated Human Genetic Projects in China’s Anhui Province (Part I)
Articles in the same Issue
- China’s Biotechnology Industry and the International Protection of Intellectual Property Rights
- Balancing Powers: Examining models of Biobank Governance
- Remedies for Injured Human Subject in the Age of Modern Biotechnology – A Perspective on Taiwan’s Civil Law and Health Regulations
- Food Sovereignty or Trade Obstruction? Labelling of Genetically Engineered Foods
- Biotechnology-Destination India
- Ethical respects of biotechnology and the case of Turkey
- Human Genetic Resources, Biopiracy and China’s Response: A Case Study of Harvard-Affiliated Human Genetic Projects in China’s Anhui Province (Part I)