Home Referential NPs as subtle expressions of attitude in infanticide trials, 1674–1775
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Referential NPs as subtle expressions of attitude in infanticide trials, 1674–1775

  • Turo Vartiainen EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 13, 2017

Abstract

This article discusses how victims of infanticide were portrayed in the Proceedings of the Old Bailey in 1674–1775. More specifically, the study focuses on the use of lexical NPs as subtle foregrounding devices in the trial accounts. It is argued that the use of a prosodically prominent lexical NP in a place where a topical and a highly accessible referent could naturally be expressed by an unstressed pronoun may not be emotionally or attitudinally neutral; rather, I will argue that by repeatedly using lexical NPs, the trial participants were able to express sympathy and solidarity to the victims in a very subtle way by making the referent more discourse-prominent and emphasising the victims’ young age by using head nouns like child and infant. The data will mainly be discussed from a diachronic perspective, and the results show that as most women convicted of infanticide in the eighteenth century were acquitted, the frequency of lexical NPs used in reference to the deceased children increased. The overuse of lexical NPs is particularly prominent in the trials where the woman was found guilty of the crime, suggesting a possible connection between the degree of violence used in the murder and the kinds of NPs the trial participants used to refer to the deceased children as subtle indications of sympathy.

Funding statement: University of Helsinki.

References

Ariel, Mira. 1990. Accessing noun phrase antecedents. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Ariel, Mira. 2001. Accessibility theory: An overview. In Ted Sanders, Joost Schilperoord & Wilbert Spooren (eds.), Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects, 29–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.8.04ariSearch in Google Scholar

Clayton, Mary. 2009. Changes in Old Bailey trials for the murder of newborn babies, 1674–1803. Continuity and Change 24(2). 337–359.10.1017/S0268416009007206Search in Google Scholar

Craig, Michael. 2004. Perinatal risk factors for neonaticide and infant homicide: Can we identify those risks? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 97(2). 57–61.10.1177/014107680409700203Search in Google Scholar

Crotty, Homer D. 1924. History of insanity as a defence to crime in English Criminal Law. California Law Review 12(2). 105–123.10.2307/3475205Search in Google Scholar

D’Orban, P.T. 1979. Women who kill their children. British Journal of Psychiatry 134(6). 560–571.10.1192/bjp.134.6.560Search in Google Scholar

Danet, Brenda. 1980. ‘Baby’ or ‘fetus’?: Language and the construction of reality in a manslaughter trial. Semiotica 32(3–4). 187–219.10.1515/semi.1980.32.3-4.187Search in Google Scholar

Emsley, Clive, Tim Hitchcock & Robert Shoemaker. 2016. Publishing history of the Proceedings. Old Bailey Proceedings Onlinewww.oldbaileyonline.org/static/Publishinghistory.jsp, version 7.2, November 1, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard. 2002. The definite article, accessibility, and the construction of discourse referents. Cognitive Linguistics 12(4). 333–378.10.1515/cogl.2002.007Search in Google Scholar

Francus, Marilyn. 1997. Monstrous mothers, monstrous societies: Infanticide and the rule of law in restoration and eighteenth-century England. Eighteenth-Century Life 21(2). 133–156.Search in Google Scholar

Friedman, Susan Hatters & Phillip J. Resnick. 2007. Child murder by mothers: Patterns and prevention. World Psychiatry 6(3). 137–141.Search in Google Scholar

Hale, Matthew. 1736. The history of the pleas of the crown. London: Printed by E. and R. Nutt and R. Gosling.Search in Google Scholar

Huber, Magnus. 2007. The Old Bailey Corpus, 1674–1834. Evaluating and annotating a corpus of 18th and 19th century spoken English. In Anneli Meurman-Solin & Arja Nurmi (eds.), Annotating variation and change (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 1). Helsinki: VARIENG. http://www.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/01/huber/Search in Google Scholar

Hunter, William. 1783. On the uncertainty of the signs of murder, in the case of bastard children. http://special.lib.gla.ac.uk/teach/murder/murder.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Jackson, Mark. 1996. New-born child murder: Women, illegitimacy and the courts in eighteenth-century England. Manchester & New York: Manchester University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kilday, Anne-Marie. 2013. A history of infanticide in Britain, c. 1600 to the present. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137349125Search in Google Scholar

Kytö, Merja & Terry Walker. 2003. The linguistic study of Early Modern English speech-related texts. Journal of English Linguistics 31(3). 221–248.10.1177/0075424203257260Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, Robin. 1974. Remarks on ‘this’ and ‘that’. In Michael W. LeGaly, Robert A. Fox & Anthony Bruck (eds.), Papers from the tenth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society: April 9–21, 345–356. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Search in Google Scholar

Loughnan, Arlie. 2012. Manifest madness: Mental incapacity in the criminal law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199698592.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Malcolmson, Robert W. 1977. Infanticide in the eighteenth century. In J.S. Cockburn (ed.), Crime in England 1550–1800, 133–165. London: Methuen.Search in Google Scholar

McLynn, Frank. 1989. Crime and punishment in eighteenth-century England. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Nevala, Minna & Marianna Hintikka. 2009. Cider-Wenches and High prized Pin-Boxes: Bawdy terminology in 17th- and 18th-century England. In Roderick W. McConchie, Alpo Honkapohja & Jukka Tyrkkö (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2008 Symposium on New Approaches in English Historical Lexis (HEL-LEX2), 134–152. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rabin, Dana Y. 2004. Identity, crime and responsibility in eighteenth-century England. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/9780230505094Search in Google Scholar

Resnick, P.J. 1970. Murder of the newborn: A psychiatric review of neonaticide. American Journal of Psychiatry 126(10). 1414–1420.10.1176/ajp.126.10.1414Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, Edgar W. 2013. Investigating variation and change in written documents. New perspectives. In J. K. Chambers & Natalie Schillings (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 2nd edn, 57–81. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118335598.ch3Search in Google Scholar

Shoemaker, Robert B. 2008. The Old Bailey proceedings and the representation of crime and criminal justice in eighteenth-century London. Journal of British Studies 47(3). 559–580.10.1086/587722Search in Google Scholar

Staub, Susan C. 2005. Nature’s cruel stepdames: Murderous women in the street literature of seventeenth century England. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Vartiainen, Turo. 2016. Evaluative nominals in Present-day English: A corpus-based study of the definiteness and syntactic distribution of subjective and objective NPs. Folia Linguistica 50(1). 243–268.10.1515/flin-2016-0008Search in Google Scholar

Vartiainen, Turo. Submitted. Covert attitudes in 18th century rape trials: The portrayal of child plaintiffs in the Old Bailey Corpus and the Proceedings of the Old Bailey, 1720–1749.Search in Google Scholar

Woods, Robert. 2006. Mortality in eighteenth-century London: A new look at the Bills. Local Population Studies 77. 12–23.Search in Google Scholar

Wrightson, Keith. 1975. Infanticide in earlier seventeenth-century England. Local Population Studies 15. 10–22.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-09-13
Published in Print: 2017-10-26

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jhsl-2017-1006/html
Scroll to top button