Skip to main content
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The sociolinguistics of gender, social status and masculinity in Aristophanes

  • EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 12, 2016

Abstract

This article explores variation in the language of male characters in the plays of the Athenian playwright Aristophanes, using Thesmophoriazusae and Frogs as in-depth case studies. Studies of modern languages have shown that men’s linguistic practices can be just as marked for gender as women’s, and the data from these plays bears this out. Using past work on ‘female speech’ as a starting point, this article explores the incidence of gendered markers in male characters’ speech, and shows that some of these features characterise not just gender but the intersection of different aspects of identity including gender, social class and sexuality. These features include particular oaths, obscenities, certain uses of the particle ge, hedging and politeness strategies. The article shows that a lack of male-associated speech markers is enough to characterise a male Greek speaker as ‘unmanly’, without the addition of female-associated speech markers.

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Olga Tribulato, James Clackson, Lyndsay Coo, John Gallagher and Patrick Clibbens for their comments on versions of this article, and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions for further improvements.This research was conducted at the University of Cambridge.

References

Adams, James N. 1982. The Latin sexual vocabulary. London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar

Adams, James N. 1984. Female speech in Latin comedy. Antichthon 18. 43–77.10.1017/S0066477400003142Search in Google Scholar

Adams, James N. 2005. Neglected evidence for female speech in Latin. Classical Quarterly 55. 582–596.10.1093/cq/bmi052Search in Google Scholar

Austin, Colin & S. Douglas Olson. 2004. Thesmophoriazusae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/actrade/9780199265275.book.1Search in Google Scholar

Bain, David. 1984. Female speech in Menander. Antichthon 18. 24–42.10.1017/S0066477400003130Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Paul. 2008. Sexed texts: Language, gender and sexuality. London: Equinox.10.3138/9781845535865Search in Google Scholar

Bassi, Karen. 1998. Acting like men: Gender, drama, and nostalgia in Ancient Greece. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.14678Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary & Kira Hall. 2004. Theorizing identity in language and sexuality research. Language in Society 33. 469–515.10.1017/S0047404504334020Search in Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. 1988. Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal 40. 519–531.10.2307/3207893Search in Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. 1997. Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York, London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, Deborah. 1997. Performing gender identity: Young men’s talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. In Sally Johnson & Ulrike H. Meinhof (eds.), Language and masculinity, 47–64. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, Deborah & Don Kulick. 2003. Language and sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791178Search in Google Scholar

Clackson, James. 2011. The social dialects of Latin. In James Clackson (ed.), A companion to the Latin language, 505–526. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444343397Search in Google Scholar

Clackson, James. 2015. Language and society in the Greek and Roman worlds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139047944Search in Google Scholar

Coates, Jennifer. 1993 [1986]. Women, men and language: A sociolinguistic account of sex differences in language, 2nd edn. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Coates, Jennifer & Pia Pichler (eds.). 2011 [1998]. Language and gender: A reader, 2nd edn. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Colvin, Stephen. 1999. Dialect in Aristophanes and the politics of language in Ancient Greek literature. Oxford: Clarendon.10.1093/oso/9780198152491.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Colvin, Stephen. 2004. Social dialect in Athens. In John Penney (ed.), Indo-European perspectives: Studies in honour of Anna Morpurgo Davies, 95–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199258925.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Compton-Engle, Gwendolyn. 2003. Control of costume in three plays of Aristophanes. The American Journal of Philology 124. 507–535.10.1353/ajp.2003.0056Search in Google Scholar

Conde-Silvestre, Juan Camilo & Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy. 2012. Introduction. In Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 1–8. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118257227Search in Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas. 2007. Style: Language variation and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511755064Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, James N. 2007. The Greeks and Greek love: A radical reappraisal of homosexuality in Ancient Greece. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Search in Google Scholar

Denniston, John. 1996 [1966]. The Greek particles, 2nd edn. (revised by Kenneth J. Dover). London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar

Dickey, Eleanor. 1995. Forms of address and conversational language in Aristophanes and Menander. Mnemosyne 48. 257–271.10.1163/156852595X00167Search in Google Scholar

Dover, Kenneth J. 1978. Greek homosexuality, London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar

Dover, Kenneth J. 1987. Language and character in Aristophanes. In Kenneth J. Dover (ed.), Greek and the Greeks: Collected papers volume 1: Language, poetry, drama, 237–248. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Dover, Kenneth J. 1993. Aristophanes’ Frogs. Oxford: Clarendon.10.1093/actrade/9780198150053.book.1Search in Google Scholar

Duhoux, Yves. 2004. Langage de femmes et d’hommes en grec ancien: l’exemple de Lysistrata. In John Penney (ed.), Indo-European perspectives: Studies in honour of Anna Morpurgo Davies, 131–145. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199258925.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Eckert, Penny. 2011 [1998]. Gender and sociolinguistic variation. In Jennifer Coates & Pia Pichler (eds.), Language and gender: A reader, 2nd edn, 57–66. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Fletcher, Judith. 2012. Performing oaths in classical Greek drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139005272Search in Google Scholar

Fögen, Thorsten. 2010. Female speech. In Egbert J. Bakker (ed.), A companion to the Ancient Greek language, 311–326. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444317398.ch21Search in Google Scholar

Foxhall, Lin & J. B. Salmon. 1998a. Thinking men: Masculinity and its self-representation in the classical tradition. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203759356Search in Google Scholar

Foxhall, Lin & J. B. Salmon. 1998b. When men were men: Masculinity, power and identity in classical antiquity. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203759417Search in Google Scholar

Freed, Alice F. & Alice Greenwood. 1996. Women, men, and type of talk: What makes the difference? Language in Society 25. 1–26.10.1017/S0047404500020418Search in Google Scholar

Gaudio, Rudolf P. 1994. Sounding gay: Pitch properties in the speech of gay and straight men. American Speech 69. 30–57.10.2307/455948Search in Google Scholar

Gilleland, Michael E. 1980. Female speech in Greek and Latin. American Journal of Philology 101. 180–183.10.2307/294426Search in Google Scholar

Gleason, Maud W. 1995. Making men: Sophists and self-presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691187570Search in Google Scholar

Goldhill, Simon. 2004. Masculinity. Review: Andreia: Studies in manliness and courage in classical antiquity. The Classical Review (New Series) 54. 437–439.10.1093/cr/54.2.437Search in Google Scholar

Habash, Martha. 2002. Dionysos’ roles in Aristophanes’ ‘Frogs’. Mnemosyne 55. 1–17.10.1163/156852502753776920Search in Google Scholar

Henderson, Jeffrey. 1991 [1975]. The maculate muse: Obscene language in Attic comedy, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195066845.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet. 1995. Women, men and politeness. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet. 2001 [1992]. An introduction to sociolinguistics, 2nd edn. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet. 2007. Social constructionism, postmodernism and feminist sociolinguistics. Gender and Language 1. 51–66.10.1558/genl.2007.1.1.51Search in Google Scholar

Hughes, Susan E. 1992. Expletives of lower working-class women. Language in Society 21. 291–303.10.1017/S004740450001530XSearch in Google Scholar

Kiełkiewicz-Janowiak, Agnieszka. 2012. Class, age, and gender-based patterns. In Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 307–331. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118257227.ch17Search in Google Scholar

Kiesling, Scott. 1998. Men’s identities and sociolinguistic variation: The case of fraternity men. Journal of Sociolinguistics 2. 69–99.10.1111/1467-9481.00031Search in Google Scholar

Klerk, Vivian de. 1997. The role of expletives in the construction of masculinity. In Sally Johnson & Ulrike H. Meinhoff (eds.), Language and masculinity, 144–158. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Kramer, Cheris. 1977. Perceptions of female and male speech. Language and Speech 20. 151–161.10.1177/002383097702000207Search in Google Scholar

Kroon, Caroline. 1995. Discourse particles in Latin: A study of nam, enim, autem, vero and at. Amsterdam: Gieben.10.1163/9789004408999Search in Google Scholar

Kruschwitz, Peter. 2012. Language, sex, and (lack of) power: Reassessing the linguistic discourse about female speech in Latin sources. Athenaeum 100. 197–229.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2006 [1966]. The social stratification of English in New York City, 2nd edn. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511618208Search in Google Scholar

Lada-Richards, Ismene. 1999. Initiating Dionysus: Ritual and theatre in Aristophanes’ Frogs. Oxford: Clarendon.10.1093/oso/9780198149811.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, Robin T. 1975. Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.Search in Google Scholar

Leap, W. L. 2008. Queering gay men’s English. In Kate Harrington et al. (eds.), Gender and language research methodologies, 283–296. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Maltby, Robert. 1985. The distribution of Greek loan-words in Terence. Classical Quarterly 35. 110–123.10.1017/S0009838800014609Search in Google Scholar

McClure, Laura. 1999. Spoken like a woman: Speech and gender in Athenian drama. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400832446Search in Google Scholar

Mossman, Judith. 2001. Women’s speech in Greek tragedy: The case of Electra and Clytemnestra in Euripides’ ‘Electra’. Classical Quarterly 51. 374–384.10.1093/cq/51.2.374Search in Google Scholar

Motschenbacher, Heiko. 2010. Language, gender and sexual identity: Poststructuralist perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/impact.29Search in Google Scholar

Rademaker, Adriaan. 2003. ‘Most citizens are europrōktoi now’: (un)manliness in Aristophanes. In Ralph M. Rosen & Ineke Sluiter (eds.), Andreia: Studies in manliness and courage in classical antiquity, 115–125. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789047400738_007Search in Google Scholar

Robson, James. 2006. Humour, obscenity and Aristophanes. Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar

Rosen, Ralph M. & Ineke Sluiter (eds.). 2003. Andreia: Studies in manliness and courage in classical antiquity. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789047400738Search in Google Scholar

Schauwecker, Yela. 2002. Zum Sprechverhalten der Frauentypen bei Plautus. Gymnasium 109. 191–211.Search in Google Scholar

Shibamoto, Janet S. 1987. The womanly woman: Manipulation of stereotypical and nonstereotypical features of Japanese female speech. In Susan U. Philips, Susan Steele & Christine Tanz (eds.), Language, gender, and sex in comparative perspective, 26–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621918.003Search in Google Scholar

Silk, Michael. 1990. The people of Aristophanes. In C. Pelling (ed.), Characterization and individuality in Greek literature, 150–173. Oxford: Clarendon.10.1093/oso/9780198140580.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Skinner, Marilyn. 2005. Sexuality in Greek and Roman culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Sommerstein, Alan H. 1994. The comedies of Aristophanes, volume 8: Thesmophoriazusae. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.Search in Google Scholar

Sommerstein, Alan H. 1995. The language of Athenian women. In Francesco De Martino & Alan H. Sommerstein (eds.), Lo spettacolo delle voci, 61–85. Bari: Levante.Search in Google Scholar

Sommerstein, Alan H. 1996. The comedies of Aristophanes, volume 9: Frogs. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.Search in Google Scholar

Speer, Susan. 2005. Gender talk: Feminism, discourse and conversation analysis. London; New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Stehle, Eva. 2002. The body and its representation in Aristophanes’ Thesmophoriazusae: Where does the costume end? American Journal of Philology 123. 369–406.10.1353/ajp.2002.0043Search in Google Scholar

Sutherland, Elizabeth H. 2005. Writing (on) bodies: Lyric discourse and the production of gender in Horace Odes 1.13. Classical Philology 100. 52–82.10.1086/431430Search in Google Scholar

Taaffe, Lauren. 1993. Aristophanes and women. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 1972. Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1. 179–195.10.1017/S0047404500000488Search in Google Scholar

Wakker, Gerry C. 1996. The discourse functions of particles: Some observations on the use of μάν/μήν in Theocritus. In M. Annette Harder, Remco F. Regtuit & Gerry C. Wakker (eds.), Theocritus, 247–263. Groningen: Egbert Forsten.Search in Google Scholar

West, Candace & Don H. Zimmerman. 1987. Doing gender. Gender and Society 1. 125–151.10.1177/0891243287001002002Search in Google Scholar

Willi, Andreas. 2003. The languages of Aristophanes: Aspects of linguistic variation in classical Attic Greek. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wit-Tak, Thalien M. de. 1968. The function of obscenity in Aristophanes’ ‘Thesmophoriazusae’ and ‘Ecclesiazusae’. Mnemosyne (Fourth Series) 21. 357–365.10.1163/156852568X00428Search in Google Scholar

Worman, Nancy. 2008. Abusive mouths in classical Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511482434Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-10-12
Published in Print: 2016-10-1

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 1.5.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jhsl-2016-0011/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button