Home Research and Policy in Homeland Security and Climate Change: Results from a Roundtable and Thoughts on Developing a National Research Agenda for Climate Change and Security
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Research and Policy in Homeland Security and Climate Change: Results from a Roundtable and Thoughts on Developing a National Research Agenda for Climate Change and Security

  • Jim Ramsay EMAIL logo and Kent Butts
Published/Copyright: October 9, 2014

Abstract

To scientists, there is a clear consensus that human activities have a measurable effect on the climate, and that subsequently there are concerns about how a changing climate could impact global economies, trade relations, water (and other resource) access and logically therefore, also to security. Whether anthropomorphic climate change is a homeland or national security issue is a difficult distinction to make given the lack of consensus over the definition of modern homeland security. However, such distinctions may be moot given the recent and profound changes in the Arctic. On the one hand, Alaska shares a coastline with the Arctic Ocean; hence security concerns in the Arctic may be considered homeland security issues. On the other hand, given the Russian military interest/presence in the Arctic, security concerns in the Arctic may be considered matters of national security. The resulting challenge to the academic community is how to move the discussion about climate change and security forward. The authors recently held a roundtable at Penn State University that included several distinguished and accomplished policy makers, executives and scholars who collectively examined the impacts and threats posed by climate change.


Corresponding author: Jim Ramsay, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University – Chair, Department of Security Studies and International Affairs, Professor of Homeland Security, Security Studies and International Affairs, College of Arts and Sciences, 600 Clyde Morris Blvd., Daytona Beach, FL 32114, USA, Phone: +386-226-7153, Fax: +386-226-7739, e-mail:

References

Center for Naval Analysis (CNA). (2007) National Security and the Threat of Climate Change. Alexandria, Va.: CNA Corporation. Available at: https://www.cna.org/sites/default/files/National%20Security%20and%20the%20Threat%20of%20Climate%20Change%20-%20Print.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). (2003) National Strategy for Combating Terrorism. Washington, DC. Available at: https://www.cia.gov/news-information/cia-the-war-on-terrorism/Counter_Terrorism_Strategy.pdf¯.Search in Google Scholar

Harvard University Center for the Environment. (2014) “A New Harvard Report Probes Security Risks of Extreme Weather and Climate Change.” Available at: http://environment.harvard.edu/climate-extremes.Search in Google Scholar

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2014) “Summary for Policymakers.” In (C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken and P. R. Mastrandrea, eds.) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://ipcc-wg2.gov/AR5/images/uploads/WG2AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

McElroy, Michael and D. James Baker (2012) Climate Extremes: Recent Trends with Implications for National Security. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Center for the Environment.Search in Google Scholar

Mills-Knapp, Sara, Emily Bourdeau, Gregory Falco, Carol Resler, Harold Tovar and Stephen Zoegall. (2011) Climate Change Adaptation and Sustainable Design at the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey. May 11. Available at: http://www.earth.columbia.edu/sitefiles/file/education/capstone/Capstone_final_5_11_11_reduced.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Nordås, Ragnhild and Nils Petter Gleditsch. (2007) “Climate Change and Conflict,” Political Geography, 26(6):627–638. Available at: http://graduateinstitute.ch/files/live/sites/iheid/files/sites/political_science/shared/political_science/1701/Environmental-Security-Article-Nordas-Gleditsch.pdf.10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.06.003Search in Google Scholar

Pumphrey, Carolyn. (2008) Global Climate Change: National Security Implications. Carlisle, Pa.: Strategic Studies Institute. Available at: http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/pub862.pdf¯.10.21236/ADA480687Search in Google Scholar

Ramsay, James D. and Terrence M. O’Sullivan. (2013) “There’s a Pattern Here: The Case to Integrate Environmental Security into Homeland Security Strategy,” Homeland Security Affairs Journal 9(6):1–21. Available at: http://commons.erau.edu/db-applied-aviation/11.Search in Google Scholar

Steinbruner, John D., Paul C. Stern and Jo L. Husbands, eds. (2012) Climate and Social Stress: Implications for Security Analysis. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Search in Google Scholar

United Nations. (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future (The Brundtland Report). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm.Search in Google Scholar

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (1994) Human Development Report 1994. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/255/hdr_1994_en_complete_nostats.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2009) From Conflict to Peacebuilding: The Role of Natural Resources and the Environment. Policy Paper No. 1, Nairobi, Kenya. Available at: http://www.unep.org/pdf/pcdmb_policy_01.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

U.S. Coast Guard (USCG). (2013) Arctic Strategy. Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.uscg.mil/seniorleadership/DOCS/CG_Arctic_Strategy.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

U.S. Department of Defense (DOD). (2011) Trends and Implications of Climate Change for National and International Security. Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force. Washington, DC: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. Available at: http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/ADA552760.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

U.S. Department of Defense (DOD). (2013) Arctic Strategy. Available at: http://www.defense.gov/pubs/2013_Arctic_Strategy.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS). (2012) The Climate Change Adaptation Roadmap. Washington, D.C. Available at: http://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Appendix%20A%20DHS%20FY2012%20Climate%20Change%20Adaptation%20Plan_0.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

U.S. House of Representatives. (2008) National Intelligence Assessment on the National Security Implications of Global Climate Change to 2030. Joint Hearing before the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, 110th Cong., 2nd sess. June 25. Statement of Dr. Thomas Fingar, Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Analysis and Chairman of the National Intelligence Council. Available at: http://fas.org/irp/congress/2008_hr/062508fingar.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

White House. (2006) The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. 2006. Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.comw.org/qdr/fulltext/nss2006.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

White House. (2013) National Strategy for the Arctic Region. May 2013. Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/nat_arctic_strategy.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-10-9
Published in Print: 2014-9-1

©2014 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 10.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jhsem-2014-0049/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button