Home Mathematics On geometries of the Conway group Co3 and their McLaughlin group subgeometries
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

On geometries of the Conway group Co3 and their McLaughlin group subgeometries

  • Alexander A. Ivanov EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 20, 2026
Journal of Group Theory
From the journal Journal of Group Theory

Abstract

Recently, the author published a book [A. A. Ivanov, Ever-Evolving Groups—an Introduction to Modern Finite Group Theory, Algebr. Appl. 32, Springer, Cham, 2025] where he summarised the recent progress in the geometric theory of sporadic groups and outlined some geometries which require further investigation. Among them was a geometry for the smallest Conway sporadic simple group Co 3 , with diagram originally introduced in [M. A. Ronan and G. Stroth, Minimal parabolic geometries for the sporadic groups, European J. Combin. 5 (1984), 1, 59–91] (cf. [M. A. Ronan, Coverings of certain finite geometries, Finite Geometries and Designs, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 49, Cambridge University, Cambridge (1981), 316–331, Table 1] and [F. Buekenhout, Diagram geometries for sporadic groups, Finite Groups—Coming of Age (Montreal 1982), Contemp. Math. 45, American Mathematical Society, Providence (1985), geometry (23), p. 14]), which we denote by G ( Co 3 ) . The 2-local geometries for the other Conway groups Co 1 and Co 2 are the tilde and Petersen geometries which have been intensively studied (cf. [A. A. Ivanov and S. V. Shpectorov, The flag-transitive tilde and Petersen-type geometries are all known, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N. S.) 31 (1994), 2, 173–184]). However, G ( Co 3 ) seems to be studied less. There is another geometry associated with Co 3 (cf. [M. A. Ronan, Coverings of certain finite geometries, Finite Geometries and Designs, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 49, Cambridge University, Cambridge (1981), 316–331, Table 1] and [F. Buekenhout, Diagram geometries for sporadic groups, Finite Groups—Coming of Age (Montreal 1982), Contemp. Math. 45, American Mathematical Society, Providence (1985), geometry (23), p. 14]) with diagram The elements of type 1, 2, 3, and 4 in the geometry G 276 correspond to cliques of size 1, 2, 3, and 6, respectively, in a double cover of the complete graph on 276 vertices. The group Co 3 acts doubly transitively on the vertex set of the complete graph and flag-transitively on G 276 . This double cover is naturally associated with the well-known 2-graph of Co 3 . The geometry G 276 is simply connected, as established by [M. A. Ronan, Coverings of certain finite geometries, Finite Geometries and Designs, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 49, Cambridge University, Cambridge (1981), 316–331, Proposition 6]. In the present paper, we recover the distance 2 graph of G 276 from the universal cover of G ( Co 3 ) , in particular re-proving the simple connectedness of the latter geometry originally established in [A. Chermak, B. Oliver and S. Shpectorov, The linking systems of the Solomon 2-local finite groups are simply connected, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 97 (2008), 1, 209–238]. A key step in our proof makes use of the simple connectedness of the Petersen-type geometry of the McLaughlin group, as shown in [B. Baumeister, A. A. Ivanov and D. V. Pasechnik, A characterization of the Petersen-type geometry of the McLaughlin group, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 128 (2000), 1, 21–44].

Acknowledgements

It is a great pleasure to sincerely thank the referee for their exceptionally detailed and professional comments on an earlier version of this paper. These remarks led to several substantial improvements and clarifications, including

  1. the explicit use of the geometry G 276 in the proof of simple connectedness;

  2. recall and application of the fundamental dichotomy principle (Theorem 2), a concept that was something of a manifesto in the 1990s but is now often forgotten, even among experts in diagram geometries;

  3. the use of this principle to establish the infiniteness of the universal cover of the minimal parabolic geometry of Co 3 , as suggested by the referee;

  4. the removal of any explicit reliance on data computed for me by Andries Brouwer (to whom I nevertheless remain deeply grateful);

  5. a complete reworking of the paper’s exposition, which, while rendering many of the referee’s specific comments moot, significantly improved the overall clarity and structure.

My further gratitude goes to Hendrik Van Maldeghem, Antonio Pasini and Sergey Shpectorov for comments and suggestions with special thanks to William Giuliano for drawing diagrams and revising the whole exposition. Towards the present revised version, I am extremely thankful to Andy Chermak for the following comment: “The paper [4] that you mention concerned the simple connectivity of the Benson–Solomon ‘groups’ and of their direct limit (the Dwyer–Wilkerson 2-compact ‘group’ D I ( 4 ) . In order to prove what we wanted, we reduced the problem to the simple connectivity of Co 3 (which is in some sense the smallest Benson–Solomon group). That’s where Sergei came in, to perform his magic with I guess some version of the Todd–Coxeter algorithm. I have no doubt that your method is far more conceptual, and thereby far more informative.”

  1. Communicated by: Michael Giudici

References

[1] B. Baumeister, A. A. Ivanov and D. V. Pasechnik, A characterization of the Petersen-type geometry of the McLaughlin group, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 128 (2000), no. 1, 21–44. 10.1017/S0305004199004028Search in Google Scholar

[2] A. E. Brouwer and H. Van Maldeghem, Strongly Regular Graphs, Encyclopedia Math. Appl. 182, Cambridge University, Cambridge, 2022. 10.1017/9781009057226Search in Google Scholar

[3] F. Buekenhout, Diagram geometries for sporadic groups, Finite Groups—Coming of Age (Montreal 1982), Contemp. Math. 45, American Mathematical Society, Providence (1985), 1–32. 10.1090/conm/045/822231Search in Google Scholar

[4] A. Chermak, B. Oliver and S. Shpectorov, The linking systems of the Solomon 2-local finite groups are simply connected, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 97 (2008), no. 1, 209–238. 10.1112/plms/pdn011Search in Google Scholar

[5] J. H. Conway, Three lectures on exceptional groups, Sphere Packings, Lattices and Groups, Springer, New York (1993), 267–298. 10.1007/978-1-4757-2249-9_10Search in Google Scholar

[6] J. H. Conway, R. T. Curtis, S. P. Norton, R. A. Parker and R. A. Wilson, A T L A S of Finite Groups, Oxford University, Eynsham, 1985. Search in Google Scholar

[7] J.-M. Goethals and J. J. Seidel, The regular two-graph on 276 vertices, Discrete Math. 12 (1975), 143–158. 10.1016/0012-365X(75)90029-1Search in Google Scholar

[8] A. A. Ivanov, Geometry of Sporadic Groups. I, Encyclopedia Math. Appl. 76, Cambridge University, Cambridge, 1999. 10.1017/CBO9780511525933Search in Google Scholar

[9] A. A. Ivanov, Ever-Evolving Groups—an Introduction to Modern Finite Group Theory, Algebr. Appl. 32, Springer, Cham, 2025. 10.1007/978-3-031-89011-6Search in Google Scholar

[10] A. A. Ivanov and S. V. Shpectorov, The flag-transitive tilde and Petersen-type geometries are all known, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N. S.) 31 (1994), no. 2, 173–184. 10.1090/S0273-0979-1994-00511-7Search in Google Scholar

[11] A. Pasini, Covers of finite geometries with nonspherical minimal circuit diagram, Buildings and the Geometry of Diagrams, Lecture Notes in Math. 1181, Springer, Berlin (1986), 218–241. 10.1007/BFb0075517Search in Google Scholar

[12] A. Pasini and S. Tsaranov, Bounding the size of certain rank 3 geometries with designs as rank 2 residues, Discrete Math. 155 (1996), 183–204. 10.1016/0012-365X(94)00382-SSearch in Google Scholar

[13] M. A. Ronan, Coverings of certain finite geometries, Finite Geometries and Designs, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 49, Cambridge University, Cambridge (1981), 316–331. 10.1017/CBO9781107325579.032Search in Google Scholar

[14] M. A. Ronan, On the second homotopy group of certain simplicial complexes and some combinatorial applications, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 32 (1981), no. 126, 225–233. 10.1093/qmath/32.2.225Search in Google Scholar

[15] M. A. Ronan and S. D. Smith, 2-local geometries for some sporadic groups, The Santa Cruz Conference on Finite Groups, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 37, American Mathematical Society, Providence (1980), 283–289. 10.1090/pspum/037/604595Search in Google Scholar

[16] M. A. Ronan and G. Stroth, Minimal parabolic geometries for the sporadic groups, European J. Combin. 5 (1984), no. 1, 59–91. 10.1016/S0195-6698(84)80020-7Search in Google Scholar

[17] S. V. Shpectorov, The universal 2-cover of the 𝑃-geometry G ( Co 2 ) , European J. Combin. 13 (1992), no. 4, 291–312. 10.1016/S0195-6698(05)80035-6Search in Google Scholar

[18] J. Tits, A local approach to buildings, The Geometric Vein, Springer, New York (1981), 519–547. 10.1007/978-1-4612-5648-9_35Search in Google Scholar

[19] S. V. Tsaranov, Representation and classification of Coxeter monoids, European J. Combin. 11 (1990), no. 2, 189–204. 10.1016/S0195-6698(13)80073-XSearch in Google Scholar

[20] R. A. Wilson, Vector stabilizers and subgroups of Leech lattice groups, J. Algebra 127 (1989), no. 2, 387–408. 10.1016/0021-8693(89)90260-3Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-03-06
Revised: 2025-12-08
Published Online: 2026-01-20

© 2026 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 30.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jgth-2025-0033/pdf?lang=en
Scroll to top button