Home On limits of betweenness relations
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

On limits of betweenness relations

  • David Bradley-Williams ORCID logo EMAIL logo and John K. Truss
Published/Copyright: March 15, 2023

Abstract

We give a flexible method for constructing a wide variety of limits of betweenness relations. This unifies work of Adeleke, who constructed a Jordan group preserving a limit of betweenness relations, and Bhattacharjee and Macpherson who gave an alternative method using a Fraïssé-type construction. A key ingredient in their work is the notion of a tree of 𝐵-sets. We employ this and extend its use to a wider class of examples.

Award Identifier / Grant number: GRK 2240

Funding statement: This paper is based on part of the first author’s PhD thesis at the University of Leeds, 2014, which received DTG funding from the EPSRC. He is partially supported by the research training group GRK 2240: Algebro-Geometric Methods in Algebra, Arithmetic and Topology, funded by the DFG.

Acknowledgements

D. Bradley-Williams would particularly like to thank Dugald Macpherson for introducing him to the topic of this paper, and for many helpful discussions during his time as a PhD student. The authors are grateful to the anonymous referee for suggestions that improved the presentation of this paper.

  1. Communicated by: John S. Wilson

References

[1] S. A. Adeleke, Semilinear tower of Steiner systems, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 72 (1995), no. 2, 243–255. 10.1016/0097-3165(95)90063-2Search in Google Scholar

[2] S. A. Adeleke, On irregular infinite Jordan groups, Comm. Algebra 41 (2013), no. 4, 1514–1546. 10.1080/00927872.2011.643843Search in Google Scholar

[3] S. A. Adeleke and D. Macpherson, Classification of infinite primitive Jordan permutation groups, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 72 (1996), no. 1, 63–123. 10.1112/plms/s3-72.1.63Search in Google Scholar

[4] S. A. Adeleke and P. M. Neumann, Primitive permutation groups with primitive Jordan sets, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 53 (1996), no. 2, 209–229. 10.1112/jlms/53.2.209Search in Google Scholar

[5] S. A. Adeleke and P. M. Neumann, Relations related to betweenness: Their structure and automorphisms, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 623 (1998), 1–125. 10.1090/memo/0623Search in Google Scholar

[6] A. I. Almazaydeh and D. Macpherson, Jordan permutation groups and limits of 𝐷-relations, J. Group Theory 25 (2022), no. 3, 447–508. 10.1515/jgth-2020-0083Search in Google Scholar

[7] M. Bhattacharjee and D. Macpherson, Jordan groups and limits of betweenness relations, J. Group Theory 9 (2006), no. 1, 59–94. 10.1515/JGT.2006.004Search in Google Scholar

[8] D. B. Bradley-Williams, Jordan groups and homogeneous structures, PhD thesis, University of Leeds, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

[9] O. Caramello, Fraïssé’s construction from a topos-theoretic perspective, Log. Univers. 8 (2014), no. 2, 261–281. 10.1007/s11787-014-0104-6Search in Google Scholar

[10] M. Droste, Structure of partially ordered sets with transitive automorphism groups, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 334 (1985), 1–100. 10.1090/memo/0334Search in Google Scholar

[11] M. Droste and R. Göbel, A categorical theorem on universal objects and its application in abelian group theory and computer science, Proceedings of the International Conference on Algebra. Part 3 (Novosibirsk 1989), Contemp. Math. 131, American Mathematical Society, Providence (1992), 49–74. 10.1090/conm/131.3/1175872Search in Google Scholar

[12] M. Droste and R. Göbel, Universal domains and the amalgamation property, Math. Structures Comput. Sci. 3 (1993), no. 2, 137–159. 10.1017/S0960129500000177Search in Google Scholar

[13] D. M. Evans, Examples of 0 -categorical structures, Automorphisms of First-Order Structures, Oxford Sci. Publ., Oxford University, New York (1994), 33–72. 10.1093/oso/9780198534686.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

[14] K. Johnson, Constructions of semilinear towers of Steiner systems, Tits Buildings and the Model Theory of Groups (Würzburg 2000), London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 291, Cambridge University, Cambridge (2002), 235–278. 10.1017/CBO9780511549786.012Search in Google Scholar

[15] W. A. Kubiś, Fraïssé sequences: Category-theoretic approach to universal homogeneous structures, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 165 (2014), no. 11, 1755–1811. 10.1016/j.apal.2014.07.004Search in Google Scholar

[16] W. A. Kubiś, Weak Fraïssé Categories, Theory Appl. Categ. 38 (2022), 27–63. Search in Google Scholar

[17] J. K. Truss, Betweenness relations and cycle-free partial orders, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 119 (1996), no. 4, 631–643. 10.1017/S0305004100074478Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-03-06
Revised: 2022-11-22
Published Online: 2023-03-15
Published in Print: 2023-09-01

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 12.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jgth-2022-0048/html
Scroll to top button