Home Mathematics Group actions and non-vanishing elements in solvable groups
Article Publicly Available

Group actions and non-vanishing elements in solvable groups

  • EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 11, 2020

Abstract

For a solvable group, a theorem of Gaschutz shows that F(G)/Φ(G) is a direct sum of irreducible G-modules and a faithful G/F(G)-module. If each of these irreducible modules is primitive, we show that every non-vanishing element of G lies in F(G).

An element g of a finite group G is non-vanishing (in G) if χ(g) is non-zero for all irreducible characters χ of G. A well-known theorem [3, Theorem 3.15] of Burnside says every nonlinear irreducible character has some zeroes, and so every element of G is non-vanishing if and only if G is abelian. Isaacs, Navarro and the author [4] showed that if G is solvable and x in G is non-vanishing, then the order of x modulo the Fitting subgroup F(G) is a power of two, and so non-vanishing elements of odd order lie in F(G). It is conjectured for solvable groups that every non-vanishing element lies in F(G). For arbitrary groups, it is not true that a non-vanishing element x lies in F(G) or even F(G), but x does lie in F(G) if the order of x is coprime to 6 (see Dolfi et al. [1]). For solvable G, Moreto and the author [6] show a non-vanishing element lies in F10(G), and that is improved to F8(G) by Yang [8].

For solvable G, a theorem of Gaschutz shows that F(G)/Φ(G) is a direct product of minimal normal subgroups, which by solvability are elementary abelian p-groups for various primes p. Consequently, F(G)/Φ(G) is a direct sum of irreducible G-modules Mi and is, via Gaschutz’s theorem, a faithful G/F(G)-module. We show that every non-vanishing element of G lies in F(G) if each Mi is a primitive G-module.

If N is a normal subgroup of G and θIrr(N), then a non-vanishing element x of G must fix some G-conjugate of θ (see Lemma 1 below), or equivalently, θ is fixed by a G-conjugate of x. In particular, if N/K is an abelian chief factor of G, then W=Irr(N/K) is an irreducible G-module (over a prime field) and each w in W is centralized by some G-conjugate of x. In [7], we studied when V is a faithful quasi-primitive H-module and x in F(H) fixes an element of each H-orbit in V. Those results are critical to our results here. We should point out that the correct conclusion of [7, Corollary 2.5] should be that every non-vanishing element of G lying in F2(G) lies in F(G), although the stronger conclusion stated now follows from our results here.

Suppose that V is a faithful completely reducible G-module and that U is a normal subgroup of G with a regular orbit in V (this necessarily occurs if U is abelian by Proposition 2 below). If x is in U and every element of V is fixed by a G-conjugate of x, then x=1 because every G-conjugate of x lies in U and U has a regular orbit in V. We use this observation frequently.

All groups and vector spaces considered here are finite.

Lemma 1.

If x is a non-vanishing element of G and θIrr(N) for a normal subgroup N of G, some G-conjugate of θ is fixed by x.

Proof.

This is [4, Lemma 2.3]. Or note that, via Clifford theory, each χIrr(G|θ) vanishes off gGIG(θg). ∎

The following is well known (e.g. [4, Lemma 3.1]). We give an alternate proof.

Proposition 2.

If an abelian group A acts faithfully and completely reducibly on a finite-dimensional vector space V (possibly of mixed characteristic), then A has a regular orbit on V.

Proof.

We argue by induction on dim(V). If dim(V)=0, then A=1 and the zero vector is in a regular orbit of A. If V is the direct sum of proper A-invariant subspaces U and W, then the inductive hypothesis implies the existence of uU and wW such that CA(u)=CA(U) and CA(w)=CA(W). Then

CA(u+w)=CA(U)CA(W)=1

and u+w is in a regular A-orbit. Finally, if V{0} is an irreducible A-module, let x be a non-zero vector of V and set B=CA(x). Then CV(B){0} and CV(B) is A-invariant because B is normal in A. By irreducibility, CV(B)=V. Since A acts faithfully on V, B=1. Now x is in a regular A-orbit of V. ∎

Lemma 3.

The following statements hold.

  1. If M and N are normal subgroups of G with NM and if there exists θIrr(M) that vanishes on M-N, then every non-vanishing element of G lying in M indeed lies in N.

  2. Suppose that G is solvable and Fi(G)MFi+1(G) with i1 and M normal in G. If M/Fi(G) is abelian, then every non-vanishing element of G lying in M lies in Fi(G).

  3. If G is supersolvable, then every non-vanishing element of G lies in Z(F(G)).

Proof.

(a) Every G-conjugate of θ vanishes on M-N. Choose χIrr(G|θ). By Clifford theory, χM is a sum of G conjugates of θ, and thus χ vanishes on M-N, proving (i).

(b) Let J/Fi-1(G)=Φ(G/Fi-1(G)). By a theorem of Gaschutz [2, Sätze, III, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.5], Fi(G)/J is a completely reducible and faithful G/Fi(G)-module (possibly of mixed characteristic). Then V=Irr(Fi(G)/J)) is a completely reducible and faithful G/Fi(G)-module. Since M/Fi is abelian and acts completely reducibly and faithfully on V, then M/Fi has a regular orbit on V by Proposition 2, i.e. there exists αIrr(Fi(G)) whose inertia group in M is Fi. Then α induces to an irreducible character θ of M. Since θ vanishes on M-Fi(G), part (i) implies that every non-vanishing element of G lying in M lies in Fi(G).

(c) This is [4, Theorem B]. ∎

If V is a vector space of dimension n over a field of order q, then the semi-linear group Γ(V)=Γ(qn) acts faithfully and irreducibly on V. Now Γ(V) has a normal cyclic subgroup of order qn-1 whose factor group is cyclic of order n, and so Γ(V) is supersolvable. Under certain conditions when a group G acts on V, one can label the elements of V so that GΓ(V). See [5, Section 1.2], which includes the structure of many small linear groups. Results there will be frequently used in Lemma 6.

The following is the main result of [7] and does not assume any solvability conditions.

Theorem 4.

Suppose that V is a faithful irreducible G-module and that there exists 1xF(G) such that each vV is centralized by a G-conjugate of x. Then there exists a faithful irreducible H-module W and a transitive permutation group S of degree n such that G is isomorphic to a subgroup of H wreath S (i.e. HS) in its action on V=Wn. Here H is a factor group of a subgroup of G. Furthermore, we have that

  1. |W|=q2 for a Mersenne prime q, H=F(H)Γ(W) and the Sylow-2-subgroup of H is semi-dihedral of order 4(q+1),

  2. |W|=52, F(H)Q8YZ4 and H/F(H)Z3 or S3, or

  3. |W|=34, F(H)Q8YD8, with H/F(H)Z5, D10, F20, A5 or S5.

Furthermore, if V is a quasi-primitive module, then V=W and G=H.

Proof.

See [7, Corollary 2.3 and Theorem 2.1]. ∎

Corollary 5.

Suppose that V is a faithful quasi-primitive irreducible G-module and that there exists 1xF(G) such that each vV is centralized by a G-conjugate of x. Then there exists χIrr(G) such that χ(x)=0.

Proof.

Note V and G satisfy Theorem 4 with G=H and V=W. If (b) or (c) holds, set U=Z(F). If (a) holds, then G=F(G) has a self-centralizing cyclic subgroup U of index two. Since U is abelian, U has a regular orbit on V, and so xF(G)-U. In all cases, there exists θIrr(F(G)) that vanishes on F(G)-U. By Lemma 3 (a), there exists χIrr(G) such that χ(x)=0. ∎

Lemma 6.

Suppose that V is a (finite) faithful completely reducible G-module for a solvable group G. Assume that dim(V)2, that |V|=2j with j8, that |V|=3k with k5, or that V is irreducible with prime dimension. If xG is non-vanishing and x fixes an element in each G-orbit on V, then x=1.

Proof.

We argue by induction on |V||G|. Suppose that V=V1V2 for G-modules Vi, and let Ci=CG(Vi). Now Cix is a non-vanishing element of G/Ci, and Cix fixes an element of each G/Ci-orbit on Vi. If both Vi are non-trivial, then induction shows xC1C2=1. So we may assume that V is irreducible. We let F=F(G).

If x lies in a normal subgroup U of G such that U has a regular orbit O in V, then x=1 (see discussion two paragraphs before Lemma 1). In particular, if x lies in an abelian normal subgroup of G, then x=1 as desired by Proposition 2.

If G is supersolvable, then every non-vanishing element of G lies in Z(F(G)) by Lemma 3 (c), and so x=1 by the last paragraph. In particular, the result holds if dim(V)=1 of if |V|=22 or if GΓ(V). If |V|=2p for a prime p, then GΓ(V) by [5, Corollary 2.13] and so x=1 as desired.

Suppose that xF. Then, by Theorem 4, either x=1 or both char(V) is odd and dim(V) is even. Given our hypotheses, we see that V is quasi-primitive, that G is a subgroup of the wreath product Γ(32)Z2, or that x=1. If V is quasi-primitive, then x=1 by Corollary 5. If GΓ(32)Z2, G is a 2-group and x=1 by the last paragraph. In all cases, x=1 if xF(G).

Theorem 2.4 of [4] shows that if a solvable group H has Fitting length f>1, then every non-vanishing element of H lies in Ff-1(H). It follows from the last paragraph and Lemma 3 (b) that x=1 if the Fitting length fl(G) is at most 2 or if fl(G)=3 and F2(G)/F(G) is abelian.

Suppose M is a normal subgroup of G with F/M a faithful completely reducible G/F-module (possibly of mixed characteristic). This does occur when M=Φ(G) by Gaschutz’s theorem. Write F/M=M1Mm for irreducible G-modules Mi. Let Di=CG(Mi). Then W=Irr(F/M) is a direct sum of irreducible G-modules W1Wm such that |Wi|=|Mi| and Di=CG(Wi). Since x is a non-vanishing element of G, then x fixes an element of each G/Di-orbit on Wi and also Dix is a non-vanishing element of G/Di. Assume for each i, one of the following occurs: dim(Mi) is 1 or prime, |Mi|=2j with j8, or |Mi|=3k with k5. Then the induction argument shows that Dix=1 for all i. Then xD1Dm=F. By the next to last paragraph, x=1.

Assume dim(V)=p, a prime. We apply [5, Theorem 2.12] to determine the structure of G. If V is quasi-primitive, then G is isomorphic to a subgroup of Γ(V) or F/Z(G) is a faithful irreducible module G/F-module of order p2. Then x=1 by the third paragraph or the last paragraph, respectively. If V is not a quasi-primitive module, then G has a normal subgroup N such that VN is a direct sum of p one-dimensional N-modules permuted transitively by G/N. Then N is abelian and G/N is a subgroup of the Frobenius group of order p(p-1). Then fl(G)3 and F2(G)/F(G) is abelian. By the next to last paragraph, x=1 in this case. So x=1 if dim(V) is prime.

Suppose that |V|=24 or 28. Since char(V)=2 and dim(V) is a power of 2, we see that F must be an abelian group of odd order by [5, Corollary 2.5]. If V is quasi-primitive, then GΓ(V) by [5, Corollary 2.3], and so x=1 by the third paragraph. So we assume V is not quasi-primitive. If |V|=24, then G is isomorphic to a subgroup of the wreath product S3Z2 which has Fitting length 2, and so x=1 by the fifth paragraph. We can assume that |V|=28. Since V is not quasi-primitive, G is isomorphic to a subgroup of Γ(24)Z2 or a subgroup of S3S4. Thus |F| divides 5232 or 35 (respectively). Since F/Φ(G) is a completely reducible and faithful G/F-module, it follows from the sixth paragraph that x=1.

Suppose that |V|=26. It follows from [5, Corollary 2.15] that F is extra-special of order 33 or that G is isomorphic to a subgroup S3S3, a subgroup of Γ(23)Z2, or a subgroup of Γ(26). In all cases, |F| divides 3472. Since F/Φ(G) is a completely reducible and faithful G/F-module, it follows from the sixth paragraph that x=1.

Finally, suppose that |V|=34. If V is not quasi-primitive, then G is isomorphic to a subgroup of GL(2,3)Z2 and so fl(G)3 and F2(G)/F is an abelian 3-group. In this case, x=1 by the fifth paragraph. We may assume that V is a quasi-primitive, but G is not a subgroup of Γ(V). By [5, Theorem 1.10 and Corollary 2.5], we have that F is extra-special of order 25 or that F=ET, where E is extra-special of order 23 and T has a cyclic subgroup U of index 1 or 2 and |U| divides 8. In all cases, |F| divides 27. Since F/Φ(G) is a completely reducible and faithful G/F-module, it follows from the sixth paragraph that x=1. ∎

Theorem 7.

Suppose that V is a (finite) quasi-primitive G-module for a solvable group G and x is a non-vanishing element of G such that x fixes an element in each G-orbit of V. Then x=1.

Proof.

Since V is quasi-primitive, every abelian normal subgroup of G is cyclic. By [5, Corollary 1.10], there exist normal subgroups F=F(G), E, T, Z, and A=CG(Z) such that Z=Z(E) is cyclic, such that F/TE/Z is a completely reducible G-module (possibly of mixed characteristic) of order e2 for an integer e, and A/F acts faithfully on E/Z. Since G has no regular orbit of V (by discussion preceding Lemma 1), a theorem of Yang [9] shows that e is 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9 or 16.

Now W=Irr(F/T) is a completely reducible G/F-module of order e2 and A/F acts faithfully on W. Let D=CG(W). Then FD and AD=F. We claim xD. This is trivial if e=1. Else write W=W1Wk for irreducible G-modules Wi. Set Di=CG(Wi) for each i. As x is a non-vanishing element of G, indeed, Dix is a non-vanishing element of G/Di. Also Dix must fix an element of each G/Di-orbit on Wi. Since |Wi| is 2i with i8 or 3j with j4, it follows from Lemma 6 that xDi for each i. Since i=1kDi=D, then xD, as claimed.

Now Z is cyclic and A=CG(Z). Since AD=F, we have F=CD(Z). Let λIrr(Z) be faithful. Since Z is cyclic and λ is faithful, it follows that ID(λ)=AD=F. Thus every αIrr(D|λ) vanishes on D-F. As D and F are normal in G, it follows that every non-vanishing element of G lying in D indeed lies in F by Lemma 3. By the last paragraph, xF. By Corollary 5, x=1. ∎

Theorem 8.

For a solvable group G, Gaschutz’s theorem shows that F(G)/Φ(G) is a direct sum of irreducible G-modules Mi. If each Mi is a quasi-primitive G-module, then every non-vanishing element of G lies in F(G).

Proof.

Gaschutz’s theorem [2, Sätze, III, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.5] also says G/F(G) acts faithfully on F(G)/Φ(G). If G=F(G), the result holds. So we may write

F(G)/Φ(G)=M1Mm

for irreducible G-modules Mi with m1. Let Di=CG(Mi), and note that

D1Dm=F(G)

by the first sentence. Then W=Irr(F(G)/Φ(G)) is a direct sum of irreducible G-modules W1Wm such that |Wi|=|Mi| and Di=CG(Wi). Since Mi is a quasi-primitive G-module, so is Wi (a dual of Mi) a quasi-primitive G-module. Since x is a non-vanishing element of G, then x fixes an element of each G/Di-orbit on Wi and also Dix is a non-vanishing element of G. By Theorem 7, xDi for all i. Hence xF(G). ∎


Communicated by Britta Spaeth


References

[1] S. Dolfi, G. Navarro, E. Pacifici, L. Sanus and P. H. Tiep, Non-vanishing elements of finite groups, J. Algebra 323 (2010), no. 2, 540–545. 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2009.08.014Search in Google Scholar

[2] B. Huppert, Endliche Gruppen. I, Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 134, Springer, Berlin, 1967. 10.1007/978-3-642-64981-3Search in Google Scholar

[3] I. M. Isaacs, Character Theory of Finite Groups, Dover Publications, New York, 1994. Search in Google Scholar

[4] I. M. Isaacs, G. Navarro and T. R. Wolf, Finite group elements where no irreducible character vanishes, J. Algebra 222 (1999), no. 2, 413–423. 10.1006/jabr.1999.8007Search in Google Scholar

[5] O. Manz and T. R. Wolf, Representations of Solvable Groups, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 185, Cambridge University, Cambridge, 1993. 10.1017/CBO9780511525971Search in Google Scholar

[6] A. Moretó and T. R. Wolf, Orbit sizes, character degrees and Sylow subgroups, Adv. Math. 184 (2004), no. 2, 18–39, 409. 10.1016/S0001-8708(03)00093-8Search in Google Scholar

[7] T. R. Wolf, Group actions related to non-vanishing elements, Int. J. Group Theory 3 (2014), no. 2, 41–51. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Y. Yang, Orbits of the actions of finite solvable groups, J. Algebra 321 (2009), no. 7, 2012–2021. 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2008.12.016Search in Google Scholar

[9] Y. Yang, Regular orbits of finite primitive solvable groups, II, J. Algebra 341 (2011), 23–34. 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2011.03.031Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-05-26
Revised: 2020-04-22
Published Online: 2020-06-11
Published in Print: 2020-11-01

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 21.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jgth-2019-0077/html
Scroll to top button