Home Towards HIPC 2.0? Lessons from Past Debt Relief Initiatives for Addressing Current Debt Problems
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Towards HIPC 2.0? Lessons from Past Debt Relief Initiatives for Addressing Current Debt Problems

  • Dennis Essers EMAIL logo and Danny Cassimon
Published/Copyright: September 14, 2022

Abstract

When the COVID-19 pandemic added to already elevated debt vulnerabilities in low-income countries, the G20 launched the Debt Service Suspension Initiative (DSSI) and the Common Framework for Debt Treatments beyond the DSSI, which have provided limited relief so far. For several countries, deeper and more wide-ranging debt treatments will likely be needed to secure future debt sustainability. This paper looks at the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) initiative, the largest and most comprehensive debt relief effort for low-income countries to date, as a potential reference point for the 2020s. While the HIPC initiative appears to have been a qualified success, its replication in the current context would be infeasible and undesirable. Creditor base heterogeneity justifies a more flexible, differentiated approach to debt restructuring. Yet, the HIPC experience holds valuable lessons. “Delay and replay” tendencies should be avoided. Involving commercial creditors is a real challenge, requiring carrots and sticks. And imposing extra conditionality on debt relief proceeds could be helpful but should not be overdone. Even if the Common Framework is unlikely to suffice in case of a systemic debt crisis, its inter-creditor dialogue could perhaps serve as the basis for a more inclusive advisory body or forum for debt restructuring.


Corresponding author: Dennis Essers, Economics and Research Department, National Bank of Belgium, 1000 Brussel, Belgium, E-mail:

Acknowledgements

The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bank of Belgium or the Eurosystem. We thank Ugo Panizza and Andrea Presbitero for inviting us to write this paper and are grateful to an anonymous referee, our discussant Silvia Marchesi and other JGD workshop participants for very useful comments and suggestions.

Appendix
Figure A1: 
Evolution of key variables for the group of non-HIPC DSSI-eligible countries: Public external debt-to-GDP ratio. (A), share of external debt owed to official and non-official Chinese creditors (B), share of external debt owed to commercial creditors (C), external debt service-to-revenue ratio (D), real GDP growth (E), and overall CPIA scores (F).
Sources: IMF, World Bank, authors’ calculations.
Figure A1:

Evolution of key variables for the group of non-HIPC DSSI-eligible countries: Public external debt-to-GDP ratio. (A), share of external debt owed to official and non-official Chinese creditors (B), share of external debt owed to commercial creditors (C), external debt service-to-revenue ratio (D), real GDP growth (E), and overall CPIA scores (F).

Sources: IMF, World Bank, authors’ calculations.

References

Agarwal, R., and G. Gopinath. 2021. A Proposal to End the COVID-19 Pandemic. IMF Staff Discussion Note No. 2021/004. Washington: International Monetary Fund.10.5089/9781513577609.006Search in Google Scholar

Alonso, J. A. 2018. “Two Major Gaps in Global Governance: International Tax Cooperation and Sovereign Debt Crisis Resolution.” Journal of Globalization and Development 9 (2). 20180014.https://doi.org/10.1515/jgd-2018-0016.Search in Google Scholar

Andone, I., and B. Scheubel. 2019. Once Bitten: New Evidence on the Link between IMF Conditionality and IMF Stigma. ECB Working Paper No. 2262. Frankfurt: European Central Bank.10.2139/ssrn.3372048Search in Google Scholar

Arellano, C., Y. Bai, and G. Mihalache. 2021. Deadly debt Crises: COVID-19 in Emerging Markets. Staff Report No. 603. Minneapolis: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.10.21034/sr.603Search in Google Scholar

Asonuma, T., M. Chamon, A. Erce, and A. Sasahara. 2019. Costs of Sovereign Defaults: Restructuring Strategies, Bank Distress and the Capital Inflow-Credit Channel. IMF Working Paper No. 19/69. Washington: International Monetary Fund.10.5089/9781498303255.001Search in Google Scholar

Birdsall, N., S. Claessens, and I. Diwan. 2003. “Policy Selectivity Foregone: Debt and Donor Behavior in Africa.” The World Bank Economic Review 17 (3): 409–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhg029.Search in Google Scholar

Bolton, P., L. Buchheit, P.-O. Gourinchas, M. Gulati, C.-T. Hsieh, U. Panizza, and B. Weder di Mauro. 2020. Sovereign debt Standstills: An Update. VoxEU.org. 28 May.Search in Google Scholar

Bolton, P., U. Panizza, and M. Gulati. 2021. “Legal Air Cover.” Journal of Financial Regulation: fjab004. advance access. https://doi.org/10.1093/jfr/fjab004.Search in Google Scholar

Boote, A. R., and K. Thugge. 1997. Debt relief for Low-Income Countries and the HIPC Initiative. IMF Working Paper No. 97/24. Washington: International Monetary Fund.10.5089/9781451844108.001Search in Google Scholar

Borensztein, E., and U. Panizza. 2009. “The Costs of Sovereign Default.” IMF Staff Papers 56 (4): 686–741. https://doi.org/10.1057/imfsp.2009.21.Search in Google Scholar

Brautigam, D. 2020. China, the World Bank, and African Debt: A War of Words. The Diplomat. 17 August.Search in Google Scholar

Buchheit, L., G. Chabert, C. DeLong, and J. Zettelmeyer. 2020. “The Restructuring Process.” In Sovereign debt: A Guide for Economists and Practitioners, edited by Abbas, S. A., Pienkowski, A. and Rogoff, K., pp. 328–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198850823.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Buchheit, L., and M. Gulati. 2021. “Avoiding a Lost Decade: Sovereign Debt Workouts in the Post-covid Era.” Capital Markets Law Journal 16 (1): 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/cmlj/kmaa028.Search in Google Scholar

Bulow, J., and K. Rogoff. 1991. “Sovereign Repurchases: No Cure for Overhang.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (4): 1219–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937962.Search in Google Scholar

Cassimon, D., P.-J. Engelen, and L. Van Liedekerke. 2016. “When Do Firms Invest in Corporate Social Responsibility? A Real Option Framework.” Journal of Business Ethics 137 (1): 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2539-y.Search in Google Scholar

Cassimon, D., and D. Essers. 2017. “A Chameleon Called Debt Relief: Aid Modality Equivalence of Official Debt Relief to Poor Countries.” In Development Finance: Innovations for Sustainable Growth, edited by Biekpe, N., Cassimon, D. and Mullineux, A., pp. 161–97. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-54166-2_6Search in Google Scholar

Cassimon, D., D. Essers, and K. Verbeke. 2018. “Sovereign Debt Workouts: Quo Vadis?” Africagrowth Agenda 15 (3): 4–8.Search in Google Scholar

Cassimon, D., and B. Van Campenhout. 2007. “Aid Effectiveness, Debt Relief and Public Finance Response: Evidence from a Panel of HIPC Countries.” Review of World Economics 143 (4): 742–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-007-0130-z.Search in Google Scholar

Cassimon, D., and B. Van Campenhout. 2008. “Comparative Fiscal Response Effects of Debt Relief: An Application to African HIPCs.” South African Journal of Economics 76 (3): 427–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1813-6982.2008.00201.x.Search in Google Scholar

Cassimon, D., B. Van Campenhout, M. Ferry, and M. Raffinot. 2015. “Africa: Out of Debt, into Fiscal Space? Dynamic Fiscal Impact of the Debt Relief Initiatives on African Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPCs).” International Economics 144 (December): 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2015.04.007.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, G., J. Diaz-Cassou, and A. Erce. 2019. “The Macroeconomic Effects of Official Debt Restructuring: Evidence from the Paris Club.” Oxford Economic Papers 71 (2): 344–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpy032.Search in Google Scholar

Claessens, S., D. Cassimon, and B. Van Campenhout. 2009. “Evidence on Changes in Aid Allocation Criteria.” The World Bank Economic Review 23 (2): 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhp003.Search in Google Scholar

Claessens, S., and I. Diwan. 1994. “Recent Experience with Commercial Bank Debt Reduction: Has the ‘Menu’ Outdone the Market?” World Development 22 (2): 201–13, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750x(94)90070-1.Search in Google Scholar

Clements, B., S. Gupta, J. Tovar Jalles, and V. Mylonas. 2021. Low-income Developing Countries Will Surely Need More Debt Relief Down the Line. Center for Global Development Blog. 23 June.Search in Google Scholar

Cordella, T., and A. Powell. 2021. Preferred and Non-preferred Creditors. IDB Working Paper No. 1215. Washington: Inter-American Development Bank.10.18235/0003109Search in Google Scholar

Cosio-Pascal, E. 2008. The Emerging of a Multilateral Forum for Debt Restructuring: The Paris Club. UNCTAD Discussion Paper No. 192. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.Search in Google Scholar

Das, U. S., M. G. Papaioannou, and C. Trebesch. 2012. Sovereign Debt Restructurings 1950–2010: Concepts, Literature Survey, and Stylized Facts. IMF Working Paper No. 12/203. Washington: International Monetary Fund.10.5089/9781475505535.001Search in Google Scholar

Debrun, X., J. D. Ostry, T. Willems, and C. Wyplosz. 2020. “Debt Sustainability.” In Sovereign Debt: A Guide for Economists and Practitioners, edited by Abbas, S. A., Pienkowski, A. and Rogoff, K., pp. 151–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198850823.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Depetris Chauvin, N., and A. Kraay. 2005. What has 100 Billion Worth of Debt Relief Done for Low-Income Countries? Mimeo.10.2139/ssrn.818504Search in Google Scholar

Depetris Chauvin, N., and A. Kraay. 2007. “Who Gets Debt Relief?” Journal of the European Economic Association 5 (2–3): 333–42. https://doi.org/10.1162/jeea.2007.5.2-3.333.Search in Google Scholar

Dixit, A., and R. Pindyck. 1994. Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400830176Search in Google Scholar

Djimeu, E. W. 2018. “The Impact of the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Initiative on Growth and Investment in Africa.” World Development 104 (April): 108–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.11.002.Search in Google Scholar

Dömeland, D., and H. Kharas. 2009. “Debt Relief and Sustainable Financing to Meet the MDGs.” In Debt Relief and beyond: Lessons Learned and Challenges Ahead, edited by Primo Braga, C. A. and Dömeland, D., pp. 117–40. Washington: World Bank.10.1596/978-0-8213-7874-8Search in Google Scholar

Duggan, J., P. Jaupart, and J. Sandefur. 2021. Debt, Aid, and Social Spending. Mimeo.Search in Google Scholar

Easterly, W. 2002. “How Did Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Become Heavily Indebted? Reviewing Two Decades of Debt Relief.” World Development 30 (10): 1677–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-750x(02)00073-6.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, H. 1999. “Debt Relief for the Poorest Countries: Why Did it Take So Long?” Development Policy Review 17 (3): 267–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7679.00087.Search in Google Scholar

Ferry, M., and M. Raffinot. 2019. “Curse or Blessing? Has the Impact of Debt Relief Lived up to Expectations? A Review of the Effects of the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiatives for Low-Income Countries.” Journal of Development Studies 55 (9): 1867–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2018.1499895.Search in Google Scholar

Ferry, M., M. Raffinot, and B. Venet. 2021. “Does Debt Relief ‘Irresistibly Attract Banks as Honey Attracts Bees’? Evidence from Low-Income Countries’ Debt Relief Programs.” International Review of Law and Economics 66 (June): 105978, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2021.105978.Search in Google Scholar

Freytag, A., and G. Pehnelt. 2009. “Debt Relief and Governance Quality in Developing Countries.” World Development 37 (1): 62–80.10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.01.004Search in Google Scholar

Gamarra, B., M. Pollock, and C. A. Primo Braga. 2009. “Debt Relief to Low-Income Countries: A Retrospective.” In Debt Relief and beyond: Lessons Learned and Challenges Ahead, edited by Primo Braga, C. A. and Dömeland, D., pp. 11–33. Washington: World Bank.Search in Google Scholar

Gautam, M. 2003. Debt Relief for the Poorest: An OED Review of the HIPC Initiative. Washington: World Bank.10.1596/0-8213-5521-XSearch in Google Scholar

Georgieva, K., and C. Pazarbasioglu. 2021. “The G20 Common Framework for Debt Treatments Must Be Stepped up.” IMF Blog 2 December.Search in Google Scholar

Graf von Luckner, C., J. Meyer, C. Reinhart, and C. Trebesch. 2021. External Sovereign Debt Restructurings: Delay and Replay. VoxEU.org. 30 March.Search in Google Scholar

Group of Thirty (G30) 2021. Sovereign Debt and Financing for Recovery after the COVID-19 Shock: Next Steps to Build a Better Architecture. Report by the Working Group on Sovereign Debt and COVID-19. Washington: Group of Thirty.Search in Google Scholar

Guzman, M., and D. Heymann. 2015. “The IMF Debt Sustainability Analysis: Issues and Problems.” Journal of Globalization and Development 6 (2): 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1515/jgd-2015-0034.Search in Google Scholar

Hjertholm, P. 2003. “Theoretical and Empirical Foundations of HIPC Debt Sustainability Targets.” Journal of Development Studies 39 (6): 67–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380312331293587.Search in Google Scholar

Institute of International Finance (IIF). 2020. Terms of Reference for Voluntary Private Sector Participation in the G20/Paris Club DSSI. Washington: Institute of International Finance.Search in Google Scholar

International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2017. Guidance Note on the Bank-Fund Debt Sustainability Framework for Low-Income Countries. Washington: International Monetary Fund.Search in Google Scholar

IMF. 2020. The International Architecture for Resolving Sovereign Debt Involving Private-Sector Creditors: Recent Developments, Challenges, and Reform Options. Washington: International Monetary Fund.10.5089/9781513557472.007Search in Google Scholar

IMF. 2021a. Fiscal Monitor April 2021: A Fair Shot. Washington: International Monetary Fund.Search in Google Scholar

IMF. 2021b. Review of the Debt Sustainability Framework for Market Access Countries. Washington: International Monetary Fund.Search in Google Scholar

IMF. 2021c. Macro-economic Developments and Prospects in Low-Income Countries 2021. Washington: International Monetary Fund.10.5089/9781513575858.007Search in Google Scholar

IMF. 2021d. Global Financial Stability Report April 2021: Preempting a Legacy of Vulnerabilities. Washington: International Monetary Fund.Search in Google Scholar

IMF. 2021e. Fund Support for Debt- and Debt-Service-Reduction Operations. Washington: International Monetary Fund.Search in Google Scholar

IMF World Bank. 2001. Tracking of Poverty-Reducing Public Spending in Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPCs). Washington: International Monetary Fund and World Bank.10.5089/9781498328081.007Search in Google Scholar

IMF World Bank. 2019. Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative and Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI): Statistical Update. Washington: International Monetary Fund and World Bank.Search in Google Scholar

IMF World Bank. 2021. Joint IMF-WBG Staff Note: DSSI Fiscal Monitoring Update. Washington: International Monetary Fund and World Bank.10.5089/9781513595382.007Search in Google Scholar

Johansson, P. 2010. “Debt Relief Investment and Growth.” World Development 38 (9): 1204–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.11.021.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, T. 2020. Rising Debt Burdens, the Impact on Public Spending, and the Coronavirus Crisis. Paper prepared for the Center for Global Development Conference on Financing Low-Income Countries Towards Realistic Aspirations and Concrete Actions in a Post-COVID-19 World, 8 October.Search in Google Scholar

Jubilee Debt Campaign. 2021. How the G20 Debt Suspension Initiative Benefits Private Lenders. London: Jubilee Debt Campaign.Search in Google Scholar

Kearse, N. 2020. The DSSI, Defaults and Credit Ratings: A Primer. African Legal Support Facility Academy Blog. 26 June.Search in Google Scholar

Kozack, J. A. 2005. Considerations in the Choice of the Appropriate Discount Rate for Evaluating Sovereign Debt Restructurings. IMF Policy Discussion Paper No. 05/9. Washington: International Monetary Fund.10.5089/9781451975840.003Search in Google Scholar

Krueger, A. O. 2002. A New Approach to Sovereign Debt Restructuring. Washington: International Monetary Fund.10.5089/9781589061217.054Search in Google Scholar

Krugman, P. 1988. “Financing versus Forgiving a Debt Overhang.” Journal of Development Economics 29 (3): 253–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(88)90044-2.Search in Google Scholar

Landers, C. 2020. Revisiting HIPC as Part of the COVID-19 Response: How Did Commercial Debt Relief for Poorest Countries Work Last Time? Center for Global Development Blog. 16 April.Search in Google Scholar

Lang, V., D. Mihalyi, and A. F. Presbitero. 2021. Borrowing costs after Sovereign Debt Relief. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 15832. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.Search in Google Scholar

Lang, V., and A. F. Presbitero. 2018. “Room for Discretion? Biased Decision-Making in International Financial Institutions.” Journal of Development Economics 130 (January): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2017.09.001.Search in Google Scholar

Le Gouguec, A. 2016. Will Africa Need a New ‘Heavily Indebted Poor Countries’ Initiative? Trésor-Economics No. 164. Paris: French Treasury.Search in Google Scholar

Marchesi, S., and T. Masi. 2021. “Life after Default: Private and Official Deals.” Journal of International Money and Finance 113 (May): 102339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2020.102339.Search in Google Scholar

Marchesi, S., and A. Missale. 2013. “Did High Debts Distort Loan and Grant Allocation to IDA Countries?” World Development 44 (April): 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.12.011.Search in Google Scholar

McDonald, R., and D. Siegel. 1986. “The Value of Waiting.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 101 (4): 707–28.https://doi.org/10.2307/1884175.Search in Google Scholar

Morris, S. 2019. HIPC with Chinese Characteristics: Why Yesterday’s Debt Relief Is the Wrong Point of Reference for Today’s Crises. Center for Global Development Blog. 24 October.Search in Google Scholar

Morris, S. 2020. 5 Principles on the Uses and Misuses of Debt Relief to Address the Coronavirus Pandemic. Center for Global Development Blog. 24 March.Search in Google Scholar

Munevar, D. 2020. The G20 ‘Common Framework for Debt Treatments Beyond the DSSI’: Is it Bound to Fail? Eurodad Briefing Paper. Brussels: European Network on Debt and Development.Search in Google Scholar

Munevar, D. 2021. A Debt Pandemic: Dynamics and Implications of the Debt Crisis of 2020. Eurodad Briefing Paper. Brussels: European Network on Debt and Development.Search in Google Scholar

Pattillo, C., H. Poirson, and L. Ricci. 2004. What are the Channels through Which External Debt Affects Growth? IMF Working Paper No. 04/15. Washington: International Monetary Fund.10.5089/9781451843293.001Search in Google Scholar

Pitchford, R., and M. L. J. Wright. 2012. “Holdouts in Sovereign Debt Restructuring: A Theory of Negotiation in a Weak Contractual Environment.” The Review of Economic Studies 79 (2): 812–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdr038.Search in Google Scholar

Powell, R., and G. Bird. 2010. “Aid and Debt Relief in Africa: Have They Been Substitutes or Complements?” World Development 38 (3): 219–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.005.Search in Google Scholar

Presbitero, A. F. 2009. “Debt-relief Effectiveness and Institution-Building.” Development Policy Review 27 (5): 529–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2009.00458.x.Search in Google Scholar

Raddatz, C. 2011. “Multilateral Debt Relief through the Eyes of Financial Markets.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 93 (4): 1262–88. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00196.Search in Google Scholar

Reinhart, C., and C. Trebesch. 2016. “Sovereign Debt Relief and its Aftermath.” Journal of the European Economic Association 14 (1): 215–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12166.Search in Google Scholar

Roodman, D. 2010. The Arc of the Jubilee. Center for Global Development Essay. Washington: Center for Global Development.Search in Google Scholar

Sandefur, J. 2021. “World Bank Grants for Global Vaccination: Why So Slow?” Nature 594 (7864): 475. World View. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01678-5.Search in Google Scholar

Scheubel, B., A. Tafuro, and B. Vonessen. 2018. Stigma? What Stigma? A Contribution to the Debate on Financial Market Effects of IMF Lending. ECB Working Paper No. 2198. Frankfurt: European Central Bank.10.2139/ssrn.3285815Search in Google Scholar

Smith, G. 2021. Where Credit Is Due: How Africa’s Debt Can Be a Benefit, Not a Burden. London: Hurst & Co.10.1093/oso/9780197619971.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Stiglitz, J., and H. Rashid. 2020. Averting Catastrophic Debt Crises in Developing Countries: Extraordinary Challenges Call for Extraordinary Measures. CEPR Policy Insight No. 104. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.Search in Google Scholar

Trigeorgis, L. 1996. Real Options. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

UNICEF. 2021. COVID-19 and the Looming Debt Crisis. Innocenti Policy Brief 2021-01. Florence: United Nations Children’s Fund of Research – Innocenti.Search in Google Scholar

Volz, U., S. Akthar, K.P. Gallagher, S. Griffith-Jones, and J. Haas. 2020. Debt relief for green and inclusive recovery. Berlin, London, and Boston, MA: Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung; SOAS, University of London; and Boston University.Search in Google Scholar

Volz, U., S. Akhtar, K. P. Gallagher, S. Griffith-Jones, J. Haas, and M. Kraemer. 2021. Debt Relief for a Green and Inclusive Recovery: Securing Private Sector Participation and Creating Policy Space for Sustainable Development. Berlin: Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung; SOAS, University of London; and Boston University.Search in Google Scholar

World Bank. 2020. International Debt Statistics 2021. Washington: World Bank.Search in Google Scholar

World Bank. 2021a. Debt transparency in Developing Economies. Washington: World Bank.Search in Google Scholar

World Bank. 2021b. International Debt Statistics 2022. Washington: World Bank.Search in Google Scholar

World Bank. 2022. “Special Focus: Resolving High Debt after the Pandemic – Lessons from Past Episodes of Debt Relief.” In Global Economic Prospects January 2022, pp. 48–62. Washington: World Bank.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-07-05
Accepted: 2022-04-27
Published Online: 2022-09-14

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 12.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jgd-2021-0051/html
Scroll to top button