Problematising ‘Recovery’ in Drug Policy within Great Britain: A Comparative Policy Analysis Between England, Wales and Scotland

References

Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs. 1988. AIDS and Drug Misuse Pt 1. London: HMSO.Search in Google Scholar

Andersen, D., and M. L. Kessing. 2018. “Stigma, Problem Drug Use, and Welfare State Encounters: Changing Contours of Stigmatization in the Era of Social Investment.” Addiction Research & Theory 27 (4): 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2018.1508568.Search in Google Scholar

Bacchi, C. L. 1999. Women, Policy and Politics: The Construction of Policy Problems. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446217887Search in Google Scholar

Bacchi, C. 2005. “Discourse, Discourse Everywhere: Subject “Agency” in Feminist Discourse Methodology.” NORA: Nordic Journal of Women’s Studies 13 (3): 199. Reproduced in C. Hughes (Ed.) (2012). Researching Gender. Sage Fundamentals of Applied Research Series. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740600600407.Search in Google Scholar

Bacchi, C. 2009. Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented to Be?, 1st ed. Pearson, AU: Pearson Higher Education AU.Search in Google Scholar

Bacchi, C. 2012. “Introducing the ‘What’s the Problem Represented to Be?’ Approach.” In Engaging with Carol Bacchi: Strategic Interventions and Exchanges, edited by Bletsas, A. and Beasley, C., 21–4. Adelaide, AU: The University of Adelaide Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/upo9780987171856.003.Search in Google Scholar

Bacchi, C., and S. Goodwin. 2016. Poststructural Policy Analysis: A Guide to Practice. New York: Palgrave, https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52546-8.Search in Google Scholar

Bacchi, C. 2018. “Drug Problematizations and Politics: Deploying a Poststructural Analytic Strategy.” Contemporary Drug Problems 45 (1): 3–14 https://doi.org/10.1177/0091450917748760.Search in Google Scholar

Best, D., S. J. De Alwis, and D. Burdett. 2017. “The Recovery Movement and its Implications for Policy, Commissioning and Practice.” Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 34 (2): 107–11, https://doi.org/10.1177/1455072517691058.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Bjerge, B., L. Christensen, and J. Oute. 2020. “Complex Cases–Complex Representations of Problems.” International Journal of Drug Policy 80: 102563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.09.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Brewster, D., and R. Jones. 2019. “Distinctly Divergent or Hanging onto English Coat-Tails? Drug Policy in Post-devolution Wales.” Criminology & Criminal Justice 19 (3): 364–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895818757834.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, K., and E. Wincup. 2020. “Producing the Vulnerable Subject in English Drug Policy.” International Journal of Drug Policy 80: 102525, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.07.020.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Centre for Social Justice. 2007. Addictions: Towards Recovery. London: Centre for Social Justice.Search in Google Scholar

Chowdhury, M. F. 2014. “Coding, Sorting and Sifting of Qualitative Data Analysis: Debates and Discussion.” Quality & Quantity 49 (3): 1135–43, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0039-2.Search in Google Scholar

Corbin, J. M., and A. Strauss. 1990. “Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria.” Qualitative Sociology 13 (1): 3–21, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00988593.Search in Google Scholar

Corbin, J., and A. Strauss (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153.Search in Google Scholar

Donovan, D. 2005. “Assessment of Addictive Behaviours for Relapse Prevention.” In Assessment of Addictive Behaviours, 2nd ed., edited by Donovan, D. N. and Marlatt, G. M., 1–48. New York: The Guilford Press.Search in Google Scholar

Duke, K., and B. Thom. 2014. “The Role of Evidence and the Expert in Contemporary Processes of Governance: The Case of Opioid Substitution Treatment Policy in England.” International Journal of Drug Policy 25 (5): 964–71, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.01.015.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Farrugia, A., K. Seear, and S. Fraser. 2017. “Authentic Advice for Authentic Problems? Legal Information in Australian Classroom Drug Education.” Addiction Research & Theory 26 (3): 193–204, https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2017.1343823.Search in Google Scholar

Floodgate, W. 2018. From Maintenance to Recovery: Exploring the Reorientation towards Recovery in British Drug Policy during a Time of Reform and Economic Austerity. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Manchester.Search in Google Scholar

Fraser, S. 2004. “‘It’s Your Life!’: Injecting Drug Users, Individual Responsibility and Hepatitis C Prevention.” Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 8 (2): 199–221, https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459304041070.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Heilig, M. 2015. The Thirteenth Step: Addiction in the Age of Brain Science. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/heil17236.Search in Google Scholar

HM Government. 2017. 2017 Drug Strategy. London: HM Government.Search in Google Scholar

HM Government. 2010. Drug Strategy 2010, Reducing Demand, Restricting Supply, Building Recovery: Supporting People to Live a Drug Free Life. London: HM Government.Search in Google Scholar

Hudson, B. 2004. “Analysing Network Partnerships: Benson Re-visited.” Public Management Review 6 (1): 75–94, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030410001675740.Search in Google Scholar

Information Services Devision (ISD) Scotland. 2018. National Drug and Alcohol Treatment Waiting Times Summary. Retrieved from: https://www.isdscotland.org/Health-Topics/Drugs-and-Alcohol-Misuse/Publications/ (accessed December 20, 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Kalk, N. J., J. R. Robertson, B. Kidd, E. Day, M. J. Kelleher, E. Gilvarry, and J. Strang. 2017. “Treatment and Intervention for Opiate Dependence in the United Kingdom: Lessons from Triumph and Failure.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 24 (2): 183–200, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-017-9364-z.Search in Google Scholar

Lancaster, K., and A. Ritter. 2014. “Examining the Construction and Representation of Drugs as a Policy Problem in Australia’s National Drug Strategy Documents 1985–2010.” International Journal of Drug Policy 25 (1): 81–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.07.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Lancaster, K., K. Duke, and A. Ritter. 2015. “Producing the “Problem of Drugs”: A Cross National-Comparison of “Recovery” Discourse in Two Australian and British Reports.” International Journal of Drug Policy 26 (7): 617–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.04.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Laudet, A. B. 2007. “What Does Recovery Mean to You? Lessons from the Recovery Experience for Research and Practice.” Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 33 (3): 243–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2007.04.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Lipsky, M. 2010. Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. 30th Anniversary Expanded Edition New York, NY: The Russell Sage Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Lucas, S., P. J. Archard, J. Tangen, and D. Murphy. 2018. “Arrangements for Adult Service Users Who are Homeless in English Mental Health Trusts.” Mental Health Review Journal 23 (1): 64–71, https://doi.org/10.1108/mhrj-03-2017-0017.Search in Google Scholar

MacGregor, S. 2012. “Addiction Recovery: A Movement for Social Change and Personal Growth in the UK, by David Best, Brighton.” Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 19 (4): 351–2, https://doi.org/10.3109/09687637.2012.692594.Search in Google Scholar

McAra, L. 2008. “Crime, Criminology and Criminal Justice in Scotland.” European Journal of Criminology 5 (4): 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370808095127.Search in Google Scholar

McKay, J. R. 2016. “Making the Hard Work of Recovery More Attractive for Those with Substance Use Disorders.” Addiction 112 (5): 751–7, https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13502.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

McKeganey, N., Z. Morris, J. Neale, and M. Robertson. 2004. “What are Drug Users Looking for When They Contact Drug Services: Abstinence or Harm Reduction?” Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy 11 (5): 423–35, https://doi.org/10.1080/09687630410001723229.Search in Google Scholar

McKeganey, N. 2014. “Clear Rhetoric and Blurred Reality: The Development of a Recovery Focus in UK Drug Treatment Policy and Practice.” International Journal of Drug Policy 25 (5): 957–63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.01.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Monaghan, M., E. Wincup, and K. Wicker. 2018. “Experts, Expertise and Drug Policymaking.” The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice 57 (3): 422–41, https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12265.Search in Google Scholar

National Treatment Agency. 2007. The National Treatment Agency 2006 Survey of User Satisfaction in England. England: National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse.Search in Google Scholar

Nelles, B. 2005. “Comment on ‘What are Drug Users Looking for When They Contact Drug Services: Abstinence or Harm Reduction? by Neil McKeganey, Zoë Morris, Joanne Neal, & Michele Robertson.” Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 12 (4): 255–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687630500090720.Search in Google Scholar

Ritter, A. 2015. “The Privileged Role of Researchers in “Evidence-Based” Policy: Implications and Engagement of Other Voices.” Drugs and Alcohol Today 15 (4): 181–91, https://doi.org/10.1108/dat-06-2015-0027.Search in Google Scholar

Roy, A., and J. Buchanan. 2016. “The Paradoxes of Recovery Policy: Exploring the Impact of Austerity and Responsibilisation for the Citizenship Claims of People with Drug Problems.” Social Policy & Administration 50 (3): 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12139.Search in Google Scholar

Scottish Government. 2008. The Road to Recovery: A New Approach to Tackling Scotland’s Drug Problem. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.Search in Google Scholar

Seddon, T., R. Ralphs, and L. Williams. 2008. “Risk, Security and the ‘Criminalization’ of British Drug Policy.” The British Journal of Criminology 48 (6): 818–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azn056.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, C., and K. Riach. 2014. “Drug Taking and Employment: Exploring the Employable Citizen in UK Policy.” Sociology 50 (1): 24–42, https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038514554330.Search in Google Scholar

Stevens, A., and G. F. Zampini. 2019. “Drug Policy Constellations: A Habermasian Approach for Understanding English Drug Policy.” International Journal of Drug Policy 57: 61–71 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.03.030.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, S., J. Buchanan, and T. Ayres. 2016. “Prohibition, Privilege and the Drug Apartheid: The Failure of Drug Policy Reform to Address the Underlying Fallacies of Drug Prohibition.” Criminology & Criminal Justice 16 (4): 452–69, https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895816633274.Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, N., and M. Bull. 2018. “Representations of Women and Drug Use in Policy: A Critical Policy Analysis.” International Journal of Drug Policy 56: 30–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.02.015.Search in Google Scholar

Trace, M. 2005. “Comment on ‘What are Drug Users Looking for When They Contact Drug Services: Abstinence or Harm Reduction? by Neil McKeganey, Zoë Morris, Joanne Neal, & Michele Robertson.” Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 12 (4): 267–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687630500090787.Search in Google Scholar

Volkow, N. D., and G. Koob. 2015. “Brain Disease Model of Addiction: Why is it so Controversial?” The Lancet Psychiatry 2 (8): 677–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00236-9.Search in Google Scholar

Welsh Government. 2008. Working Together to Reduce Harm. The Substance Misuse Strategy for Wales 2008–2018. Cardiff: Welsh Government.Search in Google Scholar

Zampini, G. F. 2018. “Evidence and Morality in Harm-Reduction Debates: Can We Use Value-Neutral Arguments to Achieve Value-Driven Goals?” Palgrave Communications 4 (1): 62, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0119-3.Search in Google Scholar