Home Medicine Exploring the awareness of research among registered massage therapists in Ontario
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Exploring the awareness of research among registered massage therapists in Ontario

  • Amanda J. Baskwill EMAIL logo and Kelly Dore
Published/Copyright: December 8, 2015

Abstract

Background: An increase in available research has highlighted that knowledge changes over time as theories are challenged and adjusted or dismissed. This is particularly important to healthcare practitioners, including massage therapists, who need to frequently review current research and adjust practice accordingly. However, when research findings related to practice are generated, there is considerable delay in implementation. Few studies measure actual knowledge of current evidence for practice. The objectives of the study reported here were to (a) describe current awareness of evidence for practice among registered massage therapists (RMTs) in Ontario and (b) identify the sources of information RMTs use to inform their awareness of current evidence and the reported importance and frequency of use for each source.

Methods: An online questionnaire-based mixed-methods cross-sectional study was conducted. Ontario RMTs were invited to participate. This report focuses on the quantitative analysis.

Results: In total, 1,762 questionnaires were included. Of seven sources of information provided, respondents rated cumulative professional experience as most important, followed by recent research studies and education. Cumulative professional experience also rated as most frequently used, followed by other RMTs and education.

Conclusions: There was a tendency for respondents to agree with positive statements about MT, or disagree with negative statements, regardless of correctness. The results suggest that RMTs need to improve their awareness of the current evidence for practice. Furthermore, cumulative professional experience was ranked most frequently used. This has the potential to not include the most current research. Improving communication of research findings to RMTs might improve awareness.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support and guidance of Drs. Geoffrey Norman and Lawrence Grierson.

Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

Research funding: This study was funded by IN-CAM through the Massage Therapy Research Fund.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Shroff FM, Sahota IS. How can massage therapy move forward? Registered massage therapists touch on key points shaping their profession in British Columbia, Canada. Home Health Care Manag Pract 2012;24:182–92.10.1177/1084822311429563Search in Google Scholar

2. Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E, Mays MZ. The evidence-based practice beliefs and implementation scales: psychometric properties of two new instruments. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2008;5:208–16.10.1111/j.1741-6787.2008.00126.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Dryden T, Moyer C. Massage therapy: integrating research and practice. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2012.10.5040/9781718210509Search in Google Scholar

4. Leboeuf-Yde C, Lanlo O, Walker BF. How to proceed when evidence-based practice is required but very little evidence available? Chiropr Man Therap 2013;24:24–9.10.1186/2045-709X-21-24Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Suter E, Vanderheyden LC, Trojan LS. How important is research-based practice to chiropractors and massage therapists? J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2007;30:109–15.10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.12.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Dawes M, Summerskill W, Glasziou P, Cartabellotta A, Martin J, Hopayian K, et al. Sicily statement on evidence-based practice. BMC Med Educ 2005;5:1–7.10.1186/1472-6920-5-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Lizarondo L, Grimmer-Somers K, Kumar S. A systematic review of the individual determinants of research evidence use in allied health. J Multidiscip Healthcare 2011;4:261–72.10.2147/JMDH.S23144Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Brown CE, Wickline MA, Ecoff L, Glaser D. Nursing practice, knowledge, attitudes and perceived barriers to evidence-based practice at an academic medical centre. J Adv Nurs 2008;65:371–81.10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04878.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Gowan-Moody DM, Leis AM, Abonyi S, Epstein M, Premkumar K. Research utilization and evidence –based practice among Saskatchewan massage therapists. J Complement Integr Med 2013;10:1–10.10.1515/jcim-2012-0044Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Hadley J, Hassan I, Khan KS. Knowledge and beliefs concerning evidence-based practice amongst complementary and alternative medicine health care practitioners and allied health care professionals: a questionnaire survey. BMC Complement Altern Med 2008;8:45–52.10.1186/1472-6882-8-45Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. McEvoy MP, Williams MT, Olds TS. Evidence based practice profiles: differences among allied health professionals. BMC Med Educ 2010;10:69–76.10.1186/1472-6920-10-69Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Madhavji A, Araujo EA, Kim KB, Buschang PH. Attitudes, awareness, and barriers toward evidence-based practice in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:309–16.10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.05.023Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Majid S, Foo S, Luyt B, Zhang X, Theng YL, Chang YK, et al. Adopting evidence-based practice in clinical decision making: Nurses’ perceptions, knowledge, and barriers. J Med Libr Assoc 2011;99:229–36.10.3163/1536-5050.99.3.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Rashidbeygi M, Sayehmiri K. Knowledge and attitudes of physicians towards evidence based medicine in Ilam, Iran. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2013;15:798–803.10.5812/ircmj.7204Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Ulvenes LV, Aasland O, Nylenna M, Kristainasen IS. Norwegian physicians’ knowledge of and opinions about evidence-based medicine: cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2001;4:1–6.10.1371/journal.pone.0007828Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Eva KW, Regehr G. I’ll never play professional football” and other fallacies of self-assessment. J Contin Educ Health Proof 2008;28:14–19.10.1002/chp.150Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Baskwill A. Awareness of the Evidence for Practice of RMTs in Ontario (MSc Thesis). 2014. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/15391Search in Google Scholar

18. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use, 4th ed. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

19. Pravikoff DS, Tanner A, Pierce ST. CE credit: readiness of US nurses for evidence-based practice. Am J Nurs 2005;105:40–52.10.1097/00000446-200509000-00025Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2015-2-10
Accepted: 2015-11-19
Published Online: 2015-12-8
Published in Print: 2016-3-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 12.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jcim-2015-0006/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button