Home Factors affecting the use of complementary and alternative medicine among Japanese university students
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Factors affecting the use of complementary and alternative medicine among Japanese university students

  • Yasuhiro Ujiie EMAIL logo and Hiroki Okada
Published/Copyright: October 21, 2014

Abstract

Background: Patients suffering from intractable diseases and individuals seeking relief from mild symptoms resort to treatments outside the modern medical paradigm, such as complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). In order to improve doctor–patient communication about CAM, it is essential to evaluate CAM usage among social groups likely to choose it in the future. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate how university students – individuals highly subject to future CAM usage – perceive CAM and the factors affecting their choice of CAM use.

Methods: We conducted a questionnaire survey with 1,096 Japanese university students not studying medical subjects.

Results: The term CAM was known to 11% of the subjects. Modalities they most associated with CAM were art therapy (353 subjects), hot spring therapy (349), and aromatherapy (345). They had experience taking vitamins, trace elements, other supplements (498), and nutritional drinks (483). Several subjects wanted to experience shiatsu massage (373) and hot spring therapy (303). Multiple regression analysis of the modalities that the subjects wanted to experience revealed a 42% multiple coefficient of determination for prioritizing modalities that the subject associated with CAM, showing a large contribution of this deciding factor.

Conclusions: Although most subjects were not familiar with the term CAM, many of them had decided to ingest substances in the CAM category on the basis of self-judgment and without adequate knowledge. Because such behavior can be detrimental to health, medical professionals should be aware of CAM usage among their patients and seek effective communication with them in order to enable safe CAM practice.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the students who participated in the survey.

Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

Research funding: None declared.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. OnishiH. Rapid change in Japanese medical education. Med Teach2004;26:4038.10.1080/01421590412331270492Search in Google Scholar

2. MurrayC. Why is Japanese life expectancy so high?The Lancet2011;378:11245.10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61221-XSearch in Google Scholar

3. PeregoyJ, ClarkeT, JonesL, StussmanB, NahinR. Regional variation in use of complementary health approaches by U.S. adults. NCHS Data Brief2014;146:18.Search in Google Scholar

4. AdamsD, SchiffgenM, KunduA, DagenaisS, CliffordT, BaydalaL, et al. Patterns of utilization of complementary and alternative medicine in two pediatric gastroenterology clinics. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr2014. Epub ahead of print.Search in Google Scholar

5. HyodoI. Complementary and alternative medicine in cancer treatment. Jpn J Complement Altern Med2004;1:715.Search in Google Scholar

6. AstinJA. Why patients use alternative medicine: results of a national study. JAMA1998;279:154853.10.1001/jama.279.19.1548Search in Google Scholar

7. EisenbergDM, DavisRB, EttnerSL, AppelS, WilkeyS, Van RompayM, et al. Trends in alternative medicine use in the united states, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA1998;280:156975.10.1001/jama.280.18.1569Search in Google Scholar

8. EisenbergDM, KesslerRC, FosterC, NorlockFE, CalkinsDR, DelbancoTL. Unconventional medicine in the United States. Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use. N Engl J Med1993;328:24652.10.1056/NEJM199301283280406Search in Google Scholar

9. TasakiK, MaskarinecG, ShumayDM, TatsumuraY, KakaiH. Communication between physicians and cancer patients about complementary and alternative medicine: exploring patients’ perspectives. Psychooncology2002;11:21220.10.1002/pon.552Search in Google Scholar

10. FlahertyJH, TakahashiR, TeohJ, KimJI, HabibS, ItoM, et al. Use of alternative therapies in older outpatients in the united states and Japan: prevalence, reporting patterns, and perceived effectiveness. J Gerontol Biol Sci Med Sci2001;56:M6505.10.1093/gerona/56.10.M650Search in Google Scholar

11. ErnstE, WhiteA. The BBC survey of complementary medicine use in the UK. Complement Ther Med2000;8:326.10.1016/S0965-2299(00)90833-1Search in Google Scholar

12. YamashitaH, TsukayamaH, SugishitaC. Popularity of complementary and alternative medicine in Japan: A telephone survey. Complement Ther Med2002;10:8493.10.1054/ctim.2002.0519Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. SpencerJW. Essential issues in complementary and alternative medicine. In: SpencerJW, JacobsJJ, editors. Complementary and alternative medicine: an evidence-based approach, 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 2003:239.Search in Google Scholar

14. BrodyJE, GD. The New York Times guide to alternative health: a consumer reference. New York: Times Books, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

15. WadaT. Students recognize alternative medicine more rather than a doctor. Tokyo Jikeikai Med J2000;115:628.Search in Google Scholar

16. WatanabeS, ImanishiJ, SatohM, OzasaK. Unique place of Kampo (Japanese traditional medicine) in complementary and alternative medicine: A survey of doctors belonging to the regional medical association in Japan. Tohoku J Exp Med2001;194:5563.10.1620/tjem.194.55Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. YaegashiH. A survey regarding attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine among hospital staffs. Jpn J Complement Altern Med2004:86.Search in Google Scholar

18. ImanishiJ, WatanabeS, SatohM, OzasaK. Japanese doctors’ attitudes to complementary medicine. Lancet1999;354:17356.10.1016/S0140-6736(05)76729-5Search in Google Scholar

19. FisherP, WardA. Complementary medicine in Europe. BMJ1994;309:10711.10.1136/bmj.309.6947.107Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. World Health Organization. Legal status of traditional medicine and complementary/alternative medicine: a worldwide review. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

21. World Health Organization. WHO traditional medicine strategy 2002–2005. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

22. IshikawaT, AyadaJ. Drug-induced liver injury. J Ther2007;89:3198203.Search in Google Scholar

23. KonnoT, UmedaY, UmedaM, et al. A case of inflammatory myopathy with widely skin rash following use of supplements containing Spirulina. Rinsho Shinkeigaku2011;51:3303.10.5692/clinicalneurol.51.330Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2014-1-23
Accepted: 2014-9-14
Published Online: 2014-10-21
Published in Print: 2015-3-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 17.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jcim-2014-0003/html
Scroll to top button