The effects of the “physical BEMER® vascular therapy”, a method for the physical stimulation of the vasomotion of precapillary microvessels in case of impaired microcirculation, on sleep, pain and quality of life of patients with different clinical pictures on the basis of three scientifically validated scales
Abstract
As part of the statutory market monitoring of certified medical devices, 658 valid patient questionnaires were evaluated between April 2011 and March 2013. The questions consisted mainly of three scientifically recognized scales for assessing the changes of sleep, pain and quality of life in patients who had used the “physical BEMER® vascular therapy” for different diseases over 6 weeks. The result clearly shows that there are significant improvements in all areas surveyed through the application of this complementary treatment option, regardless of the underlying disease.
References
1. Klopp R. Mikrozirkulation im Focus der Forschung. ISBN 978-3-033-01464-0, 2008.Search in Google Scholar
2. Schmidt RF, Lang F, Thews G (eds.) Physiologie des Menschen. Springer Heidelberg, 29th ed.ff 2005.10.1007/b137547Search in Google Scholar
3. Tuma RF, Duran WN, Ley K (eds.). Handbook of physiology. microcirculation. Amsterdam, Boston, Heidelberg, London, New York, Oxford, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Elsevier. 2008.Search in Google Scholar
4. Basset, CAL. Fundamental and practical aspects of uses of pulsed electromagnetic fields. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1989;17:451–529.Search in Google Scholar
5. Basset, CAL. Beneficial effects of electromagnetic fields. J Cell Bio-Chem 1993;51/4:387–93.10.1002/jcb.2400510402Search in Google Scholar PubMed
6. Bohn W, Kafka WA. Energie und Gesundheit. BEMER 3000, 2004. ISBN 3-8304-7199-8.Search in Google Scholar
7. Nakagawa K. M Isuzu Hospital Tokyo; Magnetic Field Deficiency Syndrome. Jap Med J 1976; 2745.Search in Google Scholar
8. Carpenter DO, Aryapetyan S. Biological effects of electric and magnetic fields: sources and mechanism Vol 1; Beneficial and harmful effects Vol 2. Academic Press, 1994. ISBN 012160262.Search in Google Scholar
9. Polk C, Postow E. Handbook of biological effects of electromagnetical fields. CRC Press, 1996. ISBN 0849306418.Search in Google Scholar
10. Piatkowski J, Kern S, Ziemssen T. Effect of BEMER magnetic field therapy on the level of fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis – a randomized, double blind controlled trial. J Altern Complem Med 2009;15:1–5.10.1089/acm.2008.0501Search in Google Scholar PubMed
11. Szilagyi I. Erfahrungen durch Behandlung mit Bio-Elektro-Magnetischer Energie-Regulation (BEMER) bei Patienten mit subjektivem Tinnitus. Fül-, Orr-, Gegegyaszat 2010;56.Search in Google Scholar
12. Ziemssen T, Piatkowski J, Haase R. Long-term effects of Bio-electromagnetic-energy regulation therapy on fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis. Altern Ther Health Med 2011;17:22–8.Search in Google Scholar
13. Rihova B. Synergistic effect of EMF-BEMER-type pulsed weak electromagnetic field and HPMA-bound doxorubicin on mouse EL4 T-cell lymphoma. J Drug Target 2011;19:890–9.10.3109/1061186X.2011.622403Search in Google Scholar PubMed
14. Baldi E, Baldi C, Lithgow BJ. A pilot investigation of the effect of extremely low frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields on humans heart rate variability. Bioelectromagnetics 2007;28:64–8.10.1002/bem.20268Search in Google Scholar PubMed
15. Selvam R, Ganesan K, Narayana Raju KV, Gangadharan AC, Manohar BM, Puvanakrishnan R. Low frequency and low intensity pulsed elektromagnetic field exerts its antiinflammtory effect through restoration of plasma membrane calcium ATPase activity. Life Sci 2007;80:2403–10.10.1016/j.lfs.2007.03.019Search in Google Scholar PubMed
16. Zorzi C, Dall`Oca C, Cadossi R, Setti S. Effects of pulsed magnetic fields on patients recovery after arthroscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized and double-blind study. Offic J ESSKA 2007;15:830–4.Search in Google Scholar
17. Athanasiou A, Karkambounas S, Batistatou A, Lykoudis E, Katsaraki A, Kartsiouni T, et al. The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on secundary skin wound healing: an experimental study. Bioelectromagnetics 2007;28:362–8.10.1002/bem.20303Search in Google Scholar PubMed
18. Li JK, Lin JC, Liu HC, Chang WH. Cytokine release from osteoblasts in response to different intensities of pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation. J Electromagnet Biol Med 2007;26:153–65.10.1080/15368370701572837Search in Google Scholar PubMed
19. Markow MS. Expanding use of pulsed magnetic field therapies. J Electromagnet Biol Med 2007;26:257–74.10.1080/15368370701580806Search in Google Scholar PubMed
20. Tsai MT, Chang WH, Chand K, Hou RJ, Wu TW. Pulsed electromagnetic fields affect osteoblast proliferation and differentiation in bone tissue engineering. Bioelectromegnetics 2007;28:519–28.10.1002/bem.20336Search in Google Scholar PubMed
21. Grote V, Lackner H, Kelz C, Trapp M, Aichinger F, Puff H, et al. Short-term effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields after physical exercise are dependent on autonomic tone before exposure. Eur J Appl Physiol 2007;101:495–502.10.1007/s00421-007-0520-xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
22. Thomas AW, Graham K, Prato FS, McKay J, Forster M, Moulin DE, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial using a low-frequency magnetic field in treatment of musculoskeletal chronic pain. Pain Res Manag 2007;12:249–58.10.1155/2007/626072Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
23. Callaghan MJ, Chang EI, Seiser N, Aarabi S, Ghali S, Kinnucan ER, et al. Pulsede electromagnetic fields accelerate normal and diabetic wound healing by increasing endogenous FGF-2 release. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:130–41.10.1097/01.prs.0000293761.27219.84Search in Google Scholar PubMed
24. Bachl N, Ruoff G, Wessner B, Tschan H. Electromagnetic interventions in musucloskeletal disorders. J Clin Spor Med 2008;27:87–105.10.1016/j.csm.2007.10.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed
25. Ishida M, Fujioka M, Takahashi KA, Arai Y, Kubo T. Electromagnetic fields: a novel prophylaxis for steroid induced osteonecrosis. J Clin Orthop Rel Res 2008;466:1068–73.10.1007/s11999-008-0182-ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
26. Fitzsimmons RJ, Gordon SL, Kronberg J, Ganey T, Pilla AA, et al. A pulsing electric field increases human chondrocyte proliferation through a transduction pathway involving nitric oxide signaling. J Orthop Res 2008;26:854–9.10.1002/jor.20590Search in Google Scholar PubMed
27. Monache SD, Alessandro R, Iorio R, Gualtieri G, Colonna R. Extremly low frequency pulsed electromagnetic diels (ELF-EMFs) induce in vitro angiogenesis process in human endothelial cells. Bioelectromagnetics 2008;29:640–8.10.1002/bem.20430Search in Google Scholar PubMed
28. Foley KT, Mroz TE, Arnold PM, Chandler HC Jr, Dixon RA, Girasole GJ, et al. Randomized, prospective and controlled clinical trial of pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation for cervical fusion. Spine J 2008;8:436–42.10.1016/j.spinee.2007.06.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed
29. Benazzo F, Zanon G, Pederzini L, Modonesi F, Cardile C, Falez F, et al. Effects of biophysical stimulation in patients undergoing arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: a prospective, randomized and double-blind study. Off J ESSKA 2008;16:595–601.10.1007/s00167-008-0519-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
30. Vianale G, Reale M, Amerio P, Stefanachi M, Di Luzio S, Muraro R. Extremly low frequency electromagnetic field enhances human keratinocyte cell growth and decreases proinflammatory chemokine production. Br J Dermatol 2008;158:1189–96.10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08540.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
31. Köbbert C, Berndt A, Bierbaum T, Sontag W, Breithardt G, Weissen-Plenz G, et al. Low-energy electromagnetic fields promote proliferation of vasculare smooth muscle cells. J Electromagnet Biol Med 2008;27:41–53.10.1080/15368370701878929Search in Google Scholar PubMed
32. Blank M. Protein and DANN reactions stimulated by electromagnetic fields. J Electromagnet Biol Med 2008;27:3–23.10.1080/15368370701878820Search in Google Scholar PubMed
33. Kaszuba-Zwoinska J, Ciecko-Michalska I, Madroskiewicz D, Mach T, Slodowska-Hajduk Z, Rokita E, et al. Magnetic field inflammatory effects on Crohns disease depends upon viability and cytokine profile oft he immine competent cells. J Phys Pharm 2008;59:177–87.Search in Google Scholar
34. Heden P, Pilla AA. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on postoperative pain: a double-blind, randomized pilot study in breast augmentation patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008;32:660–6.10.1007/s00266-008-9169-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
35. Schwartz Z, Simon BJ, Duran MA, Barabino G, Chaudhri R, Boyan BD. Pulsed electromagnetic fields enhance BMP-2 dependent osteoblastic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. J Orthop Res 2008;26:1250–5.10.1002/jor.20591Search in Google Scholar PubMed
36. Huang LQ, He HC, He CQ, Chen J, Yang L. Clinical update of pulsed electromagnetic fields on osteoporosis. Chin Med J 2008;121:2095–9.10.1097/00029330-200810020-00028Search in Google Scholar
37. Weintraub MI, Cole SP. A randomized controlled trial of the effects of a combination of static and dynamic magnetic fields of carpal tunnel syndrome. Pain Med 2008;9:493–504.10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00324.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
38. Perez FP, Zhou X, Morisaki J, Ilie J, James T, Jurivich DA. Engineered repeated electromagnetic field shock therapy for cellular senescence and age-related dideases. Rejuv Res 2009;11:1049–57.10.1089/rej.2008.0793Search in Google Scholar PubMed
39. Van Bergen CJ, Blankevoort L, De Haan RJ, Sierevelt IN, Meuffeis DE, d’Hooghe PR, et al. Pulsed electromagnetic fields after arthroscopic treatment for asteochondral defects of the talus: Double blind randomized controlled multicenter trial. BMC Musculoskelt Disord 2009;10:83.10.1186/1471-2474-10-83Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
40. Dallari D, Fini M, Giavaresi G, Del Piccolo N, Stagni C, Amendola L, et al. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic stimulation on patients undergoing hip revision prostheses: a randomized prospective double-blind study. Bioelectromagnetics 2009;30:423–30.10.1002/bem.20492Search in Google Scholar PubMed
41. Sutbeyaz ST, Sezer N, Koseoglu F. Low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in fibromyalgia: a randomized, double blind, sham-controlled clinical study. Clin J Pain 2009;25:722–8.10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181a68a6cSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
42. Ganesan K, Gengadharan AC, Balachandran C, Manohar BM, Puvanakrishnan R. Low frequency pulsed electromagnetic field: a viable alternative therapy for arthritis. Indian J Exp Biol 2009;47:939–48.Search in Google Scholar
43. Nelson FR, Zvirbulis R, Pilla AA. Non-invasive electromagnetic field therapy produces rapid and substantial pain reduction in early knee osteoarthritis: a randomized double-blind pilot study. Rheumatol Int 2012. (Epub ahead of print) PMID: 22451021.10.1016/j.joca.2012.02.265Search in Google Scholar
44. Lodish H, Baltimore D, Berk A, Zipursky SL, Matsudaira P, Darnell J. Molekulare Zellbiologie. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter, 2nd ed. ff 1996.Search in Google Scholar
45. Schartel M, Gessler M, Von Eckardstein A. Biochemie und Molekularbiologie des Menschen. Urban & Fischer München, 2009.Search in Google Scholar
46. Klopp R (K. Rainer). Komplementärtherapeutische Effekte bestimmter elektromagnetischer Wechselfelder auf die lokalen Regulationsmechanismen der Mikrozirkulation. Abstracts/Eur J Integrative Med 2009;1:186–7.Search in Google Scholar
47. Hartung J, Elpelt B, Klösener KH. Lehr- und Handbuch der angewandten Statistik. München, Vienna and Oldenbourg, 2009.10.1524/9783486710540Search in Google Scholar
©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Masthead
- Masthead
- Editorial
- The technological development history and current significance of the “physical BEMER® vascular therapy” in medicine
- Research articles
- The effects of the “physical BEMER® vascular therapy”, a method for the physical stimulation of the vasomotion of precapillary microvessels in case of impaired microcirculation, on sleep, pain and quality of life of patients with different clinical pictures on the basis of three scientifically validated scales
- Effects of physical stimulation of spontaneous arteriolar vasomotion in patients of various ages undergoing rehabilitation
- Influence of a specific, biorhythmically defined physical stimulus on deficient vasomotion in small-caliber arterioles in the subcutis in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy
- Complementary-therapeutic stimulation of deficient autorhythmic arteriolar vasomotion by means of a biorhythmically physical stimulus on the microcirculation and the immune system in 50-year-old rehabilitation patients
- Effects of various physical treatment methods on arteriolar vasomotion and microhemodynamic functional characteristics in case of deficient regulation of organ blood flow. Results of a placebo-controlled, double-blind study
Articles in the same Issue
- Masthead
- Masthead
- Editorial
- The technological development history and current significance of the “physical BEMER® vascular therapy” in medicine
- Research articles
- The effects of the “physical BEMER® vascular therapy”, a method for the physical stimulation of the vasomotion of precapillary microvessels in case of impaired microcirculation, on sleep, pain and quality of life of patients with different clinical pictures on the basis of three scientifically validated scales
- Effects of physical stimulation of spontaneous arteriolar vasomotion in patients of various ages undergoing rehabilitation
- Influence of a specific, biorhythmically defined physical stimulus on deficient vasomotion in small-caliber arterioles in the subcutis in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy
- Complementary-therapeutic stimulation of deficient autorhythmic arteriolar vasomotion by means of a biorhythmically physical stimulus on the microcirculation and the immune system in 50-year-old rehabilitation patients
- Effects of various physical treatment methods on arteriolar vasomotion and microhemodynamic functional characteristics in case of deficient regulation of organ blood flow. Results of a placebo-controlled, double-blind study