Home Performing Resilience: Anchorage and Leverage in Live Action Role-Play Drama
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Performing Resilience: Anchorage and Leverage in Live Action Role-Play Drama

  • Jamie Harper

    is a UK-based theatre director, performance researcher, and game designer. He trained on the Directors’ Course at LAMDA and went on to win the JMK Directors’ Award, the National Theatre Cohen Bursary, and a Churchill Trust Fellowship to research the merger of drama and game design at the University of Miami. He has designed live action role-play works for a range of arts organisations including Serpentine Galleries, Camden People’s Theatre, and the Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art. As an active member of the Nordic larp community, he has presented works at festivals including Grenselandet in Oslo, Blackbox Cph in Copenhagen, and Minsk Larp Festival. He recently completed a practice-led PhD in participatory performance at Newcastle University and currently works as Lecturer in Drama at University of Plymouth.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 14, 2022

Abstract

The concept of resilience is frequently described within neoliberal discourses as the ability of individuals to bounce back from shocks and reflexively adapt to changing circumstances. In ecological sciences, however, resilience is more commonly understood as the capacity of systems to radically transform themselves, when their usual mode of operation is challenged, rather than simply reverting to their original state. This article considers how live action role-play, as a form of participatory performance, might support ecological resilience by enabling players to actively reflect on their cultural practices in constructing the systems of their play and develop new capacities in the process through intersubjective exchanges with diverse others.The notion of performing resilience is concretised through discussion of artistic research residencies at Trumpington Community Orchard in Cambridge in 2017 and the Peartree Bridge estate in Milton Keynes in 2018. These projects explored how encounters with unfamiliar spaces and beings might enable participants to play with their resilient changeability. Specifically, the article addresses the value of spatial reflexivity in building resilience, proposing spatial defamiliarization as an aesthetic strategy for transcending the immediate familiarity of habitual practices, expanding participants’ horizons of perception and imagination. These arguments yield a theoretical model for cultivating resilience through participatory performance termed anchorage-leverage. This model suggests that habit can provide the foundation for potential transformations of cultural practices as existing capacities are reconfigured by new relational connections, conferring new affordances that enable participants to radically reconfigure the ecologies in which they play and live.

About the author

Jamie Harper

is a UK-based theatre director, performance researcher, and game designer. He trained on the Directors’ Course at LAMDA and went on to win the JMK Directors’ Award, the National Theatre Cohen Bursary, and a Churchill Trust Fellowship to research the merger of drama and game design at the University of Miami. He has designed live action role-play works for a range of arts organisations including Serpentine Galleries, Camden People’s Theatre, and the Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art. As an active member of the Nordic larp community, he has presented works at festivals including Grenselandet in Oslo, Blackbox Cph in Copenhagen, and Minsk Larp Festival. He recently completed a practice-led PhD in participatory performance at Newcastle University and currently works as Lecturer in Drama at University of Plymouth.

Works Cited

Adams, Matthew. “Hybridizing Habitus and Reflexivity: Towards an Understanding of Contemporary Identity?” Sociology 40.3 (2006): 511–528. Web. 18 Dec. 2021. <https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/003803850663672>.10.1177/003803850663672Search in Google Scholar

Akram, Sadiya, and Anthony Hogan. “On Reflexivity and the Conduct of the Self in Everyday Life: Reflections on Bourdieu and Archer.” British Journal of Sociology 66.4 (2015): 605–625. Web. 15 Jan. 2022. <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468–4446.12150>.10.1111/1468-4446.12150Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. The Logic of Practice. Trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge: Polity, 1990. Print.10.1515/9781503621749Search in Google Scholar

—. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Trans. Richard Nice. Abingdon: Routledge Classics, 2010. Print.Search in Google Scholar

Burkitt, Ian. “Emotional Reflexivity: Feeling, Emotion and Imagination in Reflexive Dialogues.” Sociology 46.3 (2012): 458–472. Web. 18 Dec. 2021. <https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0038038511422587>.10.1177/0038038511422587Search in Google Scholar

—. “Relational Agency: Relational Sociology, Agency and Interaction.” European Journal of Social Theory 19.3 (2015): 322–339. Web. 18 Dec. 2021. <https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1368431015591426>.10.1177/1368431015591426Search in Google Scholar

Cerys. Personal interview. 23 Sept. 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Crossley, Nick. “The Phenomenological Habitus and Its Construction.” Theory and Society 30.1 (2001): 81–120. Web. 18 Dec. 2021. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/658063>.10.1023/A:1011070710987Search in Google Scholar

Damasio, Antonio. Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow and the Feeling Brain. London: Vintage Books, 2004. Print.Search in Google Scholar

Folke, Carl. “Resilience: The Emergence of a Perspective for Social-Ecological Systems Analyses.” Global Environmental Change 16.3 (2006): 253–267. Web. 18 Dec. 2021. <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378006000379?via%3Dihub>.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002Search in Google Scholar

Freshwater, Helen. Theatre & Audience. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. Print.10.1007/978-0-230-36460-8Search in Google Scholar

James. Personal interview. 13 June 2018.Search in Google Scholar

—. Personal interview. 20 June 2018.Search in Google Scholar

—. Personal interview. 30 Aug. 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Joseph, Jonathan. “Resilience as Embedded Neoliberalism: A Governmentality Approach.” International Policies, Practices and Discourses 1.1 (2013): 38–52. Web. 18 Dec. 2021. <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21693293.2013.765741>.10.1080/21693293.2013.765741Search in Google Scholar

Lampo, Marjukka. “Ecological Approach to the Performance of Larping.” International Journal of Role-Playing 5 (2015): 35–46. Web. 18 Dec. 2021. <http://ijrp.subcultures.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/IJRP-5-Lampo.pdf>.10.33063/ijrp.vi5.235Search in Google Scholar

Lottie. Personal interview. 30 Aug. 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Lysbeth. Personal interview. 4 July 2018.Search in Google Scholar

—. Personal interview. 18 July 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Maton, Karl. “Habitus.” Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts. Ed. Michael Grenfell. Stocksfield: Acumen, 2008. 49–65. Print.10.1017/UPO9781844654031.006Search in Google Scholar

Noble, Greg, and Megan Watkins. “So, How Did Bourdieu Learn to Play Tennis? Habitus, Consciousness and Habituation.” Cultural Studies 17.3–4 (2003): 520–539. Web. 18 Dec. 2021. <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0950238032000083926>.10.1080/0950238032000083926Search in Google Scholar

Postill, John. “Fields: Dynamic Configurations of Practices, Games and Socialities.” Thinking through Sociality: An Anthropological Interrogation of Key Concepts. Ed. Vered Amit. New York: Berghahn Books, 2015. 47–68. Print.10.1515/9781782385868-004Search in Google Scholar

Sharp, Hasana. Spinoza and the Politics of Renaturalization. Chicago: U of Illinois P, 2011. Print.10.7208/chicago/9780226750750.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Spinoza, Baruch. Ethics: Proved in Geometrical Order. Ed. G. H. R. Parkinson. Trans. Andrew Boyle and G. H. R. Parkinson. London: Everyman Classics, 1992. Print.Search in Google Scholar

Stenros, Jaakko. “Nordic Larp: Theatre, Art and Game.” Nordic Larp. Ed. Markus Montola and Jaakko Stenros. Stockholm: Fëa Livia, 2010. 300–315. Web. 18 Dec. 2021. <https://trepo.tuni.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/95123/nordic_larp_2010.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y>.Search in Google Scholar

Susan. Personal interview. 23 July 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Sutton-Smith, Brian. The Ambiguity of Play. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1997. Print.Search in Google Scholar

Thrift, Nigel. “Intensities of Feeling: Towards a Spatial Politics of Affect.” Geografiska Analer: Human Geography 86.1 (2004): 57–78. Web. 18 Dec. 2021. <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.0435–3684.2004.00154.x>.10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00154.xSearch in Google Scholar

Turner, Nancy J., Iain J. Davidson-Hunt, and Michael O’Flaherty. “Living on the Edge: Ecological and Cultural Edges as Sources of Diversity for Social-Ecological Resilience.” Human Ecology 31 (2003): 439–461. Web. 18 Dec. 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025023906459>.10.1023/A:1025023906459Search in Google Scholar

White, Gareth. Audience Participation in Theatre: Aesthetics of the Invitation. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. Print.10.1057/9781137010742_5Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Yang. “Bourdieu, Practice and Change: Beyond the Criticism of Determinism.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 46.14 (2014): 1522–1540. Web. 18 Dec. 2021. <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00131857.2013.839375>.10.1080/00131857.2013.839375Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-05-14
Published in Print: 2022-05-12

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Frontmatter
  3. Preliminary Note
  4. Co-Mutability, Nodes, and the Mesh: Critical Theatre Ecologies – An Introduction
  5. Writing in the Green: Imperatives towards an Eco-n-temporary Theatre Canon
  6. Bec(h)oming with Simon Whitehead: Practising a Logic of Sensation
  7. An Art Like Nature: Theatre Environment as Territory in Tim Spooner Performances
  8. Performing Resilience: Anchorage and Leverage in Live Action Role-Play Drama
  9. Encounters in the Chthulucene: Simon McBurney’s Theatre of Compost
  10. To Be Like Water: Material Dramaturgies in Posthumanist Performance
  11. “A Missile to the Future”: The Theatre Ecologies of Caryl Churchill’s Far Away on Spike Island
  12. Symptomatic Spaces: Adam Rapp and American Eco-Drama in the Anthropocene
  13. Kinship and Community in Climate-Change Theatre: Ecodramaturgy in Practice
  14. Eco-Drama, Multinational Corporations, and Climate Change in Nigeria
  15. Playing the Petrocene: Toxicity and Intoxication in Leigh Fondakowski’s Spill and Ella Hickson’s Oil
  16. An Ecology of Plants: The Post-Manufacturing Age in Philip Ridley’s Shivered and David Eldridge’s In Basildon
  17. Alienation, Abjection, and Disgust: Encountering the Capitalocene in Contemporary Eco-Drama
  18. Elaine Aston. Restaging Feminisms. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020, viii + 132 pp., £44.99 (hardback), £44.99 (paperback), £35.99 (PDF/EPUB ebook).
  19. Maria Chatzichristodoulou, ed. Live Art in the UK: Contemporary Performances of Precarity. London: Methuen Drama, 2020, x + 212 pp., £65 (hardback), £19.79 (paperback), £15.83 (PDF ebook).
  20. Yana Meerzon, David Dean, and Daniel McNeil, ed. Migration and Stereotypes in Performance and Culture. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020, xvi + 298 pp., €124.99 (hardback), €85.59 (PDF ebook).
  21. Mark Brown. Modernism and Scottish Theatre since 1969: A Revolution on Stage. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, xvii + 254 pp., € 80.24 (hardback), € 24.99 (softcover).
Downloaded on 18.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jcde-2022-0006/html
Scroll to top button