What is Qohelet’s Problem?
-
Brennan W. Breed
and
Davis Hankins
Abstract
This essay distinguishes various interpretations of Ecclesiastes using heuristic categories that effectively map their divergent readings on the basis of how they primarily construe the central problem posed by the book. We suggest that there are roughly five broad conceptual models used by readers to answer the question, “What is Qohelet’s problem?” namely: as an epistemological, theological/ethical, political/economic, existential, and/or ontological issue. This article provides examples of each approach from both recent scholarship and the history of reception, showing that each brings certain aspects of the text to light, even as they keep other parts of the book in the dark. While we therefore recognize the value of each approach to Ecclesiastes, we especially advocate for the ontological perspective because we find that it is often overlooked or underappreciated in contemporary scholarship and because we think that it is central to a full understanding of Ecclesiastes’ teachings. This perspective sees Qohelet’s key term הבל (hebel) as pointing to a fundamental instability or incoherence in the nature of reality itself. We support our advocacy for this approach through readings of key texts, an exploration of relevant themes in Ecclesiastes, and engagement with various receptions of the book in literature, art, music, and film. The aims of this article, therefore, are to provide a conceptual map of the interpretation and reception of Ecclesiastes. We also advocate for the need to understand the book as a response to various problems including ontological contradictions, which may not be prevalent among contemporary interpretations but nonetheless have precedents in the book’s reception history.
References
Atkinson, Tyler. 2015. Singing at the Winepress: Ecclesiastes and The Ethics of Work. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar
Balentine, Samuel. 2021. “Galileo Reading Qohelet: Seeing the World with ‘Curiosity’s Eye.’” Biblical Interpretation 29: 332–57. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685152-00284p24.Search in Google Scholar
Bicksler, William H. 2005. Commentary on Ecclesiastes: The Believing Skeptic with a Message. Maitland, FL: Xulon.Search in Google Scholar
Blum, Paul Richard. 2012. Studies on Early Modern Aristotelianism. Leiden: E.J. Brill.10.1163/9789004232198Search in Google Scholar
Bolin, Thomas M. 2017. Ecclesiastes and the Riddle of Authorship. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315647302Search in Google Scholar
Bonaventure. 2005. Commentary on Ecclesiastes. Ed. and trans. Campion Murray, and Robert J. Karris. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Borges, Jorge Luis. 1999. Obra Poética, 22nd ed. Buenos Aires: Emecé.Search in Google Scholar
Breed, Brennan W. 2014. Nomadic Text: A Theory of Biblical Reception History. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.10.2979/7022.0Search in Google Scholar
Brettler, Marc Z. 1991. “The Structure of 1 Kings 1–11.” Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 49: 91–3.10.1177/030908929101604905Search in Google Scholar
Brown, William P. 2014. Wisdom’s Wonder: Character, Creation, and Crisis in the Bible’s Wisdom Literature. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, Carleton, and R. H. Robbins, eds. 1943. The Index of Middle English Verse. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bundvad, Mette. 2015. Time in the Book of Ecclesiastes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739708.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Burke, Jill, and Michael Bury. 2008. Art and Identity in Early Modern Rome. Abingdon: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar
Christianson, Eric S. 2007. Ecclesiastes Through the Centuries. Oxford: Blackwell: BBC.10.1002/9780470755631Search in Google Scholar
Craig, Kevin. 2013. “Meet a Professor Coming to a Screen Near You.” UCF Today, August 30. https://www.ucf.edu/news/meet-a-professor-coming-to-a-screen-near-you/ (accessed February 2, 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Crenshaw, James. 1978. “The Shadow of Death in Qoheleth.” In Israelite Wisdom: Theological and Literary Essays in Honor of Samuel Terrien, edited by John G. Gammie, 205–16. New York: Union Theological Seminary.Search in Google Scholar
de Balzac, Honore. 1900 [1837]. Muse of the Department and Les Employés, trans. James Waring. Philadelphia: Gebbie Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Donnell, Courtney Graham, Ivan Albright, Susan Weininger, and Robert Cozzolino. 1997. Ivan Albright. Chicago: Art Institute of Chicago.Search in Google Scholar
Enns, Peter. 2011. Ecclesiastes. THOT. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.10.5040/bci-008cSearch in Google Scholar
Finocchiaro, M. A., eds. 2008. The Essential Galileo. Indianapolis, Cambridge: Hacket Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Fisch, Menachem. 1995. “Ecclesiastes (Qohelet) in Context–A Study of Wisdom as Constructive Skepticism.” In Critical Rationalism: Essays for Joseph Agaassi. Vol. 2: The Social Sciences and the Humanities, edited by I. C. Jarvie, and N. Laor, 167–85. BSPS 162. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-017-0441-0_10Search in Google Scholar
Fox, Michael V. 1986. “The Meaning of Hebel for Qohelet.” Journal of Biblical Literature 105: 409–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/3260510.Search in Google Scholar
Fox, Michael V. 1999. A Time to Tear Down and a Time to Build Up: A Rereading of Ecclesiastes. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Search in Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo. 1957. Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo, trans. Stillman Drake. New York: Anchor Books.Search in Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo. 1967 [1953]. Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems – Ptolemaic and Copernican, trans. Stillman Drake, 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520342941Search in Google Scholar
Gammie, John G. 1974. “Spatial and Ethical Dualism in Jewish Wisdom and Apocalyptic Literature.” Journal of Biblical Literature 93: 356–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/3263385.Search in Google Scholar
Gan, Vicky. 2013. “Snack on This: One Curator Has Devoted a Whole Show to Pizza Art.” Smithsonian Magazine. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/snack-on-this-one-curator-has-devoted-a-whole-show-to-pizza-art-306691/ (accessed August 11, 2025).Search in Google Scholar
Gilliam, Terry, dir. 2013. The Zero Theorem. Written by Pat Rushin. Voltage Pictures.Search in Google Scholar
Ginsburg, C. D. 1861/1970. Coheleth (Commonly Called the Book of Ecclesiastes). London: Longman; repr. New York: KTAV.Search in Google Scholar
Goh, Samuel T. S. 2020. “The Hebel World, Its Ambiguities and Contradictions.” Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 45: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309089220903333.Search in Google Scholar
Green, Rosalie, Michael Evans, Christine Bischoff, and Michael Curschmann, eds. 1979. The Hortus Deliciarum of Herrad of Hohenbourg (Landsberg, 1176-96): A Reconstruction. Leiden: E.J. Brill.10.1163/9789004544499_002Search in Google Scholar
Gregory the Great. 1959. Dialogues, trans. O. J. Zimmerman. FOTC 39. New York: Fathers of the Church.Search in Google Scholar
Griffiths, Fiona J. 2011. The Garden of Delights: Reform and Renaissance for Women in the Twelfth Century. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hallam, Elizabeth. 2016. The Anatomy Museum: Death and the Body Displayed. London: Reaktion.Search in Google Scholar
Hankins, Davis. 2015. “The Internal Infinite: Deleuze, Subjectivity, and Moral Agency in Ecclesiastes.” Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 40: 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309089215605792.Search in Google Scholar
Hankins, Davis, and Breed Brennan. 2024. “Holy, Wholly, Holey: Ecclesiastes 4:17–5:6 in Text and Tradition.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 86: 700–21.10.1353/cbq.2024.a940008Search in Google Scholar
Hawthorne, Nathaniel. 1901. The Marble Fawn: Or, the Romance of Monte Beni. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin and Company.Search in Google Scholar
Helgerson, Richard. 2001. “The Folly of Maps and Modernity.” In Literature, Mapping, and the Politics of Space in Early Modern Britain, edited by Andrew Gordon, and Bernhard Klein, 241–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
James, Regina. 2005. Losing Our Heads: Beheadings in Literature and Culture. New York: New York University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Jones, Scott C. 2014. “The Values and Limits of Qohelet’s Sub-Celestial Economy.” Vetus Testamentum 64: 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685330-12301147.Search in Google Scholar
Jurkowski, Henryk, and Penny Francis. 1996. A History of European Puppetry: From Its Origins to the End of the 19th Century. Lewiston, NY: Mellen Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kelly, Raymond J. 2006. To Be, Or Not To Be: Four Hundred Years of Vanitas Paintings. Flint, MI: Flint Institute of Arts.Search in Google Scholar
Knobel, Peter. 1991. Targum of Qohelet. The Aramaic Bible 15. Collegeville: Liturgical. Press.Search in Google Scholar
Koosed, Jennifer L. 2006. (Per)Mutations of Qohelet: Reading the Body in the Book. Old Testament Studies 429. London: T & T Clark.Search in Google Scholar
Koudounaris, Paul. 2011. The Empire of Death: A Cultural History of Ossuaries and Charnel Houses. London: Thames and Hudson.Search in Google Scholar
Lee, Eunny P. 2005. The Vitality of Enjoyment in Qohelet’s Theological Rhetoric. BZAW 353. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter10.1515/9783110923063Search in Google Scholar
Lieberman, Saul. 1967. “Notes on Chapter 1 of Midrash Qohelet Rabbah.” In Studies in Mysticism and Religion Presented to Gershom G. Scholem, edited by Efraim Elimelech Urbach, R. J. Zwi Werblowsky, and Chaim Wirszubski, 163–70. Jerusalem: Magnes Press.Search in Google Scholar
Longman, TremperIII. 1998. The Book of Ecclesiastes. NICOT. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Search in Google Scholar
Matsuda, Takami. 1997. Death and Purgatory in Middle English Didactic Poetry. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.Search in Google Scholar
McCormack, Catherine. 2019. The Art of Looking Up. London: White Lion.Search in Google Scholar
Meaume, Édouard. 1860. Recherches sur la vie et les ouvrages de Jacques Callot suite au Peintre-graveur français de M. Robert-Dumesnil, Vol. 1. Paris: V. J. Renouard.Search in Google Scholar
Meek, Russell. 2016. “Twentieth and Twenty-First Century Readings of Hebel (הבל) in Ecclesiastes.” Currents in Biblical Research 14: 279–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476993x15586039.Search in Google Scholar
Miller, Douglas B. 2002. Symbol and Rhetoric in Ecclesiastes: The Place of HEBEL in Qohelet’s Work. Atlanta: SBL.Search in Google Scholar
Parker, K. 1992. “Solomon as a Philosopher King? The Nexus of Law and Wisdom in 1 Kings 1-11.” Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 53: 83–6.10.1177/030908929201705305Search in Google Scholar
Perry, Theodore A. 1993. Dialogues with Kohelet: The Book of Ecclesiastes. Translation and Commentary. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Priest, John. 1968. “Humanism, Skepticism, and Pessimism in Israel.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 36: 324.10.1093/jaarel/XXXVI.4.311Search in Google Scholar
Quigley, Christine. 2001. Skulls and Skeletons: Human Bone Collections and Accumulations. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Search in Google Scholar
Ricasoli, Corinna. 2015/16. “Memento Mori in Baroque Rome.” Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review 104 (416): 456–67.Search in Google Scholar
Robinson, James T. 2007. Samuel Ibn Tibbon’s Commentary on Ecclesiastes: The Book of the Soul of Man. TSMEMJ 20. Tübingen: Mohr Seibeck.Search in Google Scholar
Rudman, Dominic. 1999. “A Note on the Dating of Ecclesiastes.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 61: 47–52.Search in Google Scholar
Samet, Nili. 2021. “Linguistic Dating of the Book of Qohelet: A New Angle.” Vetus Testamentum 71: 430–71. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685330-00001107.Search in Google Scholar
Scherer, Heinrich. 1710. Atlas novus exhibens orbem terra queum per naturae opera, historiae novae ac veteris monumenta, artisquae geographicae leges et praecepta. Munich: Johannis Caspari Bencard.Search in Google Scholar
Seow, Choon-Leong. 1996. “The Socioeconomic Context of The Preacher’s’ Hermeneutic.” Princeton Seminary Bulletin 17: 168–95.Search in Google Scholar
Seow, Choon-Leong. 1997. Ecclesiastes: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. New York: Doubleday. AB 18C.10.5040/9780300261295Search in Google Scholar
Shirley, Rodney W. 1983. The Mapping of the World: Early Printed World Maps, Vol. 1, 1472–700. London: Holland Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sneed, Mark. 2012. The Politics of Pessimism in Ecclesiastes: A Social-Science Perspective. Ancient Israel and Its Literature 12. Atlanta: SBL.10.2307/j.ctt32bzwzSearch in Google Scholar
Sorrentino, Fernando. 2010/1982. Seven Conversations with Jorge Luis Borges, trans. C. Zlotchew. Philadelphia: Paul Dry Books.Search in Google Scholar
Stanford, Peter. 2013. How to Read a Graveyard: Journeys in the Company of the Dead. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar
Takeuchi, Kumiko. 2019. Death and Divine Judgment in Ecclesiastes. University Park, PA: Eisenbrauns.Search in Google Scholar
Tamez, Elsa. 2000. When the Horizons Close: Rereading Ecclesiastes, trans. Margaret Wilde. Maryknoll, N.Y.: Orbis.Search in Google Scholar
Urban, Otto M. 2011. Joel-Peter Witkin: Vanitas. Prague: Arbor Vitae.Search in Google Scholar
Vaccari, Alberto. 1928. “Stultorum infinitus est numerus’ (Eccl. 1,15 Vulg.).” Verbum Domini 8: 81–4.Search in Google Scholar
Velez, Gonzalo Salvador. 2004. Borges, lector de Qohélet: Sobre la presencia del Eclesiastés en J. L. Borges a partir del análisis de su obra poética. Ph.D. Diss. Barcelona: Institut Universitari de Cultura, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Search in Google Scholar
Voltaire. 1901. Philosophical Dictionary, Vol. 4, ed. William Fleming. Paris: E. R. DuMont.Search in Google Scholar
Weeks, Stuart. 2012. Ecclesiastes and Scepticism. New York: T & T Clark.Search in Google Scholar
Weeks, Stuart. 2020. Ecclesiastes 1-5. ICC. London: T&T Clark.Search in Google Scholar
Weil, Tom. 1992. The Cemetery Book. New York: Hippocrene Books.Search in Google Scholar
Whitfield, Peter. 1994. The Image of the World. London: British Library.Search in Google Scholar
Whybray, R. N. 1998. “Qoheleth as a Theologian.” In Qohelet in the Context of Wisdom, edited by Antoon Schoors, 239–65. Leuven: Leuven University Press and Peeters. BETL 136.Search in Google Scholar
Wikin, Joel-Peter. 1985. Joel-Peter Witkin: Forty Photographs. San Francisco: San Francisco Museum of Art.Search in Google Scholar
Wolfe, Lisa Michele. 2020. Qoheleth (Ecclesiastes). Wisdom Commentary 24. Collegeville: Liturgical.Search in Google Scholar
Wright, G. Ernest. 2010. Martin Luther’s Understanding of God’s Two Kingdoms. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.Search in Google Scholar
Wright, J. Robert, ed. 2014. Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon. ACCSOT 9. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.Search in Google Scholar
Young, George. 1824. A Picture of Whitby and Its Environs. Whitby: R. RodgersSearch in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
