Home Enoch’s Green Apocalypse: The Source Material of Aronofsky’s Noah
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Enoch’s Green Apocalypse: The Source Material of Aronofsky’s Noah

  • Robby Waddell ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 4, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

A cataclysmic event, often spelling disaster for the environment, is an essential element to the backstory of any post-apocalyptic tale. In these stories, the presupposed ecological tragedy may have severely altered the environment, but it has not annihilated it. In fact, what has happened is that the apocalyptic catastrophe has neutralized the ecological threats that were the original catalysts for the devastation in the first place, resulting in an opportunity for the environment to rebound once its abusers have faced judgment. In other words, Earth may get beaten black-and-blue, yet the final effect is a green apocalypse—an event that rids Earth of its destructive inhabitants or at least counterbalances their negative effects, giving the global ecosystem a chance to renew. In this article I offer readings of two apocalyptic stories—1 Enoch and Darren Aronofsky’s Noah. My approach to these stories utilizes elements from a method of ecological hermeneutics that has been developed by Norman Habel and others from the Earth Bible team. The Noahic flood story is one of the earliest examples of a “green” apocalypse, in which the penultimate event may have been devastation on the planet, but the ultimate end was a renewal of Earth. It is my hope that these ecological readings with their attention to the concept of a green apocalypse may be useful in appreciating the possibility of eco-friendly interpretations of apocalyptic texts.


Corresponding author: Robby Waddell, School of Divinity, Southeastern University, 1000 Longfellow Blvd, Lakeland, FL, USA, E-mail:

References

Aronofsky, D., dir. 2014. Noah. Hollywood: Paramount Pictures. DVD.Search in Google Scholar

Bacon, F. 1857–8. The Works of Francis Bacon, edited by J. Spedding, R. Leslie Ellis, and D. Denon Heath. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Bauckham, R. 1994. “Jesus and the Wild Animals (Mark 1:13): A Christological Image for an Ecological Age.” In Jesus of Nazareth: Essays on the Historical Jesus and the New Testament Christology, edited by J. B. Green, and M. Turner, 3–21. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Search in Google Scholar

Bauckham, R. 2011. Living With Other Creatures: Green Exegesis and Theology. Waco: Baylor University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Birch, C. 1990. On Purpose. Kensington: University of New South Wales Press.Search in Google Scholar

Buber, M. 1970. I and Thou. trans. Walter Kaufmann. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Burnette-Bletsch, R., and J. Morgan, eds. 2017. Noah as Antihero: Darren Aronofsky’s Cinematic Deluge. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315180892Search in Google Scholar

Collin, R. 2014. “Darren Aronofsky Interview: ‘The Noah Story Is Scary’.” The Telegraph. April 7. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/10739539/Darren-Aronofsky-interview-The-Noah-story-is-scary.html (accessed August 9, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Collins, J. J. 1998. The Apocalyptic Imagination: An Introduction to Jewish Apocalyptic Literature. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Search in Google Scholar

De La Torre, M. A. 2011. Genesis. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.Search in Google Scholar

Emmerich, R., dir. 2004. The Day After Tomorrow. Los Angeles: 20th Century Fox. DVD.Search in Google Scholar

Emmerich, R., dir. 2009. 2012. Culver City: Columbia Pictures. DVD.Search in Google Scholar

Godawa, B. 2012. “Darren Aronofsky’s Noah: Environmentalist Wacko.” http://godawa.com/movieblog/darren-aronofskys-noah-environmentalist-wacko (accessed August 9, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Godawa, B. 2014. “The Noah Movie: Deconstructing Noah’s Arc: Godawful Storytelling.” The Christian Post. March 28. www.christianpost.com/news/noah-movie-review-deconstructing-noahs-arc-godawful-storytelling-117044 (accessed August 9, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Goodenough, U. 1998. The Sacred Depths of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195126136.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Habel, N. C. 2003. “The Origins and Challenges of an Ecojustice Hermeneutic.” In Relating to the Text: Interdisciplinary and Form-Critical Insights on the Bible, edited by T. Sandoval, and C. Mandolfo, 141–59. London: T & T Clark.Search in Google Scholar

Habel, N. C. 2008. “Introduction to Ecological Hermeneutics.” In Exploring Ecological Hermeneutics, edited by N. C. Habel, and P. Trudinger, 1–8. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Search in Google Scholar

Ham, K. 2014. “Ken Ham: The Unbiblical Noah Is a Fable of a Film.” Time. March 28. http://time.com/42274/ken-ham-the-unbiblical-noah-is-a-fable-of-a-film (accessed August 9, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Hill, W. 2014. “A Pauline Exegete Watches Aronofsky’s Noah.” First Things. March 31. www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2014/03/a-pauline-exegete-watches-aronofskys-noah (accessed August 9, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Isaac, E. 1983. “The Book of Enoch.” In The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, edited by J. Charlesworth, 13–89. Hendrickson: Peabody.Search in Google Scholar

Landa, G. 1919. Jewish Fairy Tales and Legends. New York: Bloch Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, E. L. 2014. “Darren Aronofsky’s Noah and Jewish Tradition.” Noah’s Flood. www.floodofnoah.com/#!noah-movie-jewish-tradition/c1yem (accessed October 1, 2014).Search in Google Scholar

McFague, S. 1997. Super, Natural Christians: How We Should Love Nature. Minneapolis: Fortress.Search in Google Scholar

Middleton, J. R. 2006. “A New Heaven and a New Earth: The Case for a Holistic Reading of the Biblical Story of Redemption.” Journal for Christian Theological Research 11: 73–97.Search in Google Scholar

Moltmann, J. 2003. Science and Wisdom. Minneapolis: Fortress.Search in Google Scholar

Moltmann, J. 2012. Ethics of Hope. trans. Margaret Kohl. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nicklesburg, G. W. E. 1977. “Apocalyptic and Myth in 1 Enoch 6–11.” Journal of Biblical Literature 96: 383–405.10.2307/3266192Search in Google Scholar

Northcott, M. S. 1996. The Environment and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511557477Search in Google Scholar

Recklis, K. 2014. “Noah as a Main Character.” Noah’s Flood. www.floodofnoah.com/#!noah-movie-main-character-/c3me (accessed October 1, 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Reid, D. 2000. “Setting Aside the Latter to Heaven: Revelation 21:1–22:5 From the Perspective of the Earth.” In Readings from the Perspective of Earth, edited by N. C. Habel, 232–45. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tongue, S. 2017. “‘It’s Not the End of the World’: Aronofsky’s Noah and IMAXed Apocalyptic Animals.” In Noah as Antihero: Darren Aronofsky’s Cinematic Deluge, edited by R. Burnette-Bletsch, and J. Morgan, 183–98. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315180892-12Search in Google Scholar

Tutu, D. 2001. “Foreword.” In The Earth Story in the New Testament, edited by N. C. Habel, and V. Balabanski, vii–viii. London: Sheffield Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Volf, M. 1990. “Loving With Hope: Eschatology and Social Responsibility.” Transformation 7: 28–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/026537889000700314.Search in Google Scholar

Waddell, R. 2014. “A Green Apocalypse: Comparing Secular and Religious Eschatological Visions of Earth.” In Blood Cries Out: Pentecostals, Ecology, and the Groans of Creation, edited by A. J. Swoboda, 133–51. Eugene: Pickwick.Search in Google Scholar

White, L. 1967. “The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis.” Science 155: 1203–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.155.3767.1203.Search in Google Scholar

Wright, N. T. 1999. The Challenge of Jesus. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wyse-Rhodes Jackie, A. 2014. “The Rock Giants and 1 Enoch’s Watchers in Aronofsky’s Noah.” Noah’s Flood. www.floodofnoah.com/#!noah-movie-rock-watchers/cicf (accessed September 30, 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-08-09
Accepted: 2023-07-31
Published Online: 2023-10-04
Published in Print: 2023-11-27

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 20.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jbr-2022-0011/html
Scroll to top button