Abstract
Exemplarity, ethnography, and exegesis are three forms of cultural practice well known to the ancient Mediterranean world. The use of role models, the ‘writing’ of peoples, and the interpretation of authoritative writings (i.e. “Scriptures”) were ways in which many authors of Greco-Roman and Judeo-Christian antiquity situated themselves and others within history. Here I argue that the biblical patriarch Abraham, as received within the late antique Christian text called Pseudo-Hegesippus (On the Destruction of Jerusalem), provides a quintessential example of these scribal-rhetorical habits in action. The upshot of this study is that key figures like Abraham were integral tools for doing the things that certain interested ancient writers were trying to do, and as such these figures constitute appropriate, even necessary, objects of research for those seeking to understanding ancient Mediterranean texts, authors, and readers.
Funding source: Swiss National Science Foundation
Research funding: Funding for this article was provided in part by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF, Sinergeia Project 180217) as part of the project “Lege Iosephum: Ways of Reading Josephus in the Latin Middle Ages”.
References
Adams, S. A., and Domoney-Lyttle, Z., eds. (2019). Abraham in Jewish and Early Christian Literature. Library of Second Temple Studies (LSTS) 93. New York: T&T Clark.10.5040/9780567675545Search in Google Scholar
Auerbach, E. 1974. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Barton, C. A., and D. Boyarin. 2016. Imagine No Religion: How Modern Abstractions Hide Ancient Realities. New York: Fordham University Press.10.1515/9780823271221Search in Google Scholar
Bay, C. 2018. “The Bible, the Classics, and the Jews in Pseudo-Hegesippus: A literary analysis of the fourth-century De Excidio Hierosolymitano 5.2.” PhD diss., Tallahassee: Florida State University.Search in Google Scholar
Bell, A. A.Jr. 1977. “An historiographical analysis of the De Excidio Hierosolymitano of Pseudo-Hegesippus.” PhD diss., Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Search in Google Scholar
Bell, A. A.Jr. 1980. “Classical and Christian Traditions in the Work of Pseudo-Hegesippus.” Indiana Social Studies Quarterly 33: 60–4.Search in Google Scholar
Bell, A. A.Jr. 1987. “Josephus and Pseudo-Hegesippus.” In Josephus, Judaism, and Christianity, edited by L. H. Feldman, and G. Hata, 349–61. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.10.1163/9789004671799_022Search in Google Scholar
Berzon, T. S. 2016. Classifying Christians: Ethnography, Heresiology, and the Limits of Knowledge in Late Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/california/9780520284265.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Berzon, T. S. 2018. “Ethnicity and Early Christianity: New Approaches to Religious Kinship and Community.” Currents in Biblical Research (CBR) 16: 191–227, https://doi.org/10.1177/1476993x17743454.Search in Google Scholar
Böhme, H. 2011. “Einladung zur Transformation: Was ist Transformation?” In Transformation: Ein Konzept zur Erforschung kulturellen Wandels, edited by H. Böhme, L. Bergemann, M. Dönike, A. Schirrmeister, G. Töpfer, M. Walter, and J. Weitbrecht, 7–38. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.10.30965/9783846752616_002Search in Google Scholar
Buell, D. K. 2008. Why This New Race? Ethnic Reasoning in Early Christianity. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cameron, A., ed. (1989). History as Text: The Writing of Ancient History. London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar
Chaplin, J. D. 2001. Livy’s Exemplary History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Davidson, I. J., trans. and ed. (2001). Ambrose, De Officiis: Edited with an Introduction, Translation and Commentary. 2 Volumes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199245789.003.0001Search in Google Scholar
Doerfler, M. E. 2019. Jephthah’s Daughter, Sarah’s Son: The Death of Children in Late Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520972964Search in Google Scholar
Dwyer, W. F. 1931. The Vocabulary of Hegesippus: A Study of Latin Lexicography. Patristic Studies XXVII. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Search in Google Scholar
Fishbane, M. 1988. The Exegetical Imagination: On Jewish Thought and Theology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Helmrath, J. 2019. “‘Transformations of Antiquity’: A Berlin Concept.” Aegyptiaca: Journal of the History of Reception of Ancient Egypt 4: 139–51.Search in Google Scholar
Isaac, B. 2004. The Invention of Racism in Classical Antiquity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400849567Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, A. P. 2006. Ethnicity and Argument in Eusebius’ Praeparatio Evanglica. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296132.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Kessler, E. 2004. Bound by the Bible: Jews, Christians and the Sacrifice of Isaac. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511520624Search in Google Scholar
Kremer, B. 1994. Das Bild der Kelten bis in Augusteische Zeit: Studien zur Instrumentalisierung eines antiken Feinbildes bei griechischen und römischen Autoren. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Search in Google Scholar
Levenson, J. D. 2012. Inheriting Abraham: The Legacy of the Patriarch in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Litwa, M. D. 2019. How the Gospels Became History: Jesus and Mediterranean Myths. New Haven: Yale University Press.10.12987/yale/9780300242638.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Lomas, K. 2004. “Hellenism, Romanization, and Cultural Identity.” In Greek Identity in the Western Mediterranean: Papers in Honour of Brian Shefton, edited by K. Lomas, 475–98. Mnemosyne Supplements 246. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789047402664_022Search in Google Scholar
Magness, J. 2019. Masada: From Jewish Revolt to Modern Myth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691186016Search in Google Scholar
Malherbe, A. J., and E. Ferguson, trans. and eds. (1978). Gregory of Nyssa: The Life of Moses. New York: Paulist.Search in Google Scholar
Marincola, J. 2010. “The Rhetoric of History: Allusion, Intertextuality, and Exemplarity in Historiographical Speeches.” In Stimmen der Geschichte: Funktionen von Reden in der antiken Historiographie, edited by D. Pausch, 259–90. Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 284. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110224184.259Search in Google Scholar
Nongbri, B. 2013. Before Religion: A History of a Modern Concept. New Haven: Yale University Press.10.12987/yale/9780300154160.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Rambaud, M. 1966. L’art de la deformation historique dans les Commentaires de César. Études anciennes 4. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar
Reed, A. Y. 2009. “The Construction and Subversion of Patriarchal Perfection: Abraham and Exemplarity in Philo, Josephus, and the Testament of Abraham.” Journal for the Study of Judaism (JSJ) 40: 185–212.10.1163/157006309X355187Search in Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. M. 2006. Caesar in Gaul and Rome: War in Words. Austin: University of Texas Press.10.7560/713031Search in Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. 2018. Models from the Past in Roman Culture: A World of Exempla. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316677353Search in Google Scholar
Sehlmeyer, M. 2009. Geschichtsbilder für Pagane und Christen: Res Romanae in den spätantiken Breviarien. Beiträge zur Altertumskunde (BzA) 272. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110220094Search in Google Scholar
Somenzi, C. 2009. Egesippo – Ambrogio: Formazione scolastica e Cristiana a Roma alla metà del IV secolo. Studia Patristica Mediolanensia (SPM) 27. Milan: Vita e Pensiero.Search in Google Scholar
Thackeray, H. St. J. 1928. Josephus: The Jewish War, Volume III: Books 5–7. Loeb Classical Library (LCL) 210. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ussani, V. 1932. Hegesippi qui dicitur Historiae libri V – Pt. 1: Textum criticum continens. Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum (CSEL) 66, 1. Leipzig: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Search in Google Scholar
Wilken, R. L. 2008. “The Novelty and Inescapability of the Bible in Late Antiquity.” In The Reception and Interpretation of the Bible in Late Antiquity, edited by L. DiTommaso, and L. Turcescu, 3–16. The Bible in Ancient Christianity (BAC) 6. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004167155.i-608.9Search in Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1994. Historiography and Imagination: Eight Essays on Roman Culture. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.Search in Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. 1988. Rhetoric in Classical Historiography: Four Studies. Portland: Areopagitica.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Receiving the Word in Image: Federico Zuccaro’s the Annunciation Broadcast by Prophets (1565) and the Reception History of the Bible in the Counter-Reformation
- Exemplarity, Exegesis, & Ethnography: Abraham in Pseudo-Hegesippus as a Test Case for Biblical Reception in Christian Late Antiquity
- The Recovery of the Nazirite in Carolingian Discourse
- Lot’s Wife is Still Standing: In Search of the Pillar of Salt
- The Most Significant Book of the Netherlands — And Its Ordinary Readers
- Book Review
- Lisa M. Bowens: African American Readings of Paul: Reception, Resistance, and Transformation
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Receiving the Word in Image: Federico Zuccaro’s the Annunciation Broadcast by Prophets (1565) and the Reception History of the Bible in the Counter-Reformation
- Exemplarity, Exegesis, & Ethnography: Abraham in Pseudo-Hegesippus as a Test Case for Biblical Reception in Christian Late Antiquity
- The Recovery of the Nazirite in Carolingian Discourse
- Lot’s Wife is Still Standing: In Search of the Pillar of Salt
- The Most Significant Book of the Netherlands — And Its Ordinary Readers
- Book Review
- Lisa M. Bowens: African American Readings of Paul: Reception, Resistance, and Transformation