Genre as Reception: A Multidimensional Network Approach

References

Barr, D. L. 2006. “Beyond Genre: The Expectations of Apocalypse,” In The Reality of Apocalypse: Rhetoric and Politics in the Book of Revelation, edited by D. L. Barr, 71–89. Symposium Series 39. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Search in Google Scholar

Barton, J. 2007. The Nature of Biblical Criticism. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox.Search in Google Scholar

Baumgärtel, F. 1933. Der Hiobdialog: Aufriss und Deutung. BWANT 61. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Search in Google Scholar

Beebee, T. O. 1994. The Ideology of Genre: A Comparative Study of Generic Instability. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ben Zvi, E. 2003. “The Prophetic Book: A Key Form of Prophetic Literature,” In The Changing Face of Form Criticism for the Twenty-First Century, edited by M. A. Sweeney, and E. Ben Zvi, 276–97. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Search in Google Scholar

Benjamin, W. 1977. The Origin of German Tragic Drama, trans. by J. Osborne. London: NLB.Search in Google Scholar

Blanchot, M. 1959. Le Livre à venir. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar

Blount, B. K. 2019. “The Souls of Biblical Folks and the Potential for Meaning.” Journal of Biblical Literature 138: 6–21.10.1353/jbl.2019.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bowker, G. C., and S. L. Star. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT.10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Boyarin, D. 2010. Border Lines: The Partition of Judaeo-Christianity, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar

Breed, B. W. 2014. Nomadic Text: A Theory of Biblical Reception History. Indiana Studies in Biblical Literature. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Briggs, C. L., and R. Bauman. 1992. “Genre, Intertextuality, and Social Power.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 2: 131–72. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1992.2.2.131.Search in Google Scholar

Brooke, C. G. 2009. Lingua Fracta: Toward a Rhetoric of New Media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brooke, George J. 2010. “Genre Theory, Rewritten Bible and Pesher.” Dead Sea Discoveries 17: 361–86. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851710x513584.Search in Google Scholar

Bruch, J. F. 1839. Études philosophiques sur le christianisme. Paris: Pitois-Levrault.Search in Google Scholar

Bruch, J. F. 1851. Weisheits-Lehre der Hebräer: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Philosophie. Strasbourg: Treuttel & Würtz.Search in Google Scholar

Collins, J. J. 2010. “Epilogue: Genre Analysis and the Dead Sea Scrolls.” Dead Sea Discoveries 17: 418–30. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851710x513601.Search in Google Scholar

Collins, J. J. 2021. “Wisdom as Genre and as Tradition in the Book of Sirach,” In Sirach and Its Contexts: The Pursuit of Wisdom and Human Flourishing, edited by S. Adams, G. Schmidt Goering, and Matthew J. Goff, 15–32. Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic, and Roman Period, Supplements 196. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004447332_003Search in Google Scholar

Crenshaw, J. L. 1969. “Method in Determining Wisdom Influence upon ‘Historical’ Literature.” Journal of Biblical Literature 88: 129–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3262873.Search in Google Scholar

Crenshaw, J. L. 2010. Old Testament Wisdom: An Introduction, 3rd ed. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox.Search in Google Scholar

Croce, B. 2000. “Criticism of the Theory of Artistic and Literary Kinds.” In Modern Genre Theory, edited by D. Duff, 25–28. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Delitzsch, F. 1866. Biblical Commentary on the Book of Job, Vol. 2, trans. by F. Bolton. Clark’s Foreign Theological Library 10–11. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Search in Google Scholar

Delitzsch, F. 1874. Biblical Commentary on the Proverbs of Solomon, Vols. 2, trans. by M. G. Easton. CFThL, 43, 47. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Search in Google Scholar

Dell, K., and W. Kynes, eds. (2013). Reading Job Intertextually. The Library of Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Studies 574. New York: Bloomsbury T&T Clark.Search in Google Scholar

Dell, K., and W. Kynes, eds. (2014). Reading Ecclesiastes Intertextually. The Library of Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Studies 587. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark.Search in Google Scholar

Dell, K., and W. Kynes, eds. (2019). Reading Proverbs Intertextually. The Library of Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Studies 629. New York: Bloomsbury T&T Clark.10.5040/9780567667380Search in Google Scholar

Dell, K. J. 2013. “Studies of the Didactical Books of the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament,” In Hebrew Bible, Old Testament: The History of Its Interpretation, Vol. 3.1, edited by M. Sæbø, 603–24. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.10.13109/9783666540219.603Search in Google Scholar

Dell, K. J. 2015. “Deciding the Boundaries of ‘Wisdom’: Applying the Concept of Family Resemblance,” In Sneed 2015a, 145–60.10.2307/j.ctt173zmjp.10Search in Google Scholar

Derrida, J. 2000. “The Law of Genre,” In Duff 2000, 219–31.Search in Google Scholar

DeShell, J. 1997. The Peculiarity of Literature: An Allegorical Approach to Poe’s Fiction. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Devitt, A. J. 2004. Writing Genres. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Duff, D. ed. (2000). Modern Genre Theory. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Engnell, I. 1970. “The Figurative Language of the Old Testament.” In Critical Essays on the Old Testament, trans. and edited by J. T. Willis, 242–90. London: SPCK.Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, G., and M. Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Fisch, H. 1988. Poetry with a Purpose: Biblical Poetics and Interpretation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fishelov, D. 1993. Metaphors of Genre: The Role of Analogies in Genre Theory. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fowler, A. 1982. Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fox, M. V. 2015. “Three Theses on Wisdom,” In Sneed 2015a, 69–86.10.2307/j.ctt173zmjp.7Search in Google Scholar

Frow, J. 2015. Genre, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315777351Search in Google Scholar

Gadamer, H.-G. 2004. Truth and Method, trans. Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall, 2nd ed. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Green, B. 2000. Mikhail Bakhtin and Biblical Scholarship: An Introduction. Atlanta: SBL.Search in Google Scholar

Grondin, J. 2010. “Nihilistic or Metaphysical Consequences of Hermeneutics?” In Consequences of Hermeneutics: Fifty Years After Gadamer’s Truth and Method, edited by J. Malpas and S. Zabala, 190–201. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.10.2307/j.ctv47w3wx.16Search in Google Scholar

Hazony, Y. 2012. The Philosophy of Hebrew Scripture. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139017381Search in Google Scholar

Hempel, C. 2017. “Wisdom and Law in the Hebrew Bible and at Qumran.” Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic, and Roman Periods 48: 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700631-12340144.Search in Google Scholar

Jauss, H. R. 2000. “Theory of Genres and Medieval Literature,” In Duff 2000, 127–47.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, J. W., and J. R. Johnson. 1940. The Books of American Negro Spirituals. New York: Viking Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kallen, H. M. 1918. The Book of Job as a Greek Tragedy. New York: Moffat, Yard and Company.Search in Google Scholar

Kilgore, C. D. 2013. “Rhetoric of the Network: Toward a New Metaphor.” Mosaic 46: 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1353/mos.2013.0044.Search in Google Scholar

Koh, Y. V. 2006. Royal Autobiography in the Book of Qoheleth. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, Vol. 369. Berlin: de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Kovacs, J. L., and C. Rowland. 2004. Revelation: The Apocalypse of Jesus Christ. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470773512Search in Google Scholar

Kuhl, C. 1953. “Neuere Literarkritik des Buches Hiob.” Theologische Rundschau 21 (163–204): 257–317.Search in Google Scholar

Kynes, W. 2019. An Obituary for “Wisdom Literature”: The Birth, Death, and Intertextual Reintegration of a Biblical Corpus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198777373.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Levine, C. 2015. Forms: Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400852604Search in Google Scholar

Loretz, O. 1993. “Poetry and Prose in the Book of Qoheleth (1:1–3:22; 7:23–8:1; 9:6–10; 12:8–14),” In Verse in Ancient Near Eastern Prose, edited by J. C. de Moor, and W. G. E. Watson, 155–89. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener.Search in Google Scholar

McCauley, L. P., and A. A. Stephenson. 1968. St. Cyril of Jerusalem: Works. Fathers of the Church, 61. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, D. B. 2015. “Wisdom in the Canon: Discerning the Early Intuition,” In Sneed 2015a, 87–113.10.2307/j.ctt173zmjp.8Search in Google Scholar

Murphy, R. E. 2002. The Tree of Life: An Exploration of Biblical Wisdom Literature, 3rd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Search in Google Scholar

Najman, H. 2012. “The Idea of Biblical Genre: From Discourse to Constellation.” In Prayer and Poetry in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Related Literature: Essays in Honor of Eileen Schuller on the Occasion of Her 65th Birthday, edited by J. Penner, Ken M. Penner, C. Wassen, 307–21. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004215016_018Search in Google Scholar

Najman, H. 2014. Losing the Temple and Recovering the Future: An Analysis of 4 Ezra. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139051651Search in Google Scholar

Najman, H. 2017. “Jewish Wisdom in the Hellenistic Period: Towards the Study of a Semantic Constellation.” In Is There a Text in This Cave? Studies in the Textuality of the Dead Sea Scrolls in Honour of GeorgeJ. Brooke, edited by A. Feldman, M. Cioata, and C. Hempel, 459–72. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004344532_026Search in Google Scholar

Newsom, C. A. 2005. “Spying Out the Land: A Report from Genology.” In Seeking out the Wisdom of the Ancients: Essays Offered to Honor Michael V. Fox on the Occasion of His Sixty-Fifth Birthday, edited by R. L. Troxel, K. G. Friebel, and D. R. Magary, 437–50. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.10.1515/9781575065625-031Search in Google Scholar

Newsom, C. A. 2010. “Pairing Research Questions and Theories of Genre: A Case Study of the Hodayot.” Dead Sea Discoveries 17: 270–88. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851710x513548.Search in Google Scholar

Nickelsburg, George W. E. 2005. “Wisdom and Apocalypticism in Early Judaism: Some Points for Discussion.” In Conflicted Boundaries in Wisdom and Apocalypticism, edited by B. G. Wright, and L. Wills, 17–37. SBL Symposium Series 35. Atlanta: SBL.Search in Google Scholar

Rad, G. von 1972. Wisdom in Israel, trans. by J. D. Martin. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International.Search in Google Scholar

Reed, A. Y. 2021. “Away from a Definition of Apocalyptic.” In Paper presented at Enoch Seminar/LMU Munich Congress on Apocalypticism in Antiquity. Online.Search in Google Scholar

Ricœur, P. 1976. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, J. 2011. “Introduction,” In The Oxford Handbook of the Reception History of the Bible, edited by M. Lieb, E. Mason, J. Roberts, and C. Rowland, 1–8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rosch, E. 1999. “Principles of Categorization,” In Concepts: Core Readings, edited by E. Margolis, and S. Laurence, 189–206. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rosmarin, A. 1985. The Power of Genre. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schellenberg, A. 2015. “Don’t Throw the Baby Out with the Bathwater: On the Distinctness of the Sapiential Understanding of the World,” In Sneed 2015b, 115–43.10.2307/j.ctt173zmjp.9Search in Google Scholar

Schlegel, F. 1971. “Athenaeum Fragments.” In Friedrich Schlegel’s “Lucinde” and the Fragments, trans. by P. Firchow, 161–240. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schüssler Fiorenza, Elisabeth. 1988. “The Ethics of Biblical Interpretation: Decentering Biblical Scholarship.” Journal of Biblical Literature 107: 3–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/3267820.Search in Google Scholar

Sinding, M. 2004. “Beyond Essence (Or, Getting over ‘There’): Cognitive and Dialectical Theories of Genre.” Semiotica 149: 377–95.10.1515/semi.2004.035Search in Google Scholar

Sinding, M. 2005. “Genera Mixta: Conceptual Blending and Mixed Genres in Ulysses.” New Literary History 36: 589–619. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2006.0009.Search in Google Scholar

Sinding, M. 2011. “Framing Monsters: Multiple and Mixed Genres, Cognitive Category Theory, and Gravity’s Rainbow.” Poetics Today 31: 465–505. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-2010-003.Search in Google Scholar

Sinding, M. 2012. “Blending in a Baciyelmo: Don Quixote’s Genre Blending and the Invention of the Novel,” in Blending and the Study of Narrative: Approaches and Applications, edited by R. Schneider, and M. Hartner, 147–71. Narratologia 34. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110291230.147Search in Google Scholar

Smith, J. Z. 1990. Drudgery Divine: On the Comparison of Early Christianities and the Religions of Late Antiquity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, J. Z. 2000. “The ‘End’ of Comparison: Redescription and Rectification.” In A Magic Still Dwells: Comparative Religion in the Postmodern Age, edited by K. C. Patton, and B. C. Ray, 237–44. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520923867-018Search in Google Scholar

Sneed, M. 2011. “Is the ‘Wisdom Tradition’ a Tradition?” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 73: 50–71.Search in Google Scholar

Sneed, M. 2015a. “Was There a Wisdom Tradition?” New Prospects in Israelite Wisdom Studies. Ancient Israel and Its Literature 23. Atlanta: SBL.10.2307/j.ctt173zmjpSearch in Google Scholar

Sneed, M. 2015b. “‘Grasping after the Wind’: The Elusive Attempt to Define and Delimit Wisdom,” In Sneed 2015a, 39–67.10.2307/j.ctt173zmjp.6Search in Google Scholar

Strawn, B. A. 2009. “Comparative Approaches: History, Theory, and the Image of God.” In Method Matters: Essays on the Interpretation of the Hebrew Bible in Honor of David L. Peterson, edited by J. M. LeMon and K. H. Richards, 117–42. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Search in Google Scholar

Swales, J. M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Todorov, T. 2000. “The Origin of Genres,” In Duff 2000, 193–209.Search in Google Scholar

Van Leeuwen, Raymond C. 2003. “Form Criticism, Wisdom, and Psalms 111–112.” In The Changing Face of Form Criticism for the Twenty-First Century, edited by M. A. Sweeney, and E. Ben Zvi, 65–84. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Search in Google Scholar

Van Seters, J. 2004. The Pentateuch: A Social-Science Commentary. London: T&T Clark International.Search in Google Scholar

Vayntrub, J. 2021. “Wisdom in Transmission: Rethinking Sirach and Proverbs,” In Sirach and Its Contexts: The Pursuit of Wisdom and Human Flourishing, edited by S. Adams, G. Schmidt Goering, and Matthew J. Goff, 33–55. Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic, and Roman Period Supplements 196. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004447332_004Search in Google Scholar

Watts, D. J. 2003. Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age. New York: Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Watts, J. W. 1999. Reading Law: The Rhetorical Shaping of the Pentateuch. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic.Search in Google Scholar

Weeks, S. 2010. “Predictive and Prophetic Literature: Can Neferti Help Us Read the Bible?” In Prophecy and Prophets in Ancient Israel: Proceedings of the Oxford Old Testament Seminar, edited by J. Day, 25–46. The Library of Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Studies 531. New York: T&T Clark.Search in Google Scholar

Weeks, S. 2013. “The Limits of Form Criticism in the Study of Literature, with Reflections on Psalm 34.” In Biblical Interpretation and Method: Essays in Honour of John Barton, edited by K. J. Dell, and P. M. Joyce, 15–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199645534.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Weeks, S. 2016. “Is ‘Wisdom Literature’ a Useful Category?” In Tracing Sapiential Traditions in Ancient Judaism, eds. H. Najman, J.-S. Rey, and E. J. C. Tigchelaar, 3–23. Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic, and Roman Period, Supplements 174. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004324688_003Search in Google Scholar

Westermann, C. 1995. Roots of Wisdom: The Oldest Proverbs of Israel and Other Peoples, trans. J. Daryl Charles. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox.Search in Google Scholar

Wette, W. M. L. de. 1807. “Beytrag zur Charakteristik des Hebraismus,” In volume 3 of Studien, edited by C. Daub, and F. Creuzer, 241–312. Heidelberg: Mohr & Zimmer.Search in Google Scholar

Williamson, R.Jr. 2010. “Pesher: A Cognitive Model of the Genre.” Dead Sea Discoveries 17: 336–60. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851710x513575.Search in Google Scholar

Witte, M. 2007. “Die literarische Gattung des Buches Hiob: Robert Lowth und seine Erben,” In Sacred Conjectures: The Context and Legacy of Robert Lowth and Jean Astruc, edited by J. Jarick, 93–123. The Library of Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Studies 457. London: T&T Clark.Search in Google Scholar

Witte, M. 2012. “‘Weisheit’ in der alttestamentlichen Wissenschaft: Ausgewählte literatur- und theologiegeschichtliche Fragestellungen und Entwicklungen.” Theologische Literaturzeitung 137: 1159–76.Search in Google Scholar

Witte, M. 2021. “Literary Genres of Old Testament Wisdom.” In The Oxford Handbook of Wisdom and the Bible,edited by W. Kynes, 353–71. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190661267.013.22Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1958. Philosophical Investigations, trans. by G. E. M. Anscombe, 2nd ed. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Wright, B. G. 2010. “Joining the Club: A Suggestion about Genre in Early Jewish Texts.” Dead Sea Discoveries 17: 289–314. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851710x513557.Search in Google Scholar

Zahn, M. M. 2012. “Genre and Rewritten Scripture: A Reassessment.” Journal of Biblical Literature 131: 271–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/23488225.Search in Google Scholar

Zahn, M. M. 2020. Genres of Rewriting in Second Temple Judaism: Scribal Composition and Transmission. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108769983Search in Google Scholar