Abstract
The Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) and the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) have made it illegal for States to develop or use certain chemical and biological weapons. However, these treaties are not all-encompassing. Many nations continue to develop and produce chemical and biological weapons. In 2002, as part of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), the Pentagon released a proposal from an Air Force lab seeking permission to develop biologically based chemicals that would significantly alter human behavior. The premise of behavior-modifying chemicals in conflict situations raises concern, primarily if this technology is developed, how should it be regulated?
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- Introduction to Volume XV
- Articles
- The Rise of Bionanotechnology as a Tool for Saving the Planet and Destroying the World
- Threat of Biowarfare from Recent Genome Editing Advancements
- Make Love Not War: The Possibility of Gaseous Hormones Against Civilians in Conflict Situations
- The Environment Can Save the Country: How Advancing Environmental Justice Can Improve Biosecurity
- Balancing Biosafety and Innovation: Navigating Legislative Landscapes in AI-driven Biohacking
- The Urgent Need for a Carve Out Exception in the United Nations Security Council Veto Power
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- Introduction to Volume XV
- Articles
- The Rise of Bionanotechnology as a Tool for Saving the Planet and Destroying the World
- Threat of Biowarfare from Recent Genome Editing Advancements
- Make Love Not War: The Possibility of Gaseous Hormones Against Civilians in Conflict Situations
- The Environment Can Save the Country: How Advancing Environmental Justice Can Improve Biosecurity
- Balancing Biosafety and Innovation: Navigating Legislative Landscapes in AI-driven Biohacking
- The Urgent Need for a Carve Out Exception in the United Nations Security Council Veto Power