Home Decolouration of Dye Solutions Using Photoelectrocatalysis and Photocatalysis
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Decolouration of Dye Solutions Using Photoelectrocatalysis and Photocatalysis

  • Terry A Egerton EMAIL logo , Herry Purnama , Swasmi Purwajanti and Muhammad Zafar
Published/Copyright: November 30, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper compares the photocatalytic and photoelectrocatalytic decolouration of dilute solutions of two dyes, one, methylene blue, cationic and one, reactive orange, anionic. For both methylene blue and reactive orange there is evidence that, as in photocatalytic decolouration, the initial stage in photoelectrocatalytic degradation is the destruction of the chromophore responsible for absorption in the visible region of the spectrum. For both dyes, both photoelectrocatalysis and photocatalysis were more efficient at pH > 9 than at pH 4. For the cationic dye, methylene blue, photoelectrocatalytic degradation was slower than photocatalytic degradation - indeed even though photocatalytic decolouration of 0.2 mM methylene blue solutions could be achieved photoelectrocatalytic degradation was negligible under the conditions used by us. However, photoelectrocatalytic decolouration of 0.1 mM methylene blue solution was achieved. The reduced efficiency of photoelectrocatalysis probably occurs because adsorption of the dye molecules on the TiO2 surface is a necessary first step in photocatalysis and because the positive potential on the photanode reduces adsorption of the cationic methylene blue. For the anionic dye, reactive orange, photoelectrocatalytic degradation was more effective, under the conditions of our experiment. However, the rate of decolouration was approximately the same as that of photocatalytic degradation by a TiO2 immobilized on a non-woven paper. The rate of both photocatalytic and photoelectrocatalytic degradation of the negatively charged Reactive Orange was faster at pH 10 than at pH 7, even though at the higher pH the surface of the TiO2 may be expected to be more negatively charged.

Received: 2005-8-25
Revised: 2005-10-20
Published Online: 2016-11-30
Published in Print: 2006-1-1

© 2016 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 30.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jaots-2006-0111/pdf
Scroll to top button