Abstract
Adoptions during the Old Babylonian period were driven by various social, economic, and legal motivations. In the case of adoptions of slaves, it automatically resulted in their manumission, granting them a new status as “son and heir” along with associated rights – mostly inheritance ones – and duties. Thus, adoption-manumissions transformed slaves into freed heirs. However, while laws clearly protected the inheritance rights of freeborn children, the legal situation of these freed adoptees has yet not been fully explored. By examining a corpus of 10 documents, this paper shows that the situation of freed heirs was precarious when compared with free heirs. On the one hand, their former status as slaves meant that adoption-manumission contracts included provisions for their (re-)enslavement in the event of a contractual breach. On the other hand, no specific legal regime governed and protected their inheritance rights, which were therefore entirely contingent on the contract drafted by the adopters. As a result, the fate of adopted slaves was at the mercy of their adopters. This study reveals that the inheritance rights of freed heirs were often inferior to those of free heirs. This was due to the ability of parents to add ancillary clauses to the adoption-manumission contracts to favor preexisting free heirs. However, adopters could also insert protective clauses to secure the inheritance rights of freed heirs, especially in competition with future free heirs. Through a new reading of texts concerning adopted slaves, this paper outlines for the first time their inheritance rights, highlighting the complexity and flexibility of Mesopotamian law.
References
Barberon, Lucile. 2012. Les religieuses et le culte de Marduk dans le royaume de Babylone. Archibab. Archives Babyloniennes (XXe-XXVIIe siècles av. J.-C.) 1. Antony: SEPOA.Search in Google Scholar
Ben-Barak, Zafrira. 2006. Inheritance by Daughters in Israel and the Ancient Near East. A Social, Legal and Ideological Revolution. Jaffa: Archaeological Center Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Buchanan, Ian. 2018. “Precarity.” In A Dictionary of Critical Theory. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198794790.001.0001/acref-9780198794790-e-783.10.1093/acref/9780198794790.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Charpin, Dominique. 1980. Archives familiales et propriété privée en Babylonie ancienne. Étude des documents de « Tell Sifr ». Hautes Études Orientales 12. Genève: Droz; Paris: Champion.Search in Google Scholar
Charpin, Dominique. 1984. “Un quartier de la Babylonie et ses habitants sous les successeurs d’Hammurabi.” Bibliotheca Orientalis 42 (3–4): col. 265–78.Search in Google Scholar
Charpin, Dominique. 2004. “Histoire politique du Proche-Orient amorrite.” In Mesopotamien. Annäherungen 4. Die altbabylonische Zeit, edited by D. O. Edzard, and M. Stol. Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 160, 25–480. Fribourg: Academic Press; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Search in Google Scholar
Charpin, Dominique. 2008. Lire et écrire à Babylone. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.10.3917/puf.char.2008.01Search in Google Scholar
Charpin, Dominique, and Nele Ziegler. 2003. Mari et le Proche-Orient à l’époque amorrite: essai d’histoire politique. Florilegium marianum 5. Antony: SEPOA.Search in Google Scholar
David, Martin. 1927. Die Adoption im altbabylonischen Recht. Leipziger rechtwissenschaftliche Studien 23. Leipzig: Weicher.Search in Google Scholar
David, M. 1973. “Kritik an einem Rechtsspruch aus Larsa (TCL 18, 153).” In Symbolae Biblicae et Mesopotamicae. Francisco Mario Theodoro de Liagre Böhl dedicatae, edited by M. A. Beek, A. A. Kampman, and C. Nijland. Studia Francisci Scholten memoriae dicata 4, 90–4. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004664944_011Search in Google Scholar
Davies, Eryl W. 1993. “The Inheritance of the First-Born in Israel and the Ancient Near East.” Journal of Semitic Studies 38 (2): 175–91.10.1093/jss/XXXVIII.2.175Search in Google Scholar
Démare-Lafont, Sophie. 1992. “Les partages successoraux paléobabyloniens.” In Histoire de Fractions, Fractions d’histoire. Tiré-à-Part de Science Networks – Historical Studies 10, 103–14. Basel: Birkhäuser.Search in Google Scholar
Démare-Lafont, Sophie. 2022. “L’aînesse au Proche-Orient ancien: droit du premier-né ou choix du père?” In “A Community of Peoples”: Studies on Society and the Bible in Ancient Near East in Honor of Daniel E. Fleming, edited by M. Leonard-Fleckman, L. A. S. Monroe, M. J. Stahl, and D. R. Johnson, 71–88. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004511538_006Search in Google Scholar
Durand, Jean-Marie. 2008. “La religion amorrite en Syrie à l’époque des archives de Mari.” In Ebla, Mari, Vol. 1 of Mythologie et religion des sémites occidentaux, edited by G. del Olmo Lete. Orientalia Lovaniensia analecta 162, 161–631. Leuven: Peeters; Paris: Dudley.Search in Google Scholar
Ellis, Maria de J. 1988. “Old Babylonian Texts from Harmal—and Elsewhere?” In A Scientific Humanist. Studies in Memory of Abraham Sachs, edited by E. Leichty, M. de J. Ellis, and P. D. Gerardi. Occasional Publications of the Samuel Noah Kramer Fund 9, 119–41. Philadelphia: The University Museum.Search in Google Scholar
Goddeeris, Anne. 2016. The Old Babylonian Legal and Administrative Texts in the Hilprecht Collection Jena with a Contribution by Ursula Seidl. Texts, Seal Impressions, Studies. Texte und Materialien der Frau Professor Hilprecht Collection of Babylonian Antiquities im Eigentum der Friedrich Schiller-Universität Jena 10/1. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Search in Google Scholar
Greenfield, Jonas C. 1982. “Adi Balṭu. Care for the Elderly and its Rewards.” In Vorträge gehalten auf der 28. Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale in Wien, 6-10 Juli 1981, edited by H. Hirsch, and H. Hunger, 309–16. Archiv für Orientforschung. Beiheft 19. Horn: Berger.Search in Google Scholar
Harris, Rivkah. 1975. Ancient Sippar. A Demographic Study of an Old-Babylonian City (1894–1595 B.C.). Uitgaven van het Nederlands historisch-archaeologisch Instituut te Istanbul 36. Istanbul: Nederlands historisch-archaeologisch Instituut te Istanbul.Search in Google Scholar
Klíma, Josef. 1940. Untersuchungen zum altbabylonischen Erbrecht. Monographien des Archiv Orientální 8. Prague: Orientalisches Institut.Search in Google Scholar
Klíma, Josef. 1950. “La position successorale de la fille dans la Babylonie ancienne.” Archiv Orientální 18 (3): 150–86.Search in Google Scholar
Klíma, Josef. 1971. “Sulla quota ereditaria di preferenza secondo le fonti sumere di Nippur.” In Vol. 6 of Studi in onore di edoardo volterra. Pubblicazioni fella Facoltà di giurisprudenza dell’Università di Roma 45, 367–76. Milano: Giuffrè.Search in Google Scholar
Kraus, Fritz R. 1969a. “Erbrechtliche Terminologie im alten Mesopotamien.” In Essays on Oriental Laws of Succession, edited by M. David, F. R. Kraus, and P. W. Pestman. Studia et Documenta Ad Iura Orientis Antiqui Pertinentia 9, 18–57. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Kraus, Fritz R. 1969b. “Von altmesopotamischen Erbrecht.” In Essays on Oriental Laws of Succession, edited by M. David, F. R. Kraus, and P. W. Pestman. Studia et Documenta Ad Iura Orientis Antiqui Pertinentia 9, 3–17. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Lion, Brigitte. 2015. “Mariages paléo-babyloniens typiques et atypiques.” Anabases. Traditions et réceptions de l’Antiquité 22: 11–26.10.4000/anabases.5398Search in Google Scholar
Meinhold, Wiebke. 2020. “Zur Beendigung von Adoptionsverhältnissen in altbabylonischer Zeit.” In mu-zu anza₃-še₃ kur-ur₂-še₃ ḫe₂-g˜al₂. Altorientalistische Studien zu Ehren von Konrad Volk, edited by J. Baldwin, J. Matuszak, and M. Ceccarelli. dubsar. Altorientalistische Publikationen. Publications on the Ancient Near East 17, 163–89. Münster: Zaphon.10.2307/jj.18654682.14Search in Google Scholar
Obermark, Peter R. 1991. Adoption in the Old Babylonian Period. PhD diss. Cincinnati: Hebrew Union College–Jewish Institute of Religion.Search in Google Scholar
Pardee, Dennis. 2010. “RS 94.2168 and the Right of the Firstborn at Ugarit.” In Society and Administration in Ancient Ugarit. Papers Read at a Symposium in Leiden, 13-14 December 2007, edited by W. H. van Soldt. Uitgaven van het Nederlands historisch-archaeologisch Instituut te Istanbul 114, 94–106. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten.Search in Google Scholar
Rede, Marcelo. 2004. “Práticas funerárias, culto aos ancestrais e transmissão do patrimônio familiar na antiga mesopotâmia.” Revista do Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia 14: 117–38.10.11606/issn.2448-1750.revmae.2004.89661Search in Google Scholar
Rede, Marcelo. 2009. “Héritage, dot et prestations matrimoniales en Babylonie ancienne.” Dialogues d’Histoire Ancienne 35 (2): 13–44.10.3406/dha.2009.3179Search in Google Scholar
Reid, John Nicholas. 2017. “The Children of Slaves in Early Mesopotamian Laws and Edicts.” Revue d’Assyriologie et d’archéologie orientale 111 (1): 9–23.10.3917/assy.111.0009Search in Google Scholar
Richardson, Seth. 2023. “Mesopotamian Slavery.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Global Slavery throughout History, edited by D. A. Pargas, and J. Schiel, 17–39. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-031-13260-5_2Search in Google Scholar
Roth, Martha T. 1997. Law Collections from Mesopotamia and Asia Minor, 2nd ed. Writings from the Ancient World 6. Atlanta: Scholars Press.10.2307/jj.25577265Search in Google Scholar
Roth, Martha T. 2011. “A Scandal in Larsa.” In A Common Cultural Heritage. Studies on Mesopotamia and the Biblical World in Honor of Barry, edited by L. Eichler, G. Frame, E. Leichty, K. Sonik, J. Tigay, and S. Tinney, 77–88. Bethesda: CDL Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sasson, Jack M. 2015. From the Mari Archives. An Anthology of Old Babylonian Letters. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.10.1515/9781575063768Search in Google Scholar
Seri, Andrea. 2011. “Domestic Female Slaves during the Old Babylonian Period.” In Slaves and Households in the Near East, edited by L. E. Culbertson. Oriental Institute Seminars 7, 49–67. Chicago: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.Search in Google Scholar
Shalom, M. Paul. 2005. “Adoption Formulae: A Study of Cuneiform and Biblical Legal Clauses.” In Divrei Shalom. Collected Studies of Shalom M. Paul on the Bible and the Ancient Near East. 1967–2005. Culture and History of the Ancient Near East 23, 109–19. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789047407454_019Search in Google Scholar
Stol, Marten, and Sven P. Vleeming. 1998. The Care of the Elderly in the Ancient Near East. Studies in the History and Culture of the Ancient Near East 14. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004670426Search in Google Scholar
Stone, Elizabeth C., and David I. Owen. 1991. Adoption in Old Babylonian Nippur and the Archive of Mannum-Mešu-Liṣṣur. Mesopotamian Civilizations 3. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.Search in Google Scholar
Suurmeijer, Guido. 2010. ““He Took Him as His Son”. Adoption in Old Babylonian Sippar.” Revue d’Assyriologie et d’archéologie orientale 104 (1): 9–40.10.3917/assy.104.0009Search in Google Scholar
Szlechter, Émile. 1967. “Des droits successoraux dérivés de l’adoption en droit babylonien.” Revue internationale des droits de l’Antiquité 14: 79–106.Search in Google Scholar
Veenhof, Klaas R. 2005. Letters in the Louvre. Altbabylonische Briefe in Umschrift und Übersetzung 14. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Veenhof, Klaas R. 2016. “Some Old Assyrian and Old Babylonian Adoption Contracts.” Journal of the Ancient Near Eastern Society “Ex Oriente Lux” 46: 45–57.Search in Google Scholar
Westbrook, Raymond. 1995. “Slave and Master in Ancient Near Eastern Law.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 70 (4): 1631–76.Search in Google Scholar
Westbrook, R. 2003a. “Introduction: The Character of Ancient Near Eastern Law.” In A History of Ancient Near Eastern Law, edited by R. Westbrook. Handbook of Oriental Studies 72, 1–90. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789047402091_002Search in Google Scholar
Westbrook, R. 2003b. “Mesopotamia: Old Babylonian Period.” In A History of Ancient Near Eastern Law, edited by R. Westbrook. Handbook of Oriental Studies 72, 361–430. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789047402091_010Search in Google Scholar
Westbrook, Raymond. 2009. “Slave and Master in Ancien Near Eastern Law.” In The Shared Tradition, Vol. 1 of Law from the Tigris to the Tiber. The Writings of Raymond Westbrook, 161–216. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.10.5325/j.ctv1bxh1hh.13Search in Google Scholar
Wyk, Susandra J. van. 2013. “Old Babylonian Family Division Agreement from a Deceased Estate–Analysis of its Practical and Theorical Mechanisms.” Fundamina 19 (1): 146–71.Search in Google Scholar
Ziegler, Nele. 2019. “La qadištum dépouillée.” In De l’argile au numérique. Mélanges assyriologiques en l’honneur de Dominique Charpin, edited by G. Chambon, M. Guichard, and A.-I. Langlois. Publications de l’Institut du Proche-Orient ancien du Collège de France 3, 1243–60. Leuven: Peeters.10.2307/j.ctv1q26s9t.62Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- Beyond Slavery and Freedom in Ancient Mesopotamia
- Articles
- Muškēnum in Third-Millennium BC Mesopotamia
- Humans as Donations and the Question of Temple Slavery in Early Mesopotamia
- un-il2 (“Menials”) as a Serflike Social Stratum during the Ur III Period
- The Precarious Inheritance Rights of Adopted Slaves During the Old Babylonian Period
- The Status of War Prisoners at Uruk in the Old Babylonian Period
- Detention as Liminal Space During the Middle Babylonian Period
- The Hoax of Semi-Freedom in Babylonia
- Beyond Slavery and Freedom in Ancient Mesopotamia: A Response
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- Beyond Slavery and Freedom in Ancient Mesopotamia
- Articles
- Muškēnum in Third-Millennium BC Mesopotamia
- Humans as Donations and the Question of Temple Slavery in Early Mesopotamia
- un-il2 (“Menials”) as a Serflike Social Stratum during the Ur III Period
- The Precarious Inheritance Rights of Adopted Slaves During the Old Babylonian Period
- The Status of War Prisoners at Uruk in the Old Babylonian Period
- Detention as Liminal Space During the Middle Babylonian Period
- The Hoax of Semi-Freedom in Babylonia
- Beyond Slavery and Freedom in Ancient Mesopotamia: A Response